Some of the gstreamer elements that I use keep spamming "useless" (a matter of opinion) information to stdout, anyway of muting a specific gstreamer element?
Related
So I'd like to stream video from an RTSP stream using OpenCV, and immediately save the raw video to a file without decoding. We need high performance and might be processing as many as 500 cameras on one machine. Which means that even though typically small and 2% CPU, the extra 10x CPU needed to decode every frame adds up. When I run with ffmpeg command line it's getting so little usage it shows 0.0% CPU.
The recommendation I've seen before is just use ffmpeg, reason I'd like OpenCV is:
A) We might need to do some image analysis in the future, wouldn't be on all frames though, just a small sample of them, so all still need to be saved frame by frame to file without decoding, but some will separately be decoded.
B) Simpler to implement than ffmpeg (that in the future would need to pass select frames to OpenCV)
Edit: I've tried using VideoWriter::fourcc('X', '2', '6', '4'), and -1 in order to try to skip encoding. Seems like it goes ahead and does it anyway even though it's already in that format?
Thoughts? Thanks!
any pointers to detect through a script on linux that an mp3 radio stream is breaking up, i am having issues with my radio station when the internet connection slows down and causes the stream on the client side to stop, buffer and then play.
There are a few ways to do this.
Method 1: Assume constant bitrate
If you know that you will have a constant bitrate, you can measure that bitrate over time on the server and determine when it slows below a threshold. Note that this isn't the most accurate method, and won't always work. Not all streams use a constant bitrate. But, this method is as easy as counting bytes received over the wire.
Method 2: Playback on server
You can run a headless player on the server (via cvlc or similar) and track when it has buffer underruns. This will work at any bitrate and will give you a decent idea of what's happening on the clients. This sort of player setup also enables utility functions like silence detection. The downside is that it takes a little bit of CPU to decode, and a bit more effort to automate.
Method 3 (preferred): Log output buffer on source
Your source encoder will have a buffer on its output, data waiting to be sent to the server. When this buffer grows over a particular threshold, log it. This means that output over the network stalled for whatever reason. This method gets the appropriate data right from the source, and ensures you don't have to worry about clock synchronization issues that can occur over time in your monitoring of audio streams. (44.1 kHz to your encoder might be 44.101 kHz to a player.) This method might require modifying your source client.
Is it possible to implement IR receiver on android-things?
1st idea:
Use GPIO as input and try to buffer changes and then parse the buffer to decode a message.
findings:
GPIO listener mechanism is too slow to observe IR signal.
Another way is to read GPIO infinite loop. But all IR protocols strongly depend on time and java(dalvik) in this case is to less accurate.
2nd idea
Use UART
findings:
It seems to be possible to adjust baud rate to observe all bits of a message but UART API require to setup quantity of start bits etc. and this is a problem because IR protocols do not fit that schema.
IMHO at the moment, UART is the only path but it would be a huge workaround.
The overarching problem (as you've discovered) is that any non-realtime system will have difficulty parsing this input directly because of the timing constraints. This is a job best suited to a microcontroller where you can access a timer interrupt. Grab an inexpensive tinyAVR or PIC to manage the sensor for you.
You will also want to use a dedicated receiver sensor (you might already be doing this) to simplify parsing the signal. These sensors include a demodulator, which means you don't have to deal with 38kHz pulse signal and the input is converted into a more standard PWM wave.
I believe you can't process the IR signal in Java because the reading pulses would be quicker than the reading resolution-at least in a raspberry pi. To get faster gpio readings I'm confident you can do in c++ with ndk with the raspberry. Though it's not officially supported there's some tricks to enable it. See How to do GPIO on Android Things bypassing Java on how to write to gpio in c. From there it should be trivial to read in a tight loop. Though I would still try to hook the trigger from Java since so far I have no clear easy idea on how to write/install interrupts in c.
I'm looking for a way to read the whole video memory that a video card outputs to a display. That includes also hardware accelerated output, video playback and output in fullscreen mode (that somehow I feel could be different from windowed mode).
In short: I want to be able to capture everything that is going to be represented on a display.
I suppose that IF that's possible it would be os-dependant. The targets I'm interested in are Windows OSX and Linux.
Do you have any hint?
For windows I guess you could take CamStudio, strip it down and use it to record the screen then do whatever you want with the output, other than that you could look into forensic kernel drivers for accessing RAM. It's not exactly as simple as a pointer pointing to the video memory anymore, haha.
Digital Rights Management, requested feature of Windows, attempts to block your access to blocks of graphics-card frame buffer memory. Using an open-source driver under Linux would seem to be the only way to access this memory, or as mentioned earlier, some 3rd party software that knows some back doors or hacks or ways to locate other program's frame buffer space.
Unless of course, you are trying to capture output from your own program (ie you are calling the video/graphics creation functions yourself), there are APIs to manipulate display frames in DirectX and OpenGL.
I think I found some resources that can help to capture the display memory in Windows
Fastest method of screen capturing
How to save backbuffer to file in DirectX 10?
http://betterlogic.com/roger/2010/07/fast-screen-capture/
By default, is STDOUT unbuffered? If not what is the type of its default buffering
Thanks
You didn't give a language, but assuming that you're using C's stdio functions (fopen() etc.) or a language that uses these (and most do, for portability reasons):
It depends on the underlying C runtime library.
Most libraries will try to detect whether STDOUT is connected to a terminal, and avoid buffering if so, and perform block buffering (e.g. my Linux system buffers 8Kb at a time) if not.
Short Answer: By default STDOUT is usually unbuffered. If this is a problem for you, there is fflush(stdout); but that is rarely needed