I have a table view over very large amount of data.
For performance reasons, it can't be loaded all at once.
More, sometimes random place of array should be loaded, so incremental pagination is not good option.
The current solution to these requirements is sliding window over data array. As user scrolls, I add cells from one end and remove from opposite end. I use scroll position (by looking at what cells are going onscreen) to determine whether it's time to load new data.
Usually, when you call tableView.deleteRows(at:with:) and remove cells from the beginning of table, tableView adjusts its contentOffset property so user still see same cells as before operation.
However, when tableView is decelerating after scrolling, its contentOffset is not adjusted on updates, and this causes loading new pages over and over until deceleration is completed. Then, on first update after deceleration, contentOffset is fixed by tableView and loading stops.
Same thing occurs when scrolling back and adding values at the beginning of table with tableView.insertRows(at:with:).
How can I make UITableView adjust its contentOffset properly?
OR are there other ways to overcome this bug -- keeping the ability to load arbitrary piece in the middle of data array and scroll from it?
I made a tiny project illustrating the bug:
https://github.com/wsb9/TableViewExample
From your sample project, I can understand is you are trying to implement infinite scroll through the window content concept so that you can always have fixed number of rows (index paths ,lets say 100) so that when window scrolls down/up - table view remove indexPaths from top/bottom accordingly.
And even though you have more data source item you can always have tableView of indexPaths 100
Basically you are dealing with two problem here:
ContentOffset
Dynamic height
Let's assume we have height is fixed (44) and table is not inverted.
To implement Window for infinite scrolling you have to do following:
override func scrollViewDidScroll(_ scrollView: UIScrollView) {
let bottom: CGFloat = scrollView.contentSize.height - scrollView.frame.size.height
let buffer: CGFloat = 3 * 44
let scrollPosition = scrollView.contentOffset.y
if (scrollPosition > bottom - buffer) {
dataSource.expose(dataSource.exposedRange.shift(by: 25))
self.tableView.contentOffset.y -= self.dataSource.deltaHeightToRemove
}
}
Decide how much height buffer you need to keep when scroll goes down. This height buffer is the height after which you decides to insert some more item (25) into the datasource.
At this point you now have to remove items from the top
As you remove item from top you are basically telling scrollView to reduce it's content-offset by same height.
In this way total content size will be fixed every time
Hope it will help.
EDIT:-
Here is the modified code which actually does infinite scroll at bottom of
table view with dynamic cell height. This doesn't increase the rows count more than 100. but still loads data in sliding window.
link
From your sample project, I can understand the following,
One thing is you want to increase performance of your table view by only loading few number of cells at a time
Your second concern is sometimes you want to load table view with data that randomly placed in data source array
I checked your code and you have implemented your sliding-window over data-source model very interestingly. The problem caused because of you had been trying to make tableview efficiently by removing and readding cells.
Actually the Dequeuing a cell should be reusing a cell already in memory. Please take a look at the apple documentation,
For performance reasons, a table view’s data source should generally
reuse UITableViewCell objects when it assigns cells to rows in its
tableView(_:cellForRowAt:) method. A table view maintains a queue or
list of UITableViewCell objects that the data source has marked for
reuse. Call this method from your data source object when asked to
provide a new cell for the table view. This method dequeues an
existing cell if one is available or creates a new one using the class
or nib file you previously registered. If no cell is available for
reuse and you did not register a class or nib file, this method
returns nil.
The good news is your sliding-window over data-source model is working perfectly once I removed your row delete and readd mechanism. Here is your working code,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2y_JJbzjRA6dDR3QzRMUzExSGs/view?usp=sharing
Related
I'm implementing a chat functionality in my app, and I'm rolling my own UIViewController to do so. I'm using a UITableView instead of a UICollectionView because it fits my needs better.
Some of my messages are text-based (which can be multi-line) and some of them are image-based. I also have some cells in place to show headers (timestamp information) and footers ("Sending...", "Delivered", etc.).
When I build my data source, I am calculating the height needed for each of these cells, and returning that data in my tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: method.
I am trying to take more control over this process because automatic sizing of cells using auto layout doesn't work all that well when I want the UITableView to spend most of its time at the bottom, rather than at the top.
So, I have the following needs:
When the view loads, it should start fully scrolled to the bottom
At that point, the UITableView's contentSize should be correctly calculated
Inserting new cells at the bottom of the UITableView should work well and also animate well.
The problem I'm finding is that only some of my cells have their height checked by heightForRowAtIndexPath:.
For instance, here's a particular case:
I have 100 messages + 32 header/footer cells (132 total cells)
In viewWillAppear: (or viewDidAppear:, it doesn't seem to matter), I call this:
int lastRow = (int)(self.dataSource.count - 1);
NSIndexPath *lastPath = [NSIndexPath indexPathForRow:lastRow inSection:0];
[self.tableView scrollToRowAtIndexPath:lastPath
atScrollPosition:UITableViewScrollPositionBottom
animated:animated];
It doesn't change much whether the animated variable is YES or NO. YES seems to call a few more times, but both of them only really call for values at the top and bottom (beginning/end) of my data source. This means that my calculated content height (which is correct) is not in line with self.tableView.contentSize.height.
If, however, I manually scroll up through all of the cells, everything gets sorted out and the UITableView is finally aligned with my calculated height.
In addition to the initial view needing to scroll to the bottom, I also want to be able to add new messages to new cells at the bottom of the UITableView and then animate them into view. That really doesn't work well if I let the UITableView manage its content size and its own animations.
Based on Apple's documentation, I expect it to call heightForRowAtIndexPath: for every cell. I'm getting that from here:
There are performance implications to using tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: instead of the rowHeight property. Every time a table view is displayed, it calls tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: on the delegate for each of its rows, which can result in a significant performance problem with table views having a large number of rows (approximately 1000 or more). See also tableView:estimatedHeightForRowAtIndexPath:.
So, my basic question is how I can force UITableView to let me set all of these values. I'm using auto layout within the UITableViewCell instances themselves, but I want to have control of cell sizing, rather than letting UITableView do it. Any suggestions?
Just adding tableView.estimatedRowHeight = 0 will solve the problem.
I am trying to do something like loading up different type of cells with custom height in a uitableview. The tableview cells are subclassed and consists of labels with the respective constraints. Each cell is having a dynamic height.
Now even before my table reloads the data, I am calculating the height that is required for the resizing of the cells and caching it in my model class so that I dont have to calculate the height when the data is rendered on the device.
To calculate height i did use the tutorial from Ray Wenderlich and I am having the right set of heights applies to the objects.
Now the problem comes. Whenever I am dequeueing the cells there is a
kind of a small jerk that gives me an indication that my cell is
dequeued while scrolling.
How can i make these movement smooth so that there is no jerk while scrolling the view ?
The height is getting assigned in and does get the value as per the current type of data getting loaded.
estimatedRowForIndexPath
Also I am calling layoutIfNeeded from my cellForAtindexPath
Suggestions are most welcome.
It's very hard to say without seeing your code in cellForRowAtIndexPath, and without seeing your cells and their respective code. Here are some general questions I would investigate:
What is the content of the cells and how complex is the view hierarchy in the cell?
Even though you are supplying the correct estimated height, an autolayout pass still needs to happen, and a complex view hierarchy will take time to resolve
Does the cell contain images?
Images that need to be decompressed from a file (UIImage imageNamed:) can be intensive and cause scrolling issues, check images are not bigger than they need to be. If needed, bump this work onto a background thread.
Are you calling a complex method to configure the cell for display in cellForRowAtIndexPath?
Look at the work actually being done in cellForRowAtIndexPath, is there a complex method being triggered in you cell subclass or view model?
Are you adding and removing views to the cell view hierarchy in cellForRowAtIndexPath?
If views are being added, removed, created, inflated from a xib, constrained etc during the cell config, this could slow things down. Try to do only what is strictly needed. Check if there is any code being run internally in the cell subclass during cellForRowAtIndexPath that could be moved to cells initWith... or awakeFromNib methods (ie code that could just run once when the cell is created, rather than every time the cell is displayed)
Also run the Instruments time profiler, see if that offers any more clues
I have a UITableView that reads information from CoreData via the proper mechanisms (using a FetchedResultsController, etc). This information is either textual, or a URL to a local image to load into the tableview.
Data needs to be populated in the table in a bottom-up fashion (similar to a messaging app). I am targeting iOS 8+, but if I use estimatedHeightForRowAtIndexPath, I get terrible jerkiness on 3+ multi line labels and images. The estimate seems way too far off unless it's a one line UILabel. My hunch is that the cell height is being estimated in a top down manner, such that cell heights are growing from top of cell to bottom of cell. This means that scrolling top to bottom is fine, but bottom to top is not, since the cell is being resized "downward" dynamically as I scroll upward.
I am currently using heightForRowAtIndexPath to calculate cell heights. The problem with this is that it takes a very long time for the view to initially load because cell heights are all calculated at once. I am using cell height caching to store cell height so that once the view has loaded, scrolling is buttery smooth.
So my question is this: how do you use heightForRowAtIndexPath without taking the 3-5 second initial load hit?
And follow up bonus question, is there any way to reliably use estimatedHeightForRowAtIndexPath when you have cells that are vastly different in height? We're talking anywhere from 44px to 300px. From what I've read, I can't use the estimatedHeight calculation at all in this situation.
I've exhausted all of the stackoverflow posts concerning estimatedHeight/heightForRowAtIndexPath and I'm now starting to look at the same posts more than once. So I'm stuck.
why woncha stuff a few rows in the table to populate the visible area and after
the viewDidAppear start stuffing older messages on top of the table one or two
at the time with animation none, automatic or whatever.
this way with the postponement of the uitableview population
me thinks you'd get a passable performance.
or you could do it the skype way, postponing population of the table
with older messages until after table bounces off the top edge.
I have tried looking for an answer to this question but so far I haven't got any luck.
Context
I have a UITableView inside a standard UIViewController (NOT a UITableViewController..). I have subclassed UITableViewCell and all the cells in the tableview are from the same class.
Requirement
I would like to find an efficient way to resize the cells based on the scrolling of the tableview. For example, when the cell is at the bottom of the visible list, the height is X. When the cell moves up on the screen, its height should proportionally increase to 2X.
Additional Info
I am close to just ditch the UITableView way and start making my own control that would implement such a feat by subclassing a UIScrollView. However, I would like to see if it is possible before going this path. I did see some very interesting SO posts but nothing that would put me on the right path.
Any hint or help would be highly appreciated.
You would need to respond to the scroll view delegate method scrollViewDidScroll: and implement it to record the cell at the top of the table view and reload the table view. Then your table view delegate method tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: sets the cell height by the relationship between the index path and the top cell index path.
Your main issue is performance while reloading the table view all the time.
If you wanted to roll your own solution it would be along the lines of the above description anyway, but you would be able to be more efficient than the table view as the table view will call the tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: method once for every row for every reload in order to calculate the total height of the table content.
I have a UICollectionView which lays its cells out using Flow Layout. It is vertically scrolling.
It fills a 320x480 screen and displays a custom UICollectionViewCell which is always 96*96 - the size is set in Interface Builder and the delegate does not implement methods to set the item size on a per item basis.
There are insets on the left and right which are 10 px each and the minimum spacing is set to 6px.
What happens therefore is 3 cells per horizontal line.
<-10-><----96----><-6-><----96----><-6-><----96----><-10-> = 320.
The problem that I am having is that occasionally it lays 4 cells on one line!
The 4th cell is mostly off the screen. It then lays only 2 cells out on the following line to compensate. The whole point of flow layout is that it is a line-breaking layout which should not put anything off-screen!
I have attached a picture:
Please note that on the second row there is a fourth item mostly off the screen.
I really have no idea what could be causing it. The cells are dynamically filled with data but their size is constant. The cells on all other rows are fitting just fine so there is no reason why on some rows this should happen.
This error occurs at different places each time the collection view is updated. ie. it might happen at row 2 then once an update happens it might happen at row 10 and so on.
The collection view is being updated by a timer. The timer essentially calls a function which processes some data, and then using dispatch_async (onto the main queue) an array containing the backing data is updated and [collectionView reloadData] is called. So I haven't updated the collection view from any thread apart from the main thread. The backing array is only updated on the main queue and in that function; not from anywhere else.
Please could someone give me some suggestions as to what might be going wrong.
Thanks
I have fixed it by adding [_collectionViewFlowLayout invalidateLayout] in scrollViewDidScroll: delegate methods.
https://github.com/f33chobits/FSCalendar/issues/21