I have following code written by other person:
public enum MSEntity<T : Metable> {
case meta(MSMeta)
case entity(T)
public func value() -> T? {
guard case let MSEntity.entity(value) = self else {
return nil
}
return value
}
public func objectMeta() -> MSMeta {
switch self {
case .entity(let entity): return entity.meta
case .meta(let meta): return meta
}
}
}
I have following questions:
1) what is the point of doing case entity(T)? What is "value" of that enum case and for what it may be used for?
2) I can't understand public func value() func.
What is that guard checking? What is value? Can someone provide an example where similar code may be useful?
The enum seems to represent an object that can either only contain metadata or a entity with metadata.
It has 2 cases: meta represents an object with only metadata and that metadata is this case's associated value, entity represents an object that has a entity and metadata. This case's associated value is the object's entity, which contains metadata (so the constraint on T is Metable)
what is the point of doing case entity(T)? What is "value" of that enum case and for what it may be used for?
Well, for this you have to look at the docs or ask the person who wrote the code. As far as I'm concerned, MSEntity is an object that has 2 states:
only metadata (meta case)
entity and metadata (entity case)
So the entity case is there to represent that.
I can't understand public func value() func. What is that guard checking? What is value?
The value function seems to return the object's entity, but what if this object has no entity (i.e. self is actually in the meta case)? The author of this code decided to return nil. That is why there is a check: if self is in the meta case. The word value is part of the pattern matching. It might be clearer if I wrote it like this:
guard case let MSEntity.entity(let value) = self else {
Whatever is in the associated value of entity case is put into a variable called value, so that you can return it later.
The (MSMeta) and (T) associated values of the meta and entity cases, respectively.
The value() method (which IMO should be a computed property of type T?, rather than a function of type () -> T?) returns the associated value of the entity case, if self is entity, otherwise it returns nil (when the self is meta).
Related
In the documentation for #dynamicMemberLookup it says,
Apply this attribute to a class, structure, enumeration, or protocol to enable members to be looked up by name at runtime.
If I'm not mistaken, instance methods are considered members of a struct / class. However, when I try to call a function dynamically I get an error saying:
Dynamic key path member lookup cannot refer to instance method foo()
To reproduce the problem:
struct Person {
var name: String
var age: Int
func greet() {
print("hello, my name is \(name)")
}
}
#dynamicMemberLookup
struct Wrapper {
var value: Person
subscript<T>(dynamicMember keypath: KeyPath<Person, T>) -> T {
value[keyPath: keypath]
}
}
let person = Person(name: "John Doe", age: 21)
let wrapper = Wrapper(value: person)
wrapper.greet() // << Error: Dynamic key path member lookup cannot refer to instance method `greet()`
// Or
let function = wrapper.greet // << Error: Dynamic key path member lookup cannot refer to instance method `greet()`
function()
How can I dynamically call greet() using #dynamicMemberLookup? Is there any way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
Thanks in advance!
No, dynamicMemberLookup does not work for methods. As the signature of the subscript suggests, it only works for things that can be represented as a KeyPath. Method calls cannot be part of a key path. :(
Key-Path Expression
A key-path expression refers to a property or subscript of a type.
The path consists of property names, subscripts, optional-chaining
expressions, and forced unwrapping expressions. Each of these key-path
components can be repeated as many times as needed, in any order.
At compile time, a key-path expression is replaced by an instance of
the KeyPath class.
I suspect the reason why it is called "dynamic member lookup" is because it also works with subscripts. The alternative of dynamicPropertyOrSubscriptLookup is rather a mouthful isn't it?
One rather hacky fix would be to change greet into a computed property:
var greet: () -> Void { {
print("hello, my name is \(name)")
} }
If greet has had parameters, you could also change it into a subscript, but I think that is an even uglier solution.
How to get the raw value from a enum passing the key value? Must work for any enum types working like an extension of enum types.
Any mirror reflection, mappable or RawRepresentable solutions are welcome.
I would like something like this:
enum Test : String {
case One = "1"
}
Test.rawValueFromKey(keyValue: "One") // Must return "1"
// I don't want the solution below, I must get the rawValue through the key name as String.
Test.One.rawValue
I do need to get the rawValue passing the name of the key as a String. Otherwise, I will need to make a switch or many if/else conditions. I have a big Enum and I don't want to check the string passed in a switch for example and pass Test.One.rawValue. I would like to get the rawValue directly through the key as String, just like in a dictionary.
I also don't want the code below, because I have a Enum of 40 items and I think it is ugly to make a switch of 40 items.
switch keyValue {
case "One":
return Test.One.rawValue
break
}
I want something like this:
func rawValueFromKey (keyValue: String) -> Test {
// code here to get the rawValue through the keyValue as String
// return the proper Test Enum
}
I tried some possible solutions using Mirror reflection and enum iterations to find the rawValue through the keyValue but didn't work.
Please give the solution in both Swift 2 and 3.
Thanks
As far as I know, you can't reflect on types so I think you will be able to achieve this only with CustomReflectable or maybe using localized strings for mapping the values/keys. Invariably you'll have to map somehow.
Why not something like this? Sure you are just comparing Strings so it's potentially unsafe (if your enum would conform to CustomStringConvertible, etc), but you can't really avoid that.
I think CaseIterable is available only from Swift 4 though...
protocol KeyRepresentable: CaseIterable {
}
extension KeyRepresentable {
static func fromKey(key: String) -> Self? {
return Self
.allCases
.first { "\($0)" == key }
}
}
Usage:
enum Option: Int, KeyRepresentable {
case a = 1, b = 2
}
print(Option.fromKey(key: "a")?.rawValue)
I would like to know if it is possible to instantiate a realm object based on a string that is the class name of the realm object but without knowing what that string will be until it is provided.
For example:
for(_, object) in json["AllObjects"]{
let objectType = self.getRealmObjectBasedOnString(type: className, params: object.stringValue)
self.objectList.append(objectType)
}
Here I go through a json that I get and want to create a realm object from each json object in the array. The problem is that this method will be called several times and each time the only thing that will change is the className variable. So I would like to keep this logic in only one method instead of creating several methods with same logic or a huge and complicated if else that determines the realm object to be created.
Here is getRealmObjectBasedOnString
func getRealmObjectBasedOnString(type: String, params: String) -> Object{
switch type {
case "classA":
return ClassA(JSONString: params)!
case "classB":
return ClassB(JSONString: params)!
default:
return DefaultClass(JSONString: params)!
}
}
Can someone explain why this does not work and whether it is possible to accomplish what I want?
You can use NSClassFromString to get Realm object type from string, but keep in mind that Swift uses modules for nemespacing, so you'll need to add your app's module name before your class name.
guard let objectType = NSClassFromString("YourAppModuleName.\(json["className")") else {
// handle unexpected class here
}
let objectList = realm.objects(objectType)
Below I have a class, B, with a generic type and the generic type has a subclass type constraint. In a separate class, A, I create a dictionary property, values, with the key as String and value as B. Class A then has methods to return or set values in the dictionary such that the values are not constrained to a single type (they maintain their generic SomeType type which is a subclass of NSObject). However, this produces the following two errors noted inline below:
class A: NSObject {
var values = [String : B]()
func get<SomeType: NSObject>(key: String) -> B<SomeType>? {
// #1 Error on line below: cannot convert return expression of type 'B<NSObject>?' to return type 'B<SomeType>?'
return values[key]
}
func set<SomeType: NSObject>(key: String, value: B<SomeType>) {
// #2 Error on line below: cannot assign value of type 'B<SomeType>' to type 'B<NSObject>?'
values[key] = value
}
}
class B<SomeType: NSObject>: NSObject {
}
I've attempted various forms of declaring the values dictionary to tell the compiler that SomeType is a subclass of NSObject and everything is going to be ok, but have been unsuccessful. Similarly to this question, I'm a bit stumped because the methods define SomeType as a subclass of NSObject and therefore things appear to be type safe when setting and getting from values.
I could remove the generic types from the methods and instead force the type to be <NSObject>, but then I'd run into the same problem as noted here.
This may not be doing what you think it's doing:
var values = [String : B]()
This isn't really [String : B], it's [String : B<NSObject>]. (I'm actually kind of surprised that this is legal syntax; I'd be tempted to open a bugreport about that; B isn't a proper type in Swift.) You may realize this already, but it's the first important note.
The second important note is that generic types are not covariant in Swift. A Thing<Cat> is not a subtype of Thing<Animal>. There are some type-theory reasons for this, and there are some technical implementation reasons for this, but the important fact is that it's not possible in Swift.
If you need to hold a variety of B types, then you'll need to build a type eraser. In your case, the type eraser could possibly be B<NSObject> with something like this:
class B<SomeType: NSObject>: NSObject {
let value: SomeType
init(value: SomeType) {
self.value = value
}
func liftGeneric() -> B<NSObject> {
return B<NSObject>(value: value)
}
}
If you need to hold just one kind of B type, then make A generic as well.
I'm binding a table view to a collection of Results<Person> this result set can be filtered but normally it is not. The problem is that when I try to bind - say; person.children to the table view which is of type List<Person>. If I don't filter it, I don't get a Results<Person> type, so I need to have two different properties to store the dataset for the table. One for Results, one for List.
My question is... is there a way to return all records from a List as Results? Something similar to .all()? I have tried to use an empty NSPredicate, but this is not allowed and a property name must be specified. I want my function to be generic enough that it can be called on any List to obtain all Results. I don't want to have to specify say... .filter("firstName != ''") just to get all the results.
I have currently implemented something like this... But I'm curious if there's a better way.
extension List {
func all() -> Results<T> {
let primaryKey = T.primaryKey() ?? "id"
return self.filter("\(primaryKey) != ''")
}
}
EDIT: Looks like this implementation of All will not work for Objects with a primary key of type Int. Is there anyway to check an object's primary key type?
Using TRUEPREDICATE seems to work!
extension List {
/// Returns an Results object for all Objects in the List.
func all() -> Results<T> {
return self.filter("TRUEPREDICATE")
}
}