Trying to figure out how to get the "X.Y.Z" substituted below when not every file will have that in the name. Simple filespec:
{
"files": [
{
"pattern": "artifacts/",
"target": "repository/project/X.Y.Z/"
}
]
}
Not all of the files have the full version number in them so I can't use a simple placeholder (per this solution). I was wondering if there was some other way to dynamically figure out the part to replace the "X.Y.Z" using some maybe-more-complex syntax?
Thinking about the problem a bit more it occurred to me that I could put the artifacts in a specially-named directory that I could then use to publish from.
{
"files": [
{
"pattern": "artifacts-(*)/",
"target": "repository/project/{1}/"
}
]
}
Tested, and that seemed to do the trick. It just required a little scripting at the end of the build to name that directory with the version number in it.
Related
#angular/cli#7+ allows a customWebpackConfig to be specified to provide custom webpack configuration, such as:
"architect": {
"build": {
"builder": "#angular-builders/custom-webpack:browser",
"options": {
"customWebpackConfig": {
"path": "./build/custom-webpack.config.js",
"mergeStrategies": {
"externals": "prepend"
}
},
...
This file then technically allows you to prepend, append or replace any portion of the webpack configuration. Prior to upgrading to #angular#7.1.3 and #angular/cli#7.1.3 we had ejected the webpack configuration to make some additions. One such addition was the postcss-momentum-scrolling postcss-loader plugin that automatically enabled iOS momentum scrolling on all scrollable containers.
I am seeking support on figuring out how to generate the necessary custom webpack code to load this plugin via the supported customizations allowed by #angular/cli#7+.
Here is a sample of what I have tried in my custom-webpack.config.js file:
const postcssMomentumScrolling = require('postcss-momentum-scrolling');
module.exports = {
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.scss$|\.sass$/,
use: [
{
"loader": "postcss-loader",
"options": {
"plugins": [
postcssMomentumScrolling(),
]
}
}
]
},
],
},
};
As soon as I touch the scss chunk of the webpack config, it seems to do a replace instead of a merge or prepend, breaking the build.
I am wondering if anyone has a guide or suggestions on how to see what the initial webpack configuration that #angular/cli generates that is the starting point for modifications and a way to preview/peek at the code to be executed as debugging.
Also, an example of a similar customization would be great.
Thanks!
I think you need to tell to "customWebpackConfig" which portion to merge. Like this:
"mergeStrategies": {
"module.rules": "prepend"
}
In this way you're going to tell to merge with prepend strategy.
According to "custom-webpack" documentation it should default to "append" which doesn't seem the case in your example.
It's been a while since you've put the question but I wanted to actually ask if you have been able to fix it since I'm running in some issues getting my "module.rules" merged...it seems to work only if I set "replace" strategy.
I created a new extension for TFS following MS tutorial. For some reason when I'm adding Icon to my extension I can see this icon when I'm installing the extension and in the "Extension Manager" page,
But when I choose my extension from the build step menu the image is missing.
In the "vss-extension.json" file I added:
"icons": {
"default": "images/icon.png"
},
"files": [
{
"path": "images",
"addressable": true
},
{
"path": "dist",
"addressable": true,
"packagePath": "scripts"
},
{
"path": "infoTab.html",
"addressable": true
},
{
"path": "node_modules/vss-web-extension-sdk/lib",
"addressable": true,
"packagePath": "lib"
},
{
"path": "buildtask"
}
],
The image file is 32x32
Should this image be reference in the "task.json" file as well?
The accepted answer is not correct for Microsoft Visual Studio Team Foundation Server version 15.105.25910.0. Perhaps it was correct for previous versions.
The image file must be named icon.png.
The image file must be in the same folder as task.json.
The image file should be 32 x 32; no image scaling is applied.
The task.json file does not contain any reference to this file. It is located by using these conventions.
The task itself has its own icon and it must be stored in the same directory as the task.json and must be called icon.png and be 32x32 pixels and optionally an additional icon.svg can be put alongside it. This has to do with the fact that one extension can contain multiple build tasks, each build task then has its own icon. It's not referenced from the task.json, the correct file name will cause it to be picked up.
For an example, check my Azure Pipelines Snyk task. Also, if this is your complete extension manifest, then it's missing the Build task contribution point:
"contributions": [
{
"id": "buildtask",
"type": "ms.vss-distributed-task.task",
"targets": [
"ms.vss-distributed-task.tasks"
],
"properties": {
"name": "buildtask"
}
}
I configured a task in VSCode to compile a Delphi 2005 dpk. It is working and returning the errors on the "problems view", but it is not showing that errors in the file.
I think it is happening because when I click on an error, I get the error message:
Unable to open 'sr075pro.pas': File not found
(...projectfolder\sr075pro.pas)
But the file is in ...projectfolder\webservices\sr075pro.pas.
I can't find a way to tell to the task that the file is in a subfolder. I tried to use the "relative" option on the "fileLocation" tag without sucess.
The error returned:
Compiling sa_webservices...
Borland Delphi Version 13.0 Copyright (c) 1983,99 Inprise Corporation
sr075pro.pas(99) Error: Undeclared identifier: 'ni'
sa_webservices.dpk(802) Fatal: Could not compile used unit 'sr075pro.pas'
My task configuration:
{
"version": "0.1.0",
"name": "Compilar",
"command": "C:\\Compilers\\compile.bat",
"suppressTaskName": true,
"isShellCommand": true,
"isBuildCommand": true,
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "Compile sa_webservices",
"isBuildCommand": false,
"isTestCommand": false,
"showOutput": "always",
"args": [
"sa_webservices"
],
"problemMatcher": {
"owner": "external",
"fileLocation": "relative",
"pattern": {
"regexp": "^([\\w]+\\.(pas|dpr|dpk))\\((\\d+)\\)\\s(Fatal|Error|Warning|Hint):(.*)",
"file": 1,
"line": 3,
"message": 5
}
}
}
My compile.bat:
#echo off
#P:
#set arg1=%1
shift
...
if "%arg1%" == "sa_webservices" set arg2="webservices"
...
echo Compiling %arg1%...
cd\%arg2%
dcc32.exe -H -W -Q %arg1%.dpk
Your task configuration is wrong. First of all you don't close all brackets but I guess it's a mistake made by copying and pasting it here on StackOverflow. Otherwise the task configuration wouldn't have worked at all.
Now to the real problem:
DCC32 produces hints and warnings containing relative file paths. These paths are relative to the project file. In your task configuration you define the compiler's output to contain relative paths by setting
"fileLocation": "relative"
Visual Studio Code doesn't know how to build the correct absolute path from the relative paths given by the compiler message. So it guesses your current ${workspaceRoot} (in your case it's projectfolder) would be the absolute path.
This explains why you see errors and warnings which contain wrong file paths. In order to get the correct paths you'll need to tell VSCode the correct path to combine the relative paths with.
You do this by simply adding the correct path to the fileLocation entry in you tasks.json:
"fileLocation": ["relative", "${workspaceRoot}\\webservices"]
The entire tasks.json looks like that:
{
"version": "0.1.0",
"name": "Compilar",
"command": "C:\\Compilers\\compile.bat",
"suppressTaskName": true,
"isShellCommand": true,
"isBuildCommand": true,
"tasks": [
{
"taskName": "Compile sa_webservices",
"isBuildCommand": false,
"isTestCommand": false,
"showOutput": "always",
"args": [
"sa_webservices"
],
"problemMatcher": {
"owner": "external",
"fileLocation": ["relative", "${workspaceRoot}\\webservices"],
"pattern": {
"regexp": "^([\\w]+\\.(pas|dpr|dpk))\\((\\d+)\\)\\s(Fatal|Error|Warning|Hint):(.*)",
"file": 1,
"line": 3,
"message": 5
}
}
}
]
}
It might be easier to find files in the problemMatcher in vscode 1.74, see file location search: v1.74 release notes. There is a new option search for the fileLocation property:
New file location method; search
Previously, problem matchers needed to know exactly where to look for
the problematic files, via the fileLocation property. The supported
methods were absolute, relative, or autoDetect (i.e., check for
relative paths first and opt to absolute paths in case of failure).
However, in workspaces that need to invoke various scripts residing in
nested sub-directories, the developers could have a hard time setting
up their tasks; since such scripts seldom report file paths in a
unified manner (e.g., relative to the workspace's base directory).
To help alleviate the problem, a new file location method, named
search, is introduced in this version. With this method, a deep file
system search will be initiated to locate any captured path. See the
example below on how to setup the search file location method
(although, all parameters are optional):
// ...
"fileLocation": [
"search",
{
"include": [ // Optional; defaults to ["${workspaceFolder}"]
"${workspaceFolder}/src",
"${workspaceFolder}/extensions"
],
"exclude": [ // Optional
"${workspaceFolder}/extensions/node_modules"
]
}
],
// ... } ```
⚠️ Of course, users should be wary of the possibly **heavy file system
searches** (e.g., looking inside `node_modules` directories) and set
the `exclude` property with discretion.
I'm using electron-react-boilerplate to develop electron app (which uses electron-builder to pack apps).
I want to create tray, but it requires icon path or native image. The question is how to retrieve icon image from electron-builder or how to tell electron-builder to include icons dir into resources (without packing), so I can use:
appIcon = new Tray(iconPath | nativeImage)
I kind of struggled with a solution about non-packaged assets (such as media or JSON config files), mostly because I was not familiar with Electron until now. :)
I built a simple personal tray-only app and I didn't want to repackage every time I change an icon for instance.
If you too plan on using changing/dynamic assets you can distinguish between "development" and "production" using this property:
https://electronjs.org/docs/api/app#appispackaged-readonly
Make sure you have this in your package.json:
"build": {
...
"extraResources": [
"./assets/**"
],
}
https://www.electron.build/configuration/contents#extraresources
Then in your code you can have:
const assetsPath = app.isPackaged ? path.join(process.resourcesPath, "assets") : "assets";
Of course you can also use a different path for storing assets, independent of your packaged app folder, for example your user's home or user's documents:
https://electronjs.org/docs/api/app#appgetpathname
Electron v7.0.1
electron-builder 21.2.0
Firstly you need to tell electron-builder which extra files need copying into your output build. I copy over native drivers for each os like below, but you should be able to adapt this to your needs. The "to": "resources" means you'll be able to use the next code to find the files later.
"build": {
...
"extraFiles": [
{
"from": "resources/${os}/drivers",
"to": "resources",
"filter": [
"**/*"
]
}
],
Then to get access to that path from in electron you can use:
const path = require('path');
const imgPath = path.join(process.resourcesPath, 'image.png')
If you're in the main process you can omit the remote part.
You can then use nativeImage.createFromPath to get a native image:
const nativeImage = require('electron').nativeImage
let image = nativeImage.createFromPath(imgPath)
Thanks, Tim, your answer gave me a good thought. I reused it with some addition depending on how I run my app - form vs code using electron or from installed deb file:
"build": {
...
"extraFiles": [
{
"from": "assets",
"to": "resources",
"filter": [
"**/*"
]
}
]
...
}
And then:
let imgPath = process.env.DEV ? "assets/icon.png" : path.join(process.resourcesPath, "icon.png");
tray = new Tray(imgPath);
Ok, so this is documented plain as day, yet I'm probably doing something stupid and can't get it to work...
I'm using the eslint-plugin-import on an Electron app and I'm getting a lint error of Unable to resolve path to module 'electron'.
In the docs, it says I need to either A.) use the shared Electron config B.) pass in an array with electron in to the "import/core-modules" setting.
for A, I tried this:
{
"extends": [
"airbnb",
"plugin:import/electron"
]
}
and when I lint, I get this:
for B, I tried:
{
"extends": [
"airbnb"
],
"plugins": [
"import"
],
"rules": {
"import/core-modules": [
"electron"
]
}
}
and get this:
I've also tried:
{
"extends": [
"airbnb"
],
"plugins": [
"import"
],
"settings": {
"import/core-modules": [
"electron"
]
}
}
and I just get the "unresolved path to module' error.
It's probably something really silly, but what am I doing wrong? Ideally I'd just like to use the shared config.
Ok, after posting this issue on the Github repo, turns out that the Electron related changes have not been released to npm yet. They will be in the next release, but as of now, they are only in master.
https://github.com/benmosher/eslint-plugin-import/issues/393#issuecomment-227821876