I have a Jenkinsfile multibranch pipeline script, which runs on two different Jenkins systems. Jenkinsfile relies on a specific label name. In one of the systems, the label based agent is available and in another not (intentionally). In the former it runs fine. In the Jenkins system without the matching label, the job just hangs because it cant find a matching agent.
Is there a way to specify an option to abort (or not start) a build if a label is not found?
Some discussion here:
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-35905
Might not be possible anytime soon
If they are calling in to a shared library then you can check for label being online/available and then fail the build
def computers = Jenkins.instance.computers
for(computer in computers){
if(computer.isOnline()){
labelStr = computer.node.getLabelString()
}
if labelStr ~= /user input/
break;
}
System.exit(1); // no label
For a declarative pipeline it may be possible to use when{beforeAgent} to test whether a label exists.
This would only be useful where the agent is specified for a stage rather than the whole pipeline.
...and caveat that this is an as yet untested hypothesis.
Just a workaround, but in order to avoid dependency on shared lib I run the below every X minutes to clean-up culprits from queue:
import hudson.model.*
def q = Jenkins.instance.queue
q.items.each {
if (it =~ /someregex or match all/) {
why = it.getWhy()
if (why =~ /.*There are no nodes with the label.*/) {
println "No node found for $it.task.runId. It's stuck in damn jenkins queue forever and ever. Killing it"
q.cancel(it.task)
}
}
}
Related
I am developing software for an embedded device. The steps involved in building and verifying it all are complicated: creating the build environment (via containers), building the actual SD card image, running unit tests, automated tests on target hardware, license compliance checks and so on - details aren't important here.
Currently I have this in one long declarative Jenkinsfile as a multibranch-pipeline (for all intents and purpose here, we're doing gitflow). In doing this I've hit a limit on the size of a Jenkinsfile (https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-37984) and can't actually get all the stages in that I want to.
It's too big so i need to cut this massive pipeline up. I broke this all up in little pipeline jobs with parameters to pass data/context between each part of the pipeline and came up with something like this:
I've colour-coded the A and B artifacts as they're used a lot and the lines would make things messy. What this tries to show is an order of running things, where things in a column depend on artifacts created in column to the left.
I'm struggling to discover how to do the "waiting" for multiple upstream jobs (for instance in Job Foxtrot in the diagram) before starting another downstream job that depends on them.
I specifically do not want to turn each column in the diagram into a parallel group of things, because for instance Job Delta might take 2 minutes but Job Charlie take 20 minutes. The exact duration of each job is variable and unpredictable as for some parameter combinations will mean building from scratch and others will cause an existing artifact to be output.
I think I need something like the join plugin (https://plugins.jenkins.io/join/), but for pipeline jobs (join only works on freestyle jobs and is quite aged).
The one approach I've explored is to have a "controller" job (maybe job Alpha in the diagram?) that uses the build step (https://www.jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/steps/pipeline-build-step/_) with the wait parameter set to false to trigger the downstream jobs in correct order, with the correct parameters. It would involve searching Jenkins.instance.getItems() to locate the Runs for the downstream projects, which have an upstream cause that matches the currently executing "controller" job. This involves polling waiting for the job to appear and then polling for the job to complete. This feels like I'm "doing it wrong". Below is the source for this polling approach - be gentle, i'm new to groovy!
Is this polling approach a good way? What problems could I encounter with this approach? Should I be using the ItemListener Jenkins ExtensionPoint and writing a plugin to do this sort of thing in a generic way? Is there another way I've not found?
I feel like I'm not "holding it right" when it comes to the overall pipeline design/architecture here.
Finally after writing this I notice that Jobs India, Juliet and Kilo could be collapsed into a single Job, but I don't think that solve much.
#NonCPS
Integer getTriggeredBuildNumber(String project, String causeJobName, Integer causeBuildNumber) {
//find the job/project first
def job = Jenkins.instance.getAllItems(org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowJob.class).find { job -> job.getFullName() == project }
//find a build for this job that was caused by the current build
def build = job.getBuilds().find { build ->
build.getCauses().findAll{ it.class == hudson.model.Cause.UpstreamCause.class }.find { cause ->
cause.getUpstreamProject() == causeJobName && cause.getUpstreamBuild() == causeBuildNumber
} != null
}
if(build != null) {
return build.getNumber()
} else {
return -1
}
}
#NonCPS
Boolean isBuildComplete(String jobName, Integer buildNumber) {
def job = Jenkins.instance.getAllItems(org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.job.WorkflowJob.class).find { job -> job.getFullName() == jobName }
if(job) {
def build = job.getBuildByNumber(buildNumber)
return build.isBuilding() == false && build.getResult() != null
} else {
println "WARNING: job '" + jobName + "' not found."
return false
}
}
We've hit the "Code too large" too many times, but the way to cope with it is to refactor your pipeline to remain deep under the limit. The following may be used:
You can run a combination of scripted and declarative pipeline. So some stages in the beginning and/or in the end may be refactored out.
You can build some of the parallel stages dynamically. This code would not be counted towards the limited code size.
Lastly, the issue mentions transformation variables, and that can help too.
We used the combination of the above and have expanded our pipeline well beyond what it was when we first encountered the issue you're facing.
So, most of the questions and answers I've found on this subject is for people who want to use the SAME workspace for different runs. (Which baffles me, but then I require a clean slate each time I start a job. Leftover stuff will only break things)
My issue is the EXACT opposite - I MUST have a separate workspace for each run (or I need to know how to create files with the same name in different runs that stay with that run only, and which are easily reachable from bash scripts started by the pipeline!)
So, my question is - how do I either force Jenkins to NOT use the same workspace for two concurrently-running jobs on different hosts, OR what variable can I use in the 'custom workspace' field to accomplish this?
After I responded to the question by #Joerg S I realized that I'm saying the thing that Joerg S says CAN'T happen is EXACTLY what I'm observing! Jenkins is using the SAME workspace for 2 different, concurrent, jobs on 2 different hosts. Is this a Jenkins pipeline bug?
See below for a bewildering amount of information.
Given the way I have to go onto and off of nodes during the run, I've found that I can start 2 different builds on different hosts of the same job, and they SHARE the workspace dir! Since each job has shell scripts which are busy writing files into that directory, this is extremely bad.
In Custom workspace in jenkins we are told to use custom workspace, and I'm set up just like that
In Jenkins: how to run builds in unique directories we are told to use ${BUILD_NUMBER} in the above custom workspace field, so what I tried was:
${JENKINS_HOME}/workspace/${ITEM_FULLNAME}/${BUILD_NUMBER}
All that happens to me when I use that is that the workspace name is, you guessed it, "${BUILD_NUMBER}" (and I even got a "${BUILD_NUMBER}#2" just for good measure!)
I tried {$BUILD_ID}, same thing (uses that literally, does not substitute the number).
I have the 'allow concurrent builds' turned on.
I'm using pipelines exclusively.
All jobs here, as part of normal execution, cause the slave, non-master host to reboot into an OS that does not have the capability to run slave.jar (indeed, it has no network access at all), so I cannot run the entire pipeline on that host.
All jobs use the following construct somewhere inside them:
tests=Arrays.asList(tests.split("\\r?\n"))
shellerror=231
for( line in tests){
So let's call an example job 'foo' that loops through a list, as above, that I want to run on 2 different hosts. The pipeline for that job starts running on master (since the above for (line in tests) is REQUIRED to run on a node!)). Then goes back and forth between master and slave, often multiple times.
If I start this job on host A and host B at about the same time, they will BOTH use the workspace ${JENKINS_HOME}/workspace/${JOB_NAME}, or in my case /var/lib/jenkins/jenkins/workspace/job
Since they write different data to files with the same name in that directory, I'm clearly totally broken immediately.
So, how do I force Jenkins to use a unique workspace EVERY SINGLE JOB?
Or, what???
Other things: pipeline build step version 2.5.1, Jenkins 2.46.2
I've been trying to get the workspace statement ('ws') to work, but that doesn't quite work as I expected either - some files are in the workspace I explicitly name, and some are still in the 'built-in' workspace (workspace/).
I was asked to provide code. The 'standard' pipeline I use is about 26K bytes, composing about 590 lines. So, I'm going to GREATLY reduce. That being said:
node("master") { // 1
..... lots of stuff....
} // this matches the "node('master')" above
node(HOST) {
echo "on $HOST, check what os"
if (isUnix())
...some more stuff...
} // end of 'node(HOST)' above
if (isok == 0 ) {
node("master") {
echo "----------------- Running on MASTER 19 $shellerror waiting on boot out of windows ------------"
sleep 120
echo "----------------- Leaving MASTER ------------"
}
}
... lots 'o code ...
node(HOST) {
... etc
} // matches the latest 'node HOST' above
node("master") { // 120
.... code ...
for( line in tests) {
...code...
}
}
... and on and on and on, switching back and forth from one to the other
FWIW, when I tried to make the above use 'ws' so that I could make certain the ws name was unique, I simply added a 'ws wsname' block directly under (almost) every 'node' opening so it was
node(name) { ws (wsname) { ..stuff that was in node block before... } }
But then I've got two directories to worry about checking - both the 'default' workspace/jobname dir AND the new wsname one.
Try using customWorkspace node common option:
pipeline {
agent {
node {
label 'node(s)-defined-label'
customWorkspace "${JENKINS_HOME}/workspace/${JOB_NAME}/${BUILD_NUMBER}"
}
}
stages {
// Your pipeline logic here
}
}
customWorkspace
A string. Run the Pipeline or individual stage this
agent is applied to within this custom workspace, rather than the
default. It can be either a relative path, in which case the custom
workspace will be under the workspace root on the node, or an absolute
path.
Edit
Since this doesn't work for your complex pipeline. Maybe try this silly solution:
def WORKSPACE = "${JENKINS_HOME}/workspace/${JOB_NAME}/${BUILD_NUMBER}"
node(HOST) {
sh(script: "mkdir -p ${WORKSPACE}")
sh(script: "cd ${WORKSPACE}")
//Do stuff here
}
or if dir() is accessible:
def WORKSPACE = "${JENKINS_HOME}/workspace/${JOB_NAME}/${BUILD_NUMBER}"
node(HOST) {
sh(script: "mkdir -p ${WORKSPACE}")
dir(WORKSPACE) {
//Do stuff here
}
}
customWorkspace didn't work for me.
What worked:
stages {
stage("SCM (For commit trigger)"){
steps {
ws('custom-workspace') { // Because we don't want to switch from the pipeline checkout
// Generated from http://lstool01:8080/job/Permanent%20Build/pipeline-syntax/
checkout(xxx)
}
}
}
'${SOMEVAR}'
will not get substituted
"${SOMEVAR}"
will - this is how groovy strings are being handled
see groovy string handling
so if you have a
ws("/some/path/somewhere/${BUILD_ID}")
{
//something
}
on your node in your pipeline Jenkinsfile it should do the trick in this regard
the problem with #2 workspaces can occur when you allow concurrent builds of the project - I had the exact same problem with a custom ws() with #2 - simply disallow concurrent builds or work around that.
I am using a Jenkins pipeline script and when all nodes are offline, the builds keep on queuing up. How do I stop Jenkins from adding jobs to the queue while all slaves are offline?
pipeline {
triggers {
pollSCM('H/3 * * * 1-5')
}
}
Is your agent's availability configured to 'Keep this agent online as much as possible' ?
One way to tackle this situation is, run the below script on master node and build your pipeline(s) only if at least one of the nodes is online. You can pass the online node name to your downstream job as a parameter.
def axis = []
for (slave in jenkins.model.Jenkins.instance.getNodes()) {
if (slave.toComputer().isOnline()) {
axis += slave.getDisplayName()
}
}
return axis
Above script source: Jenkins: skip if node is offline
Other links that may help are:
Monitor and restart your slave nodes - https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/Monitor+and+Restart+Offline+Slaves
I found this script handy in some situations:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins-scripts/blob/master/scriptler/clearBuildQueue.groovy
I'm not into pipeline jobs, but for regular freestyle jobs, this kind of queueing will only happen if your builds are parameterized. Seperate builds are needed then to ensure that the project will run seperately for each and every parameter value (it does not matter whether the value is actually different).
So, removing build parameters in your project might solve the problem.
The Jenkins Pipeline plugin (aka Workflow) can be extended with other Multibranch plugins to build branches and pull requests automatically.
What would be the preferred way to run multiple configurations? For example, building with Java 7 and Java 8. This is often called matrix configuration (because of the multiple combinations such as language version, framework version, ...) or build variants.
I tried:
executing them serially as separate stage steps. Good, but takes more time than necessary.
executing them inside a parallel step, with or without nodes allocated inside them. Works but I cannot use the stage step inside parallel for known limitations on how it would be visualized.
Is there a recommended way to do this?
TLDR: Jenkins.io wants you to use nodes for each build.
Jenkins.io: In pipeline coding contexts, a "node" is a step that does two things, typically by enlisting help from available executors on agents:
Schedules the steps contained within it to run by adding them to the Jenkins build queue (so that as soon as an executor slot is free on a node, the appropriate steps run)
It is a best practice to do all material work, such as building or running shell scripts, within nodes, because node blocks in a stage tell Jenkins that the steps within them are resource-intensive enough to be scheduled, request help from the agent pool, and lock a workspace only as long as they need it.
Vanilla Jenkins Node blocks within a stage would look like:
stage 'build' {
node('java7-build'){ ... }
node('java8-build'){ ... }
}
Further extending this notion Cloudbees writes about parallelism and distributed builds with Jenkins. Cloudbees workflow for you might look like:
stage 'build' {
parallel 'java7-build':{
node('mvn-java7'){ ... }
}, 'java8-build':{
node('mvn-java8'){ ... }
}
}
Your requirements of visualizing the different builds in the pipeline would could be satisfied with either workflow, but I trust the Jenkins documentation for best practice.
EDIT
To address the visualization #Stephen would like to see, He's right - it doesn't work! The issue has been raised with Jenkins and is documented here, the resolution of involving the use of 'labelled blocks' is still in progress :-(
Q: Is there documentation letting pipeline users not to put stages inside of parallel steps?
A: No, and this is considered to be an incorrect usage if it is done; stages are only valid as top-level constructs in the pipeline, which is why the notion of labelled blocks as a separate construct has come to be ... And by that, I mean remove stages from parallel steps within my pipeline.
If you try to use a stage in a parallel job, you're going to have a bad time.
ERROR: The ‘stage’ step must not be used inside a ‘parallel’ block.
I would suggest Declarative Matrix as a preferred way to run multiple configurations in Jenkins. It allows you to execute the defined stages for every configuration without code duplication.
Example:
pipeline {
agent none
stages {
stage('Test') {
matrix {
agent {
label "${NODENAME}"
}
axes {
axis {
name 'NODENAME'
values 'java7node', 'java8node'
}
}
stages {
stage('Test') {
steps {
echo "Do Test for ${NODENAME}"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Note that declarative Matrix is a native declarative Pipeline feature, so no additional Plugin installation needed.
Jenkins blog post about the matrix directive.
As noted by #StephenKing, Blue Ocean will show parallel branches better than the current stage view. A planned upcoming version of the stage view will be able to show all the branches, though it will not visually indicate any nesting structure (would look the same as if you ran the configurations serially).
In any event, the deeper issue is that you will essentially only get a pass/fail status for the build overall, pending a resolution to JENKINS-27395 and related requests.
In order to test each commit on several platforms, I've used this base Jenkinsfile skeleton:
def test_platform(label, with_stages = false)
{
node(label)
{
// Checkout
if (with_stages) stage label + ' Checkout'
...
// Build
if (with_stages) stage label + ' Build'
...
// Tests
if (with_stages) stage label + ' Tests'
...
}
}
/*
parallel ( failFast: false,
Windows: { test_platform("Windows") },
Linux: { test_platform("Linux") },
Mac: { test_platform("Mac") },
)
*/
test_platform("Windows", true)
test_platform("Mac", true)
test_platform("Linux", true)
With this it's relatively easy to switch from a sequential to a parallel execution, each of them having their pros and cons:
Parallel execution runs much faster, but it doesn't contain the stages labelling
Sequential execution is much slower, but you get a detailed report thanks to stages, labelled as "Windows Checkout", "Windows Build", "Windows Tests", "Mac Checkout", etc.)
I'm using the sequential execution for the time being, until I find a better solution.
It seems like there is relief coming at least with the BlueOcean UI. Here is what I got (the tk-* nodes are the parallel steps):
TLDR: I want to be able to run job simultaneously on multiple nodes in Jenkins pipeline. [ for example - build application x on nodes dev, test & staging nodes based on aws ]
I have a large group of nodes with the same label. I would like to be able to run a job in Jenkins that executes on all of the nodes with the same label as well as doing so simultaneously.
I saw a suggestion to use the matrix configuration option in Jenkins, but I can only think of one axis (the label group). When I try and run the job, it seems like it only executes once instead of 300 times (1 for each of the nodes in that label group).
What should my other axis be? Or...is there some plugin to do this? I had tried the NodeLabel Parameter Plugin, and choosing "run on all available online nodes", but it does not seem to run the jobs simultaneously.
Install
Parameterized Trigger Plugin
NodeLabel Parameter Plugin
For the job you want to run, enable Execute concurrent builds if necessary
Create another job besides the job you want to run on all slaves and configure it
Build > Add build step > Trigger/call builds on other projects
Add ParameterFactories > All Nodes for Label Factory > Label: the label of the nodes
The matrix build will work; use "Slaves" as the axis and expand the "Individual nodes" list to select all of your nodes.
Note that you will need to update the selection every time you add or remove a slave.
For a more maintainable solution, you could use the Job DSL plugin to set up a seed job that has the template for the build, then loops over each slave and creates a new job with the build label set to the name of the slave.
There is two plugins that you need: Paramitrized Trigger Plugin to be able to trigger other jobs as build step of your main job, and NodeLabel Plugin (read the BuildParameterFactory section for descrition of what you need) to specify the label.
The best and easiest way to accomplish this is using Elastic Axis plugin. 1. Install the pulgin.
2. Create a Multi Configuration job.(Install if not present)
3. In the job configuration you can find new axis added as Elastic axis. Add the label as shown below to get the job run on multiple slaves.
Taking a few of the above answers and adjusting them for 2.0 series.
You can now launch all a job on all nodes.
// The script triggers PayloadJob on every node.
// It uses Node and Label Parameter plugin to pass the job name to the payload job.
// The code will require approval of several Jenkins classes in the Script Security mode
def branches = [:]
def names = nodeNames()
for (int i=0; i<names.size(); ++i) {
def nodeName = names[i];
// Into each branch we put the pipeline code we want to execute
branches["node_" + nodeName] = {
node(nodeName) {
echo "Triggering on " + nodeName
build job: 'PayloadJob', parameters: [
new org.jvnet.jenkins.plugins.nodelabelparameter.NodeParameterValue
("TARGET_NODE", "description", nodeName)
]
}
}
}
// Now we trigger all branches
parallel branches
// This method collects a list of Node names from the current Jenkins instance
#NonCPS
def nodeNames() {
return jenkins.model.Jenkins.instance.nodes.collect { node -> node.name }
}
Taken from the code
https://jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/examples/#trigger-job-on-all-nodes
Rundeck might be a tool better suited to your needs. Can be setup to run several jobs in parallel and has a plugin for Jenkins: http://rundeck.org/
Rundeck is designed to integrate with larger systems. We generate the resource file from our configuration management database. Very easy to do see the documentation: http://rundeck.org/docs/administration/node-resource-sources.html.
Additionally plugins available for amazon and/or systems like puppet and chef: http://rundeck.org/plugins
I was looking for a way to run docker system prune on all nodes (with label docker). I ended with a pretty simple scripted pipeline, which AFAIK will only need the pipeline plugin to work:
#!/usr/bin/env groovy
def nodes = [:]
nodesByLabel('docker').each {
nodes[it] = { ->
node(it) {
stage("docker-prune#${it}") {
sh('docker system prune -af --filter "until=1440h"')
}
}
}
}
parallel nodes
Note: Requires Pipeline Utility Steps
What this does, it is looking for all nodes with label docker, then iterates over it and creates an associative array nodes with one step per found node (to be precise, what this is doing is cleaning all old docker stuff older then 60 days). parallel nodes starts to execute in parallel (on all found nodes simultaneously).
Hope that this will help someone.
Got it - No need for any special plugin!
I've created a parent job that triggers/call another build ,
And when I'm calling him I pass him the Label that I wan't the child job to run on.
So basically the parent job Only triggers the job I need ,
and the child job will run as many times as the number of slaves in that Label
(In my case 4 times).
Enable This project is parameterized, add a parameter of type Label, enter an arbitrary name for the label and select a default value such as a label covering a number of nodes or a conjuction (&&) of such labels. Enable Run on all nodes matching the label, keep Run regardless of result, keep Node eligibility at All nodes.
Solution: You can succinctly parallel the same build across multiple Jenkins nodes
This can be useful for building the same project on different environments ( for example: build node applications on test ,dev and staging environments )
Example:
pipeline {
agent { docker { image 'node:14-alpine' } }
stages {
stage('build') {
steps {
parallelTasks
}
}
}
}
def parallelTasks() {
def labels = ['test', 'dev', 'staging'] // labels for Jenkins node types we will build on
def builders = [:]
for (x in labels) {
def label = x
builders[label] = {
node(label) {
sh """#!/bin/bash -le
echo "build app on ${label} node"
cd /home/app
npm run build
"""
}
}
}
parallel builders
}