I am a newbie to docker . I am using docker for windows on Windows 10 .
I have created a docker container application (spring boot) which need to communicate with a rabbitmq - which is again inside a container
both of them are using the same docker network(default bridge network) but when I try to connect to rabbitmq(port 5672) the connection get refused.I am using the container IP (172.17.0.2 for rabbitmq) . If I run the connecting application outside docker container and connect to a mapped rabbitmq port for my local machine it works. Deoesn't the containers connected to same docker network cannot communicate with each other using the docker ports?
First make sure, that the ports are exposed. When starting the rabbitmq container, open/map the port: -p 5672:5672.
Also, on Docker for Windows, you can query from container to container using the special DNS name host.docker.internal (see documentation: https://docs.docker.com/docker-for-windows/networking/#known-limitations-use-cases-and-workarounds).
Related
I am trying to connect and run a device (LiDAR) through Docker container since it needs Ubuntu 16 while my computer is Ubunutu 20.
I got the device to ping inside the docker container, but it is not recognised when I try to use it.
What I did:
Made Dockerfile with requirements (Added EXPOSE to expose all ports)
Built docker image using:
docker build -t testLidar
I then made a container using
docker run -d -P --name test_Lidar (imagename)
Then
docker exec -t test_Lidar (device_ip) works
I am able to ping my LiDAR IP inside the container, but when I do ip a I cannot see the interfaces connected to my machine.
Been stuck on this for 3 days, any suggestions?
Note: I have done the exact same steps but on an Ubuntu 16 machine. The only change was the docker run command had --net host instead of -P tag and my device worked perfectly. I feel like this is the root of my problem.
Use --net host flag with docker run to attach the container to your host's networking stack and make it available in for other hosts in your network.
When you use --net host, you actually attach the container to your host's networking stack. By default, containers are attached to the default network of type bridge and can communicate with each other. You can then reach them only from your host using its ip addresses typically in subnet 172.17.0.0/16.
Using -P actually binds exposed ports from a container with randomly selected free ports on your host. It should be used for exposing network services (eg. web server with port 80), but not for ICMP ping.
I have a basic question about Docker that is probably due to lack of knowledge on my part about networking. The Docker container networking documentation states:
By default, when you create a container, it does not publish any of its ports to the outside world. To make a port available to services outside of Docker, or to Docker containers which are not connected to the container’s network, use the --publish or -p flag. This creates a firewall rule which maps a container port to a port on the Docker host.
It sounds like, when you install a container on your computer without mapping any ports from the container to the host machine, the container should not be able to access the internet. However, for example, I install the Ubuntu container with:
docker pull ubuntu
Then I enter the container's command line with:
docker run -ti ubuntu bash
At that point, I can run apt-get update and the container starts pulling information from the internet without mapping any ports (e.g. -p 80:80). How is this possible?
Publishing a port allows machines external to the docker host to access the container, inbound connectivity. By default, containers can access the network with outbound connectivity.
To restrict a container from accessing the network, you can either run the container with no network (note: this still creates a loopback interface, and you can later connect it to another network):
docker run --net none ...
Or you can create a network with the --internal option and run containers on that network:
docker network create --internal internal
docker run --net internal ...
The internal network is created without a gateway interface on the bridge network.
When they talk about publishing ports, they mean inbound ports.
Outbound ports work - depending on your network type - see here for more:
https://docs.docker.com/network/
I am running docker on my windows 10 machine , i have docker for windows installed and when i run selenium hub image with exposes ports it works fine , I can view the selenium hub console with localhost:4444 (4444 is the exposed port) . Now i want other machines connected to the same network to be able to connect to my selenium hub container .
How can i achieve this .
I have exposed ports using -p 4444:4444 , but this looks good for working between the host machine and the docker container.
hub:
image: selenium/hub:latest
ports:
- "4444:4444"
You have already done everything you need, as mentioned #mostafa in comments.
When you expose ports, you actually map internal docker network ports onto host's ones, thus making your services available from host.
The only thing you have to care about - is host interface, to which the services are being bound. By default, when you write -p 123:123 docker maps to 0.0.0.0 that means services become available on all networks, where host is connected.
You can explicitly specify this in form -p <interface>:123:456 to make this port only visible in specified network.
How to access or connect to a process running on docker on host A from a remote host B
consider a Host A with ip 192.168.0.3 which is running a application on docker on port 3999 .
If i want to access that application from remote machine with IP 192.168.0.4 in same subnet.
To be precise i am running Kafka producer on the server and i am trying to receive using Kafka-console-Consumer.
Use --net=host to run your container and it'll use the host's network stack, then you can connect to the application running inside container like it's running on host directly.
Port mapping, use option -p to map the port inside your container to a port of your host. e.g. docker run -d -p <container port>:<host port> <image>, then you can connect to <host>:<host port> to connect your application inside container
Docker's built-in multi-host network. In early releases the network driver is isolated from docker's core, you have to use 3rd party tools like flannel or weave for multi-host connection, but from release 1.9, it has been merged into docker. You can follow it's guide to set it up.
Hope this is helpful :-)
First you need to bind docker container's port to the Host A:
docker run -d -p 3999:3999 kafka-producer
Then you need to access Host A from Host B using IP:Port
192.168.0.3:3999
I want to be able to access a docker container via its Ip eg the one I can see when I do docker container inspect foo
The reason is I am using zookeeper inside a docker container that is managing two other docker containers running solr. My code (not in docker and I don't at this stage want it to be) calls zookeeper to get the urls of the solr servers which zookeeper reports as the docker containers ip. My code then falls over because calling the docker containers ip from the host fails as it should be calling localhost.
So how can I allow a call to the docker containers ip from the host to be routed correctly. (I am using Docker native for Mac)
I'm not using Docker for Mac, so I'm not sure the newest version Docker for Mac is still based on Docker-machine (which based on VirtualBox) or not.
If you can confirm your Docker for Mac is based on VirtualBox, then you probably could get the inet IP of vboxnet0 network interface via ifconfig command. This IP should be used as your calling IP.
Besides, you should know the port number of your Zookeeper container. Normally the exposed port of a container could be configured in docker run command, for example:
docker run -p 5000:5001 -i -t ubuntu /bin/bash
Where -p indicated the exposed port of the container.