I have development code repository at bitbucket and another test script code repository at bitbucket. Now I have setup a Jenkins job by linking test code repository. Is there any way to trigger jenkins job automatically on change in development repository ?
You can add the BitBucket Plugin to your Jenkins instance. It will allow you to configure a webhook in BitBucket that will then trigger any Jenkins job listening for that webhook. The plugin's page has a detailed breakdown, but the basics are;
In your repo in BitBucket, create a new Webhook using your Jenkins' url. I believe the url is generally http://[your jenkins url]/bitbucket-hook/
Make the trigger a repo push.
In your Jenkins job, check the box "Build when a change is pushed to BitBucket" under the Build Triggers section.
Now any time you commit to the repo you created the Webhook on, that Jenkins job will be run.
You can also limit what branches trigger commits by parameterizing your Jenkins build to ignore certain branches / keywords / etc if that's something you need for your specific project.
Builds by source changes
You can have Jenkins poll your Revision Control System for changes. You can specify how often Jenkins polls your revision control system using the same syntax as crontab on Unix/Linux. However, if your polling period is shorter than it takes to poll your revision control system, you may end up with multiple builds for each change. You should either adjust your polling period to be longer than the amount of time it takes to poll your revision control system, or use a post-commit trigger. You can examine the Polling Log for each build to see how long it took to poll your system.
Alternatively, instead of polling on a fixed interval, you can use a URL trigger (described above), but with /polling instead of /build at the end of the URL. This makes Jenkins poll the SCM for changes rather than building immediately. This prevents Jenkins from running a build with no relevant changes for commits affecting modules or branches that are unrelated to the job. When using /polling the job must be configured for polling, but the schedule can be empty.
Related
I have a free style project which will trigger on commits. I have kept poll scm which polls for commits in remote repository. This jenkins job actually make some changes to a file after checkout and then commits+push back to remote repository.
This push by jenkins job is actually triggering back a new build due to scm poll for new commits is set in job. I want this job not to trigger again for self commit by job itself
It is not clear if you are using Git. In case you are and expect that the file will be always be changed by Jenkins, Git plugin in freestyle has options to ignore certain file paths.
If this specific file is expected to edited by user other than Jenkins than only solution I can think of is through conditional logic in jenkins pipeline-as-code.
I am new to Jenkins. I have development code repository at bitbucket and another test script code repository at bitbucket. Now I have setup a Jenkins job by linking test code repository. Is there any way to trigger a build when code is pushed in develop repo?
I tried many times by pushing change in develop repo, but it does not triggers the jenkins job.
You can configure the Jenkins trigger as an SCM poll.
You will have to enter a cron expression for the polling time period, like:
*/5 * * * *
This means polling from 5 to 5 minutes. If any change is detected, then the build is triggered.
You can add the BitBucket Plugin to your Jenkins instance. It will allow you to configure a webhook in BitBucket that will then trigger any Jenkins job listening for that webhook. The plugin's page has a detailed breakdown, but the basics are;
In your repo in BitBucket, create a new Webhook using your Jenkins' url. I believe the url is generally http://[your jenkins url]/bitbucket-hook/
Make the trigger a repo push.
In your Jenkins job, check the box "Build when a change is pushed to BitBucket" under the Build Triggers section.
Now any time you commit to the repo you created the Webhook on, that Jenkins job will be run.
You can also limit what branches trigger commits by parameterizing your Jenkins build to ignore certain branches / keywords / etc if that's something you need for your specific project.
You can use webhooks to trigger build automatically. There are few options how to use it. See the following articles: this, this and this.
Windows Server 2016, Jenkins 2.107.1. We have GitHub repositories, Git repositories not in GitHub, and CVS repositories. This link...Can I restrict poll SCM job to be run only once in a day?, tells me that I can set the polling to happen only once a day (which is all that we want, in that the coders can check in, up to a certain time). It does not tell me how to exit out (not to continue with the rest of the build steps), if there are no changes (and, send out a message that there are no changes and thus will be no build tonight). We are not using pipeline. Thanks.
the poll scm plugin in by default will not run the job if there are no SCM changes, also you will get GIT polling logs to see the detailed information
I recently made the transition from Subversion to Git for all my repos at work. However, with svn we had commit hooks in place so that our Jenkins job would run for whichever branch was checked into. Now, I'm trying to set this up using Gitlab and there appears to only be one place to add a web hook. It looks like any time something is checked into ANY branch, the web hook will run. Meaning if I have a branch_A associated with jenkins_job_A, something could be checked into branch_B and the commit hook for jenkins_job_A will still run. Is there a branch by branch way to configure these web hooks? Or is there some kind of script I can check into each branch that will act as a commit hook? Or (my fear) is this feature not supported in Gitlab?
I guess you set up GitLab to do a post commit request to http://yourserver/jenkins/git/notifyCommit?url=<URL of the Git repository>? In theory this should trigger the polling on all jobs that are configured with that URL, and in the polling step the jobs should decide whether they should build or not. In practice this will unfortunately cause all jobs to fire.
We worked around this issue by moving the Job configuration into a Jenkinsfile and then use a Multibranch Pipeline.
As an alternative you could also install the GitLab plugin for Jenkins and use the Jenkins integration in GitLab. This will allow you to trigger the correct jobs when commits are pushed on a branch. The downside is that it requires a per-job configuration.
To give some context the question is about GitLab and Jenkins setup.
I know how to setup a web hook, I know how to setup a job to be triggered by the hook. The problem is that I need to have multiple jobs and only a single entry-point (parent job) trigger for them.
The downstream jobs at the same time need to be git repo aware so I have to set repo url for them. This causes them to be triggered independently by the hook and I don't want that as this means that they are triggered twice.
On the other hand if I don't configure repo url on a downstream job and the parent job triggers it, it fails as it is not able to do a checkout.
I may try to hack around with some 'execute shell' build step, I believe it's not a valid way to go. Has anybody a good tip how to solve that?
For the reference here is the GitLab Jenkins plugin documentation according to which:
Plugin will parse the GitLab payload and extract the branch for which
the commit is being pushed and changes made. It will then scan all Git
projects in Jenkins and start the build for those that:
match url of the GitLab repo
match the configured refspec pattern if any
and match committed GitLab branch
I tried playing around with different settings, without a great result though.
For the project you want to get only local triggers, just enable Don't trigger a built on commit notification in the Additional behaviours of git plugin.
(https://github.com/elvanja/jenkins-gitlab-hook-plugin/issues/11#issuecomment-35385032, as you actually have discovered).
But a better solution could be to make your downstream jobs reference the repository locally cloned by main job (not sure if actually possible), so the plugin will never consider them for schedule a build, as the git url don't match.