While running a job in jenkins using ant script i got the build in artifactory . My problem is when a change in build happens it should store as a new version in artifactory. How can i do this?
Thank You
The question is missing a lot of details, but assuming you are using a Jenkinsfile together with the Artifactory Jenkins plugin, you would need to use something like ${env.BUILD_NUMBER} when defining the target in the Jenkinsfile.
It should be something similar to:
{
"files": [
{
"pattern": "my-build-directory/*.tar.gz",
"target": "my-repo/${env.BUILD_NUMBER}/"
}
]
}
If this helps answer your question, I would appreciate it if you could mark it as the accepted answer.
Related
For a given scripted pipeline(jenkins), the pipeline should only get triggered through webhook from GitLab
Build Now option should be disabled for that pipeline.
Can we configure Jenkins, to disable Build Now option for a specific pipeline script job in jenkins?
EDIT: Here the solution with an scripted Pipeline:
node {
def userIdCause = currentBuild.getBuildCauses('hudson.model.Cause$UserIdCause')
stage("Authorize Usage") {
if (userIdCause.size()) {
error('Aborting Build due to manual start - thats not permitted!')
}
}
}
How about the following solution without any extra plugin on an declarative pipeline:
pipeline {
...
stages {
stage ("Authorize Usage") {
when { expression { getCause() == "USER" } }
steps {
currentBuild.description = 'Aborting Build due to manual start - thats not permitted!'
error('Aborting Build due to manual start - thats not permitted!')
}
}
...
}
Have taken a look at this plug-in supplied on the Jenkin's site? Matrix Authorization Strategy Plugin :
Matrix Strategy
Specifically this sectionL Allow configuring per-agent permissions. This allows e.g. restricting per-agent build permissions when using the Authorize Project plugin (JENKINS-46654)
Not ideal, but if this is a 'freestyle pipeline job'
a quick workaround is to add a build step "Execute shell" as first step. You can use this to prevent a build, when noting has changed.
Every time your sources changes and you push to your repo, a build will have been triggered and as there are changes this script will not exit.
When you click the 'Build now', nothing should have changed in your repo (as the only way it can is through a push which would then trigger a build) it will causes an exit, and fail the build.
if [[ $GIT_COMMIT -eq $GIT_PREVIOUS_COMMIT ]]
then
echo "Exiting build - Nothing has changed"
echo "This is to prevent the usage of Jenkins 'build now'"
exit 1
fi
EDIT: This is the answer to the question of user #mohet in the comments of my other answer because it was to long for the comment section (https://stackoverflow.com/a/55058788/7746963).
The currentBuild variable, which is of type RunWrapper, may be used to refer to the currently running build...
Source: https://opensource.triology.de/jenkins/pipeline-syntax/globals .
hudson.model is the package name of most corresponding core jenkins classes. 'Hudson' because jenkins was once cloned from the codebase of his ancestor named 'hudson'.
You can look up them here: https://javadoc.jenkins.io/hudson/model/package-summary.html .
There you will also find https://javadoc.jenkins.io/hudson/model/Cause.UserIdCause.html . To specify directly the package$classname in some methods like getbuildcauses is the straightforward thought of jenkins dev Team. This reduces the failure potential and makes the code better readable and understandable.
When configuring the Artifactory Plugin for "Generic-Artifactory" integration, someone changed the artifact name without updating the Jenkins2 plan and the upload no longer worked. Unfortunately, the Jenkins build never failed or warned us.
Is there an option in the specs that I have yet to find that would allow it to fail the build in this case?
I'm sure there's an obvious answer here somewhere, but I'm missing it. I don't want to write a script that checks for the artifact and exits if it's not there, although it would work. I'm looking for the right way to do this.
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Using+File+Specs
{
"files": [
{
"pattern": "$WORKSPACE/foobar.jar",
"target": "libs-release-local/com/mycompany/foo-1.1.jar"
}
]
}
Your desired functionality is the fail-no-op flag, which will fail the build if no files were affected (uploaded/downloaded) during the process.
The fail-no-op flag is only available in pipeline jobs, both in declarative and scripted syntax.
According to the documentation in https://jenkinsci.github.io/job-dsl-plugin/#method/javaposse.jobdsl.dsl.helpers.wrapper.MavenWrapperContext.buildName
Following code should update build name in Build History in Jenkins jobs:
// define the build name based on the build number and an environment variable
job('example') {
wrappers {
buildName('#${BUILD_NUMBER} on ${ENV,var="BRANCH"}')
}
}
Unfortunately, it is not doing it.
Is there any way to change build name from Jenkins Job DSL script?
I know I can change it from Jenkins Pipeline Script but it is not needed for me in this particular job. All I use in the job is steps.
steps {
shell("docker cp ...")
shell("git clone ...")
...
}
I would like to emphasise I am looking for a native Jenkins Job DSL solution and not a Jenkins Pipeline Script one or any other hacky way like manipulation of environment variables.
I have managed to solve my issue today.
The script did not work because it requires build-name-setter plugin installed in Jenkins. After I have installed it works perfectly.
Unfortunately, by default jobdsl processor does not inform about missing plugins. The parameter enabling that is described here https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-37417
Here's a minimal pipeline changing the build's display name and description. IMHO this is pretty straight forward.
pipeline {
agent any
environment {
VERSION = "1.2.3-SNAPSHOT"
}
stages {
stage("set build name") {
steps {
script {
currentBuild.displayName = "v${env.VERSION}"
currentBuild.description = "#${BUILD_NUMBER} (v${env.VERSION})"
}
}
}
}
}
It results in the following representation in Jenkins' UI:
setBuildName("your_build_name") in a groovyPostBuild step may do the trick as well.
Needs Groovy Postbuild Plugin.
I missed one of the semicolon to see the red build on the jenkins, while using the Git
public class SpringbootController {
public void callSerivce() {
System.out.println("to check se changes");
System.out.println("to check se changes")
}
}
but still on the jenkins, it is showing the build is successful.
don't know what exactly i missed,please help
newbie in jenkins
is there anything i need to add in the shell to make it work, right now it is empty.
To sum up the conversation in the comments: in order for Jenkins to build your code you need to tell it how to build your code. By default Jenkins doesn't do anything beyond the SCM checkout on its own.
Since you're building a Java project with Maven you should add a Maven build step after your SCM checkout. You will need the Maven Project Plugin.
In your post-build steps you should add an "Archive the artifacts" step to gather up anything built during your job you want to keep since your workspace will get potentially wiped out next run.
I defined a Jenkins Declarative pipeline to CI/CD my project. I am using gradle as my build tool. However I don't want to use the Gradle Wrapper and check it int the VCS. So I planed on using the jenkins tools functionality as below so that I can update the version number if I need to in future. But it doesn't seem to work.
pipeline {
agent any
tools {
gradle "gradle-4.0"
}
stage("Compile") {
steps {
sh 'gradle project/build.gradle classes'
}
}
I get the error "script.sh: gradle: not found".
I tried to echo PATH and that doesn't contain the path of this autoinstalled gradle tool. Please help.
Looks like there is an issue on the gradle plugin for Jenkins on plugin version 1.26. Please see the link to the bug reported below.
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-42381