Applying a date format to a grid is easily done { type: 'date', cellFilter: "date:\'MM/dd/yyyy\'" }
however what if we want to display a different format for French - Canadian date:\'yyyy-MM-dd\'
I have a grid which uses 'i18nService' to translate the grid like this
app.controller('ctrl', ['$scope', '$http', '$timeout', '$filter','i18nService', 'uiGridConstants', function ($scope, $http, $timeout, $filter, $i18nService, uiGridConstants) {
$i18nService.setCurrentLang('fr');
...
now how do I format the dates in the grid differently based on language the grid is rendered in?
Related
I am building an application using MVC & Web Api. On a View I am using JqGrid. Previously we used to assign local data to JqGrid which was working fine. Now due to some changes in logic, we are using WebApi to bring data from Server, this is a Json data, we store it in variable then we assign this data object to JqGrid but data does not get displayed.
When instead of data option i give "url" of web api then everything works fine, but as soon we use "data" option then jqgrid does not work.What could be the possible reason? Reason for doing this is that I want to add, edit, update data locally and then when final save button is pressed, data goes back to Server.
$().ready(function () {
//{"total":1,"page":1,"records":3,"rows":[{"id":"1","cell":["1","Tomato
//Soup","db#db.com","db#db.com","Groceries"]},{"id":"2","cell":["2","Yo-
//yo","db#db.com","db#db.com","Toys"]},{"id":"3","cell":
//["3","Hammer","db#db.com","db#db.com","Hardware"]}]}
//
$.getJSON("api/userwebapi/",
function (data) {
//userDataFromApi = jQuery.parseJSON(data);
userDataFromApi =data;
//alert(userDataFromApi[0].ID);
ConfigureUserGrid(userDataFromApi);
});
});
function ConfigureUserGrid(userDataFromApi) {
var grdUsers = $("#grdUsers");
var lastsel = 0;
$("#grdUsers").jqGrid({
datatype: "json"
, data: userDataFromApi
//, url: "api/userwebapi"
,colNames: ['ID', 'Name', 'User Role', 'Email', 'Address']
,colModel: [
{ name: 'ID', index: 'ID', width: 80, hidden: true }
, { name: 'Name', index: 'Name', width: 150 }
, { name: 'UserRole', index: 'UserRole', width: 150 }
, { name: 'Email', index: 'Email', width: 200, sortable: true }
, { name: 'Address', index: 'Address', width: 200, sortable: true }]
, viewrecords: true
, pager: '#pager1'
, mtype: 'GET'
,rowNum:true
,caption: 'My first grid'
}); //close of jQuery("#grdUsers").jqGrid({
$("#grdUsers").jqGrid('navGrid', '#pager1',
{ add: false, del: false, edit: false, search: false, refresh: false });
}
The reason of the problem is wrong usage of jqGrid parameters (options). To be exactly you use wrong combination of jqGrid options. Tony Tomov (the developer of jqGrid) added many features in jqGrid during every new version. He wanted to hold backwards compatibility if it's possible. As the result there are a lot of options without clear name conversion. Many options work only if some other options are set. Exactly like in case of jQuery or jQuery UI there are no validation of input parameters. It makes many problems who people who starts to use jqGrid.
The problem in your case is the usage of data parameter together with datatype: "json". It's wrong combination of parameters. The problem is that jqGrid supports two remote datatypes and some local datatypes.
If you use datatype: "json" or datatype: "xml" then jqGrid get for you AJAX request for initial filling of grid and on every sorting, paging and (optionally) filtering. In any way the request to the url will be send. One uses HTTP command specified by mtype parameter. The paging and sorting of data have to be implemented on the server side. The request contain the requested page number, the length of the page, the index of the column used for the sorting and the direction of sorting. The data returned from the server should in the format described here. If you have non-standard data format you can use jsonReader options of jqGrid and jsonmap (xmlmap) in colModel to specify how the server response should be used to fill the grid.
If you don't want to implement server side paging, sorting and filtering of data you can use loadonce: true option. In the case the server should return all data at once. The data should be sorted once based on the initial sorting column (based of sortname and sortorder which you use). jqGrid will change datatype automatically to "local" after the first loading of data.
All other datatypes will be interpreted as local datatypes. The data parameter will be used only in case of datatype: "local". One should use another format of data in the case. One can use localReader (see here) to change the way how the data should be read from data parameter.
There are special case datatype: "jsonstring" where you can fill the grid in the way close with datatype: "json", but to use an object or JSON string as the input. In the case one should use datastr (not data !!!) as the input of data. After the first filling the datatype will be changed by jqGrid from datatype: "jsonstring" to datatype: "local".
So you have some options to fix the problem:
to use url and loadonce: true options if you don't want to implement paging of data.
to use datatype: "jsonstring" and datastr instead of data.
to use datatype: "local" and data filled as array of named items (properties of items should be the same as the value of name property of the columns).
How to configure the Kendo UI grid, so it would issue requests only for specific (displayed) fields?
In my instance, a Kendo UI grid is bound to a OData service. The service exposes a table with many (200+) fields. The app allows users to configure displayed field set of the Grid, set initial filters and sort parameters. The app configures the Grid, which then goes off and queries OData service.
The grid kendo.Data.DataSource is defined as:
var gridDataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
type: "odata",
transport: {
read: {
url: "#Url.Content(dynDataSource.Url)",
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
type: "GET",
dataType: "json"
}
},
pageSize: #Model.MaxPageSize,
serverPaging: true,
serverFiltering: true,
serverSorting: true,
filter: ...
}
Here's a sample request issued by the Grid (captured by Firebug):
http://localhost:22411/Data/Comp?%24inlinecount=allpages&%24top=1000&%24filter=DistrictCode+eq+%27460800%27
This returns all the fields of the table, which is a problem. The fields need to be limited by selecting only the required fields, the request for which would look like:
http://localhost:22411/Data/Comp?%24inlinecount=allpages&%24top=1000&%24filter=DistrictCode+eq+%27460800%27&%24select=DistrictCode,DistrictName,DistrictNumber
Again, how to configure the grid for this to happen?
I realize the source is available for Kendo UI, but I'm currently still on a trial version which doesn't include the source.
I think I've got a workable solution for this myself. I used an idea from this blog post:
http://community.dynamics.com/product/crm/crmtechnical/b/zhongchenzhoustipstricksandportaldevelopment/archive/2012/05/20/how-to-use-kendo-ui-datasource-kendo-ui-grid-with-dynamics-crm-2011-rest-endpoint.aspx
I attach an event handler the ajaxSend event, watch for my OData Service URL, and once such a request is detected, append the select column list to the URL. Here's the code:
$(document).ajaxSend(function (e, jqxhr, settings) {
if (settings.url.toLowerCase().indexOf("#Url.Content(dynDataSource.Url)".toLowerCase()) >= 0) {
settings.url += "&%24select=#requestColumnList";
}
});
Hope this helps. Still, if someone has got a better solution, I'd like to hear it.
I've also posted this question to Telerik forums: http://www.kendoui.com/forums/framework/data-source/configure-the-kendo-ui-datasource-so-it-would-issue-requests-only-for-specific-displayed-fields.aspx#2131604
I ran into a similar issue and implemented an approach that constructs an array of included columns in the transport's read data callback:
dataSource.transport.read.data = function(options) {
var data = {};
data["$select"] = columns.map(function(c) {
return c.field;
});
return data;
}
If you are using column menu and have hidden columns, you can also filter based on which columns are visible and force a grid refresh as columns are enabled.
columnShow: function (e) {
e.sender.dataSource.read();
}
We are using jquerytools and want to use the tooltip functionality for showing content
loaded through AJAX.
The documentation of jquerytools tooltip say that the content of the tooltip must be contained within the HTML directly after the element that should receive
the tooltip.
Is there no better way? The UI is too complex and this requirement sux.
how would you implement a jquerytools tooltip functionality with tooltip content sucked in through AJAX?
I am using a customized version of tiptip:
http://code.drewwilson.com/entry/tiptip-jquery-plugin
however, why can't you just use ajax to dynamically insert an element after for tooltip content?
you can have a "template" div somewhere like so:
<div id="tooltip-template" style="display:none"><span></span>...</div>
and inside your callback:
$.ajax(
{
url: '...',
type: "POST",
data: JSON.stringify(...),
success: function(result)
{
var tooltip = $("#tooltip-template").clone( );
tooltip.find("span").html(result.name);
var target = $("#tooltip-target");
target.after(tooltip);
target.tooltip( );
}
});
I am using jQuery UI's autocomplete with a remote data file. It works but it's slow. My JSONP is over a meg of 'value' junk characters and I'd like to minimize that. Here is the format:
[{"value": "Aaronsburg, PA"},
{"value": "Abanda, AL"},
{"value": "Abbeville, AL"}]
How do I get jQuery UI's Autocomplete to accept a remote data file of the form:
{["Aaronsburg, PA", "Abanda, AL", "Abbeville, AL"]}
or
["Aaronsburg, PA", "Abanda, AL", "Abbeville, AL"]
?
jQuery UI Autocomplete can take any format of data. You have complete control the rendering of the list but in this case I think it might just work.
This demo (albeit with a local source) seems to work as expected.
If you need more control you can tailor the renderItem function to suit any data format:
var searches = [{
label:'first',
desc:'foo foo',
},
{
label:'second',
desc:'bar bar',
},
{
label:'third',
desc:'baz baz',
}];
$(function() {
$('input').autocomplete({
dataType: 'json',
source: searches
})
.data('autocomplete')._renderItem = function(ul, item) {
return $('<li></li>')
.data('item.autocomplete', item)
.append(item.desc)
.appendTo(ul);
};
});
Or there is an example on the jQuery site using remote JSONP as a source and customizes the label and value needed to populate the list.
Well, the only way I can think of to do this is by using php with fopen and fread, then format the data.
I'm trying to build an array structured like
[
[num,
[num, num num]],
[num,
[num, num]],
]
but I get [num,num,num,num,num,num,num] =(
code here: http://jsfiddle.net/WRppV/4/
the problem is that I'm trying to send the var 'x' as data in an AJAX update function that jQueryUI uses for sortable. And it needs to be the array structure above. =\
I'm using the http://jqueryui.com/demos/sortable/#connect-lists kind of sorting.
So, normally I would just to $j(list selector).sortable('serialize')
but because I have two lists I tried this $j(selector1,selector2).sortable('serialize') which is what you do for sorting two lists as in the example. But when the ajax request is made, it only sends the updated list. Which would be fine if I had tons of processing power. but I need the list, and which list it belongs to.
Whats really interesting is that my server says the war is getting sent as
"content"=>"215,207"
but that doesn't even include the section_id
I should be getting something similar to
["141", ["203", "206", "204", "205"],
"142", ["215", "207"]]
(numbers and structure from chrome when I run the script from the link on my webpage)
my sortable js:
$j("<%= #sortable_contents %>").sortable({
connectWith: '.section-content',
axis: 'y',
zIndex: 1003,
cursor: 'crosshair',
update: function(){
d = $j("#sort_sections > li").map(function(index, element){
return [element.id.replace(/[a-z]+_/,""), [
$j(element).find("li.content").map(function(subindex, subelement){
return subelement.id.replace(/[a-z]+_/,"");
}).get()]];
}).get();
alert(d)
$j.ajax({
type: 'post',
data: {'content': d},//$j("<%= #sortable_contents %>").sortable('serialize'),//
dataType: 'script',
complete: function(request){
$j('#sort_contents').effect('highlight');
},
url: '/contents/sort_contents'})
}
});
This is nested. Don't listen to alert, try console.log instead.
In chrome, this gets logged out as this: