I am not quite sure how to word this so I've also included some poorly formatted example :) Basically I have a report exported from Cognos. The report contains a list of cases and the people that are associated to those cases, along with additional information about their First Language and Religion (as an example). What I would like to do is create a summary and/or chart of the results based on the unique case.
Any ideas? Example data below:
Case Reference - Name - First Language - Religion
1234 - Name1 - English - Catholic
1234 - Name2 - French - Protestant
4321 - Name3 - Tamil - Unknown
3345 - Name4 - English - Hindu
So for a summary I'd like to see that for languages there is 1 for Tamil and 1 for French (English would be the default if no other languages are present - so for file 1234 it would have been English if there was no French speaking person). For religions I'd like to be able to see that out of the 3 files, 1 is unknown, 1 is Hindu and also that the 3rd file is actually 2 religions (Catholic and Protestant).
I am not sure if any of this is making sense but hopefully one of you can shed some light on a possible solution. I'd like to template it out so that on line one of the case it would have an x under each heading, but do it automatically instead of manually. Basically, for each unique case are there any members that are French, any that are Tamil, any that are Catholic, any that are Christian, etc...
Thanks!
I hope I'm following correctly. It seems you want to show for each language, how many cases they are associated with and for every case, how many religions are associated with it.
For language, add a column to your report's query called Language Count with the following expression:
count(distinct [Case Reference] for [First Language])
This will count the number of unique cases for each language.
For religions, add a column to your report's query called Religion Count with the following expression:
count(distinct [Religion] for [Case Reference])
This will count the number of unique religions for each case.
Related
The following are my favorite patterns
%c{2} - which displays the corresponding number of rightmost logger
name components. So a logger with a name like "org.apache.commons.Foo"
is displayed as "commons.Foo".
and
%c{1.} - which abbreviates the name based on the pattern. So a logger
with a name like "org.apache.commons.Foo" is displayed as "o.a.c.Foo".
Is there a way to combine the two. I want to abbreviate the name of all logger components except the 2 rightmost. Such that "org.apache.commons.Foo" is displayed as "o.a.commons.Foo".
Is it possible to do this using the pattern layout or in any other easy way?
Yes and no. NameAbbreviator.java handles creating the abbreviation of the name. It has a getAbbreviator method that returns one of 3 implementations -
NoOp - returns the string as is.
MaxElement - returns the last n elements.
Pattern - This uses the pattern to break up the string into fragments, formatting each according to the pattern. If you specify 1.2 then the first character of the first item will be printed and 2 characters of each following item will be printed up to the final token, which is never abbreviated. A special case is if the pattern contains a "*". That indicates that everything that follows should be printed as is.
So the answer to your question is that you could use the following patterns:
1.* - would print o.apache.commons.Foo
1.1.* - would print o.a.commons.Foo
As you can see this isn't very helpful when package names have different lengths. I would suggest you create a Jira issue for this. Patches and pull requests are welcome!
I have a graph database with information about different companies and their subsidiaries. Now my task is to display the structure of the company. This I have achieved with d3 and vertical tree.
But additionally I have to write summary statistics about the company that is currently displayed. Companies can be chosen from a dropdown list which is fetching this data dynamically via AJAX call.
I have to write in the same HTML a short summary like :
Total amount of subsidiaries for CompanyA: 300
Companies in Corporate Havens : 45%
Companies in Tax havens 5%
My database consists of two nodes: Company and Country, and the country has label like CH and TH.
CREATE (:TH:Country{name:'Nauru', capital:'Yaren', lng:166.920867,lat:-0.5477})
WITH 1 as dummy MATCH (a:Company), (b:Country) WHERE a.name=‘CompanyA ' AND b.name='Netherlands' CREATE (a)-[:IS_REGISTERED]->(b)
So how can I find amount of subsidiaries of CompanyA that are registered in corporate and tax havens? And how to pass this info further to html
I found different cypher queries to query all the labels as well as apocalyptic.stats but this does not allow me to filter on mother company. I appreciate help.
The cypher is good because you write a query almost in natural language (the query below may be incorrect - did not check, but the idea is clear):
MATCH (motherCompany:Company {name: 'CompanyA'})-[:HAS_SUBSIDIARY]->(childCompany:Company)
WITH motherCompany,
childCompany
MATCH (childCompany)-[:IS_REGISTERED]->(country:Country)
WITH motherCompany,
collect(labels(country)) AS countriesLabels
WITH motherCompany,
countriesLabels,
size([countryLabels IN countriesLabels WHERE 'TH' IN countryLabels ]) AS inTaxHeaven
RETURN motherCompany,
size(countriesLabels) AS total,
inTaxHeaven,
size(countriesLabels) - inTaxHeaven AS inCorporateHeaven
I am currently using this formula to get all the data from everyone whose first name is "Peter", but my problem is that if someone is called "Simon Peter" this data is gonna show up on the formula output.
=QUERY('Data'!1:1000,"select * where B contains 'Peter'")
I know that for the other formulas if I add an * to the String this issue is resolved. But in this situation for the QUERY formula the same logic do not applies.
Do someone knows the correct syntax or a workaround?
How about classic SQL syntax
=QUERY('Data'!1:1000,"select * where B like 'Peter %'")
The LIKE keyword allows use of wildcard % to represent characters relative to the known parts of the searched string.
See the query reference: developers.google.com/chart/interactive/docs/querylanguage You could split firstname and lastname into separate columns, then only search for firstnames exactly equal to 'Peter'. Though you may want to also check if lowercase/uppercase where lower(B) contains 'peter' or whitespaces are present in unexpected places (e.g., trim()). You could also search only for values that start with Peter by using starts with instead of contains, or a regular expression using matches. – Brian D
It seems that for my case using 'starts with' is a perfect fit. Thank you!
I can query using Cypher in Neo4j from the Panama database the countries of three types of identity holders (I define that term) namely Entities (companies), officers (shareholders) and Intermediaries (middle companies) as three attributes/columns. Each column has single or double entries separated by colon (eg: British Virgin Islands;Russia). We want to concatenate the countries in these columns into a unique set of countries and hence obtain the count of the number of countries as new attribute.
For this, I tried the following code from my understanding of Cypher:
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)-[:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND
NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR
(BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved", "Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
SET BEZ4.countries= (BEZ1.countries+","+BEZ2.countries+","+BEZ3.countries)
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries, BEZ3.name AS
Intermediaryname, BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries , BEZ2.name AS
Officername, BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries, BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress,DISTINCT count(BEZ4.countries) AS NoofConnections
The relevant part is the SET statement in the 7th line and the DISTINCT count in the last line. The code shows error which makes no sense to me: Invalid input 'u': expected 'n/N'. I guess it means to use COLLECT probably but we tried that as well and it shows the error vice-versa'd between 'u' and 'n'. Please help us obtain the output that we want, it makes our job hell lot easy. Thanks in advance!
EDIT: Considering I didn't define variable as suggested by #Cybersam, I tried the command CREATE as following but it shows the error "Invalid input 'R':" for the command RETURN. This is unfathomable for me. Help really needed, thank you.
CODE 2:
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)-
[:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND
NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND
BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR
(BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved",
"Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
CREATE (p:Connections{countries:
split((BEZ1.countries+";"+BEZ2.countries+";"+BEZ3.countries),";")
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries, BEZ3.name AS
Intermediaryname, BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries , BEZ2.name AS
Officername, BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries, BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress, AS TOTAL, collect (DISTINCT
COUNT(p.countries)) AS NumberofConnections
Lines 8 and 9 are the ones new and to be in examination.
First Query
You never defined the identifier BEZ4, so you cannot set a property on it.
Second Query (which should have been posted in a separate question):
You have several typos and a syntax error.
This query should not get an error (but you will have to determine if it does what you want):
MATCH (BEZ2:Officer)-[:SHAREHOLDER_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity),(BEZ3:Intermediary)- [:INTERMEDIARY_OF]->(BEZ1:Entity)
WHERE BEZ1.address CONTAINS "Belize" AND NOT ((BEZ1.countries="Belize" AND BEZ2.countries="Belize" AND BEZ3.countries="Belize") OR (BEZ1.status IN ["Inactivated", "Dissolved shelf company", "Dissolved", "Discontinued", "Struck / Defunct / Deregistered", "Dead"]))
CREATE (p:Connections {countries: split((BEZ1.countries+";"+BEZ2.countries+";"+BEZ3.countries), ";")})
RETURN BEZ3.countries AS IntermediaryCountries,
BEZ3.name AS Intermediaryname,
BEZ2.countries AS OfficerCountries ,
BEZ2.name AS Officername,
BEZ1.countries as EntityCountries,
BEZ1.name AS Companyname,
BEZ1.address AS CompanyAddress,
SIZE(p.countries) AS NumberofConnections;
Problems with the original:
The CREATE clause was missing a closing } and also a closing ).
The RETURN clause had a dangling AS TOTAL term.
collect (DISTINCT COUNT(p.countries)) was attempting to perform nested aggregation, which is not supported. In any case, even if it had worked, it probably would not have returned what you wanted. I suspect that you actually wanted the size of the p.countries collection, so that is what I used in my query.
I have a table with 1 million+ records that contain names. I would like to be able to sort the list by the first letter in the name.
.. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
What is the most efficient way to setup the db table to allow for searching by the first character in the table.name field?
The best idea right now is to add an extra field which stores the first character of the name as an observer, index that field and then sort by that field. Problem is it's no longer necessarily alphabetical.
Any suggestions?
You said in a comment:
so lets ignore the first letter part. How can I all records that start with A? All A's no B...z ? Thanks – AnApprentice Feb 21 at 15:30
I issume you meant How can I RETURN all records...
This is the answer:
select * from t
where substr(name, 1, 1) = 'A'
I agree with the questions above as to why you would want to do this -- a regular index on the whole field is functionally equivalent. PostgreSQL (with some new ones in v. 9) has some rather powerful indexing capabilities for special cases which you might want to read about here http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-createindex.html