Core Data crash on [managedObjectContext reset]; - ios

Here is the code snippet of my core data operation . It works fine most of the time. But now when I added core data debugging argument to see if all the core data calls are fine with respect to multithreading Core Data Concurrency Debugging , I see a crash on the line [contexts reset]; .
- (void)readAllModelObjects {
NSFetchRequest * fr = [NSFetchRequest ....]
NSManagedObjectContext * context = [selg getChildContext];
[context performBlockAndWait:^{
NSArray * resultArray = [context executeFetchRequest:fr error: nil ];
NSArray * nonCoreDataModelObjectsArray = [self parseCoreDataObjectsToModel: resultArray];
_memberResultArray = nonCoreDataModelObjectsArray ;
}];
[context reset]; // This is the line it crashes .
}
- (NSManagedObjectContet *)getChildContext {
NSManagedObjectContext * privateContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
privateContext.parentContext = [self mainQueueManagedObjectContext];
return privateContext ;
}
- (NSArray * )parseCoreDataObjectsToModel:(NSArray *)cdObjectsArray {
// creates and initializes the model objects array (non managed object class objects ) from core data objects
// return this array
}
There is only one main queue context attached to persistent store coordinator . This one is used as parent for each child context that is created for a core data operation .
(void)readAllModelObjects is called from a background thread as expected .
I got below error from core data
CoreData`+[NSManagedObjectContext _
_Multithreading_Violation_AllThatIsLeftToUsIsHonor__]:
Any hints / suggestions will definitely help me in figuring out the crash , please help .

When you change values of a managedObject those changes are not saved until the context is saved. Once you save the context, the context either writes to disk or pushes it up to its parent context. This is a way to have a few changes that are all done as one unit - in database speak it would be called a transaction. reset undoes those changes. So just like changing object needs to be done on the correct thread, reset which undoes the changes, needs to be done on the correct thread.
In your case, there is no need to call reset at all because you haven't changed anything to context. The context doesn't have any changes that would be undo by a reset. If you would want to call reset you would have to do inside the performBlockAndWait.
TD;DR : [context reset] is not thread-safe and must be done from the correct thread.

Related

Core Data, Concurrency and GCD

I'm having difficulties trying to figure out how to use Core Data concurrently and properly.
I have to clear Core Data of an entity before adding new data every time there is an update. Therefore I've decided to use this snippet:
-(void)addSale:(NSArray *)results{
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
NSString *entity = #"Sale";
CoreDataManager.sharedInstance.delegate = self;
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[CoreDataManager.sharedInstance deleteEntityWithName:entity];
});
NSManagedObjectContext *privateContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
privateContext.parentContext = CoreDataManager.sharedInstance.managedObjectContext;
for (NSDictionary *dataDictionary in [results valueForKey:#"Sales"])
{
NSManagedObject *managedObject = [NSEntityDescription insertNewObjectForEntityForName:entity inManagedObjectContext:privateContext];
// Fill ManagedObject
// .....
}
NSError *error;
[privateContext save:&error];
if (error != nil) {
NSLog(#"Couldn't save private context bcoz of %#\n%#", error, error.localizedDescription);
}
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
// Save Main ManagedObjectContext
[CoreDataManager.sharedInstance saveContext:CoreDataManager.sharedInstance.managedObjectContext WithEntityName:entity];
});
});
}
Problem is that I have to do the same thing for 2 other entities while keeping the UI responsive without having any impacts on the Core Data.
Is there any better approaches to handle this?
Create a private context associated with the NSPersistentStoreCoordinator.
Delete objects in the private context.
Save private context.
Tell main queue context to reset if any of those objects were being used.
There really is no reason to delete objects on the main context (which it appears you are doing with your singleton).
If your UI has not touched any of the objects you are deleting then you do not need to reset the context associated with the User Interface.
You could also, instead of doing a reset, have the main queue context consume the save notification from the private queue context and that will net the same result.

Multicontext Core Data: merging to unsaved context

I'm trying to implement this core data stack:
PSC <--+-- MainMOC
|
+-- BackgroundPrivateMOC
There are some things I'm actually don't understand. Perhaps we have an object in our Persisten Store and we fetch it from the main MOC to do some changes (user change it manually). At the same time my BG MOC is doing some changes with the same one object and save the changes to PS. After the saving is done we must merge the BG MOC to the MAIN MOC (this is a common practice). What I expect after the merging is that the MAIN MOC contains changes from the BG MOC (because the changes were done a bit later than the MAIN ones). But this actually doesn't happened. All I have after the merging is finished is a dirty refreshedObjects = 1 in my MAIN MOC and if I fetch that object again through the MAIN MOC, I don't see any changes made through the BG MOC.
How should I correctly propagate BG changes to MAIN MOC while the
MAIN MOC was not saved prior the BG changes was made?
How to handle
the situation when my MAIN MOC has non-zero refreshedObjects after merging is completed, and
how to push these objects in the MAIN MOC to make them available to
fetch and with?
I believe my sample code can help you to understand my problem more clearly. You can just download the project (https://www.dropbox.com/s/1qr50zto5j4hj40/ThreadedCoreData.zip?dl=0) and run XCTest, that I prepared.
Here is the failing test code:
#implementation ThrdCoreData_Tests
- (void)setUp
{
[super setUp];
/**
OUR SIMPLE STACK:
PSC <--+-- MainMOC
|
+-- BackgroundPrivateMOC
*/
NSPersistentStoreCoordinator *coordinator = [self persistentStoreCoordinator];
// main context (Main queue)
_mainMOC = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSMainQueueConcurrencyType];
[_mainMOC setPersistentStoreCoordinator:coordinator];
[_mainMOC setMergePolicy:NSMergeByPropertyObjectTrumpMergePolicy];
// background context (Private Queue)
_bgMOC = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
_bgMOC.persistentStoreCoordinator = self.persistentStoreCoordinator;
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:self
selector:#selector(mergeBGChangesToMain:)
name:NSManagedObjectContextDidSaveNotification
object:_bgMOC];
u_int32_t value = arc4random_uniform(3000000000); // simply generate new random values for the test
_mainMOCVlaue = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%u" , value];
_expectedBGValue = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%u" , value/2];
Earthquake * mainEq = [Earthquake MR_findFirstInContext:self.mainMOC];
if (!mainEq){ // At the very first time the test is running, create one single test oject.
Earthquake * mainEq = [Earthquake MR_createEntityInContext:self.mainMOC];
mainEq.location = nil; // initial value will be nil
[self.mainMOC MR_saveOnlySelfAndWait];
}
}
- (void)testThatBGMOCSuccessfullyMergesWithMain
{
_expectation = [self expectationWithDescription:#"test finished"];
// lets change our single object in main MOC. I expect that the value will be later overwritten by `_expectedBGValue`
Earthquake * mainEq = [Earthquake MR_findFirstInContext:self.mainMOC];
NSLog(#"\nCurrently stored value:\n%#\nNew main value:\n%#", mainEq.location, _mainMOCVlaue);
mainEq.location = _mainMOCVlaue; // the test will succeed if this line commented
// now change that object in BG MOC by setting `_expectedBGValue`
[_bgMOC performBlockAndWait:^{
Earthquake * bgEq = [Earthquake MR_findFirstInContext:_bgMOC];
bgEq.location = _expectedBGValue;
NSLog(#"\nNew expected value set:\n%#", _expectedBGValue);
[_bgMOC MR_saveToPersistentStoreAndWait]; // this will trigger the `mergeBGChangesToMain` method
}];
[self waitForExpectationsWithTimeout:3 handler:nil];
}
- (void)mergeBGChangesToMain:(NSNotification *)notification {
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[self.mainMOC mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:notification];
// now after merge done, lets find our object with expected value `_expectedBGValue`:
Earthquake * expectedEQ = [Earthquake MR_findFirstByAttribute:#"location" withValue:_expectedBGValue inContext:self.mainMOC];
if (!expectedEQ){
Earthquake * eqFirst = [Earthquake MR_findFirstInContext:self.mainMOC];
NSLog(#"\nCurrent main MOC value is:\n%#\nexptected:\n%#", eqFirst.location, _expectedBGValue);
}
XCTAssert(expectedEQ != nil, #"Expected value not found");
[_expectation fulfill];
});
}
First, when posting core data code, I suggest you not post code that depends on a third party library, unless that third party library is directly related to your problem. I assume MR is magical record, but I don't use it, and it seems to just muddy the waters of the post because who knows what it is (or is not) doing under the covers.
In other words, try to trim examples down to as little as code as necessary... and no more... and only include third-party libraries when absolutely necessary.
Secondly, when writing unit tests for your core data usage, I suggest using an in-memory stack. You always start empty and it can be initialized however you want. Much easier to use for testing.
That said, your problem is a misunderstanding of what mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification does (and does not do).
Basically, you have an object in a Core Data persistent store. You have two different MOCs attached to the store via the same PSC.
Your test then loads the object into main MOC, and changes the value without saving to the PSC. A second MOC then loads the same object, and changes its value to something different (i.e., the store, and both MOCs all have a different value for a particular attribute of the same object).
Now, when we save the MOC, if there are conflicts, the conflicts will be handled as instructed by the mergePolicy. However, the merge policy does not apply to mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification.
You can think of mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification as inserting any new objects, deleting any deleted objects, and "refreshing" any updated objects while preserving any local changes.
In your test, if you add another attribute (e.g., "title") and change both "title" and "location" in the BG MOC but only change "location" in the main MOC, you will see that the "title" gets merged from the BG MOC into the main MOC as expected.
However, as you note in your question, the "location" appears to not get merged. In actuality, it does get merged, but any local change will override what's in the store... and this is exactly what you want to happen because the user likely made that change, and does not want it to be changed behind their back.
Basically, any pending local changes will override changes from the to-be-merged-MOC.
If you want something different, you have to implement that behavior when you do the merge, like this...
- (void)mergeBGChangesToMain:(NSNotification*)note {
NSMutableSet *updatedObjectIDs = [NSMutableSet set];
for (NSManagedObject *obj in [note.userInfo objectForKey:NSUpdatedObjectsKey]) {
[updatedObjectIDs addObject:[obj objectID]];
}
[_mainMOC performBlock:^{
for (NSManagedObject *obj in [_mainMOC updatedObjects]) {
if ([updatedObjectIDs containsObject:obj.objectID]) {
[_mainMOC refreshObject:obj mergeChanges:NO];
}
}
[_mainMOC mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:note];
}];
}
That code first collects the ObjectIDs of each object that was updated in the merged-from-MOC.
Prior to doing the merge, we then look at each of the updated objects in the merge-to-MOC. If we are merging an object into our MOC, and our merge-to-MOC has also changed that object, then we want to allow the values in the merged-from-MOC to override those in the merged-to-MOC. Thus, we refresh the local object from the store, basically discarding any local changes (there are side effects, e.g., causing the object to become a fault, releasing references to any relationships, and releasing any transient properties - see documentation of refreshObject:mergeChanges:).
Consider the following category, which addresses your situation, and a common problem when using observers like NSFetchedResultsController.
#interface NSManagedObjectContext (WJHMerging)
- (void)mergeChangesIntoContext:(NSManagedObjectContext*)moc
withDidSaveNotification:(NSNotification*)notification
faultUpdatedObjects:(BOOL)faultUpdatedObjects
overrideLocalChanges:(BOOL)overrideLocalChanges
completion:(void(^)())completionBlock;
#end
#implementation NSManagedObjectContext (WJHMerging)
- (void)mergeChangesIntoContext:(NSManagedObjectContext *)moc
withDidSaveNotification:(NSNotification *)notification
faultUpdatedObjects:(BOOL)faultUpdatedObjects
overrideLocalChanges:(BOOL)overrideLocalChanges
completion:(void (^)())completionBlock {
NSAssert(self == notification.object, #"Not called with");
NSSet *updatedObjects = notification.userInfo[NSUpdatedObjectsKey];
NSMutableSet *updatedObjectIDs = nil;
if (overrideLocalChanges || faultUpdatedObjects) {
updatedObjectIDs = [NSMutableSet setWithCapacity:updatedObjects.count];
for (NSManagedObject *obj in updatedObjects) {
[updatedObjectIDs addObject:[obj objectID]];
}
}
[moc performBlock:^{
if (overrideLocalChanges) {
for (NSManagedObject *obj in [moc updatedObjects]) {
if ([updatedObjectIDs containsObject:obj.objectID]) {
[moc refreshObject:obj mergeChanges:NO];
}
}
}
if (faultUpdatedObjects) {
for (NSManagedObjectID *objectID in updatedObjectIDs) {
[[moc objectWithID:objectID] willAccessValueForKey:nil];
}
}
[moc mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:notification];
if (completionBlock) {
completionBlock();
}
}];
}
#end

New thread + NSManagedObjectContext

I'm trying to separate my application work when there is a bigger work to do to optimize performance. My problem is about a NSManagedObjectContext used in another thread than the main one.
I'm calling:
[NSThread detachNewThreadSelector:#selector(test:) toTarget:self withObject:myObject];
On the test method there are some stuff to do and I have a problem here:
NSArray *fetchResults = [moc
executeFetchRequest:request
error:&error];
Here is my test method:
-(void) test:(MyObject *)myObject{
#autoreleasepool {
//Mycode
}
}
The second time I call the test method, my new thread is blocked when the executeFetchRequest is called.
This problem arrived when my test method is called more than one time in succession. I think the problem comes from the moc but I can't really understand why.
Edit:
With #Charlie's method it's almost working. Here is my code to save my NSManagedObjectContext (object created on my new thread).
- (void) saveContext:(NSManagedObjectContext *) moc{
NSError *error = nil;
if ([moc hasChanges] && ![moc save:&error]) {
NSLog(#"Unresolved error %#, %#", error, [error userInfo]);
}
}
This method is called on the new thread. My problem now is that with this save, I have a deadlock and I don't really understand why. Without it's perfectly working.
Edit2
I'm working on this issue but I still can't fix it. I changed my code about the detachNewThreadSelector. Here is my new code:
NSManagedObjectContext* context = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc]
initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
context.persistentStoreCoordinator = self.persistentStoreCoordinator;
context.undoManager = nil;
[context performBlock:^
{
CCImages* cachedImage;
NSManagedObjectContext *childContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
childContext.parentContext = context;
cachedImage=[CCImages getCCImageForKey:path inManagedObjectContext:childContext];
UIImage *image = [self getImageFromCacheWithPath:path andCachedImage:cachedImage atDate:now];
if (image != nil){
if(![weakSelf.delegate respondsToSelector:#selector(CacheCacheDidLoadImageFromCache:)])
[weakSelf setDelegate:appDelegate.callbacksCollector];
//[weakSelf useCallbackCollectorForDelegate:weakSelf inMethod:#"initPaginatorForListMoments"];
[weakSelf.delegate CacheCacheDidLoadImageFromCache:image];
}
}
- (UIImage*) getImageFromCacheWithPath:(NSString*) path andCachedImage:(CCImages *) cachedImage atDate: (NSDate *) now{
NSURL* localURL=[NSURL URLWithString:cachedImage.path relativeToURL:[self imageCacheDirectory]];
UIImage * image;
//restore uiimage from local file system
if (localURL) {
image=[UIImage imageWithContentsOfFile:[localURL path]];
//update cache
[cachedImage setLastAccessedAt:now];
[self saveContext];
if(image)
return image;
}
return nil;
}
Just after that, I'm saving my contexts (manually for now)
[childContext performBlock:^{
NSError *error = nil;
if (![childContext save:&error]) {
DDLogError(#"Error during context saving when getting image from cache : %#",[error description]);
}
else{
[context performBlock:^{
NSError *error = nil;
if (![context save:&error]) {
DDLogError(#"Error during context saving when getting image from cache : %#",[error description]);
}
}];
}
}];
There is a strange problem. My call back method is called without any problem on my controller (which implements the CacheCacheDidLoadImageFromCache: method). On this method I attest the reception of the image (DDLogInfo) and say that I want my spinner to stop. It does not directly but only 15secondes after the callback method was called.
My main problem is that my context (I guess) is still loading my image from the cache while it was already found. I said 'already' because the callback method has been called and the image was present. There is no suspicious activity of the CPU or of the memory. Instruments didn't find any leak.
I'm pretty sure that I'm using wrongly the NSManagedObjectContext but I can't find where.
You are using the old concurrency model of thread confinement, and violating it's rules (as described in the Core Data Concurrency Guide, which has not been updated yet for queue confinement). Specifically, you are trying to use an NSManagedObjectContext or NSManagedObject between multiple threads.
This is bad.
Thread confinement should not be used for new code, only to maintain the compatibility of old code while it's being migrated to queue confinement. This does not seem to apply to you.
To use queue confinement to solve your problem, first you should create a context attached to your persistent store coordinator. This will serve as the parent for all other contexts:
+ (NSManagedObjectContent *) parentContextWithPersistentStoreCoordinator:(NSPersistentStoreCoordinator *)coordinator {
NSManagedObjectContext *result = nil;
result = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
[result setPersistentStoreCoordinator:coordinator];
return result;
}
Next, you want the ability to create child managed object contexts. You will use these to perform work on the data, wether reading or writing. An NSManagedObjectContext is a scratchpad of the work you are doing. You can think of it as a transaction. For example, if you're updating the store from a detail view controller you would create a new child context. Or if you were performing a multi-step import of a large data set, you would create a child for each step.
This will create a new child context from a parent:
+ (NSManagedObjectContext *) childContextWithParent:(NSManagedObjectContext *)parent {
NSManagedObjectContext *result = nil;
result = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
[result setParent:parent];
return result;
}
Now you have a parent context, and you can create child contexts to perform work. To perform work on a context, you must wrap that work in performBlock: to execute it on the context's queue. I do not recommend using performBlockAndWait:. That is intended only for re-rentrant methods, and does not provide an autorelease pool or processing of user events (user events are what drives nearly all of Core Data, so they're important. performBlockAndWait: is an easy way to introduce bugs).
Instead of performBlockAndWait: for your example above, create a method that takes a block to process the results of your fetch. The fetch, and the block, will run from the context's queue - the threading is done for you by Core Data:
- (void) doThingWithFetchResults:(void (^)(NSArray *results, NSError *error))resultsHandler{
if (resultsHandler != nil){
[[self context] performBlock:^{
NSArray *fetchResults = [[self context] executeFetchRequest:request error:&error];
resultsHandler(fetchResults, error);
}];
}
}
Which you would call like this:
[self doThingsWithFetchResults:^(NSArray *something, NSError *error){
if ([something count] > 0){
// Do stuff with your array of managed objects
} else {
// Handle the error
}
}];
That said, always prefer using an NSFetchedResultsController over using executeFetch:. There seems to be a belief that NSFetchedResultsController is for powering table views or that it can only be used from the main thread or queue. This is not true. A fetched results controller can be used with a private queue context as shown above, it does not require a main queue context. The delegate callbacks the fetched results controller emits will come from whatever queue it's context is using, so UIKit calls need to be made on the main queue inside your delegate method implementations. The one issue with using a fetched results controller this way is that caching does not work due to a bug.
Again, always prefer the higher level NSFetchedResultsController to executeFetch:.
When you save a context using queue confinement you are only saving that context, and the save will push the changes in that context to it's parent. To save to the store you must recursively save all the way. This is easy to do. Save the current context, then call save on the parent as well. Doing this recursively will save all the way to the store - the context that has no parent context.
Example:
- (void) saveContextAllTheWayBaby:(NSManagedObjectContext *)context {
[context performBlock:^{
NSError *error = nil;
if (![context save:&error]){
// Handle the error appropriately.
} else {
[self saveContextAllTheWayBaby:[context parentContext]];
}
}];
}
You do not, and should not, use merge notifications and mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification: with queue confinement. mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification: is a mechanism for the thread confinement model that is replaced by the parent-child context model. Using it can cause a whole slew of problems.
Following the examples above you should be able to abandon thread confinement and all of the issues that come with it. The problems you are seeing with your current implementation are only the tip of the iceberg.
There are a number of Core Data sessions from the past several years of WWDC that may also be of help. The 2012 WWDC Session "Core Data Best Practices" should be of particular interest.
if you want to use managed object context in background thread, there are two approaches,
1 Create a new context set concurrency type to NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType and set the parentContext to main thread context
2 Create a new context set concurrency type to NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType and set persistentStoreCoordinator to main thread persistentStoreCoordinator
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^(void) {
NSManagedObjectContext *privateContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
privateContext.persistentStoreCoordinator = mainManagedObjectContext.persistentStoreCoordinator;
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserverForName:NSManagedObjectContextDidSaveNotification object:nil queue:nil usingBlock:^(NSNotification* note) {
NSManagedObjectContext *moc = mainManagedObjectContext;
if (note.object != moc) {
[moc mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:note];
}
}];
// do work here
// remember managed object is not thread save, so you need to reload the object in private context
});
before exist the thread, make sure remove the observer, bad thing can happen if you don't
for more details read http://www.objc.io/issue-2/common-background-practices.html

Core data data not saved

I am currently developing an application that uses Core Data to store data. The application synchronizes its content with a web server by downloading and parsing a huge XML file (about 40000 entries). The application allows the user to search data and modify it (CRUD). The fetch operations are too heavy, that is why i decided to use the following pattern :
"One managed object context for the main thread (NSMainQueueConcurrencyType) in order to refresh user interface. The heavy fetching and updates are done through multiple background managed object contexts (NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType). No use of children contexts".
I fetch some objects into an array (let us say array of "users"), then i try to update or delete one "user" (the object "user" is obtained from the populated array)in a background context and finally i save that context.
I am listening to NSManagedObjectContextDidSaveNotification and merge any modifications with my main thread managed object context.
Every thing works fine except when i relaunch my application i realize that none of the modifications has been saved.
Here is some code to explain the used pattern
Main managed object context :
-(NSManagedObjectContext *)mainManagedObjectContext {
if (_mainManagedObjectContext != nil)
{
return _mainManagedObjectContext;
}
NSPersistentStoreCoordinator *coordinator = [self persistentStoreCoordinator];
_mainManagedObjectContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSMainQueueConcurrencyType];
[_mainManagedObjectContext setPersistentStoreCoordinator:coordinator];
return _mainManagedObjectContext;
}
Background managed object context :
-(NSManagedObjectContext *)newManagedObjectContext {
NSManagedObjectContext *newContext;
NSPersistentStoreCoordinator *coordinator = [self persistentStoreCoordinator];
newContext = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] initWithConcurrencyType:NSPrivateQueueConcurrencyType];
[newContext performBlockAndWait:^{
[newContext setPersistentStoreCoordinator:coordinator];
}];
return newContext;
}
Update a record :
-(void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath{
FootBallCoach *coach = [_coaches objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
coach.firstName = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"Coach %i",indexPath.row];
NSManagedObjectContext *context = [[SDCoreDataController sharedInstance] newManagedObjectContext];
[context performBlock:^{
NSError *error;
[context save:&error];
if (error)
{
NSLog(#"ERROR SAVING : %#",error.localizedDescription);
}
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[self refreshCoaches:nil];
});
}];
}
Am i missing any thing ? should i save my main managed object context after saving the background context ?
If your context is configured with a persistent store coordinator, then save should write data to the store. If your context is configured with another context as parent, then save will push the data to the parent. Only when the last parent, the one that is configured with persistent store coordinator is saved, is the data written to the store.
Check that your background context is really configured with persistent store coordinator.
Check the return value and possible error of the -save:.
Make sure you work with your background context via -performBlock...: methods.
UPDATE
Each time you call your -newManagedObjectContext method, a new context is created. This context knows nothing about FootBallCoach object you’re updating. You need to save the same context FootBallCoach object belongs to.
Don’t forget that each object belongs to one and only one context.
Also make sure you hold a strong reference to a context whose objects you’re using.

Core Data: nil managed object context on my managed object

I'm using 2 managed object contexts for efficiently important a large data set in the background. I'm ensuring I'm only using 1 managed object context at a time in the thread.
NSManagedObjectContext *context = [[NSManagedObjectContext alloc] init];
[context setPersistentStoreCoordinator:[self persistentStoreCoordinator]];
MetricType *metricType = [self metricTypeForName:self.metricName fromContext:context];
NSLog(#"metric context %#", [metricType managedObjectContext]);
[self processDataInContext:context forMetric:metricType];
In the snipped of code above, the NSLog correctly prints out the address of the managedObjectContext i'm using. I then go on to processDataInContext - which is just a private method to interate over a json data array and add objects. Each object has a relationship to the MetricType.
However, when I go to associate them
metric.metricType = metricType;
I get the error: Illegal attempt to establish a relationship 'metricType' between objects in different contexts.... even though I'm ensuring I don't do this.
When I do a log output before this line:
NSLog(#"My Context %#", context);
NSLog(#"metric context %#", [metricType managedObjectContext]);
The metricType context returns nil!!
How has it become nilled? I didn't nil it and this seems to be the reason its complaining.
I figured it out
[context reset];
..was being called every 50 records, which of course was removing my metricType object from the context and I wasn't re-fetching it.
The way you initialize metricType looks fishy. What does [self metricTypeForName:fromContext:] actually do to return a MetricType instance? Are you creating a new MetricType using [[MetricType alloc]init]? I suspect you are returning something in an auto-release pool

Resources