I recently discovered that I get memory bloats when I experience an error code 500 in my Rails apps (I run several and experience the same in all). I found out using Scout and could see a pattern of memory leaks (almost) every time I had a 500-error. Below is the most recent example:
Although it seems in the graph that exception_notification does not have much memory allocation, but rather "Middleware" has. The only middleware I use (as far as I know) is the Exception Notification (gem '[exception_notification][2]' v. 4.2.1) so I assume it must be it and it is only my interpretation that is wrong.
Edit after comment by Alexis - I ran:
Rails.configuration.middleware.each do |m|
puts "use #{m.inspect}"
end;0
which gave the following output about middleware:
use UTF8Cleaner::Middleware
use Rack::Sendfile
use ActionDispatch::Static
use #<ActiveSupport::Cache::Strategy::LocalCache::Middleware:0x0055f8e1dd5a60>
use Rack::Timeout
use Rack::Runtime
use Rack::MethodOverride
use ActionDispatch::RequestId
use Rails::Rack::Logger
use ActionDispatch::ShowExceptions
use ActionDispatch::DebugExceptions
use ActionDispatch::RemoteIp
use ActionDispatch::Callbacks
use ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::ConnectionManagement
use Airbrake::Rack::Middleware
use ActiveRecord::QueryCache
use ActionDispatch::Cookies
use ActionDispatch::Session::CookieStore
use ActionDispatch::Flash
use ActionDispatch::ParamsParser
use Rack::Head
use Rack::ConditionalGet
use Rack::ETag
use ExceptionNotification::Rack
use Rakismet::Middleware
use ScoutApm::Middleware
where Airbrake and ScoutApm would be the only one related to errors.
My production.rb contains this information:
config.middleware.use ExceptionNotification::Rack, :email => {
:email_prefix => "[MyApp.se Exception] ",
:sender_address => %{"Exception Notifier" <support#myapp.se>},
:exception_recipients => %w{me#myapp.se}
}
# Taken from mailer.rb
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :smtp
config.action_mailer.smtp_settings = {
:enable_starttls_auto => false,
:return_response => true,
:raise_delivery_errors => true,
:address => 'smtp.myapp.se',
:port => 587,
:domain => "myapp.se",
:user_name => 'mailer#myapp.se',
:password => ENV['MAILER_PWD'],
:authentication => 'plain'
}
As I have been on a Great Memory Bloat Hunt for the last week I have read that mail at least used to be a cause for concern so there may be something about this.
Why does this happen? How can I solve it, or at least troubleshoot it further? Could it be any other Rails default middleware?
IMO a better way to send notifications in rails is via the airbrake gem. You could run an instance of errbit to save some money or sign up to use airbrake itself. This also has the benefit of giving you a lot more flexibility in how you receive the notifications too, e.g. pushover, and you'll receive full stack traces that you can act upon vs having to hunt through the logs.
You can use ExceptionMailer(whatever).deliver_later to defer this task to a background job which will free up some memory.
Related
I'm getting the following error after upgrading to Rails 4:
.../ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/actionpack-4.0.0.rc2/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/stack.rb:125:in 'assert_index': No such middleware to insert before: Rack::Lock (RuntimeError)
The offending line is my "remove slashes" rack-rewrite rule:
config.middleware.insert_before(Rack::Lock, Rack::Rewrite) do
r301 %r{^/(.*)/$}, '/$1', :headers => {'Cache-Control' => 'public, max-age='+2.week.to_s}
end
Any ideas?
As the error suggests ("No such middleware to insert before"), the issue is with the middleware you are trying to insert before (and not the middleware you are trying to insert, which was my initial assumption).
In Rails4, threading is enabled by default which removes Rack::Lock.
To find a replacement, you can run rake middleware from your rails project directory, and look for something near the start of the stack. I'm going to pick Rack::Runtime as it is early in the stack, and seems pretty standard.
So the rewrite config is now:
config.middleware.insert_before(Rack::Runtime, Rack::Rewrite) do
r301 %r{^/(.*)/$}, '/$1', :headers => {'Cache-Control' => 'public, max-age='+2.week.to_s}
end
I have found it difficult to send exceptions of my Rails 3 app via the Airbrake gem. At first I thought there was an Airbrake configuration error on my part, but after trial and error and reading the documentation (https://github.com/thoughtbot/airbrake#readme) very closely, I found out that Airbrake does not report errors when an app is running in the development environment. It does report errors when the app is running in the production environment.
Is there a flag to generate an Airbrake configuration file that automatically includes the development environment in the list of environments in which notifications should not be sent?
Currently I am executing the command listed in the README
script/rails generate airbrake --api-key your_key_here
Straightforward.
config.consider_all_requests_local = false
instead of
config.consider_all_requests_local = true
in your config/environments/development.rb. In my case, like I suspect in many others, it was just a temporary change so I can "test" Airbrake's notify_airbrake.
You do need config.development_environments = [] in airbrake.rb
Not sure about a config options, but you can explicitly send notifications to Airbrake from a controller using
notify_airbrake(exception)
So to do this in development, you could catch all errors in your application_controller, send a notification and then handle the errors as before. Take a look at rescue_from to get started. This is how I'm doing this to get notifications from my staging environment (or, to be exact, any environment other than development and test).
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
rescue_from Exception, :with => :render_error
private
def render_error(exception)
render :file => "#{Rails.root}/public/500.html", :layout => false, :status => 500
logger.error(exception)
notify_airbrake(exception) unless Rails.env.development? || Rails.env.test?
end
end
I've been trying to figure out how to send delayed mail using delayed_job with rails 3. I've tried pretty much every combination of feasible possibilities I can think of - I can get the mail to run in the background, I just can't get it to delay the sending to a future time. The delayed_jobs table in the db clears the tasks, the log says 'sent', the delayed_job task processor picks up the task & says sent without failure...but the mail is either:
sent immediately, or
simply doesn't arrive
if I try to send in the future.
If anyone could offer a bare-bones example of a rails 3 delayed_job that sends mail in the future, I'd be really appreciative. I'm sure lotsa folks do this so I suspect I'm missing something obvious. One (of countless) combinations I've tried below:
delayed_job: 2.1.2
rails: 3.0.3
actionmailer: 3.0.3
Controller:
class TestmailerController < ApplicationController
def index
Testmailer.delay.test_mail
end
end
Mailer:
class Testmailer < ActionMailer::Base
def test_mail
mail(:to => '(myemailaddress#removedforprivacy.com', :from => '(removedforprivacy)#gmail.com', :subject => 'Testing Delayed Job', :content_type => 'text/plain').deliver
end
handle_asynchronously :test_mail, :run_at => Proc.new { 2.minutes.from_now }
end
relevant mail part of config/environments/development.rb:
# Don't care if the mailer can't send
config.action_mailer.raise_delivery_errors = true
# Print deprecation notices to the Rails logger
config.active_support.deprecation = :log
config.action_mailer.default_url_options = { :host => 'localhost:3000' }
ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings = {
:address => "smtp.gmail.com",
:port => 587,
:domain => "gmail.com",
:user_name => "(removedforprivacy)",
:password => "(removedforprivacy)",
:authentication => "plain",
:enable_starttls_auto => true
}
Job command:
rake jobs:work
I agree with andrea - I was having this exact problem, and after switching my local development database from sqlite to mysql, I can run code like
Emailer.delay({:run_at => 5.minutes.from_now}).welcome(#user)
and it sends the email 5 minutes later. Note that you might need a bigger delay than five minutes (in case of time zone weirdness) to be sure it is working.
I found in Rails 3 with mongoid that removing the handle_asynchronously line gets it to work. I was having all kinds of problems, and it appeared that delayed_job wasn't recognizing any objects within my Emailer class. Removing handle_asynchronously fixed it.
Both using the .delay method and setting handle_asynchronously :test_mail is redundant. Try removing the .delay method from your code. use simply
Testmailer.test_mail # without .deliver due to a delayed_job issue
However, I ran some test on your configuration and when using sqlite, run_at is simply ignored (do not know why), but when using mysql2 everything works fine.
1 The following is more to point out to the code devs an issue of rails that can be percieved as a flaw.
2 And also me asking some oppinions from people who know better.
I want to add WebDAV to my Rails 3 App with Warden authentication. My warden middleware is injected via Devise.
http://github.com/chrisroberts/dav4rack
http://github.com/hassox/warden
http://github.com/plataformatec/devise
I cannot mount DAV4Rack handlers from inside rails app (routes), like this:
# in config/routes.rb
mount DAV4Rack::Handler.new(
:root => Rails.root.to_s, # <= it's just an example
:root_uri_path => '/webdav',
:resource_class => Dav::DocumentResource # <= my custom resource, you could use FileResource from dav4rack
), :at => "/webdav"
because rails validates HTTP verbs (GET POST PUT ..), and webdav uses HTTP extensions like PROPFIND that do not validate, throwing the following exception:
ActionController::UnknownHttpMethod (PROPFIND, accepted HTTP methods are get, head, put, post, delete, and options)
This validation takes place in ActionDispatch:
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.0.0/lib/action_dispatch/http/request.rb +56 +72
in (56) "def request_method" and (72) "def method"
Sample code from ActionDispatch that does the validation, to make things clear:
def method
#method ||= begin
method = env["rack.methodoverride.original_method"] || env['REQUEST_METHOD']
HTTP_METHOD_LOOKUP[method] || raise(ActionController::UnknownHttpMethod, "#{method}, accepted HTTP methods are #{HTTP_METHODS.to_sentence(:locale => :en)}")
method
end
end
In theory, we could monkey-patch this validation to comply with webdav verbs like the railsdav project used to do (note that is rails 2 there, in rails 3 one needs to monkey-patch action_dispatch/http/request).
To add DAV4Rack handlers to the rails app I have to mount the handler outside of ActionDispatch, at rack level, like this:
# config.ru
require ::File.expand_path('../config/environment', __FILE__)
require 'dav4rack/interceptor'
require 'dav/document_resource'
app = Rack::Builder.new{
map '/webdav/' do
run DAV4Rack::Handler.new(
:root => Rails.root.to_s,
:root_uri_path => '/webdav',
:resource_class => Dav::DocumentResource
)
end
map '/' do
use DAV4Rack::Interceptor, :mappings => {
'/webdav/' => {
:resource_class => Dav::DocumentResource
},
}
run Pmp::Application
end
}.to_app
run app
Now I have Webdav support in my application. But It still needs authentication, and for that I'd like to use warden.
# in document_resource.rb
def check_authentication
puts request.env['warden'] # nil :(
end
Warden is nil because my DAV4Rack::Handler is mounted above the session and warden middleware.
Using "rake middleware" to inspect my stack I can see the following:
> rake middleware
use ActionDispatch::Static
use Rack::Lock
use ActiveSupport::Cache::Strategy::LocalCache
use Rack::Runtime
use Rails::Rack::Logger
use ActionDispatch::ShowExceptions
use ActionDispatch::RemoteIp
use Rack::Sendfile
use ActionDispatch::Callbacks
use ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::ConnectionManagement
use ActiveRecord::QueryCache
use ActionDispatch::Cookies
use ActionDispatch::Session::CookieStore
use ActionDispatch::Flash
use ActionDispatch::ParamsParser
use Rack::MethodOverride
use ActionDispatch::Head
use ActionDispatch::BestStandardsSupport
use Warden::Manager
run Pmp::Application.routes
I believe that by wrapping "Pmp::Application.routes" with DAV handler (just like I do above for "Pmp::Application" in config.ru) will inject my webdav handler in the stack at the right place to satisfy the two conditions:
Be above ActionDispatch method validation code, to avoid ActionController::UnknownHttpMethod
Be below session and Warden::Manager so I can use warden authentication.
How to do that? Looking at "rake middleware" otput it seems obvious to override the "Pmp::Application.routes" method:
# in my app at APP_ROOT/config/application.rb
# override the routes method inherited from Rails::Application#routes
def routes
routes_app = super
app = Rack::Builder.new {
map '/webdav/' do
run DAV4Rack::Handler.new(
:root => Rails.root.to_s,
:root_uri_path => '/webdav',
:resource_class => Dav::DocumentResource
)
end
map '/' do
use DAV4Rack::Interceptor, :mappings => {
'/webdav/' => {
:resource_class => Dav::DocumentResource
},
}
run routes_app
end
}.to_app
class << app; self end.class_eval do
attr_accessor :routes_app
def method_missing(sym, *args, &block)
routes_app.send sym, *args, &block
end
end
app.routes_app = routes_app
app
end
Because our new rack application "app" will be asked a few methods down the chain, that the old rack application "routes_app" used to resopnd to, we delegate theese to the old original application "routes_app" with a little method_missing magic.
And voila: everything is working!
Great success.
Only one problem: I don't like it. There must be a better way to do all this enveloping, other than overriding routes method.
Note that this doesn't work with passenger. The best way seems to be monkey patching rails.
See: dav4rack wiki
THE BIG QUESTION:
IS THERE A BETTER WAY TO ADD A RACK APP JUST ABOVE THE "Pmp::Application#routes" APP BY MEANS OF RACK MOUNT OR OTHER ???
THE BIG CONCLUSION
The "mount" semantics in routes.rb should be rack-level (not rails/railtie/whatever), to allow, in this way, handeling of HTTP extensions, or at least have a method for this case "mount_rack"
And we have a winner.
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/5895-allow-mounting-of-rack-apps-that-deal-with-http-extensions
I'm on Heroku, and emails don't get sent out in development, but are properly being sent in production. I'd like to run a seperate staging instance on Heroku, but don't want emails being sent out (just to a log).
This line in test.rb tells ActionMailer not to deliver emails:
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :test
Instead, they are accumulated in the ActionMailer::Base.deliveries array.
You'll need to set up a staging environment for your application and configure Heroku to use that environment on your staging instance.
Applications that use the Mail gem (including rails >= 3.0 projects) can use the safety_mailer gem. Specify a domain (or set of domains, or magic word in email address) email is allowed to go to, and email to all other domains is silently dropped.
https://github.com/cluesque/safety_mailer
Add the gem to your Gemfile, specifying groups (probably not production) to include it in.
gem "safety_mailer", :group => :development
Don't forget to bundle install to install
In your environment file config/environments/development.rb configure it, and some regular expressions.
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :safety_mailer
config.action_mailer.safety_mailer_settings = {
allowed_matchers: [ /mydomain.com/, /mytestacct#gmail.com/, /super_secret_test/ ],
delivery_method: :smtp,
delivery_method_settings: {
:address => "smtp.mydomain.com",
:port => 25,
:domain => "mydomain.com",
:authentication => :plain,
:user_name => "mydomain_mailer#mydomain.com",
:password => "password"
}
}
... and now, email to anyone#mydomain.com, mytestacct#gmail.com, bob+super_secret_test#yahoo.com all get sent
and email to other recipients (like the real users in the production database you copied to a test server) is suppressed.
You might be interested in mailtrap.io (disclaimer: I am affiliated with this product). It is a perfect tool to test email deliveries in development and production. All you have to do is set mailtrap.io as an smtp server in your staging environment config:
config.action_mailer.smtp_settings = {
:address => "mailtrap.io",
:port => 2525,
:authentication => :plain,
:user_name => "LOGIN",
:password => "PASSWORD"
}
Having this all your test emails sent in staging env will be stored in mailtrap for view and sharing. But non of them will be sent to the real addresses. You can use it in development as well.
And by way - it's totally free!
put this in your environment.rb file
config.action_mailer.delivery_method = :test
It should stop sending mail to the mail server, I think there is a :log option, but I have not tried it out.
I see people suggest using Mailtrap.io. Good alternative is Debug Mail. Using is quite simple.
We use maildev, which you can install locally. Great for development and staging environments, easy to install in a variety of tech stacks.
Depending on your choices
If you want a convenient way of receiving emails for debugging, etc. I recommend https://github.com/fgrehm/letter_opener_web, which will save emails locally, and provide an URL to browse emails that were sent. No email is sent outside, and you can very conveniently see the output in your browser
If you want to be able to open email files with your email clients, you should choose a :file adapter for ActionMailer (configure in config/environments/your_env.rb)
If you want a real production-like environment, I'd suggest to configure an email interceptor that would rewrite the TO/CC/BCC to a real mailbox of your choice, this way you can keep and test your original ActionMailer adapter
if Rails.env.staging?
class TestEmailsInterceptor
def self.delivering_email(mail)
mail.to = ['My Test Box <test-box#example.com>']
# remove bcc, cc, etc.
end
end
ActionMailer::Base.register_interceptor(TestEmailsInterceptor)
end