As a front end developer, I'm used to work with Git and generate changelogs automatically using an NPM module named standard-version. The generated changelog is based some commit conventions, allowing the command line tool to group commits in categories (i.e. Features, Bug fixes, Breaking changes).
Today, our team is moving to Plastic SCM. Until now, the game programmers were writing changelogs manually.
Since this can be tedious most of the time, I was wondering if there is a way to do the same thing with Plastic SCM.
Questions :
Is there a tool available out of the box like standard-version ?
How can we retrieve a list of changesets between 2 labels (i.e. v2.0.0 -> v2.0.1) using the command line ?
Thanks.
Is there a tool available out of the box like standard-version ?
I'm afraid that there isn't something like standard-version provided by Plastic SCM out of the box. I guess it would be easy to port it to support Plastic as it currently does for Git.
How can we retrieve a list of changesets between 2 labels (i.e. v2.0.0
-> v2.0.1) using the command line ?
The following doc entry covers it: https://www.plasticscm.com/documentation/cmfind/plastic-scm-version-control-query-system-guide.shtml#Findchangesetsbetween2labels
Related
At work we are using TFS Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) and the workspace is a server workspace (very large codebase). The limitations of our setup are that files checked out are locked for edit by other people. Also there is a culture of not committing until work is complete etc as many change-sets complicate merging later.
I am in no position to change the global rules or culture. I would like to locally setup a mercurial (hg) repo on my local machine. The idea is that I can work on my local copy make as many checkins to hg. When I am done I would like to bundle my changes into one changeset and send it off to the TFS location (also on my local machine). Then immediately checkin the changes to TFS server.
That way to the outside world I appear to checkout and then immediately checkin all of my code, only briefly locking the files changed. But locally in hg I get the full ability to make small checkins and work without worrying about locking files out for edit.
Somehow chain two version control systems, giving me the flexibility of HG locally, but continue using the global TFVC for final checkins.
Any ideas on how this could be achieved?
You can use git-tf and the hg-git. This was an intentional design decision when we built git-tf that this was a supported scenario.
That said... this seems a bit... icky.
You may want to write a few shell scripts to make this workflow a little bit easier.
But even with that, it's hard to imagine troubleshooting this when something inevitably goes wrong.
TFS doesn't have Mercurial support, but apparently does have Git support.
You can use the hg-git plugin to access TFS this way.
More details about the lack of support:
https://hglabhq.com/blog/2014/1/17/mercurial-support-in-tfs-declined
https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studio/suggestions/3607357-add-mercurial-support-to-team-foundation-server
We have a Visual Studio solution containing about a dozen class library projects. They're our team's main internal framework. In Jenkins we would like to automate the building of these projects as soon as a check-in is made, and also publish a new version to our local NuGet repo.
The problem: We would like to trigger the build by polling SVN at the class library level, e.g. ..trunk/OurSolution/OurCoreProject. Changes in one project should not trigger a build on all the other projects. But the checkout needs to be done one level higher, e.g. at ..trunk/OurSolution, and I cannot figure out how this can be done.
We've tried and contemplated a few solutions already:
Checking out at project level and then send the .csproj file to
MsBuild.exe instead of the .sln file. This fails because the project
expects a sibling folder named .nuget.
Looking into the Multiple SCMs
plugin, but it seems to mainly add the ability to use different SCM
providers in the same project(?) I would like to avoid adding this
plugin until I know it solves this.
Splitting all the projects up into separate solutions. Doesn't feel very optimal...
Is there a way to solve this in Jenkins? Have a missed any viable solution?
Yes you have missed something... the Advanced... button on the Subversion checkout configuration.
Do your SVN checkout on ..trunk/OurSolution
Click Advanced...
Under Included Regions, type ..trunk/OurSolution/OurCoreProject/*
For more info, click the ? icon next to relevant text area on the UI
If set, and Jenkins is set to poll for changes, Jenkins will ignore any files and/or folders that are not in this list when determining if a build needs to be triggered.
At my work, we have a number of separate TFS projects that are combined together to form our Visual Studio solutions. These separate TFS projects are maintained so that we can reuse code across multiple solutions. Admittedly, this was a bad idea, as now when we have to branch we must branch each TFS project individually (we even wrote an app to do this). We end up with a project structure that looks like this:
$/Production/[superproject]/MAIN
$/Production/[superproject]/dev/[branch]
$/Production/[dependency1]/MAIN
$/Production/[dependency1]/dev/[branch/
where [superproject] requires [dependency1] within the solution. We end up mapping all these projects to the same workspace.
I would like to use Git-TFS in order to use Git in my day-to-day development. So far, the best way I have found to do this is to have a "master" git repo with a submodule for each TFS project. This way I can branch, diff, etc by using git submodule foreach.
Unfortunately, our policy regarding checkins is to have one changeset for a task, even if the changeset spans multiple TFS projects. This is fine if all my changes are constrained to one TFS project (i.e. one git submodule), but when I have changes across multiple submodules for one task then I don't know what to do. My current plan is to shelve each individualy using git submodule foreach 'git-tfs shelve mytask_$name' and then pull each into my TFS workspace, checking in from there. That only works for whatever TFS branches I have already mapped, which defeats half the purpose of using Git in the first place.
Has anyone encountered a similar problem? Are there any solutions already out there, perhaps using the TFS command line & a script? If not, I suppose I will spend some time creating a pull request for git-tfs. I am open to using Git-TF if the problem is solved there.
Thank you all in advance.
I think there is an effort in this way here : https://github.com/git-tfs/git-tfs/pull/350
you could have a look and contribute ;)
We're using Team Foundation Service instead of a local TFS.
Our solution was created on Visual Studio 2012.
My problem is now that we want all assemblies to have the same version number (this part is already solved by using a CommonAssemblyInfo.cs that is linked into all projects).
The issue I'm facing right now is that we need the tfs changeset number at the last digit of the assembly version (e.g. 1.0.0.4711 where 4711 is the changeset number).
I've found several examples, but none of them worked for me.
And yes, I especially searched here on stackoverflow a lot.
I also have to admit that I've never looked into the MSBuild scripts...
Can anyone please give me a hint on how to accomplish this?
Is it for example possible to use the MSBuild Extension Pack on Team Foundation Service (not local TFS) and if, how to do that?
As always, time is my worst enemy...
Note that from 2010 Tfs employs Windows workflow for building the package the workflow calls msbuild for compiling the projects only - while its possible to pass changeset this way to msbuild its rather more hops.
Following deals with your problem, however the linked solution is more complex that needed:
Can assembly version been automatically updated with each TFS 2010 Build?
This is one of best series of tutorials on the custom build activities, the author is on stack as well i believe, one specificly about versioning
http://www.ewaldhofman.nl/post/2010/05/13/Customize-Team-Build-2010-e28093-Part-5-Increase-AssemblyVersion.aspx
In short you need a custom activity to run before compilation on source files, find all CommonAssemblyInfo.cs files, feed this list to your custom activity, it modifies the values inside with passed value of full version number or only the changeset and optionaly check in the change (probably not since your changeset will be out of sync then).
You can also take a look at https://tfsbuildextensions.codeplex.com/ set of activities there is TfsVersion activity among them, at the very least it will provide examples.
Functionality need for this should be available through Team Explorer and source control - The Custom activity assemblies and build templates usually are located in folder in your team project root - the location of this folder is defined for build controller you can change this through team explorer build section.
Changeset is available from value BuildDetail.SourceGetVersion, not sure if this was fixed/changed in 2012 however there were 2 issues about this value in 2010
Its doesnt respect GetVersion override in default build template - you will manualy need to update if override is used
When running latest build (no override) it will get the last changeset number from tfs - depending on your branches this may not be the same as 'last' changeset for the branch of build. You will either have to live with this, provide overrides for each build or implement activity that checks branch history for last changeset value and overrides it again.
It should be noted that GetVersion should be able to accept any sourcespec version - changeset, date, label etc. I havent played around with this enough to provide more details to you.
Colin Dembovsky wrote a great overview of doing version embedding using the new pre-build script setting in TFS 2013 build definitions.
The Changeset number is easily accessible within the pre-build process in the environment variable TF_BUILD_SOURCEGETVERSION. I was able to use this to embed the Changeset value in our binaries using a script based on Dembovsky's work above. (I used Perl, not powershell, so you probably don't want to see it ;-)
This approach doesn't require any changes to the build workflow which makes it a big win for me.
I've used Wintellect's solution - MSBuild-only, no TFS magic needed. I also added to the auto-generated CSharp file:
[assembly:AssemblyInformationalVersion("$(BuildNumber)")]
So I get the TFS build number.
We're using TFS 2008 for our source control. We're currently doing embedded work so our actual build process is using Analog Devices VisualDSP++ IDE. However, we do still use labels on TFS. What I had hoped was for the ability to have a script run when a label is applied. The idea here is to update version information in some data files. This would help ensure that every label programmatically updated that version string. Currently we have to do this manually.
I'm used to Subversion and Git to some extent and was hunting around for post-commit type hooks or something similar. TFS seems like a different beast.
I'm not a stranger to .NET and (so far as I know) could write a simple app that did the grunt work of updating our files and then applied the label programmatically but it seems like there's got to be an easier way.
Am I right? Is there some mechanism that I can attach a script/batch file when a label is applied in TFS?
No, sorry, there's no server-side event fired when labels are created/updated. I'd recommend using branches instead of labels. Then you can hook the CheckinEvent (filtered by the path of the branch[es] in question).
For more info on subscribing to CheckinEvent (including filters), check out Buck's blog + updates + links: http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2006/09/29/checkinevent-path-filter.aspx
For a code sample that illustrates what your event listener might look like, check out Martin Woodward's "bunny": http://www.woodwardweb.com/vsts/behind_brian_th.html
For info on using branches instead of labels for code promotion, try http://tfsbranchingguideiii.codeplex.com/