Jenkins API to retrieve a build log in chunks - jenkins

For a custom monitoring tool I need an API (REST) to fetch the console log of a Jenkins build in chunks.
I know about the /consoleText and /logText/progressive{Text|HTML} APIs, but the problem with this is that sometimes, our build logs get really huge (up to a few GB). I have not found any way using those existing APIs that avoids fetching and transferring the whole log in one piece. This then normally drives the Jenkins master out of memory.
I already have the Java code to efficiently fetch chunks from a file, and I have a basic Jenkins plugin that gets loaded correctly.
What I'm missing is the correct extension point so that I could call my plugin via REST, for example like
http://.../jenkins/job/<jobname>/<buildnr>/myPlugin/logChunk?start=1000&size=1000
Or also, if that is easier
http://.../jenkins/myPlugin/logChunk?start=1000&size=1000&job=<jobName>&build=<buildNr>
I tried to register my plugin with something like (that code below does not work!!)
#Extension
public class JobLogReaderAPI extends TransientActionFactory<T> implements Action {
public void doLogChunk(StaplerRequest req, StaplerResponse rsp) throws IOException {
LOGGER.log(Level.INFO, "## doLogFragment req: {}", req);
LOGGER.log(Level.INFO, "## doLogFragment rsp: {}", rsp);
}
But I failed to find the right encantation to register my plugin action.
Any tips or pointers to existing plugins where I can check how to register this?

This was indeed more simple than I expected :-) It as always: once one understands the plugin system, it just needs a few lines of code.
Turns out all I needed to do was write 2 very simple classes
The "action factory" that get's called by Jenkins and registers an action on the object in question (in my case a "build" or "run"
public class ActionFactory extends TransientBuildActionFactory {
public Collection<? extends Action> createFor(Run target) {
ArrayList<Action> actions = new ArrayList<Action>();
if (target.getLogFile().exists()) {
LogChunkReader newAction = new LogChunkReader(target);
actions.add(newAction);
}
return actions;
}
The class the implements the logic
public class LogChunkReader implements Action {
private Run build;
public LogChunkReader(Run build) {
this.build = build;
}
public String getIconFileName() {
return null;
}
public String getDisplayName() {
return null;
}
public String getUrlName() {
return "logChunk";
}
public Run getBuild() {
return build;
}
public void doReadChunk(StaplerRequest req, StaplerResponse rsp) throws IOException, ServletException {

Related

Spring Integration - List file names being downloaded via a RemoteFileTemplate

I am downloading files via Sftp using a Spring Integration RemoteFileTemplate. How do I perform some processing on each file name that is being downloaded? I see that the line
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.INFO, "sftp.inbound", Message::getHeaders)
logs the file names but I need the file names available directly.
All I need to do is write the downloaded file names as a list into a POJO for passing as a response to a later process. My code is attached below.
`
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
public class SftpInboundFlowIntegrationConfig {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SftpInboundFlowIntegrationConfig.class);
private String sftpRemoteDirectory = "/";
#Bean
public SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> inboundSftpSessionFactory() {
DefaultSftpSessionFactory factory = new DefaultSftpSessionFactory(true);
factory.setHost("localhost");
factory.setPort(2222);
factory.setUser("local");
factory.setPassword("local");
factory.setAllowUnknownKeys(true);
return new CachingSessionFactory<>(factory);
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow sftpInboundFlow(RemoteFileTemplate<ChannelSftp.LsEntry>
inboundRemoteFileTemplate) {
return e -> e
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.INFO, "sftp.inbound", Message::getPayload)
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.INFO, "sftp.inbound", Message::getHeaders)
.handle(
Sftp.outboundGateway(inboundRemoteFileTemplate, AbstractRemoteFileOutboundGateway.Command.MGET, "payload")
.localDirectory(new File("c:/tmp"))
);
}
#Bean
public RemoteFileTemplate<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> inboundRemoteFileTemplate(SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> inboundSftpSessionFactory) {
RemoteFileTemplate<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> template = new SftpRemoteFileTemplate(inboundSftpSessionFactory);
template.setRemoteDirectoryExpression(new LiteralExpression(sftpRemoteDirectory));
template.setAutoCreateDirectory(true);
template.afterPropertiesSet();
template.setUseTemporaryFileName(false);
return template;
}
}
`
Sorry all. I was trying to accomplish this in the wrong area of code. I realized that when I call my outbound gateway to download the files, sftpOutboundGateway.mget("/"); that it returns the list of files downloaded, which is what I needed.

Making business domain objects available to Jersey Servlet Context in embedded Jetty server

Using the following dependencies (Gradle):
org.glassfish.jersey.containers:jersey-container-servlet:2.22.2
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet:9.3.2.v20150730
I have an embedded Jetty server, with a Jersey servlet container... something like this ...
package mypkg.rest.jersey;
import org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server;
import org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler;
import org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder;
import org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerProperties;
import org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer;
import se.transmode.tnm.alarm.api.AlarmRetrieval;
import mypkg.rest.RestServer;
import mypkg.rest.jersey.serviceImpl.ModelAdapter;
public class JerseyBasedRestServer implements RestServer {
public static final int INITIALIZE_ON_USE = 0;
private Server server;
private final ServletContextHandler context;
private final ServletHolder servlet;
private final ModelAdapter modelAdapter;
public JerseyBasedRestServer(BusinessObjects businessObjects) {
this.modelAdapter = new ModelAdapter(businessObjects); //I want this instance to somehow be available for my ServletContainer to use.
context = new ServletContextHandler(ServletContextHandler.SESSIONS);
servlet = context.addServlet(ServletContainer.class, "/*");
servlet.setInitOrder(INITIALIZE_ON_USE);
servlet.setInitParameter(ServerProperties.PROVIDER_PACKAGES, "mypackage.jersey.generated.api.service");
servlet.setInitParameter(ServerProperties.MEDIA_TYPE_MAPPINGS, "json : application/json");
context.setContextPath("/");
}
private void startServlet() {
try {
servlet.start();
servlet.initialize();
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Failed to initialize servlet. {}", e.getMessage());
}
}
#Override
public void init(int port) {
server = new Server(port);
server.setHandler(context);
try {
server.start();
server.join();
startServlet();
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Failed to start jetty server for rest interface");
} finally {
server.destroy();
}
}
The Jersey Container will run server code and model generated using the Swagger code-gen tool
https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-codegen#getting-started
which delivers the generated model, JacksonJsonProvider, and a RestApi class:
package mypackage.jersey.generated.api.service
Path("/")
public class RestApi {
private final RestApiService delegate = new RestApiServiceImpl(); //Integration point of the generated code
#GET
#Path("/list/")
#Consumes({ "application/json" })
#Produces({ "application/json" })
public Response retrieveAlarmList(#Context SecurityContext securityContext) throws NotFoundException {
return delegate.retrieveAlarmList(securityContext);
}
}
To integrate the generated code we are left to implement RestApiServiceImpl ourselves.
The ModelAdapter's job is to convert our business objects to the generated rest model.
So the question is how do I make the instance of the adapter of our business objects, in this case ModelAdapter, which lies outside the context of the Jersey servlet context, available to the RestApi class, or rather the RestApiServiceImpl?
I kind of understood from reading the past 24 hours that I need to use some sort of Context Dependency Injection either through Jetty, Jersey, or some other library (Weld seems to appear a lot), and have tried various combinations of #Inject, #Context, etc etc, but have come to the conclusion that I have no clue what I am actually doing... I'm not even sure I understand enough about the situation to phrase my question correctly.
More info can be made available on request.
Any help is appreciated.
EDIT: added a link here to https://github.com/englishbobster/JersetAndJetty
using #peeskillets suggestions, but still not working.
First thing you need to make DI work, is an AbstractBinder. This is where you will make your objects available to be injected.
class Binder extends AbstractBinder {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(modelAdapter).to(ModelAdapter.class);
}
}
Then you need to register the binder with Jersey. The easiest way is to register in Jersey's ResourceConfig. In your case, you are not using one. You are configuring everything in the "web.xml". For that, you should take a look at this post.
If you want to change your configuration to use a ResourceConfig, which personally I'd rather use, you can do this
package com.some.pkg;
public class JerseyConfig extends ResourceConfig {
public JerseyConfig() {
packages("mypackage.jersey.generated.api.service");
property(ServerProperties.MEDIA_TYPE_MAPPINGS, "json : application/json");
register(new Binder());
}
}
Then to configure it with Jetty, you can do
servlet.setInitParameter(ServletProperties.JAXRS_APPLICATION_CLASS,
"com.some.pkg.JerseyConfig");
Now you can get rid of those other two init-params, as you are configuring it inside the ResourceConfig.
Another way, without any init-params, is to do
ResourceConfig config = new JerseyConfig();
ServletHolder jerseyServlet = new ServletHolder(ServletContainer(config));
context.addServlet(jerseyServlet, "/*");
See full example of last code snippet, here.
Now you can just inject the ModelAdapter pretty much anywhere within Jersey
In a field
#Inject
private ModelAdapter adapter;
Or in a contructor
#Inject
public RestApi(ModelAdapter adapter) {
this.adapter = adapter;
}
Or method parameter
#GET
public Response get(#Context ModelAdapter adapter) {}

How to add logs in asp.net vNext

I need to set up logs in my asp.net application. It's easy to add output to the console, but I need to configure it in Azure. I don't know how to do it. I need to log all information that occurs with my app into some file and read it.
The ILoggerFactory allows an app to use any implementation of ILogger and ILoggerProvider.
For details on how to implement the interfaces properly, look at the framework's ConsoleLogger and ConsoleLoggerProvider. See also the ASP.NET Core documentation on logging.
Here is a minimal example of a custom ILogger to get started. This is not production code, rather, it demos enough technical depth either to write your own ILogger or to use one from the community.
project.json
"dependencies": {
"Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc": "6.0.0-rc1-final",
"Microsoft.AspNet.Server.Kestrel": "1.0.0-rc1-final",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Logging": "1.0.0-rc1-final",
"Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Console": "1.0.0-rc1-final"
}
MyLoggingProvider.cs
namespace LoggingExample
{
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
public class MyLoggingProvider : ILoggerProvider
{
public ILogger CreateLogger(string categoryName)
{
return new MyLogger();
}
public void Dispose()
{
// TODO Cleanup
}
}
}
MyLogger.cs
In Azure you will want to write to somewhere other than C:/temp/some-guid.txt. This is enough to get you started, though, with writing your own simple logger.
namespace LoggingExample
{
using System;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
public class MyLogger : ILogger
{
public void Log(LogLevel logLevel, int eventId, object state,
Exception exception, Func<object, Exception, string> formatter)
{
var builder = new StringBuilder();
if (formatter != null) {
builder.AppendLine(formatter(state, exception));
}
var values = state as ILogValues;
if (values != null) {
foreach (var v in values.GetValues()) {
builder.AppendLine(v.Key + ":" + v.Value);
}
}
var logPath = string.Format("C:/temp/{0}.txt", Guid.NewGuid());
File.WriteAllText(logPath, builder.ToString());
}
public bool IsEnabled(LogLevel logLevel) {
return true;
}
public IDisposable BeginScopeImpl(object state) {
return null;
}
}
}
Startup.cs
Now in startup you can use add your logger via loggerFactory.AddProvider(new MyLoggingProvider()). Every call to the ILogger will now log with your provider.
namespace LoggingExample
{
using Microsoft.AspNet.Builder;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Http;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
public class Startup
{
public void Configure(
IApplicationBuilder app,
ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
loggerFactory
.AddConsole(minLevel: LogLevel.Verbose)
.AddProvider(new MyLoggingProvider());
app.Run(async (context) =>
{
var logger = loggerFactory.CreateLogger("CatchAll");
logger.LogInformation("Hello logger!");
await context.Response.WriteAsync("Hello world!");
});
}
}
}
MyController.cs
Anywhere that supports dependency injection can now receive an ILogger that will log to all of the providers that we registered in the Startup.Configure method.
namespace LoggingExample
{
using Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
public class MyController : Controller
{
public MyController(ILogger logger)
{
logger.LogInformation("Logging from my controller");
}
}
}
Log4Net
Use Log4Net. Its a common framework for logging that everyone who follows up on your code will understand, and it lets you do things like attach a new log "destination" on the fly just by editing your config file. It already covers most of the things you'll want to do (like create a separate file for each "day"), and most of the log mining tools out there will be able to read the files l4n creates.
Setting it Up
There are tutorials online for how to get started, but they basically require a few simple steps:
Download the Log4Net nuget package.
Adjust the log settings in your web.config file
Create a static instance of the logger object
Log Stuff wherever you need to. If you decide you want your logger to write to a file, it will. If you add a database writer, it will write to the db too. Want your log entries to show up in console, just add that logger in your default (debug) config.
Once you get it setup, logging is as simple as this code:
...
} catch(SystemException ex) {
logger.Error("This error was thrown by the XXX routine", ex);
}
Hope that's helpful.
Edit: Config File + Core
As #auga points out in his oh-so-helpful comment, config for ASP.Net 5 may require you to read carefully the link I added under step #2 above (configuring your logger). Instead of re-writing someone else's blog post, I'll just link to the article I used to set this up in our ASP.NET 5 environment. Works really well.
If you're reading this post to learn (instead of skimming it to critique), I'd suggest following the links...

Securing exclusively the REST access to a Spring Data Rest Repository

I'm using Spring Data Rest to expose a repository. I'm using #PreAuthorize and #PostFilter to restrict the access to the REST end points to exclusively admin users and filter the results.
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('ROLE_ADMIN')")
#PostFilter("hasPermission(filterObject, 'read')
public interface SomeRepository extends CrudRepository<SomeEntity, Long> {
}
At the same time I have another Controller that doesn't require any authentication but is using the repository.
#Controller
public class SomeController {
#Autowired
SomeRepository repository;
#RequestMapping(value = "/test")
public ResponseEntity test () {
// Do something
repository.findAll();
// Do something else
}
}
This doesn't work because the user that send the request to "/test" is not admin so it doesn't have access to the repository.
My question is, it is possible to add security exclusively to the REST interface of the repository and not when the repository is used internally in the application?
Thanks
Please evaluate these possibilities:
Security checks in REST event handlers
Adding custom repository methods for internal use
Using RunAsManager (or temporarily switching SecurityContext to perform a privileged operation)
Securing modifying requests using REST event handlers:
#Service
#RepositoryEventHandler
public class FooService {
/**
* Handles before-* events.
*/
#HandleBeforeCreate
#HandleBeforeSave
#HandleBeforeDelete
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('ADMIN')")
public void onBeforeModify(final Foo entity){
// noop
}
/**
* Handles before-* events.
*/
#HandleBeforeLinkSave
#HandleBeforeLinkDelete
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('ADMIN')")
public void onBeforeModifyLink(final Foo entity, final Object linked){
// noop
}
}
Securing standard CRUD methods while adding non-secure custom methods on repository for internal use:
public interface FooDao extends CrudRepository<Foo, Long> {
#Override
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('ADMIN')")
<S extends Foo> S save(final S entity);
/**
* Saves entity without security checks.
*/
#Transactional
#Modifying
default <S extends Foo> S saveInternal(final S entity) {
return save(entity);
}
}
One solution would be to remove the #PreAuthorize annotation from your repository interface, and in a configuration class, extend WebSecurityConfigAdaptor and override the configure(HttpSecurity security) method. From here you can use AntMatchers to impose access restrictions to the REST endpoints as required. For example:
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.authorizeRequests().antMatchers("/someEntities/**").hasRole('ADMIN')
.anyRequest().permitAll();
}
See http://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/current/reference/htmlsingle/#jc-httpsecurity for more details.
I ran into the same problem and came up with a workaround that doesn't feel completely right but does its job for the time being.
I basically created a security utils bean which can be used to check if a method was called internally or externally using the Spring Data REST API (remark: my repositories are prefixed /api/, if you have another prefix you need to change the regex accordingly).
#Component("securityUtils")
public class SecurityUtils {
public boolean isRestRequest(){
HttpServletRequest r = ((ServletRequestAttributes) RequestContextHolder.currentRequestAttributes()).getRequest();
return Pattern.matches("^/api/", UrlUtils.buildRequestUrl(r));
}
}
To make this work, you need to add the following line to your listeners in the web.xml:
<listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestContextListener</listener-class>
And use the method in your expression based access control like so (where the last line in the expression allows you to use the save method from any controller methods that are mapped against URLs which do not start with /api/:
#Override
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('ROLE_ADMINISTRATOR') " +
"or hasPermission(#user, 'WRITE') " +
"or !#securityUtils.isRestRequest()")
<S extends User> S save(#P("user") S user);
Caveats:
You cannot use this when you want to expose custom functionality over the /api route as this is merely a simple regex check against the route
The check has to be explicitly added to each repository or repository method for which you want to omit the authorization check internally (might be an advantage as well)
In my opinion the right solution would be to have two Repositories, one that is called EntityRepository and one SecuredEntityRepository.
Example:
#RestResource(exported = false)
public abstract interface CustomerRepository extends JpaRepository<Customer, Long> {
}
and the secured version:
#RestResource(exported = true)
public abstract interface SecuredCustomerRepository extends CustomerRepository {
#Override
#PreAuthorize("#id == principal.customer.id or hasAuthority('ADMIN_CUSTOMER_ONE')")
public Customer findOne(#Param("id") Long id);
#Override
#Query("SELECT o FROM #{#entityName} o WHERE o.id = ?#{principal.customer.id} or 1 = ?#{ hasAuthority('ADMIN_CUSTOMER_LIST') ? 1 : 0 }")
public Page<Customer> findAll(Pageable pageable);
#Override
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
#PreAuthorize("#customer.id == principal.customer.id or hasAuthority('ADMIN_CUSTOMER_SAVE')")
public Customer save(#P("customer") Customer customer);
#Override
#PreAuthorize("hasAuthority('ADMIN_CUSTOMER_DELETE')")
public void delete(#Param("id") Long id);
#Override
#PreAuthorize("hasAuthority('ADMIN_CUSTOMER_DELETE')")
public void delete(Customer customer);
}
This is currently not possible due to an issue with the auto-wiring mechanism in SD REST: https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAREST-923
Sure. Just change the location of the #PreAuthorize annotation. This annotation can be placed in classes or single methods.
For example
#Controller
public class SomeController {
#Autowired
SomeRepository repository;
#RequestMapping(value = "/test")
#PreAuthorize(....)
public ResponseEntity test () {
// Do something
repository.findAll();
// Do something else
}
}
is perfectly legit (note the annotation on the test() method.
I decorated the repository class with this:
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('admin')")
It locked down everything.
Then whatever I wanted to enable for internal use but not rest, I decorated like this:
#Transactional
#Modifying
#PreAuthorize("hasRole('user')")
#RestResource(exported = false)
default <S extends SomeEntity> S saveInternal(final S entity) {
return save(entity);
}
And whatever I wanted to expose via the Rest interface (handpicked few) I exposed with something like this:
#PreAuthorize("(hasRole('user')) and
(#entity.user.username == principal.name)")
#Override
<S extends SomeEntity> S save(#Param("entity") S entity);
Note that this also validates that you are saving a record you are authorized to save.
I solved this problem by adding my own check
I created my AbstractHttpConfigurer class with global security. I have declared methods that can be public.
public class CommonSpringKeycloakTutorialsSecurityAdapter extends AbstractHttpConfigurer<CommonSpringKeycloakTutorialsSecurityAdapter, HttpSecurity> {
public static String[] PERMIT_ALL_URL = {"/api/user/createUser"};
#Override
public void init(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
// any method that adds another configurer
// must be done in the init method
http
// disable csrf because of API mode
.csrf().disable()
.sessionManagement()
.sessionCreationPolicy(SessionCreationPolicy.STATELESS)
.and()
// manage routes securisation here
.authorizeRequests().antMatchers(HttpMethod.OPTIONS).permitAll()
// manage routes securisation here
.and()
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers(HttpMethod.OPTIONS).permitAll()
.antMatchers("/swagger-ui.html*", "/swagger-ui/**", "/v3/api-docs/**").permitAll()
.antMatchers(PERMIT_ALL_URL).permitAll()
.anyRequest().authenticated();
}
Then I created my own check based on global permissions.
#Component("securityUtils")
public class SecurityUtils {
public boolean isPermitRestRequest(){
HttpServletRequest r = ((ServletRequestAttributes) RequestContextHolder.currentRequestAttributes()).getRequest();
String currentUrl = UrlUtils.buildRequestUrl(r);
for(String url: CommonSpringKeycloakTutorialsSecurityAdapter.PERMIT_ALL_URL) {
if(currentUrl.equals(url)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
For native validation to work, include a listener
#WebListener
public class MyRequestContextListener extends RequestContextListener {
}
In my team we evaluated several of the answers in this post and they didn't fit to our scenario.
A variation of Johannes Hiemer answer worked for us. We configured Spring Data REST to only expose annotated repositories:
data.rest:
detection-strategy: annotated
Then we defined 2 repositories without hierarchical relationship.
One of the repos will be exposed by adding the #RepositoryRestResource annotation to it. For this one, we deny access to every method by default so auth will have to be specified on a method level to reduce the chances of exposing methods by mistake. For example, initially we extended CrudRepository and didn't want to expose the deletion operation:
#RepositoryRestResource
#PreAuthorize("denyAll()")
interface SomeRestResourceRepository : Repository<SomeEntity, Long> {
}
The repository to be used for internal calls is defined as a regular Spring Data Repository:
interface SomeRepository : Repository<SomeEntity, Long> {
}
We are using spring-boot-starter-data-rest 2.6.3.

How to extend Jenkins job page with new links and icons

I'm developing my first Jenkins plugin and followed the tutorial at wiki.jenkins-ci.org. After adding a BuildStep and generating the results I now want to publish them to the user. I would like to do this via a new link entry on the job page and a corrsponding result view page.
Unfortunatelly I do not find the right extension points for the navigation bar at the left side, the main navigation links in the center as well as the new target page. Can somebody point me in the right direction or give me a link to a tutorial or blog post that explains this scenario?
Thanks
Root Action and Actions are different. The first one goes only to initial page (root), the second one can be attach to a Project/Job or to a Build.
To create a Root Action, just need to create a class that it's:
Annotated with #Extension (so it can be found and automatically
loaded by Jenkins)
Implements RootAction Interface
Override 3 methods: getIconFileName(), getDisplayName() and getUrlName()
For example:
#Extension
public class GoogleRootAction implements RootAction{
#Override
public String getIconFileName() {
return "clipboard.png";
}
#Override
public String getDisplayName() {
return "Google URL";
}
#Override
public String getUrlName() {
return "http://www.google.pt";
}
}
To create an Action at a Project it's more complicated, and there's more than a way, depending of what you want.
But first, the class Action itself is the easy part, since it's very similar to a class RootAction. It's not annotated with #Extension and implements Action interface instead of RootAction.
For example:
public class LatestConsoleProjectAction implements Action {
private AbstractProject<?, ?> project;
#Override
public String getIconFileName() {
return (Jenkins.RESOURCE_PATH + "/images/48x48/terminal.png").replaceFirst("^/", "");
}
#Override
public String getDisplayName() {
return Messages.Latest_Console_Project_Action();
}
#Override
public String getUrlName() {
return "lastBuild/console";
}
public LatestConsoleProjectAction(final AbstractProject<?, ?> project) {
this.project = project;
}
}
The tricky part is to inform jenkins that this class Action exists. As I said, there are different ways.
For instance, one can associate an Action to a Builder or Publisher or other by just overriding getProjectAction() method at those classes.
For example:
#Override
public Action getProjectAction(AbstractProject<?, ?> project) {
return new LatestConsoleProjectAction(project);
}
But this way, the Action link will only show on Project left menu, if the corresponding Builder or Publisher is used by the job (or selected at Job configurations).
Another way, that always shows your Action link on left menu, it's create a factory class to inform jenkins. There are many factories, but at my example I will use TransientProjectActionFactory class.
For this, one will need to create a class that:
It's annotated with #Extensions
Extends TransientProjectActionFactory class (or another Factory class)
Override createFor method to create your class Action associated with Project object
For example:
#Extension
public class LatestConsoleProjectActionFactory extends TransientProjectActionFactory {
#Override
public Collection<? extends Action> createFor(AbstractProject abstractProject) {
return Collections.singletonList(new LatestConsoleProjectAction(abstractProject));
}
}
One can still filter project object to just the projects types you want. The one you don't want, just return Collections.emptyList().
Beside this two ways, I think there are others. You can see this link to reference:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Action+and+its+family+of+subtypes
Although, they refer to addAction method and others, but I couldn't use it (I have 2.19.2 Jenkins version).
Also they refer groovy, but I didn't try it, since I want to stick with Java :)
Btw, my example will create an action link to open console page of last build. Useful to avoid selecting last build and then select his console page.
After a lot of trial and error I figured out the solution.
All in all you need two different things in your project:
1) A class that inherits from ProminentProjectAction:
import hudson.model.ProminentProjectAction;
public class MyProjectAction implements ProminentProjectAction {
#Override
public String getIconFileName() {
// return the path to the icon file
return "/images/jenkins.png";
}
#Override
public String getDisplayName() {
// return the label for your link
return "MyActionLink";
}
#Override
public String getUrlName() {
// defines the suburl, which is appended to ...jenkins/job/jobname
return "myactionpage";
}
}
2) Even more important is that you add this action somehow to your project.
In my case I wanted to show the link if and only if the related build step of my plugin is configured for the actual project. So I took my Builder class and overwrote the getProjectActionsMethod.
public class MyBuilder extends Builder {
...
#Override
public Collection<? extends Action> getProjectActions(AbstractProject<?,?> project) {
List<Action> actions = new ArrayList<>();
actions.add(new MyProjectAction());
return actions;
}
}
Maybe this is not the perfect solution yet (because I'm still trying to figure out how all the artifacts are working together), but it might give people which want to implement the same a good starting point.
The page, which is loaded after clicking the link is defined as index.jelly file under source/main/resources and an underlying package with the name of the package of your Action class appended by its class name (e.g. src/main/resources/org/example/myplugin/MyProjectAction).
As it happens, there was a plugin workshop by Steven Christou at the recent Jenkins User Conference in Boston, which covered this case. You need to add a new RootAction, as shown in the following code from the JUC session
package org.jenkinsci.plugins.JUCBeer;
import hudson.Extension;
import hudson.model.RootAction;
#Extension
public class JenkinsRootAction implements RootAction {
public String getIconFileName() {
return "/images/jenkins.png";
}
public String getDisplayName() {
return "Jenkins home page";
}
public String getUrlName() {
return "http://jenkins-ci.org";
}
}
https://github.com/jenkinsci/s3explorer-plugin is my Jenkins plugin that adds an S3 Explorer link to all Jenkins project's side-panel.
An addition to #dchang comment:
I managed to make this functionality work also on pipelines by extending TransientActionFactory<WorkflowJob>:
#Extension
public static class PipelineLatestConsoleProjectActionFactory extends TransientActionFactory<WorkflowJob> {
#Override
public Class<WorkflowJob> type() {
return WorkflowJob.class;
}
#Nonnull
#Override
public Collection<? extends Action> createFor(#Nonnull WorkflowJob job) {
return Collections.singletonList(new LatestConsoleProjectAction(job));
}
}

Resources