I believe the short answer to my question is "No", but allow me to describe the context.
We are currently using IdentityServer to authorize access to our APIs (via client credentials). All of the API clients are computer programs which run in our data centers and are under our control. In order to minimize our attack surface, our IdentityServer is running from an internal/private network, reachable from our APIs, services, and other apps. No problems.
We now want to leverage the IdentityServer installation to provide user authentication for our public-facing web applications. These applications run via ASP.NET MVC and will consequently require user interaction with the IdentityServer for password validation (implicit or hybrid grant type). This appears to be a hard requirement, but I'm curious if there is a simple way to maintain the private installation of IdentityServer.
Can we proxy requests from the ASP.NET middle-ware for handling the authentication handshake, and does it even make sense to do so? I'm leaning towards a public-facing STS to eliminate any proxying, but thought I would ask to see what other patterns are employable.
For what its worth, we would ultimately use cookie-based authentication with the hybrid flow, but would be able to start with the implicit flow too.
The user's browser must be able to access the identity server. This can be via a proxy though.
Related
We have 2 web applications in production since several years. They are currently only accessible from the intranet of the company. Future changes in the company's organization require to make these applications accessible from the internet. It is planned to use Okta to reinforce security. I don't know nothing about Okta yet. As far as possible, the changes should have as little impact as possible.
Current situation:
Web App 1:
ASP.NET MVC solution secured with userid/password ASP.NET Membership with forms authentication. Userid is an internal user code like ADE465 for example.
Web App 2:
ASP.NET MVC solution secured with userid/password authentication through IdentityServer2 (Thinktecture). Userid is firstname dot lastname like john.doe for example.
All web apps are hosted on IIS on an Azure virtual machine named (let's say) FABVM03.
For the future Okta integration: no need to have SSO (Single Sign On). Would it be possible to simply secure with Okta everything accessed on the server FABVM03? Or everything accessed from a specific URL ?
For example, if someone tries to access https://example.com/webapp1/login.html Okta should comes up and ask for authentication (Okta verify) and if successful allow the user to access the requested url. In fact, the 'already in place' login/password should then be asked as it is already the case. I agree the user would have to enter credentials 2 times: first for Okta verify, next for login the specific web application. But that's okay. As you will have understood, no code modification in the web apps would be necessary in this scenario.
My question is to know if something like that is possible with Okta. If not what is the less impacting possible solution with Okta ?
Okta is not to enforce your policies (PEP), it's mainly SSO and Access Management solution.
Okta has a component, called OAG (Okta Access Gateway), which can be used to reverse-proxy your on-prem applications (which will work in your situation too, as your VPC is effectively equal to "on-prem in a cloud"). Which can do something like you want (protect your application and ask for authentication/authorization), but it's an additional package on top of basic Okta costs.
What you may need is a level of protection added on Azure Network layer, not sure if there is something like that though. I've seen some modules for nginx, capable of intercepting traffic and redirecting it to Okta, if not accompanied with a token. So try to dig into these 2 directions...
You need some proxy-based solution to talk to Okta and enforce the protection for your applications. There are open source tools:
https://github.com/vouch/vouch-proxy
https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy
https://github.com/buzzfeed/sso
Or you can checkout some commercial tools:
https://www.okta.com/products/access-gateway/
https://www.datawiza.com/platform/
We are developing an application in a microservice architecture, which implements signle sign-on using Spring Cloud OAuth2 on multiple OAuth2 providers like Google and Facebook. We are also developing our own authorization server, and will be integrated on next release.
Now, on our microservices, which are resource servers, I would like to know how to handle multiple token-info-uri or user-info-uri to multiple authorization servers (e.g. for Facebook or Google).
This type of situation is generally solved by having a middle-man; a single entity that your resource servers trust and that can be used to normalize any possible differences that surface from the fact that users may authenticate with distinct providers. This is sometimes referred to as a federation provider.
Auth0 is a good example on this kind of implementation. Disclosure: I'm an Auth0 engineer.
Auth0 sits between your app and the identity provider that authenticates your users. Through this level of abstraction, Auth0 keeps your app isolated from any changes to and idiosyncrasies of each provider's implementation.
(emphasis is mine)
It's not that your resource servers can't technically trust more than one authorization server, it's just that moving that logic out of the individual resource servers into a central location will make it more manageable and decoupled.
Also have in mind that authentication and authorization are different things although we are used to seeing them together. If you're going to implement your own authorization server, you should make that the central point that can:
handle multiple types of authentication providers
provide a normalized view of the user profile to downstream resource servers
provide the access tokens that can be used by your client application to make authorized requests to your microservices
We have implemented several intranet web applications in my company. They all:
are built by ASP.NET MVC 3
use CAS(ticket in cookie policy) and a shared LADP server to single sign on
have role based access control logic according to current logon user
expose many RESTful(like) web apis for page's ajax usage
Now we find those web apis for ajax requests can be used as services for other web applications(like employee info, client info etc). Which means we need to access those apis at backend(with C# code). The problem is the authentication and authorization.
I don't know how to go with the existing authentication mode to access those web apis. I can only think of a way that use an shared service credential among back end servers but it means this credential must have a full access authority. Is it a security risk? And as I metioned, we use ticket in cookie policy with CAS. Which is OK for browser but seems difficult for C# code. How to use a credential with CAS from backend? Use a WebClient and handle 302 manually?
Has anyone met a similar case and have some good experiences with this? Please give me some advice. Thanks a lot.
What you need here is to use the CAS proxy mode to access backend web services : https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CAS/Proxy+CAS+Walkthrough.
I am starting a new product that will require a .NET based server (using WCF) hosted on Azure. I would like to have basic authentication and security features. The clients are all "rich" UI but are not neccessarily microsoft ones.
We intend to have the first client application written in Silverlight, but we want to keep our options open to implement clients for iOS and Android in the future. So we do not want to use WCF specific features but rather protocols that are easily available on other enviroments.
Of course, with the Silverlight client, we hope to get as much done for us automatically as possible. We intend to only communicate through web services.
Which bindings are recommended for such a scenario?
How would you implement security? (assuming we need basic security - Users being able to log in with encrypted user and password and perhaps some built in basic role management althouh this is optional).
Suggestions?
You could use WCF to implement a REST interface
The binding would have to be a basicHttpBinding (to be open to all platforms) and using SSL to secure the line.
Managing credentials could be done using tokens to be passed back and forth after authentication. Much like a http session. You could pass the token using a cookie but the token could be part of the API or Headers as well. See this Best Practices for securing a REST API / web service
This would grant you the power of .NET and WCF without losing interopability.
I want to build my web services serving JSON data utilizing RESTful architecture.
But I want my own client apps only that can request from my web services.
Basically, my web services contain sensitive data that is not for public consumption, but I wanted to build it that way so I can build many different client apps that connects to my web service.
Would appreciate any ideas for this, thanks.
The fact that it's RESTful or uses JSON isn't a relevant factor when it comes to securing a web service. Any web service would need to be secured in the same manner. There are a few things you should do:
If possible, don't host your web service on the Internet. If the web service is hosted within your company's LAN, for example, it won't be exposed to public consumption unless you specifically exposed it through your router.
Set up authentication and authorization rules. If you're hosting your web service inside of a Windows domain, you could simply use Windows authentication and set up rules based on Active Directory users and groups. Other options are to use HTTP authentication, client certificate authentication, or if you're developing in .NET, forms authentication.
Use encryption (HTTPS), especially if your web site is hosted on the Internet.
You just need a couple things in place to do this. First, the service client will need to authenticate against your service (over HTTPS) to make a request. Once the client is authenticated, you can return a private token which the client has to include with this token. As long as the token expires after a reasonable amount of time, and a secure algorithm is used to generate it, this should do what you want.
If you have more strict security requirements, you can follow Jakob's suggestion, or have the client start a VPN session prior to making requests.