Is it possible to override the [Remote] command in Edit only? [duplicate] - asp.net-mvc

At the link below I asked a question about how to ensure a field does not already contain the same value (for example when there is a unique constraint on a field which correctly causes C# to throw an exception when voilated). With the answer I received, it solved that problem but presented another.
Ensuring another record does not already contain the same value for a field
The main issue I now have is that when I create a new View. The validation works as expected. In brief - The system needs to check that the ViewName and ViewPath (route) are both unique so a search of the DB is required.
However, when I edit the view, the validation kicks in again (and it actually should not because obviously the view exists already because you are editing it).
My issue now is how do I customise the remote validation to work differently for edit vs create. While we should not be able to edit the name of a view to match an existing view, we should also not be stopped from saving the current view simply because it is the same as the current view.
Below is my Model (the part that is not (hopefully) generated by a tool :-):
[MetadataType(typeof(IViewMetaData))]
public partial class View : IViewMetaData { }
public interface IViewMetaData
{
[Required(AllowEmptyStrings = false, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(DALResources), ErrorMessageResourceName = "ErrorRequiredField")]
[StringLength(50, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(DALResources), ErrorMessageResourceName = "ErrorLessThanCharacters")]
[Display(ResourceType = typeof(DALResources), Name = "ViewName")]
[Remote("IsViewNameAvailable", "Validation")]
string ViewName { get; set; }
[Required(AllowEmptyStrings = false, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(DALResources), ErrorMessageResourceName = "ErrorRequiredField")]
[StringLength(400, ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(DALResources), ErrorMessageResourceName = "ErrorLessThanCharacters")]
[Display(ResourceType = typeof(DALResources), Name = "ViewPath")]
[Remote("IsViewPathAvailable", "Validation")]
string ViewPath { get; set; }
[Display(ResourceType = typeof(DALResources), Name = "ViewContent")]
string ViewContent { get; set; }
}
The part I am having a problem with is the [Remote] validation attribute which is defined below:
[OutputCache(Location = OutputCacheLocation.None, NoStore = true)]
public class ValidationController : Controller
{
private FRCMSV1Entities db = new FRCMSV1Entities();
public JsonResult IsViewNameAvailable(View view)
{
bool isViewNameInvalid = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewName == view.ViewName && v.Id != view.Id);
if (!isViewNameInvalid)
return Json(true, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
string suggestedViewName = string.Format(UI_Prototype_MVC_Resources.ErrorViewAlreadyExists, view.ViewName);
for (int i = 1; i < 100; i++)
{
string altViewName = view.ViewName + i.ToString();
bool doesAltViewNameExist = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewName == altViewName);
if (!doesAltViewNameExist)
{
suggestedViewName = string.Format(UI_Prototype_MVC_Resources.ErrorViewNotAvailableTry, view.ViewName, altViewName);
break;
}
}
return Json(suggestedViewName, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
public JsonResult IsViewPathAvailable(View view)
{
bool doesViewPathExist = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewPath == view.ViewPath && v.Id != view.Id);
if (!doesViewPathExist)
return Json(true, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
string suggestedViewPath = string.Format(UI_Prototype_MVC_Resources.ErrorViewAlreadyExists, view.ViewPath);
for (int i = 1; i < 100; i++)
{
string altViewPath = view.ViewPath + i.ToString();
bool doesAltViewPathExist = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewPath == altViewPath);
if (!doesAltViewPathExist)
{
suggestedViewPath = string.Format(UI_Prototype_MVC_Resources.ErrorViewNotAvailableTry, view.ViewPath, altViewPath);
break;
}
}
return Json(suggestedViewPath, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
}
The problem is, the validation needs to work the same on both create and edit. It just needs to do an additional check on edit to ensure we are still referring to the same record and if so, then there is no need to show the validation message because there is nothing wrong.
My question is:
1. How do I get this to work as expected.
2. I can see that both methods are pretty much identical, which violates the DRY principle. How can I make this more generic and simplify it. However the first question is really the one I would like answered because there is no point in refactoring something that doesn't work.
For more information, the above code is also an edit of the code at the following link:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg508808(VS.98).aspx
Thanks for any help.

You need to add a parameter to pass the ID property of the model as AdditionalFields. Assuming its int Id, then
[Remote("IsViewPathAvailable", "Validation", AdditionalFields = "Id")]
public string ViewName { get; set; }
and the the method should be
public JsonResult IsViewNameAvailable(string viewName, int? id)
Note that in the Edit view, you include a hidden input for the Id property, so its value will be posted back by the jquery.validate remote function.
You can then check if the id parameter is null (i.e. it's new) or has a value (it's existing) and adjust the queries to suit.
bool isViewNameInvalid;
if (id.HasValue)
{
isViewNameInvalid = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewName == viewName && v.Id != id);
}
else
{
isViewNameInvalid = db.View.Any(v => v.ViewName == ViewName);
}
What is currently happening is that the Remote is only posting the value of the ViewName property, and because your parameter is the model, it is initialized with the default id value (0) and your query is translated to Any(v => v.ViewName == viewName && v.Id != 0);
I also recommend using a view model rather that your partial class
Side note: from the code that generates suggestedViewName, your expecting a lot of ViewName with the same value, meaning your possibly making numerous database calls inside you for loop. You could consider using linq .StartsWith() query to get all the records that start with your ViewName value, and then check the in-memory set in your loop.

Related

What's the return value of DBSet.Add(object o)

Consider the situation.
I have a userlogin table. the userlogin has the following fields.
userid(identity(1,1)), username(unique), password(string)
I have another table, userRole with following fields.
userid(fk referencing userlogin), role(string)
Now suppose I want to add an admin user to my empty application database.
What I am currently doing is:
// Check Userlogin if it contains adminuser1 as username, if not, add adminuser1 with password xyz.
UserLogin login = new UserLogin();
login.username = "adminuser1";
login.password = "xyz";
context.UserLogins.Add(login);
context.SaveChanges();
// query again from database to get the userid
Userlogin user = context.UserLogins.Single(l => (l.username == "adminuser1") && (l.password == "xyz"));
int userid = user.userid;
UserRole admin = new UserRole();
admin.userid = userid;
admin.role = "admin";
context.UserRoles.Add(admin);
context.SaveChanges();
I want to make it a less troublesome, if we can get the userid of userRecently Added, without making another request.
I mean I want to do this if it is possible.
UserLogin login = new UserLogin();
login.username = "adminuser1";
login.password = "xyz";
UserLogin user = context.UserLogins.Add(login);
UserRole admin = new UserRole();
admin.userid = user.userid;
admin.role = "admin";
context.UserRoles.Add(admin);
context.SaveChanges();
Update
I also wanted to know if there is some way to do
context.UserLogins.Single(l => l == login);
instead of
context.UserLogins.Single(l => (l.username == "adminuser1") && (l.password=="xyz"));
because I use the same method in large classes in many fields.
It can be different based on your needs but you can have something like:
public class UserRole
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string role { get; set; }
}
public class UserLogin
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string username { get; set; }
public string password { get; set; }
public UserRole Role { get; set; }
}
and then use them like:
var login = new UserLogin
{
username = "adminuser1",
password = "xyz"
};
var admin = context.UserRoles.Single(_=> _.role == "admin");
if (admin == null)
{
admin = new UserRole
{
role = "admin"
};
}
login.Role = admin;
context.UserLogins.Add(login);
context.SaveChanges();
Your models' relationship seems wrong but based on your information you can have this:
var login = context.UserLogins.Single(_ => _.username == "adminuser1");
if (login == null)
{
login = new UserLogin();
login.username = "adminuser1";
login.password = "xyz";
context.UserLogins.Add(login);
context.SaveChanges();
}
else
{
// this user already exists.
}
var admin = context.UserRoles.Single(_ => _.role == "admin");
if (admin == null)
{
admin.userid = login.userid;
admin.role = "admin";
context.UserRoles.Add(admin);
context.SaveChanges();
}
else
{
// the role already exists.
}
context.UserLogins.Single(l => l == login); would not work for you! you have to query DB based on your model key, not whole model data!
For the question
What's the return value of DBSet.Add(object o)
The answer is: it will return the same object o(i.e. without the userid). Simply because userid is an identity column and relies on the database, its value is only available after context.SaveChanges() is called. Since Add() method only registers that a change will take place after SaveChanges() is called.
For the answer to update,
Instead of using
context.UserLogins.Single(l => (l.username == "adminuser1") && (l.password=="xyz"));
For classes that have many fields, I can check if there are any unique columns. For example. I could use, simply
context.UserLogins.Single(l => l.username == "adminuser1");
Just because, username(unique) is specified in the question.
I would rather recommend people use a single Stored Procedure. The calling of context.SaveChanges() and the context.xyz.Single() require opening database connection multiple times. For optimising performance you can use Stored Procedures, as they require only one connection per task. For more information.
Understang Performance Considerations
As I am using database first approach, I found this link also helpful.
Use Stored Procedure in Entity Framework
Thanks :)

Error based on Remote Validation in mvc

This is my controller code:
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public JsonResult CheckBuildingName()
{
var isUnique = true;
string _buildingName = Request.Form["buildingName"]; // put your control name here
var connectionstring = ConnectionProvider();
AddBuildingModel model = new AddBuildingModel();
using (var context = new Notifier.AccountDatabase(connectionstring))
{
var objBuilding = (from building in context.Buildings
where building.buildingName == model.buildingName && building.buildingActive == true
select building).FirstOrDefault();
if (objBuilding == null)
{
isUnique = true;
}
else
{
isUnique = false;
}
}
if (isUnique == false)
{
return Json("Building already taken, Pleaes try with different name.", JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
else
{
return Json(true, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
}
}
and my model is like below:
[System.ComponentModel.DisplayName("buildingName")]
[Remote("CheckBuildingName", "ConfigLocationController",ErrorMessage = "Building already exists!")]
public string buildingName { get; set; }
I am getting errors on this. The controller path cannot be found out or does not implement IController. What does that mean. Am I missing something ? Or is my code completely wrong. ? Please help
The reason for the error is that your RemoteAttribute is calling the CheckBuildingName method of ConfigLocationControllerController. Assuming that you controller is actually named ConfigLocationController, then you attributes need to be
[Display(Name = "Building Name")] // use this attribute, not DisplayName
[Remote("CheckBuildingName", "ConfigLocation",ErrorMessage = "Building already exists!")]
public string buildingName { get; set; }
However your method also contains errors. You initialize a new instance of a model and then use the value of its buildingName property (which will be null) in your query so it will always return null. In additional, you should add a parameter for the value your ajax call is submitting rather than using Request.Form. You method can be simply
[HttpPost]
public JsonResult CheckBuildingName(string buildingName)
{
bool exists = context.Buildings.Any(x => x.buildingName == buildingName && x.buildingActive);
return Json(!exists, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
which will return true if there is no match, or false if there is, in which case the message you have defined in the attribute will be displayed in the view assuming you have included #Html.ValidationMessageFor(m => m.buildingName)

passing dynamic model in MVC5 Razor View [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Dynamic Anonymous type in Razor causes RuntimeBinderException
(12 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I'm trying to pass dynamic results to View from Controller, method ShowColor returns dynamic results. In View I try to loop through the collection but I'm getting error
'object' does not contain a definition for 'ColorID'.
I have the following code in Controller and View
public class myColor
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Like { get; set; }
}
public dynamic ShowColor()
{
IList<myColor> color = new List<myColor>();
color.Add(new myColor { ID = 1, Name = "Red", Like = "***" });
color.Add(new myColor { ID = 2, Name = "Green", Like = "*****" });
color.Add(new myColor { ID = 3, Name = "Blue", Like = "**" });
color.Add(new myColor { ID = 4, Name = "Yellow", Like = "*" });
var select = (from c in color
select new
{
ColorID = c.ID,
ColorName = c.Name
}).ToList();
return select;
}
public ActionResult DBDynamic()
{
return View(ShowColor());
}
View
#model dynamic
#{
ViewBag.Title = "DBDynamic";
}
<h2>DBDynamic</h2>
<p>
<ul>
#foreach (var m in Model)
{
<li> #m.ColorID</li>
}
</ul>
</p>
Found the solution here and a nice blog here:
public static ExpandoObject ToExpando(this object anonymousObject)
{
IDictionary<string, object> expando = new ExpandoObject();
foreach (PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor in TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(anonymousObject))
{
var obj = propertyDescriptor.GetValue(anonymousObject);
expando.Add(propertyDescriptor.Name, obj);
}
return (ExpandoObject)expando;
}
And call it like this
var select = (from c in color
select new
{
ColorID = c.ID,
ColorName = c.Name
})
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(x => x.ToExpando());
return View(select);
An anonymous object is not the same thing as a dynamic. If you want to use it like a dynamic then cast it to that:
#foreach (dynamic m in Model)
However, dynamics are best avoided if at all possible. You lose all compile-time checking and even intellisense. You won't know if you fat-fingered a property name until runtime or even if you've accidentally used the wrong type of thing the wrong way until runtime. If something is broken, you want to know about it at compile-time, not when it's already live and affecting users, when you may not even know that an error has occurred unless a user notifies you. That's a horrible situation for your app to be in.
Long and short, use strong types. If you want something with properties, ColorID and ColorName, create a view model with those properties and select your query into instances of that type. Then, everything will be nice and strongly-typed and you'll know well in advance if there's some error or problem with your code.

If input box value is empty don't pass to database. Razor / Webmatrix

So i got a form with some questions, and i want that if an input box is empty the value do not pass to database.
How can i achieve that with razor/webmatrix ?
var questionOne = Request.Form["QuestionOne"];
var questionTwo = Request.Form["QuestionTwo"];
var questionThree = Request.Form["QuestionThree"];
if (IsPost && Validation.IsValid()) {
if(ModelState.IsValid) {
// Execute to Database
}
}
By implementing simple code:
if(string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(questionOne) == false)
{
//Put it into the database
}
you can check this by using an attribute that does not allow an empty value for the string
[Required]
[RegularExpression("^(?!\s*$).+", ErrorMessage = "it mast not be empty!")]
public string questionOne { get; set; }

ASP.NET MVC: How to maintain TextBox State when your ViewModel is a Collection/List/IEnumerable

I am using ASP.NET MVC 2 Beta. I can create a wizard like workflow using Steven Sanderson's technique (in his book Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework) except using Session instead of hidden form fields to preserve the data across requests. I can go back and forth between pages and maintain the values in a TextBox without any issue when my model is not a collection. An example would be a simple Person model:
public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public int Age { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
}
But I am unable to get this to work when I pass around an IEnumerable. In my view I am trying to run through the Model and generate a TextBox for Name and Email for each Person in the list. I can generate the form fine and I can submit the form with my values and go to Step2. But when I click the Back button in Step2 it takes me back to Step1 with an empty form. None of the fields that I previously populated are there. There must be something I am missing. Can somebody help me out?
Here is my View:
<% using (Html.BeginForm()) { %>
<% int index = 0;
foreach (var person in Model) { %>
<fieldset>
<%= Html.Hidden("persons.index", index.ToString())%>
<div>Name: <%= Html.TextBox("persons[" + index.ToString() + "].Name")%></div>
<div>Email: <%= Html.TextBox("persons[" + index.ToString() + "].Email")%></div>
</fieldset>
<% index++;
} %>
<p><input type="submit" name="btnNext" value="Next >>" /></p>
<% } %>
And here is my controller:
public class PersonListController : Controller
{
public IEnumerable<Person> persons;
protected override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
{
persons = (Session["persons"]
?? TempData["persons"]
?? new List<Person>()) as List<Person>;
// I've tried this with and without the prefix.
TryUpdateModel(persons, "persons");
}
protected override void OnResultExecuted(ResultExecutedContext filterContext)
{
Session["persons"] = persons;
if (filterContext.Result is RedirectToRouteResult)
TempData["persons"] = persons;
}
public ActionResult Step1(string btnBack, string btnNext)
{
if (btnNext != null)
return RedirectToAction("Step2");
// Setup some fake data
var personsList = new List<Person>
{
new Person { Name = "Jared", Email = "test#email.com", },
new Person { Name = "John", Email = "test2#email.com" }
};
// Populate the model with fake data the first time
// the action method is called only. This is to simulate
// pulling some data in from a DB.
if (persons == null || persons.Count() == 0)
persons = personsList;
return View(persons);
}
// Step2 is just a page that provides a back button to Step1
public ActionResult Step2(string btnBack, string btnNext)
{
if (btnBack != null)
return RedirectToAction("Step1");
return View(persons);
}
}
As far as I can tell, this is not supported in ASP.NET MVC 2 Beta, nor is it supported in ASP.NET MVC 2 RC. I dug through the MVC source code and it looks like Dictionaries are supported but not Models that are IEnumerable<> (or that contain nested IEnumerable objects) and it's inheritors like IList<>.
The issue is in the ViewDataDictionary class. Particularly, the GetPropertyValue method only provides a way to retrieve property values from dictionary properties (by calling GetIndexedPropertyValue) or simple properties by using the PropertyDescriptor.GetValue method to pull out the value.
To fix this, I created a GetCollectionPropertyValue method that handles Models that are collections (and even Models that contain nested collections). I am pasting the code here for reference. Note: I don't make any claims about elegance - in fact all the string parsing is pretty ugly, but it seems to be working. Here is the method:
// Can be used to pull out values from Models with collections and nested collections.
// E.g. Persons[0].Phones[3].AreaCode
private static ViewDataInfo GetCollectionPropertyValue(object indexableObject, string key)
{
Type enumerableType = TypeHelpers.ExtractGenericInterface(indexableObject.GetType(), typeof(IEnumerable<>));
if (enumerableType != null)
{
IList listOfModelElements = (IList)indexableObject;
int firstOpenBracketPosition = key.IndexOf('[');
int firstCloseBracketPosition = key.IndexOf(']');
string firstIndexString = key.Substring(firstOpenBracketPosition + 1, firstCloseBracketPosition - firstOpenBracketPosition - 1);
int firstIndex = 0;
bool canParse = int.TryParse(firstIndexString, out firstIndex);
object element = null;
// if the index was numeric we should be able to grab the element from the list
if (canParse)
element = listOfModelElements[firstIndex];
if (element != null)
{
int firstDotPosition = key.IndexOf('.');
int nextOpenBracketPosition = key.IndexOf('[', firstCloseBracketPosition);
PropertyDescriptor descriptor = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(element).Find(key.Substring(firstDotPosition + 1), true);
// If the Model has nested collections, we need to keep digging recursively
if (nextOpenBracketPosition >= 0)
{
string nextObjectName = key.Substring(firstDotPosition+1, nextOpenBracketPosition-firstDotPosition-1);
string nextKey = key.Substring(firstDotPosition + 1);
PropertyInfo property = element.GetType().GetProperty(nextObjectName);
object nestedCollection = property.GetValue(element,null);
// Recursively pull out the nested value
return GetCollectionPropertyValue(nestedCollection, nextKey);
}
else
{
return new ViewDataInfo(() => descriptor.GetValue(element))
{
Container = indexableObject,
PropertyDescriptor = descriptor
};
}
}
}
return null;
}
And here is the modified GetPropertyValue method which calls the new method:
private static ViewDataInfo GetPropertyValue(object container, string propertyName) {
// This method handles one "segment" of a complex property expression
// First, we try to evaluate the property based on its indexer
ViewDataInfo value = GetIndexedPropertyValue(container, propertyName);
if (value != null) {
return value;
}
// If the indexer didn't return anything useful, continue...
// If the container is a ViewDataDictionary then treat its Model property
// as the container instead of the ViewDataDictionary itself.
ViewDataDictionary vdd = container as ViewDataDictionary;
if (vdd != null) {
container = vdd.Model;
}
// Second, we try to evaluate the property based on the assumption
// that it is a collection of some sort (e.g. IList<>, IEnumerable<>)
value = GetCollectionPropertyValue(container, propertyName);
if (value != null)
{
return value;
}
// If the container is null, we're out of options
if (container == null) {
return null;
}
// Third, we try to use PropertyDescriptors and treat the expression as a property name
PropertyDescriptor descriptor = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(container).Find(propertyName, true);
if (descriptor == null) {
return null;
}
return new ViewDataInfo(() => descriptor.GetValue(container)) {
Container = container,
PropertyDescriptor = descriptor
};
}
Again, this is in the ViewDataDictionary.cs file in ASP.NET MVC 2 RC. Should I create a new issue to track this on the MVC codeplex site?

Resources