This is a problem that has been bugging me for quite some time.
Assume a view that holds a tableView with X items. The goal is to make that view resize so that it is as high as the contents of the tableView.
An approach
Calculate the contents of the tableView in total ( e.g if there are 5 rows and each is 50 units high, its just a multiplication matter ). Then set the tableView constrained at a 0 0 0 0 into the view and set the view height to 250.
This works well for fixed height cell sizes. However!
a) How would the problem be approached for dynamic height cells though with complex constraints in a scenario where resizing happens automatically and the tableHeightForRow is set to UITableViewAutomaticDimension?
b) An idea could be using tableView.contentSize. However when would we retrieve that value safely in order to set the parent view frame accordingly? Is that even possible?
Thanks everyone
If you have a UITableView subclass, you can set up a property observer on the contentSize like this:
override var contentSize: CGSize {
didSet {
// make delegate call or use some other mechanism to communicate size change to parent
}
}
The most straightforward approach to this in my opinion is to use Autolayout. If you take this approach, you can use the contentSize to automatically invalidate the intrinsicContentSize which is what autolayout uses to dynamically size elements (as long as they don't have higher priority placement constraints restricting or explicitly setting their size).
Something like this:
override var contentSize: CGSize {
didSet {
self.invalidateIntrinsicContentSize()
}
}
override var intrinsicContentSize: CGSize {
return contentSize
}
Then, just add your table view to your parent view hierarchy with valid placement constraints and a content hugging/compression resistance of required.
Related
TD;DR
It seems that in some cases systemLayoutSizeFitting does not return the correct height to correctly show / position all subviews of a view. Am I using systemLayoutSizeFitting wrong or is there some other way to avoid this?
Long story:
The XIB file of a UIViewController does not only contain the main view but also a number of other views which are added to the view controllers view at runtime. All these additional views should get the same height when they are added to the view controllers view.
The views might look like this: A simple container view holding some subviews which are stacked on top of each other.
Since the height of the container view should be flexible, the vertical spacing between the bottom button and the lable above it, uses a grater-than constraint.
To give all views the same height, I tried to measure the necessary height of each view using systemLayoutSizeFitting:
#IBOutlet var pageViews: [UIView]!
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
var maxHeight: CGFloat = 0
for pageView in pageViews {
// Add pageView somewhere on view and give it leading, trailing and top
// constraint, but no height constraint yet.
addToView(pageView)
maxHeight = max(maxHeight, pageView.systemLayoutSizeFitting(CGSize(width: view.frame.width, height: UIView.layoutFittingCompressedSize.height), withHorizontalFittingPriority: .required, verticalFittingPriority: .fittingSizeLevel).height)
}
for pageView in pageViews {
// Give all pageViews the same height
pageView.heightAnchor.constraint(equalToConstant: maxHeight).isActive = true
}
}
This does not work, when the label text becomes to long:
In the right example the height is not large enough and thus the button is squeezed. I can counter act this by raising the vertical compression resistance of the button, however in this case the other controls (e.g. the title label) is squeezed...
Why is this? Why does not systemLayoutSizeFitting return a height which is sufficent to show all controls without any squeezing?
Its actually smash button's height when label text is getting bigger . You are setting top and bottom constraints but button height is not declared so when label getting bigger , view basically say "I can reduce button height before updating my height , I have space.Bottom and top constraints are still same , didn't effect."
Giving the constant height constraints of button might be fix your issue.
If you want your view to resist to compression you should use the defaultHigh priority as a verticalFittingPriority instead of fittingSizeLevel.
I need to display a dynamic table view inside a cell (of a static table). Using sections instead will not be enough for me. But I don't want this table to be scrollable, so the entire table must appear at once. The problem is that this table size [and rows count, and each row size] varies according to the content being shown. How can I associate the cell (which holds the table) autoresizing property with a table inside that must show all content at once?
Currently I have the tableView inside the cell, and constraints bonds it to all the 4 sides. The first table (not the one inside the cell) rowHeight property is set to UITableViewAutomaticDimension, but the table inside the cell doesn't appear entirely.
If I set the static cell height to a value greater than the tableView(inside cell) height, the whole table appears, and also an extra space beneath it (as the table is bounded to 4 sides of the cell)
So, any ideas on how to show this entire table inside a cell that dynamically has the perfect size for it ?
ps: I tried using collection view inside the cell. Unfortunately it doesn't serve my purpose.
Thanks!
Update
I tried to create a class for the inner table and use (as pointed by iamirzhan) contentSize didSet, like so:
override var contentSize:CGSize {
didSet {
self.invalidateIntrinsicContentSize()
}
}
I then used this method to call a function that resizes the cell that holds the table: self.frame.size.height = table.contentSize.height. The function is on this cell's own class.
This worked, the table now appears entirely. The problem is that it overlaps the cell underneath it, so i'm still looking for a solution.
I don't see why this requires 2 tableviews. The static portion should be uitableviewheaderfooters or just a UIStackView. But to answer your question simply query your child tableView for its size and return this in tableView:heightForRowAtIndexPath: for the outer tableview. The height of the child tableView is simply the sum of the hieght of all of its children (including any headers/footers). This is usually not difficult to calculate unless you are using something like a webview where you need to actually load the content and get the size asynchronously. You can calculate the size of elements that are based on their intrinsic content size with UIView.sizeThatFits(_:). The other elements should have fixed sizes or constants in the storyboard that you can sum up.
For inner tableView you should write such implementation.
Firstly, disable the scrollEnable flag
Then you should override the intrinsicContentSize method of tableView
Your inner tableView custom class:
class IntrinsicTableView: UITableView {
override var contentSize:CGSize {
didSet {
self.invalidateIntrinsicContentSize()
}
}
override var intrinsicContentSize: CGSize {
self.layoutIfNeeded()
return self.contentSize
}
}
Now, delete the height constraint, and the height will be calculating by its content.
I have tableView cell with different content(views, labels, imageViews) in one cell. But in something cells content can be not full. How can i use resizing cells without removing and adding always constraints? Thanks.
One of possible solutions for this problem:
Add constraints for hidden state with priority 1000
Add extra constraints for resized state with lower priority (ex 750)
Save constraints that is ONLY for hidden state into IBOutlet collection
Save constraints that is ONLY for resized state into another IBOutlet collection
Code:
#IBOutlet var hiddenConstraints: [NSLayoutConstraint] = []
#IBOutlet var visibleConstraints: [NSLayoutConstraint] = []
func hide(_ hide: Bool) {
for hiddenConstraint in self.hiddenConstraints {
hiddenConstraint.isActive = hide
}
for visibleConstraint in self.visibleConstraints {
visibleConstraint.isActive = !hide
}
self.layoutIfNeeded()
}
There is faster solution:
Move content that can be hidden into container view
Set height constraint for container view
Change from code height constraint constant to 0 if hidden or to proper height if visible
Code:
#IBOutlet var heightConstraint: NSLayoutConstraint!
func hide(_ hide: Bool) {
self. heightConstraint.constant = hide ? 0 : 150 //Estimated height
self.layoutIfNeeded()
}
This is not a good approach, as it will lead to constraint crashes at runtime. So I prefer to use first one.
Also you will need to update your cell from table to move other cells up or down.
Ray Wenderlich has a fantastic tutorial on dynamic sizing of table cells that can be found here:
https://www.raywenderlich.com/129059/self-sizing-table-view-cells
TL;DR You need to make sure your cell's content is pinned on all four sides to the cell's content view, as well as setting as high priority vertical hugging, greater than or equal to height constraint on your label.
I am using UICollectionView and in it my cells have auto width based on the content(text size) e.g. first row might contain 8 items and 2nd row might contains only 1. This is working fine.
I want to set the height of my UICollectionView to show all the available items but not more(not the empty space at the bottom...). If I use auto layout than I have to set the height or bottom align constraint.
But in this way the height will be fixed. Is there any way I can get number of rows in and calculate height dynamically?
Here is what my story board look like:
You could use fixed height constraint at design time and than change it at runtime when deferred height value calculated. Height constraint need to be referenced in code and than needs to be changed with your calculated height.
// Height constraint of collection view
#IBOutlet weak var heightContstraint: NSLayoutConstraint!
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
setHeightOfCollectionView()
}
func setHeightOfCollectionView() {
// Calculate height of collection view depending on collection item count
let calculatedHeight:CGFloat = 500.0
heightContstraint.constant = calculatedHeight
}
You should check the images below that demonstrate how to do.
Hope it would help.
I have several UIViews laid out along the bottom of a containing UIView. I want these views to always be equal width, and always stretch to collectively fill the width of the containing view (like the emoji keyboard buttons at the bottom). The way I'm approaching this is to set equal widths to one of the views, then just update the width constraint of that view to be superviewWidth / numberOfViews which will cause all of the other views to update to that same value.
I am wondering where the code to change the constraint constant needs to go. It needs to be set before the keyboard appears on screen for the first time and update when rotating the device.
My first attempt at a solution was to place it in updateViewConstraints and calculate the width via containerView.frame.size.width. But this method is called twice upon load, the first time it calculates the values correctly, but the second time for some reason the containerView's width is 0.0. Another issue is that when rotating, the containerView's width is not the value that it will be after rotation, it's the current value before rotation. But I don't want to wait until after the rotation completes to update the constraint, because the buttons will be the original size then change which will be jarring to the user.
My question is: where is the most appropriate place to put this code? Is there a better way to calculate what the width will be? I can guarantee it will always be the exact same width as the screen width. And I am using Size Classes in Xcode 6, so willRotateToInterfaceOrientation and similar methods are deprecated.
On all classes that implement the UITraitEnvironment protocol the method traitCollectionDidChange will be called when the trait collection changes, like on rotation. This is the appropiate place to manually update the constraints when using the new Size Classes. You can also animate the transition with the method willTransitionToTraitCollection
Basic example:
class ViewController: UIViewController {
var constraints = [NSLayoutConstraint]()
func updateConstraintsWithTraitCollection(traitCollection: UITraitCollection) {
// Remove old constraints
view.removeConstraints(constraints)
// Create new constraints
}
override func willTransitionToTraitCollection(newCollection: UITraitCollection!,
withTransitionCoordinator coordinator: UIViewControllerTransitionCoordinator!) {
super.willTransitionToTraitCollection(newCollection, withTransitionCoordinator: coordinator)
coordinator.animateAlongsideTransition({ (context: UIViewControllerTransitionCoordinatorContext!) in
self.updateConstraintsWithTraitCollection(newCollection)
self.view.setNeedsLayout()
}, completion: nil)
}
override func traitCollectionDidChange(previousTraitCollection: UITraitCollection!) {
updateConstraintsWithTraitCollection(traitCollection)
}
}
Besides that I want to recommend Cartography, which is a nice library that helps to make auto layout more readable and enjoyable. https://github.com/robb/Cartography
There is no reason to update the width manually:
Place all the views with equal width in your view with no spacing in between each other
Add an equal width constraint to all of them
Add constraints with 0 width for spacing between sides and each other
Lower the priority of one or more of the equal width constraints just in case the width cannot be divided equally.
Then auto layout will handle everything for you.