I wrote my own ORM framework (something along the lines of CoreData or Realm), and also wrote quite a few tests in Xcode for it.
Now I want to introduce an additional encoding format used for storing data on disk, but I also want to keep supporting the original encoding format.
Is there a good strategy to run my all my existing -test* methods for both encoding formats without duplicating the existing test code?
The easiest way I have found is to just create a new test target and add all the same test classes to it. If you want them run in one go, create a target that has both of these test targets as dependencies (or just runs them manually).
How you parametrize for your different targets is up to you, we've successfully used two implementations of a category that has the definition that varies.
Related
I want to use only a few filters within GPUImage2 in my swift project, how can I tailor GPUImage2 to only a few filters that I need?
I am not familiar with the code base, and I don't see any documentation on this.
P.S. My concern is mostly about app size, if including everything doesn't bloat the app size, I am OK with importing GPUImage as a whole.
This is a common question for people who want to shrink their binary size by only bringing over the operations they need, so I'll see if I can provide a canonical reference.
The easiest way to do this is to remove the dependency on GPUImage from your project and instead manually copy into your project just the files necessary to build the core components of the framework. The platform-independent core files are these:
CameraConversion.swift
SerialDispatch.swift
BasicOperation.swift
Color.swift
FillMode.swift
Matrix.swift
OpenGLContext_Shared.swift
Timestamp.swift
OpenGLRendering.swift
ShaderProgram.swift
ShaderUniformSettings.swift
Framebuffer.swift
FramebufferCache.swift
Position.swift
Size.swift
Pipeline.swift
ImageOrientation.swift
The following files also need to come over, but they have platform-specific (Mac, iOS, or Linux) variants, so you'll either need to choose the ones for your specific platform target or selectively include them to each of your various targets:
PictureInput.swift
PictureOutput.swift
MovieInput.swift
MovieOutput.swift
Camera.swift
OpenGLContext.swift
RenderView.swift
With those files, you should be able to build a project that can perform image processing in the same manner as GPUImage, but without the long list of operations. If you have one or two operations you want to bring over, you can selectively copy those files into your project. You might need to copy over one or two dependencies if they are subclassed from another operation.
I started working at a company which developed an App for mobile payment. There is a "Terminal"-App, which receives payments of customers and then there's the "Wallet"-App, which users can download and use to pay (at those terminals).
The project consists out of 2 targets - one for the Wallet and one for the Terminal. The App is used only in 2 Countries. It's all quite sophisticated and has a huge code base.
Now I need to whitelabel the whole product for a client, who wants to use our App (both targets) with his own branding (and maybe some additional features or without some specific features) and I'm not sure what the best way would be to achieve that.
Currently I see 3 options:
Duplicate whole project
To copy the whole project to a new folder and make my changes in that new folder would probably be the most "dirty" approach. At some point, my first code base could differ from the duplicated one too much. Additionally, if any security-related issues would come up, I would have to fix it in both projects.
Create another 2 targets
I was actually thinking that this would be the best way to go. Creating a new target for the Wallet and the Terminal and then checking the current target in the source code to decide which features should be enabled or disabled sounded pretty good to me at the beginning. But then I created the new target and noticed that I will have to set that checkmark on EVERY single class for that new target. Besides that, I'm not sure any more if that's really the best way to go.
Use If-conditions
The third option would be to wrap every function, that will be available in only one of the apps, with an if loop. I see this as the "cheapest" option because it's easy to set up and I can still maintain my code base pretty well.
Is there any other option I have? Which way would yo go?
The most significant difference between the base App and the whitelabeled one will be its language. The whitelabeled version will be right to left, but iOS does a pretty good job on that without needing me to do all the mirroring.
You definitely want the extra targets. Having a new target means it's easy to use a separate bundle identifier, signing settings and more. It might seem like a pain to have to tick a bunch of boxes to add your files to the new target (perhaps quicker to use the target's Build Phase|Compile Sources list in Xcode) but it's worth it to create a real separation between the apps.
Instead of using a bunch of source code checks to determine which white label app you're in, consider making your app more data-driven. A plist file could be used to determine which capabilities your app has, and a different plist file can be used for each target.
For example, it might contain a top-level dictionary called features, with true/false values for a bunch of feature names. You have a FeatureManager that reads the file and is the single source of truth for all app components that want to know if something should be available or not.
I once asked a question related to XCTests. And in one of the answers I was told that it is a common practice to use a separate test target (other than the main app) when running unit tests (at least, in iOS development). I tried to find some sources about it, but I couldn't
I understand, that it is probably a best practice, so I would really like to understand it. Could someone explain to me why is it important, what benefits do I get from it and how should I go about doing it? Links to some articles explaining the issue will be much appreciated.
P.S. I understand that I need special environment for tests (fake in-memory database, mocked networking layer, etc.), but up until now I managed to achieve it without a separate test host. But I believe that there might be a better way.
To answer your points:
Why is using a separate test target important?
Separation of concerns. A unit test target does not have the same kind of structure as a regular app target - it contains a test bundle, which references the app target under test, as well as the test classes and any helper classes required. It is not a duplicate of the app target with test code added to it - in fact it should not even contain the code under test. This means that you don't have to make any special effort to keep the test target in sync with the main app target - the fact that the test bundle loads the main app handles all that for you. (You made a comment on Richard Ross's answer to your previous q suggesting you've run into the difficulties duplication causes already).
How should I go about doing this? (checked on Xcode 7).
Assuming you are wanting to add a target to an existing project that doesn't have any tests, select the main project, and then click on the '+' beneath the list of targets in the project. You can also use the File->New->Target menu option.
You'll see a menu asking you to choose a template for your new target. Select 'Test' and within test select 'iOS Unit Testing Bundle'.
Check the fields in the next screen - they should be correct by default - but you might want to double check the 'Target to be Tested' field value is correct if you have a lot of targets in the project/workspace. Click 'OK' and you should have a functioning unit test bundle, with an example test that you should be able to run using Apple-U or Product->Test You'll still need to #import the app classes if you're using ObjC.
If you are creating a new project, all you need to do is tick the 'Include Unit Test' box when creating the project - no other steps are required.
Apple Docs (with links to relevant WWDC presentations)
Tutorials. Most of the tutorials around are a bit out of date. But not that much has changed, so just look at the docs and figure it out. The two below might be useful, otherwise just google. From a quick glance, most of them seem to assume that the project had unit tests set up at the beginning
http://www.raywenderlich.com/22590/beginning-automated-testing-with-xcode-part-12 (2012/iOS 6, but the process is still broadly the same. Also deals with Jenkins, Git and running tests from the CLI).
Unit testing in OSX - most recent post - not iOS, I know, but more up to date than most of the iOS tutorials (Oct 2015), and gives step by step instructions (including setting the unit test target in the build schemes, which probably won't be necessary in your case). Probably worth a look anyway.
I am a (very) novice iOS/Swift programmer with a basic question about moving reusable software objects to their own ... something.
I am developing three iPhone apps that present information from three distinct data sets. Those data sets contain unique information but are structurally similar. As such, the apps share some Swift classes that are identical, specifically the classes that model the data. As I continually refactor the code, I find that when I tweak a class in one app's project, I have to remember to go to the other two projects and make the same tweaks to the same classes for those apps. It's getting to be a big headache.
What I would like to do is have one class definition in its own ... something that I can share, link, import, or attach to/from each app's project. From my online research, I suspect that the ... something is a library? or maybe it's a framework? or a module? I have found all three terms are used, but I am not sure how they relate to each other.
Given that all of the software I am writing is in Swift, does Xcode support what I am trying to do? Thank you!
It seems you have the issue of needing the same Swift class in multiple projects. You could build a Framework (aka Module) for this class then copy it in to each project. This is probably the formally correct approach but it is a bit of overkill for just a single class.
Instead, you could just make the file in the Navigator panel a reference in each project to the one actual file.
You could also make a Workspace and then put each project into the workspace and just have the file at the top level (but this may introduce some build complexity).
I want to make multiple apps which share the same structure and code, but have different images, fonts, names and urls.
I would like a simple way to make this apps without replicating the whole project, so that when I find a bug I'll have to correct it only once.
Thank you.
PS: It isn't important the language (Objective-C or Swift)
Create multiple targets within the same project. You can then include or exclude asset catalogues, configuration JSON files etc. on a per-target basis. If you're consistent with the names this should get you most of the way there. You can also look at target-specific build flags or constants.