I have written a code in html for signup a website and saved into my local machine with .html extension.
In browser it showing as file:///C:/Users/xxxxx/Desktop/hello.html
can I able to do loadtest for this url using jmeter?
No (unless you are testing the speed of your file system).
The whole idea of load testing is:
Have your web site deployed onto environment close to real (the one, you'r going to have in production) so you need to consider some form of a web server software (and hardware) and deploy your website there
Mimic the load coming from real users as close as possible. It means that your JMeter test should look like exactly a real browser from the web server's perspective.
This way you should be able to confirm whether your web site is capable of handling anticipated load (or determine its boundaries so see where/when it fails)
More information:
Building a Web Test Plan
Logging in to a web-site
Jmeter measure the speed between to requests, and generally the backend speed. If you want to test your file on directly on your disk without any http ou application server , Jmeter is not the good tool. The loading time page speed can be measured by the Browser Developer tools (F12 key browser) .
Related
I'm working on an ASP.net MVC project and I noticed that when the web app gets published, IIS doesn't build a cache or anything for the views until a controller has been hit. So in other words it can take a very long time for a visitor to get the page loaded if they happen to be the first person to visit the page after the whole project gets republished.
To counter this, I'd have to manually hit every endpoint with a view in the project once. When the project first started this was a simple task but as you can imagine right now this is not maintainable.
My question is how do I execute a batch of curl commands to the endpoints with views in the project? I'm not sure where to start. Is there a programmatic way to create the batch command and append it to the AfterPublish event?
The behaviour you're encountering is due to Application Pool Start Mode in IIS. Instead of implementing AfterPublish events, you're probably better off configuring your Application Pool to do what you want it to do.
Start Mode
A few web applications take a significant amount of time to start up. IIS by default only launches a worker process when the first request for the web application is received. So for the web applications that require a longer time to initialize, users might see slow responses.
For such applications it is a good idea to launch the worker process as soon as IIS is started. The application pools have a startMode setting which when set to AlwaysRunning launches the worker process for the application pool as soon as IIS is started.
IIS 8 provides you this setting in the Application Pool Settings UI.
Source: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vijaysk/2012/10/09/iis-8-whats-new-application-pool-settings/
If you really want to run those actions after you publish the website, you'll have to learn more about the Visual Studio build process. This link can get you started: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-ca/visualstudio/msbuild/how-to-extend-the-visual-studio-build-process?view=vs-2017
IIS has to start the application again after I rebuild the website, it takes a very long time and it cuts into productivity.
I am wondering if I can somehow replace the MVC website with a small console application that listens to a port and returns a string that is then interpreted by the browser as valid html. I am not sure if this was done.
Something very lightweight.
So that it does not take 30-50 seconds on each rebuild, to see my site in action.
I want to build my app, then immediately do a request and test it and not wait almost a minute.
Is there something that does that?
There is a way to build Self-Hosted Web Api applications.
It can be console exe, or setup to run as a service.
The ASPNET engine, is designed to compile itself (views, etc), but a minute? This might be due to the weak PC, for instance.
You can use the Browser control in a windows form app. But it is not recommended, there is no way of avoiding IIS restart since your files have been changed.
I'm planning an app for work and venturing into potential features which I've not used before.
Essentially I need to be able to access files on a network share, read, write and delete files as well as amend the file names. As a pretty closed platform I'm not sure whether iOS is capable of such a thing and if it is, what features should I look for to begin researching?
My Google-Fu hasn't come up with anything thus far so hopefully looking for someone to point me in the right direction.
Thanks.
I know this isn't very secure, but I'd personally create an ASP.NET app on your target Windows Server, or a different Server on the domain. Create web services exposed, and make an iOS app with UIWebView. You can do RPC calls from the web service that do WMI/ADSI/File System manipulation. You can prompt for domain credentials, and do remote calls essentially is the gist.
You could expose the web app so that your app can access it from local network, or URL. If you were to access it from outside I'd suggest using some secure credentials in Windows/IIS.
Some years ago I created a "mobile-friendly" web app that allowed me to manage servers, perform RPC, and do basic Active Directory queries. Also allowed file listing and deletion/moving/copying with some creative scripting. It was essentially a ASP.NET/C# web app that loaded in a iPhone app. UIWebView in iOS was a able to load it, used AJAX and some other client side scripting that looked decent. You'd essentially have to make sure that your web app renders properly in Safari/UIWebView (which is bastardized safari).
Here's a link to a demo of what I created:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czXmubijHwQ&t=12s
I ran it in a browser, but it'd run from my PSP, Android test devices, iPod Touch, Blackberry, etc.
I have a quiz tool and I want to see how can I test this for 100 simultaneous users. This quiz tool have JS for its front-end and the JS is calling RESTful API.
I have some tests running on for trivial stuffs like login in Nightwatch.js for my web application but the question is how it can guarantee a number of simultaneous users?
As far as I'm aware none of the load testing tools will execute JavaScript, so the options are in:
If you need to simulate load directly on front-end and check rendering speed as well as REST backend performance you should go for browser-based testing using i..e Selenium Grid
If you think that simulating the load on REST backend will be enough you can simulate the load using i.e. SoapUI or Apache JMeter.
Personally I would combine above approaches i.e. created the main load with SoapUI or Apache JMeter and checked JS frontend client-side performance either manually using something like YSlow or in automated manner using Selenium depending on if there is an adhoc activity or something which will be executed on the regular basis.
I need to set up a server so that files can be uploaded from an iOS app. I don't know how best to proceed. I thought about FTP but not sure if there is a better option.
any ideas appreciated
GC
Also I must add that I will be building the iOS app so can use server APIs in my code.
It's not ideal to set up a blind File/FTP server and hardcode the details into your app because all it takes is one person to intercept the login details and they have access to your server where they can upload (and potentially execute) bad things.
A possible idea could be to set up an API frontend on your server in a language of your choice (PHP, Ruby, Python or similar) where you can 'POST' images to the server. With the API frontend, you can also do validation to ensure that only valid images are being uploaded and all nefarious stuff is thrown away. Then, in your iOS app, you can set up code to interact with your API frontend and send the actual images which will then be stored on your server.
This is a fairly conceptual idea rather than an absolute implementation idea. It does require some thinking/reading and more setup/coding on the server side.
Edit: Just to add, if you only want a central location to store/get your images without controlling it on a per user basis then you may want to look into Amazon S3 as a File Server.