Please could you help me to solve this?
C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\sklearn\cross_validation.py:44: DeprecationWarning: This module was deprecated in version 0.18 in favor of the model_selection module into which all the refactored classes and functions are moved. Also, note that the interface of the new CV iterators are different from that of this module. This module will be removed in 0.20. "This module will be removed in 0.20.", DeprecationWarning)
The
C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\sklearn\cross_validation.py:44: DeprecationWarning: This module was deprecated in version 0.18 in favor of the model_selection module into which all the refactored classes and functions are moved. Also, note that the interface of the new CV iterators is different from that of this module. This module will be removed in 0.20. "This module will be removed in 0.20.", DeprecationWarning)
is just a deprecation warning.
No need to worry but keep in mind that cross_val will be removed in 0.20.
This error is just to warn you that the developers are going to move this function before they do it.
Just an example.In the future we will have to replace:
from sklearn.cross_validation import KFold
with:
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
For the second error that I can see in the screenshot that you posted, the SA3L module seems not to be installed.
Now cross_validation has been deprecated and model_selection is used instead, However all the methods and classes remains the same. You just have to now import:
from sklearn import model_selection
and for training and testing the data you have to do something like this:
x_train,x_test,y_train,y_test=model_selection.train_test_split(x,y,test_size=0.2)
Related
During the Training of the CFNet (https://github.com/gallenszl/CFNet),
after loading Mish activation, the error comes:
enter image description here
RuntimeError: Legacy autograd function with non-static forward method is deprecated. Please use new-style autograd function with static forward method. (Example: https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/autograd.html#torch.autograd.Function)
anybody knows how to fix it?
It seems you're using a pytorch version that is too new where some incompatible changes have been introduced. Use the pytorch (and python) versions indicated by their repository. In this case for pytorch this is version 1.1.0.
I am trying to use the Programming Language Foundation with Agda plfa library, however the import does not appear to be working properly.
I have cloned the repository and added the repository path to: ~/.agda/libraries and plfa to ~/.agda/defaults.
When I create a test.agda file and check a single line
module plfa.part1.Naturals where
I get an import error:
You tried to load /Users/johngfisher/Desktop/agda_test/nats.agda
which defines the module plfa.part1.Naturals. However, according to
the include path this module should be defined in
/Users/johngfisher/agda_env/libraries/plfa/src/plfa/part1/Naturals.lagda.md
The file is present in the location the import is coming from so I am unsure of why Agda is unable to find it. Any help would be appreciated.
module plfa.part1.Naturals where
defines a module named plfa.part1.Naturals
Did you mean to type
module test where
open import plfa.part1.Naturals
instead?
Basically I have a lot of widgets and services and stuff, like most people do, that I need to access throughout the app. I was wondering if have a single file with an export of every single file and then just simply importing that one file in every page/file i need to access something rather than just importing specific files that the page needs, will it slow down the app or cause any issues or increase file size, etc... or will it behave the same?
Example
login_page.dart
import '1.dart'
import '2.dart'
home_page.dart
import '2.dart'
import '3.dart'
import '9.dart'
import '10.dart'
settings_page.dart
import '1.dart'
import '2.dart'
import '9.dart'
import '10.dart'
or...
all_imports.dart:
export '1.dart'
export '2.dart'
export '3.dart'
... (up until)
export '10.dart'
in every dart file:
import 'all_imports.dart'
Using 'all_imports.dart' may cause unneeded dependencies but dart knows how to handle dependencies that called but not used.
Same implementation of 'all_imports.dart' is used by flutter team on 'material.dart'
You may wish to just make simple design but when you import 'material.dart' it brings everything to the table ('about.dart', 'app.dart', 'banner.dart') and many others.
I would advise you structure your application using 'all_import.dart' pattern
actually, it dosent make a difference, lets imagine this case
in login_page.dart
import '1.dart'
import '2.dart'
here you are being explicit about the dependencies of this module/file/widget, which means it only uses what it needs. which is better for maintenance and redablity of the modules dependanices.
the other case where you have all of your imports in one file
import 'all_imports.dart'
lets see what happens here:
Dart executes the file all_imports.dart
that file is importing every module that you have listed in that file
so the import calls happend again
which means that wont affect your software's performance if you dont have an all_imports.dart file.
actulally i find that this method(the all_imports.dart) will affect your program in a bad way if any.
why? lets say we have a module A that depends on both module B and module C , you would import them this way
moduleA.dart
import 'moduleB'
import 'moduleC'
the advantages is that the module is now explicit in its dependencies and anyone who looks at this module/file in the future will know what they are.
however
the other method where you have all of your imports in a single all_imports.dart file, will cause unneeded dependencies to be loaded for a certain module
lets have the same example above, module A depends on moduleB and moduleC and you listed them in the all_imports.dart file, it will look like this
export `moduleA'
export 'moduleB'
/// some other modules that you are exporting
and in the moduleA.dart file you import it this way
import 'all_imports.dart`
now
the module A has successfully imported moduleB and moduleC which it needs. BUT, now it has all the other dependancies that it dose not need loaded for it although it only needs moduleA and moduleB.
Many of the samples I have seen for angular2 have the following import statement:
import {bind} from 'angular2/di';
I am working in VS Code (with TypeScript) and it complains about not being able to find the angular2/di module.
However I do see a bind function defined in angular2/angular2.d.ts. If I change the import statement to the following, then the error goes away.
import {bind} from 'angular2/angular2';
Is the question in the title off-base and I am making some erroneous assumption?
If not, why do many samples reference one module to import the bind function from, yet I seem to be able to get it from a different module?
Most likely because you looked at versions from older alphas. Look at the angular2.ts file. Everything is exported from it. Also note that the d.ts is going to contain everything to resolve types in your IDE and at compilation time. What import does is actually importing the .js files.
I defined both area/1 and perim/1 in modules sqaure and circle.
I want to import and use them in another module. Here is my import statements:
-import(square, [area/1, perim/1]).
-import(circle, [area/1, perim/1]).
I got these error messages.
~/test.erl:4: function area/1 already imported from square
~/test.erl:4: function perim/1 already imported from square
I know erlang does not support namespace. But since we can qualify a function call by specifying the module (i.e. square:area vs circle:area), I fail to see how the lack of namespace is the source of the error here.
So, what exactly caused the above error and how can I fix it?
In Erlang, "importing" a function from another module means being able to call it as if it were a local function, without the module prefix. So with this directive:
-import(square, [area/1, perim/1]).
you could write area(42) and it would mean the same as square:area(42).
However, if you include area and perim functions from two modules, it would be ambiguous which one you'd actually call when writing area(42).
As you correctly note, you can always qualify the function call with the name of the module, i.e. square:area(42) and circle:area(42) - so I would suggest doing so consistently and removing both import directives. This is also recommended by rule 6.6 of the Erlang Programming Rules - "Don't use import".