As quote from the documentation:
The built-in web administration GUI is deprecated in InfluxDB 1.2 and is disabled by default. We recommend using the HTTP API or the Command Line Interface to interact with InfluxDB.
Why does it encourage using HTTP API (HTTP method) and CLI, instead of the intuitive Web GUI? What is the benefit of applying this?
The old admin interface is removed in 1.3 since it was largely undeveloped internally. Instead, we've moved all that functionality and much more to Chronograf. Going forward that's where all UI for the various parts of the stack will live. It's also open source.
Related
I'm responsible for a project that is producing the server backend for an iOS application.
I would like to formally define the service interface for the clients to call so both the IOS, Android and server teams can practice contract-first development.
In the dark past we would have used WSDL and generated RPC-style client and server interop boilerplate from that. However this isn't the norm for IOS projects. We've also looked at Apache Thrift, but there is no code generator for Swift and the Objective-C generator seems to produce code that relies on deprecated IOS APIs.
Which brings us to REST, which works well as a way to move object state around. It seems less good for the kind of conversation that says "Hey server, do X with these parameters and return me a result." We just end up creating server-side controllers for particular actions, and those "define" the service's calling convention by being sticklers for getting the right parameters. Contract-last.
Is there a standard way to do contract-first web service development for iOS clients, or am I just going to have to treat documentation as the spec?
tl;dr: No.
I'm not aware of a 'standard' way of doing things, but many
client/server apps today do use some incarnation of a RESTful
interface. JSON is the usual format.
There are some well documented 3rd party utilities that can handle
this for you client side (like [RESTKit][1] in the case of REST), or
you can roll your own implementation based on apple's provided
NSURLSession or a networking library like [AFNetworking][2]
If needed, iOS can also handle socket-based communication. (3rd party
libs exist for this as well.)
[1]: https://github.com/RestKit/RestKit [2]:
http://nshipster.com/afnetworking-2/
I'm working on a webapp running on Tomcat which using spring-data to connect to a neo4j graph in embedded mode.
I would like to use neo4j server instead of the embedded mode and I am looking for some help to be sure about how to do that.
Some of my application services are quite difficult and combine, in a single transaction, the result of several cypher requests in a dto sent back to the user.
First I thought that I have to create a server unmanaged extension and I think I should follow these following steps.
- Keep my webapp with springMVC and spring security to hold and secure users sessions.
- Regroup all my transactional services in a specific jar my-app.jar
- Use Jax-RS to add a REST access point on each of my service of my-app.jar
- use something like spring restTemplate from my spring controller to call services from my-app.jar
First question : is this way of doing things is the good way ?
Second question : I have many spring injection in my services layer. How can I keep them working (how can I add dependencies in the server extension ?
Then I discovered graphAware and I wonder if I should use it instead.
And finally I just read this post http://jexp.de/blog/2014/12/spring-data-neo4j-improving-remoting-performance/ and it seems that I should use
the SpringCypherRestGraphDatabase (as explain in the bold text at the end of the article).
Well, I'm a little bit lost and I would appreciate any help to use neo4j server instead the embedded mode for my application which contain some complexe transactions.
You have a number of options here and you are on the right track with your thinking.
Option 1:
If your use cases are business-logic-heavy, and your question suggests that they are, going the unmanaged extension route is one option.
Essentially, you can then combine the most performant Java API and Cypher (if you wish) to perform your use case. I wouldn't use SDN here by the way, so you have to do your mapping manually, but is there really any mapping? Maybe you just want to execute traversals / Cypher queries for each one of your use cases.
Each use case then exposes a simple REST API, which is consumed by your Spring-powered application running Spring MVC, Spring Security, and all that. You can use the RestTemplate from Spring in your app's Controllers.
To add a twist to all that, you can use the GraphAware Framework to develop the "unmanaged extension" using Spring MVC as well. That would be my preferred option, knowing nothing about your domain/app.
Option 2:
Use the new version of SDN (v4) as Michael suggests. This allows you to run your application with annotated domain objects, Spring MVC, Security, et al. Operations (CRUD and other) are automatically translated to Cypher and sent across the wire to Neo4j running in server mode (no extensions needed). Results are then marshalled back to Java objects.
We're about to release Milestone 1 of SDN v4. It shouldn't take more than a week. That said, it is still going to be a Milestone release, thus not ready for production. A GA release is expected in May (ish).
You can already try SDN v4 yourself. Clone this repo: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-data-neo4j, make sure you're on the 4.0 branch, and do an mvn clean install on it. Here's a sample app, built using Angular JS and Spring Boot.
Please do get in touch with feedback / questions / problems (best by email info at graphaware dot com). Cheers!
I suggest you wait a bit until SDN4 Milestone 1 comes out (developed by GraphAware) this was written from scratch for Neo4j-Server.
I have an MVC web app that uses a jquery web request to generate the users notifications in a perceived async way. The notifications are built on request by each user on the site.
However I have been asked to make the notifications readily available as the happen.
This I would traditionally do using a windows service that called the same web method over http. I was thinking that this might be a good candidate functionality for using node.js
Is the any example code to call a http method in a loop and would that scale well ?
found this package and seems to do what i needed
https://npmjs.org/package/node-cron-jobs
I also came across "forever" to run node as a child process that can be re-spawned if there are errors
If you're already running on ASP.NET MVC take a look at SignalR. This was written by Microsoft, is supported by them and provides functionality similar to the Socket.IO, node.js stack.
Webmachine seems like a great system to build REST web services, but I know it does not provide websocket compatibility. My question is rather straightforward : What would be a good approach to add websocket capabilities on top of a web service built with webmachine?
I'm running Misultin alongside Webmachine for that exact matter.
For easy use websockets in webmachine I implemented that by changing sources of webmachine (adding support mochiweb_websockets ) and mochiweb (add support secure websockets).
You can download from git full solution (webmachine with websockets support) by this link:
https://github.com/Dryymoon/webmachine.git
And by this link example usage of solution.
Or if want dig a little deeper:
I changed only two files of sources:
1) webmachine_decision_core.erl changed (add support websocket handler).
2) mochiweb_websocket.erl (add support secure websockets and patch existig).
Late answer, but just stumbled upon this, but another option is to run SimpleBridge (https://github.com/nitrogen/simple_bridge), which adds an abstraction layer (conditionally bypassed using webmachines routing system) which adds websocket support to any erlang webserver it supports (includes webmachine).
I have some delphi code which, given a list of items, calculates the total price taking into account any special deals that might apply.
This code is non-trivial to rewrite in another language.
How should I set it up to communicate with a website running on the same server? The website will need to ask it for a price every time the user updates their shopping cart. It's possible that there will be multiple concurrent requests.
The delphi code needs to maintain an in-memory list of special deals, periodically refreshed from a database. So it cannot simply be executed every time or anything as simple as that.
I don't know what the website is written in, or even which http server it runs under, so I'm just looking for ideas or standard methods.
It sounds like the win32 app is already running as a Windows Service on the box. So, if you can't modify that service, you are going to have to deal with whatever way it wants to accept and respond to requests. This could be through sockets or some higher level communication protocol like web services.
You could do a couple of things. Write an assembly that knows how to communicate with the service and have your web site use that assembly. Or you could build a shim service that knows how to communicate with the legacy service, but exposes communication over higher level protocols such as web services. Either way will have the benefit of hiding the concurrency, threading and communications issue behind an easy to call interface, but the latter will make communicating with the service easier for everyone going forward.
If you can modify the delphi app to take an XML request and respond with an XML answer over a TCP socket (ideally using the HTTP protocol), you will be able to make it interoperate with most web server frameworks relatively easily. But the exact details of how to make that integration happen will depend on the language/framework it was written in.
If the web server is on windows you can compile your delphi app as a DLL that can return XML or HTML, taking parameters as part of the URL or a POST operation. Some details on making a Delphi DLL for web servers are here.
It doesn't matter what web server or OS the existing system is running under. What matters is what you want YOUR code to run under. If it is windows then the easiest solution would be to use WebBroker and write a custom ISAPI application, or use SOAP to expose web services. The first method could be used if you wanted to write a rest like API for instance, the second if your web application has the ability to consume web services.
Another option, if you are running both on the same box under IIS, is to create a COM/Automation object which you then invoke via server side scripting (ASP). If the application is an ASP.NET application, then I would use PRISM to port your code into an assembly.
I have done this with a quite complicated workers compensation calculator. I created a windows service using RemObjects Sdk. The calculations are exposed as a soap method so it can be accessed by nearly anything.
It's not necessary to use RemObjects in the service but it makes it much easier to do as it handles a lot of the underlying plumbing. The clients don't need RemObjects, they just need to be able to call soap methods. Nearly any programming langugae can do that.
You could also create an isapi dll for IIS that exposes a soap interface. This would be useful if other websites on different servers needed access to the methods. However I have handled this in my case by opening a port in the firewall to access my windows service.
There is a lot of examples on the web. A couple of places to start reading are About.Com and Dr Bob.
Torn this app into Windows Service. Write Web Service that will communicate with your windows service. You should spend some time designing your Web Service, because this Web Service is going to be your consistent interface, shielding old Delphi app. So in the future whenever you will want to write web app, mobile app, or whatever you will imagine, you will have one consistent interface – XML Web Service.
A popular way to integrate a web application with background services is a message broker.
The message flow would be:
the web application sends a "calculation request" message to a message destination on the message broker, which contains all needed parameters and also a correlation id to match the calculation request with the response from the Delphi service
one (or, in a high availability / load balanced environment more) Delphi services handle the messages: pull the next incoming message, process it by feeding the parameters to the calculation engine, and send a "calculation result message" back to the web server
the web server can either synchronously wait for the response (and discard responses which have no matching correlation ide) and build the result HTML document, or continue with other tasks and asynchronously receive the calculation result in a separate thread, for example in a Ajax based web application
See for an introduction this slideshow about the Dopplr image service:
http://de.slideshare.net/carsonified/dopplr-its-made-of-messages-matt-biddulph-presentation
If you can make it a service (but not a library), you have to do inter-process communication somehow - there are a few ways to do this on Windows:
Sockets directly which is hardest since you have to do marshalling/auth yourself
Shared Memory (yuck!)
RPC which works great but isn't trivial
DCOM which is easier but a pain to configure
WCF - but can you call it from your Windows Service written in Delphi?