Below is the code for the custom button. The objective is to store different gender and rating for different button:
var gender='Ladies';
var rating='Good';
setRating(gender, rating);
The method implementation for setRating(gender, rating) is wrote on the client script as follow. The objective is to tell browser javascript to activate sendRating(gender, rating) function.
function setRating(gender, rating){
google.script.run
.withFailureHandler(function(error) {
// An error occurred, so display an error message.
status.text = error.message;
})
.withSuccessHandler(function(result) {
// Report that the email was sent.
status.text = 'Thank you for the feedback';
})
.sendRating(gender, rating);
}
Below is the sendRating(gender, rating) implementation wrote on the server script. The objective is to tell AppMaker javascript to activate .saveRecords API to save the gender and rating records to the datasource called ToiletRating. The datasource contain field such as 'Gender' and 'Rating'.
function sendRating(gender, rating){
var db = app.models.ToiletaRating.newRecord();
person.Gender = gender;
person.Rating = rating;
app.saveRecord([db]);
}
Can you help me why I get this error saying that newRecord method is undefined while I have declare it in the Server script line no. 3 .
E
Wed Feb 28 09:47:42 GMT+800 2018
TypeError: Cannot call method "newRecord" of undefined. at sendRating (NewScript:3)
It seems that you have a typo in your script (Toileta vs Toilet):
// your version with typo
var db = app.models.ToiletaRating.newRecord();
// version without typo
var db = app.models.ToiletRating.newRecord();
But your script will fail even if you fix the typo. You need to use the variable you defined to make things work:
function sendRating(gender, rating) {
// define variable
var newRecord = app.models.ToiletRating.newRecord();
// use variable
newRecord.Gender = gender;
newRecord.Rating = rating;
// Note that in original script you have one more typo:
// app.saveRecord vs app.saveRecords
app.saveRecords([newRecord]);
}
Also keep in mind, that you can improve this script further:
Associate ratings with users to prevent adding multiple ratings from the same people
Add permission checks to prevent users adding ratings on behalf of other users
...
Take a look at Vendor Ratings and Q&A Forum templates, they have very similar functionality
Related
I'm fairly new here so apologies for asking a possibly stupid question.
I'm trying to get Google Sheets to send an email based on the information in columns B and O
Here is my code thus far...
function confirmationEmail(e) {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet(BIKE2)
var orderNumber = e.values[2];
var subject = "Order is Ready to be Confirmed";
var body = "An order from the bike shop is ready to be confirmed! Order Number: " + orderNumber;
if (e.values[14] == NOT NULL);
if (e.values[1] == 'Order Entry');
MailApp.sendEmail("dylan.bassett#activesportsinc.com", subject, body)
}
Currently when I try to run the code I get an error saying:
"Missing ) after condition. (line 6, file "Confirmation Emails")"
I'm not sure how far off I am here, I was able to get a similar code to work without a condition but things got dicey when I started trying to tell it when to do things.
Any help is appreciated! I'm sure this is a rookie problem :)
I assume your using a form Submit. I don't send much email so not sure about the syntax for that but BIKE2 needs to be in quotes and the semicolons after the if's are not wanted. So try this.
function confirmationEmail(e) {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet('BIKE2')
var orderNumber = e.values[2];
var subject = "Order is Ready to be Confirmed";
var body = "An order from the bike shop is ready to be confirmed! Order Number: " + orderNumber;
if (e.values[14] && e.values[1] == 'Order Entry')
{
MailApp.sendEmail("dylan.bassett#activesportsinc.com", subject, body);
}
}
I am having issues trying to query an Eloquent relationship.
I have 2 tables
tbl_deals
id
deal_id
merchant_id
tbl_merchants
id
merchant_id
merchant_url_text
I defined a deal model as
class deal extends Model
{
public function merchant() {
return $this->hasOne('App\merchant', 'merchant_id', 'merchant_id');
}
}
Now, I want to query all deals based where merchant_url_text = a variable in my controller
Here's what I am trying
$deals = deal::with('merchant')->get(); //Retrieving all the deals with merchants
If I return $deals its giving me all deals with merchant relationship.
How do I constraint the deals by saying where merchant_url_text = $variable
I am trying
return $deals->where('merchant_url_text', $merchant_url_text)->get();
but it is giving me an error saying :
"Missing argument 1 for Illuminate\Support\Collection::get(), called in ..."
I tried to lookup the documentation for querying relationships in Laravel Docs. It talks about this example
$user = App\User::find(1);
$user->posts()->where('active', 1)->get();
In this case, its trying to get the first user and finding corresponding posts related to the user.
In my case I want to filter from all deals, the deals that have merchant_url_text = a specific variable in my controller.
Any help on how I can achieve this?
Thanks
Try the following code :
$specific_merchant_url_text = "i don't know";
$deals_with_specific_merchant_url_text = [];
$deals = deal::with('merchant')->get();
foreach($deals as $deal)
if( $deal->merchant->merchant_url_text==$specific_merchant_url_text)
array_push($deals_with_specific_merchant_url_text, $deal);
So you get array of deals with specific merchant url text in deals_with_specific_merchant_url_text.
Another approach using DB object :
$deals = DB::table('deals')
->join('merchants', 'deals.merchant_id', '=', 'merchants.id')
->select('deals.*')
->where('merchants.merchant_url_text', $merchant_url_text)
->get();
Yours with raw :
$deals = deal::selectRaw('tbl_deals.*')
->Join('merchants','deals.merchant_id','=','merchants.merchant_id')
->where('merchants.merchant_url_text', '=', $merchant_url_text) ->get();
Hope this helps.
With takes a callback. This will bring back all deals but only eager load merchants that match.
$deals = Deal::with(['merchant' => function ($query) use ($url_text){
return $query->where('merchant_url_text', $url_text);
}])->get();
Flip-side: if you only want deals with a matching merchant, use where has.
$deals = Deal::whereHas('merchant', function ($query) use ($url_text){
return $query->where('merchant_url_text', $url_text);
})->get();
If you want both, chain them:
$deals = Deal::whereHas('merchant', function ($query) use ($url_text){
return $query->where('merchant_url_text', $url_text);
})->with(['merchant' => function ($query) use ($url_text){
return $query->where('merchant_url_text', $url_text);
}])->get();
I capitalized deal because it's standard. It wasn't capitalized in your example.
You can use query builder join query .
DB::table('tbl_merchants')
->join('tbl_deals', 'tbl_merchants.merchant_id', '=','tbl_deals.merchant_id')
->where('tbl_merchants.merchant_url_text',$merchant_url_text)
->get();
This query produces an error No value given for one or more required parameters:
using (var conn = new OleDbConnection("Provider=..."))
{
conn.Open();
var result = conn.Query(
"select code, name from mytable where id = ? order by name",
new { id = 1 });
}
If I change the query string to: ... where id = #id ..., I will get an error: Must declare the scalar variable "#id".
How do I construct the query string and how do I pass the parameter?
The following should work:
var result = conn.Query(
"select code, name from mytable where id = ?id? order by name",
new { id = 1 });
Important: see newer answer
In the current build, the answer to that would be "no", for two reasons:
the code attempts to filter unused parameters - and is currently removing all of them because it can't find anything like #id, :id or ?id in the sql
the code for adding values from types uses an arbitrary (well, ok: alphabetical) order for the parameters (because reflection does not make any guarantees about the order of members), making positional anonymous arguments unstable
The good news is that both of these are fixable
we can make the filtering behaviour conditional
we can detect the category of types that has a constructor that matches all the property names, and use the constructor argument positions to determine the synthetic order of the properties - anonymous types fall into this category
Making those changes to my local clone, the following now passes:
// see https://stackoverflow.com/q/18847510/23354
public void TestOleDbParameters()
{
using (var conn = new System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection(
Program.OleDbConnectionString))
{
var row = conn.Query("select Id = ?, Age = ?", new DynamicParameters(
new { foo = 12, bar = 23 } // these names DO NOT MATTER!!!
) { RemoveUnused = false } ).Single();
int age = row.Age;
int id = row.Id;
age.IsEqualTo(23);
id.IsEqualTo(12);
}
}
Note that I'm currently using DynamicParameters here to avoid adding even more overloads to Query / Query<T> - because this would need to be added to a considerable number of methods. Adding it to DynamicParameters solves it in one place.
I'm open to feedback before I push this - does that look usable to you?
Edit: with the addition of a funky smellsLikeOleDb (no, not a joke), we can now do this even more directly:
// see https://stackoverflow.com/q/18847510/23354
public void TestOleDbParameters()
{
using (var conn = new System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection(
Program.OleDbConnectionString))
{
var row = conn.Query("select Id = ?, Age = ?",
new { foo = 12, bar = 23 } // these names DO NOT MATTER!!!
).Single();
int age = row.Age;
int id = row.Id;
age.IsEqualTo(23);
id.IsEqualTo(12);
}
}
I've trialing use of Dapper within my software product which is using odbc connections (at the moment). However one day I intend to move away from odbc and use a different pattern for supporting different RDBMS products. However, my problem with solution implementation is 2 fold:
I want to write SQL code with parameters that conform to different back-ends, and so I want to be writing named parameters in my SQL now so that I don't have go back and re-do it later.
I don't want to rely on getting the order of my properties in line with my ?. This is bad. So my suggestion is to please add support for Named Parameters for odbc.
In the mean time I have hacked together a solution that allows me to do this with Dapper. Essentially I have a routine that replaces the named parameters with ? and also rebuilds the parameter object making sure the parameters are in the correct order.
However looking at the Dapper code, I can see that I've repeated some of what dapper is doing anyway, effectively it each parameter value is now visited once more than what would be necessary. This becomes more of an issue for bulk updates/inserts.
But at least it seems to work for me o.k...
I borrowed a bit of code from here to form part of my solution...
The ? for parameters was part of the solution for me, but it only works with integers, like ID. It still fails for strings because the parameter length isn't specifed.
OdbcException: ERROR [HY104] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]Invalid precision value
System.Data.Odbc. OdbcParameter.Bind(OdbcStatementHandle hstmt,
OdbcCommand command, short ordinal, CNativeBuffer parameterBuffer, bool allowReentrance)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcParameterCollection.Bind(OdbcCommand command, CMDWrapper cmdWrapper, CNativeBuffer parameterBuffer)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteReaderObject(CommandBehavior behavior, string method, bool needReader, object[] methodArguments, SQL_API odbcApiMethod)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteReaderObject(CommandBehavior behavior, string method, bool needReader)
System.Data.Common.DbCommand.ExecuteDbDataReaderAsync(CommandBehavior behavior, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
Dapper.SqlMapper.QueryAsync(IDbConnection cnn, Type effectiveType, CommandDefinition command) in SqlMapper.Async.cs
WebAPI.DataAccess.CustomerRepository.GetByState(string state) in Repository.cs
var result = await conn.QueryAsync(sQuery, new { State = state });
WebAPI.Controllers.CustomerController.GetByState(string state) in CustomerController .cs
return await _customerRepo.GetByState(state);
For Dapper to pass string parameters to ODBC I had to specify the length.
var result = await conn.QueryAsync<Customer>(sQuery, new { State = new DbString { Value = state, IsFixedLength = true, Length = 4} });
The next code works:
self query1 = DomainClassExample.findAllByPropertyInList("hi","bye")
But if I add Not, the dynamic finder does not exist (it DOES exists: check the answer):
self query2 = DomainClassExample.findAllByPropertyNotInList("hi","bye")
I want to get all the DomainClassExample which don't have the property "hi" or "bye". Is there any dynamic finder for that purpose? Should I use the Where Query. How?
First, a minor correction. It's not a method expression. It's a dynamic finder. Now, as to your actual problem, you'll need to use the criteria API for this...
def c = DomainClassExample.createCriteria()
def matchingProperties = c.list {
property {
not { 'in'(["hi","bye"]) }
}
}
You might run into an issue with the word 'property' and I haven't actually tested the code I just wrote. But that is the gist of it.
In Grails 1.3.9, given the following domain:
class User {
String username
....
}
this works in our application without any issues:
def userList = User.findAllByUsernameNotInList(["user1#testdomain.com","user2#anotherdomain.com"])
class Book {
String title
Date releaseDate
String ISBN
static belongsTo = [person:Person] // it makes relationship bi-directional regarding the grails-docs
}
class Person {
Book book; // it will create person.book_id
String name
Integer age
Date lastVisit
static constraints = {
book unique: true // "one-to-one". Without that = "Many-to-one".
}
}
There is a test which test if it is real bidirectional or not. As i understand it.
public void testBidirectional() {
def person = new Person(name:"person_c1", age: 99, lastVisit: new Date())
def book = new Book(
title:"somebook_c1",
ISBN: "somebook_c1",
releaseDate: new Date()
)
person.setBook (book)
assertNotNull(person.save())
def bookId = person.getBook().id
Book thatBook = Book.get(bookId)
assertNotNull(thatBook.person) // NULL !!!
}
So, i save a person with a book, and then i got that book from db by id. Then from that book i try to get back the person which book should refer to (because it should be bidirectional, right?). Eventually i got null instead of an instance of the person.
The questing is: how to make that test working?
i have found the solution how to get it working, but still can not understand why it does not work without 'refresh', see below:
public void testBidirectional() {
def person = new Person(name:"person_c1", age: 99, lastVisit: new Date())
def book = new Book(
title:"somebook_c1",
ISBN: "somebook_c1",
releaseDate: new Date()
)
person.setBook (book)
def p = person.save()
assertNotNull p
person.refresh() //load the object again from the database so all the changes made to object will be reverted
//person = Person.get(p.id) // BUT this also gets the object from db ...?
def bookId = person.getBook().id
assertNotNull bookId
def thatBook = Book.get(bookId)
assertNotNull(thatBook.person)
}
So, here as you can see i use 'refresh' to get it working, but why it does not work without 'refresh' but with the following line after 'refresh' - this one:
person = Person.get(p.id) // BUT this also gets the object from db ...?
If i just want to get object from database by id, then it would be without bidirectional?
Your problem is probably caused by the way that Hibernate works. Grails used Hibernate under the hood.
Even when you call "save", the object person may (and usually) not saved in database. That's because Hibernate is programmed to optimize the query, so it often waits to perform all query at then end of the Hibernate session.
That means if you don't call "refresh", the book-person relation (person.setBook) is still in memory, but not saved in database. Hence you can't get the book.person from book.
To enforce the save, you can use "refresh" like the previous answer, or use flush:true.
I still not try, but it's very likely that you will produce desired results with:
person.save(flush:true)