Is there a way to return several values in a function return statement (other than returning an object) like we can do in Go (or some other languages)?
For example, in Go we can do:
func vals() (int, int) {
return 3, 7
}
Can this be done in Dart? Something like this:
int, String foo() {
return 42, "foobar";
}
Dart doesn't support multiple return values.
You can return an array,
List foo() {
return [42, "foobar"];
}
or if you want the values be typed use a Tuple class like the package https://pub.dartlang.org/packages/tuple provides.
See also either for a way to return a value or an error.
I'd like to add that one of the main use-cases for multiple return values in Go is error handling which Dart handle's in its own way with Exceptions and failed promises.
Of course this leaves a few other use-cases, so let's see how code looks when using explicit tuples:
import 'package:tuple/tuple.dart';
Tuple2<int, String> demo() {
return new Tuple2(42, "life is good");
}
void main() {
final result = demo();
if (result.item1 > 20) {
print(result.item2);
}
}
Not quite as concise, but it's clean and expressive code. What I like most about it is that it doesn't need to change much once your quick experimental project really takes off and you start adding features and need to add more structure to keep on top of things.
class FormatResult {
bool changed;
String result;
FormatResult(this.changed, this.result);
}
FormatResult powerFormatter(String text) {
bool changed = false;
String result = text;
// secret implementation magic
// ...
return new FormatResult(changed, result);
}
void main() {
String draftCode = "print('Hello World.');";
final reformatted = powerFormatter(draftCode);
if (reformatted.changed) {
// some expensive operation involving servers in the cloud.
}
}
So, yes, it's not much of an improvement over Java, but it works, it is clear, and reasonably efficient for building UIs. And I really like how I can quickly hack things together (sometimes starting on DartPad in a break at work) and then add structure later when I know that the project will live on and grow.
Create a class:
import 'dart:core';
class Tuple<T1, T2> {
final T1 item1;
final T2 item2;
Tuple({
this.item1,
this.item2,
});
factory Tuple.fromJson(Map<String, dynamic> json) {
return Tuple(
item1: json['item1'],
item2: json['item2'],
);
}
}
Call it however you want!
Tuple<double, double>(i1, i2);
or
Tuple<double, double>.fromJson(jsonData);
You can create a class to return multiple values
Ej:
class NewClass {
final int number;
final String text;
NewClass(this.number, this.text);
}
Function that generates the values:
NewClass buildValues() {
return NewClass(42, 'foobar');
}
Print:
void printValues() {
print('${this.buildValues().number} ${this.buildValues().text}');
// 42 foobar
}
The proper way to return multiple values would be to store those values in a class, whether your own custom class or a Tuple. However, defining a separate class for every function is very inconvenient, and using Tuples can be error-prone since the members won't have meaningful names.
Another (admittedly gross and not very Dart-istic) approach is try to mimic the output-parameter approach typically used by C and C++. For example:
class OutputParameter<T> {
T value;
OutputParameter(this.value);
}
void foo(
OutputParameter<int> intOut,
OutputParameter<String>? optionalStringOut,
) {
intOut.value = 42;
optionalStringOut?.value = 'foobar';
}
void main() {
var theInt = OutputParameter(0);
var theString = OutputParameter('');
foo(theInt, theString);
print(theInt.value); // Prints: 42
print(theString.value); // Prints: foobar
}
It certainly can be a bit inconvenient for callers to have to use variable.value everywhere, but in some cases it might be worth the trade-off.
you can use dartz package for Returning multiple data types
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yMXUC4W1cc&t=110s
Dart is finalizing records, a fancier tuple essentially.
Should be in a stable release a month from the time of writing.
I'll try to update, it's already available with experiments flags.
you can use Set<Object> for returning multiple values,
Set<object> foo() {
return {'my string',0}
}
print(foo().first) //prints 'my string'
print(foo().last) //prints 0
In this type of situation in Dart, an easy solution could return a list then accessing the returned list as per your requirement. You can access the specific value by the index or the whole list by a simple for loop.
List func() {
return [false, 30, "Ashraful"];
}
void main() {
final list = func();
// to access specific list item
var item = list[2];
// to check runtime type
print(item.runtimeType);
// to access the whole list
for(int i=0; i<list.length; i++) {
print(list[i]);
}
}
I am very new to Dart so excuse me if I didnt see this part.
I want to make a union type e.g. for a function input. In TS this would be:
let variableInput: string | number
typedef doesnt really define types but functions and enums dont really help too.
On the other side how should it look like when a function return either one or the other of two types? There must be something I dont see here.
There are no union types in Dart.
The way to do this in Dart is returning/accepting dynamic as a type:
dynamic stringOrNumber() { ... }
void main() {
final value = stringOrNumber();
if (value is String) {
// Handle a string value.
} else if (value is num) {
// Handle a number.
} else {
throw ArgumentError.value(value);
}
}
See also: https://dart.dev/guides/language/sound-dart
Is there any way to use Strongly-Typed values in Examples table of the scenario? (or alternative solution)
I'd like to know if I made a typo in userType column already during the coding (not during running the test).
UPDATED
file.feature
Scenario Outline: Scenario123
Given Create new user of type "<userType>"
Examples:
| userType |
| PlatinumUser |
| CommonUser |
steps.cs
[Given(#"Create new user of type ""(.*)""")]
public void CreateNewUser(UserTypeEnum userType)
{
// some code like e.g.:
MyUser user = new MyUser(userType);
//...
}
enum UserTypeEnum { CommonUser, PlatinumUser, Spectre }
Looks like its a StepArgumentTransformation that you are after?
https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/wiki/Step-Argument-Conversions
Used somehow along these lines:
[Binding]
public class Transforms
{
[StepArgumentTransformation]
public UserTypeEnum UserTypeTransform(string UserType)
{
// return the string converted into the required Enum
}
}
The step binding will see that it requires a UserTypeEnum as a parameter so it will search for all the available Step Argument Transformations within any classes with the Binding attribute and use this method to perform the conversion.
Specflow supports accepting strongly typed enum values.
Though, the scenario sends it as text (case insensitive).
example:
Scenario: Some enum test
When I send enum "Second"
Then I get the second enum
public enum ChosenOption
{
First,
Second,
Third,
}
[When(#"I send enum ""(.*)""")]
public void WhenISendEnum(ChosenOption option)
{
_scenarioContext.Set(option, nameof(ChosenOption));
}
[Then(#"I get the second enum")]
public void ThenIGetTheSecondEnum()
{
var chosen = _scenarioContext.Get<ChosenOption>(nameof(ChosenOption));
chosen.Should().Be(ChosenOption.Second);
}
Is there a built-in / easy way to set mappings between domain class properties and JSON strings that don't have exact matches for the property names?
For example, when I have a domain class:
class Person {
String jobTitle
String favoriteColor
static constraints = {
jobTitle(blank: false)
favoriteColor(blank: false)
}
}
And someone's giving me the following JSON:
{ "currentJob" : "secret agent", "the-color" : "red" }
I'd like to be able to still do this:
new Person(request.JSON).save()
Is there a way in groovy/grails for me to map currentJob -> jobTitle and the-color -> favorite color?
EDIT:
I've done a little experimenting, but I still haven't gotten it working. But I have found out a couple interesting things...
At first I tried overwriting the setProperty method:
#Override
setProperty(String name, Object value) {
if(this.hasProperty(name)) this[name] = value
else {
switch(name) {
'currentJob': this.jobTitle = value; break;
'the-color': this.favoriteColor = value; break;
}
}
}
But this doesn't work for two reasons: 1) setProperty is only called if there is a property that matches name and 2) "this[name] = value" calls setProperty, leading to an infinite recursive loop.
So then I thought, well screw it, I know what the incoming json string looks like (If only I could control it), I'll just get rid of the line that handles the scenario where the names match and I'll override hasProperty, maybe that will work:
#Override
void setProperty(String name, Object value) {
switch(name) {
'currentJob': this.jobTitle = value; break;
'the-color': this.favoriteColor = value; break;
}
}
#Override
boolean hasProperty(String name) {
if(name == "currentJob" || name == "the-color") return true
return false
}
But no, that didn't work either. By a random stroke of luck I discovered, that not only did I have to overwrite hasProperty(), but I also had to have an empty setter for the property.
void setCurrentJob(){ }
That hack worked for currentJob - I guess setProperty only gets called if hasProperty returns true and there is a setter for the property (Even if that setter is auto generated under the covers in grails). Unfortunately I can't make a function "setThe-Color" because of the dash, so this solution doesn't work for me.
Still stuck on this, any help would definitely be appreciated.
EDIT:
Overriding the void propertyMissing(String name, Object value){} method is called by this:
Person person = new Person()
person["currentJob"] = "programmer"
person["the-color"] = "red"
But not by this:
Person person = new Person(["currentJob":"programmer", "the-color":"red"])
I can't override grails getter method and becoming crazy.
What I want is use a double value and a string value to get a formatted data, but when I'm typing my override method into String, the double value is null and when into double, it obviously get me an error because a String is returned !
I get a domain class like that :
class Project {
...
String currency
Double initialTargetAmount
...
}
First Override method (initialTargetAmount is null in this case) :
//#Override Comment or uncomment it does not make any change to the behaviour
public String getInitialTargetAmount() {
println "${initialTargetAmount} ${currency}" // display "null EUR"
"${initialTargetAmount} ${currency}" // initialTargetAmount is null
}
Second method :
//#Override Comment or uncomment it does not make any change to the behaviour
public Double getInitialTargetAmount() {
println "${initialTargetAmount} ${currency}" // display "1000.00 EUR"
"${initialTargetAmount} ${currency}" // Error : String given, Double expected
}
Any help is welcome.
Snite
Groovy has dynamic getters and setters.
So, initalTargetAmount field "creates" automatically a Double getInitialTargetAmount method. Which is why it works when you have the Double return Type. But when you set String, getInitialTargetAmount automatically refers to a field String initalTargetAmount which doesn't exist
Try changing the name of the method, for example getInitialAmountWithCurrency() and it will work. Maybe your best bet will be to override toString() method ^^
Your getter should be always the same type of your field, and it's noot a good approach to change the getter like this, because Grails (Hibernate internally) will understand that your object instance changed and will try to update it ( it will check the old and new values).
You're trying in fact is to have a String representation of your amount, so you have a couple of options to this:
1 - A new method
Creating a new method that returns String will not interfere in the hibernate flow and you can use it anywere.
class Project {
...
String currency
Double initialTargetAmount
...
String displayTargetAmount() {
"${initialTargetAmount} ${currency}"
}
}
2 - TagLib
Depending on your needs, you could create a TagLib to make this custom representations of your class. This can include html formatting.
class ProjectTagLib {
static namespace = "proj"
def displayAmount = { attrs ->
if(!attrs.project) {
throwTagErrro("Attribute project must be defined.")
}
Project project = attrs.remove('project')
//just an example of html
out << "<p>${project.initialTargetAmount} , ${project.currency}</p>"
}
}