Given the ActiveRecord models and associations below, I need to add a has_one :owner association on the account model to reference a user whose account_user role is set to "owner".
AccountUser model have a role attribute
class AccountUser < ApplicationRecord
enum role: [:user, :admin, :owner]
belongs_to :account
belongs_to :user
end
Account Model Has many users through account users.
class Account < ApplicationRecord
has_many :account_users
has_many :users, through: :account_users
has_one :owner, -> { where(role: :owner) } #, correct options here.
end
User Model Has many accounts through account users
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :account_users
has_many :accounts, through: :account_users
end
Try to make an intermediate association account_owner:
class Account < ApplicationRecord
has_many :account_users
has_many :users, through: :account_users
has_one :account_owner, -> { where(role: :owner) }, class_name: 'AccountUser'
has_one :owner, through: :account_owner, source: :user
end
Related
I have 3 model User Project Bug. I want to create many to many relation with through. I create the relation in model i don't know it is correct or not, user have user type column which is enum type user type contain developer, manager , QA
user.user_type.manager belong to many project it has one to many relation
user.user_type.developer has many project and many project belong to developer. it has many to many realtion
project has many bugs and bugs belong to project
developer has many bugs and many bugs belong to developer
bug model
class Bug < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :project
has_many :developers, -> { where user_type: :Developer }, class_name: 'User', through: :project, source: :bugs
end
project model
class Project < ApplicationRecord
has_many :bugs, dependent: :delete_all
has_many :developers, -> { where user_type: :Developer }, class_name: 'User', through: :users, source: :project
has_many :users //it belong to manager_id
end
user model
class User < ApplicationRecord
enum user_type: %i[Manager Developer QA]
has_many :projects
has_many :bugs
end
developer_bug model
class DevelopersBug < ApplicationRecord
has_many :bugs
has_many :users
end
project_developer model
class ProjectsDeveloper < ApplicationRecord
has_many :projects
has_many :users
end
This
has_many :developers, -> { where user_type: :Developer },
class_name: 'User',
through: :users,
source: :project
is not what you think it is. It means something on the line of:
I already have an association 'users'. The users have an association 'project'.
Please configure an association that makes both JOINs and gives me the list of projects associated to the associated users.
This association will be named "developers" and be of objects of class "User".
You can see how these instructions are inconsistent. This
has_many :projects, through: :users, source: :project
will define a list of associated projects, by jumping over users.
On the other side, this:
has_many :developers, -> { where user_type: :Developer }, class_name: 'User'
will define a direct has-many association with a subset of all the users.
Given your description, your data model seems wrong, maybe this will be better:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :managed_projects, inverse_of: :manager, class_name: 'Project'
has_and_belongs_to_many :projects
has_many :bugs
end
class Project < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :manager, class_name: 'User', inverse_of: :managed_projects
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
has_many :bugs
end
class Bug < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :project
end
Your schema should include the three tables, and an additional many-to-many join table projects_users that holds foreign keys to both users and projects.
As rewritten has already pointed in his excellent answer out your data model is flawed. What you want instead is a join table which joins the users and projects:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :project_roles
has_many :projects, through: :project_roles
end
class ProjectRole < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :project
end
class Project < ApplicationRecord
has_many :users
has_many :projects, through: :project_roles
end
If you then want to give the user specific roles in a project you would add the enum to the join table and this is where it starts to get hairy so bear with me here:
class ProjectRole < ApplicationRecord
enum roles: [:manager, :developer, :qa]
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :project
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :project_roles
has_many :projects, through: :project_roles
has_many :project_roles_as_manager,
-> { manager }, # short for `where(role: :manager)`
class_name: 'ProjectRole'
has_many :projects_as_manager,
class_name: 'Project',
through: :project_roles_as_manager,
source: :project
has_many :project_roles_as_developer,
-> { developer },
class_name: 'ProjectRole'
has_many :projects_as_developer,
class_name: 'Project',
through: :project_roles_as_developer,
source: :project
# ...
end
This defines associations with a default scope and then joins through that association. You would then do the same thing on the other end of the assocation:
class Project < ApplicationRecord
has_many :users
has_many :projects, through: :project_roles
has_many :manager_project_roles,
-> { manager },
class_name: 'ProjectRole'
has_many :managers,
through: :manager_project_roles,
source: :user
# ...
end
Of course this is a lot of duplication which you can cut by looping over ProjectRoles.roles.keys and defining the assocations dynamically.
This is a very flexible way of modeling it which makes as few assumptions about the domain as possible. For example it allows multiple managers for a project and it allows users to have different roles in different projects.
If you want to model "bugs" as you would typically would with issues in a tracker you would create one table for the bug and a join table for the assignment:
class Bug < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :project
has_many :bug_assignments
has_many :users, through: :bug_assignments
end
class BugAssignment < ApplicationRecord
has_one :project, through: :bug
belongs_to :bug
belongs_to :user
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
# ...
has_many :bug_assignments
has_many :bugs
end
I have a complex model association in mind, and was wondering how I could accomplish it. This is what i want to accomplish.
I have a User and a Document model
A User can create documents. He is now the document admin.
He can add other users to his document, and give them permissions such as Editor, Viewer, Admin
He can also make a team, a group of users, and add multiple teams to his document. Each user on a team that the User has added to his document will also have permissions. A user can belong to many teams.
I am a little bit confused about the associations I will have to setup. This is the code I have so far, which has not incorporated the team aspect:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :documents, through: :participations
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :document
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
I would recommend introducing a Team and TeamMembership models in a similary way to existing models. Also change the belongs_to association on Participation from user to a polymorphic participant.
class Team < ApplicationRecord
has_many :team_memberships
has_many :users, through: :team_memberships
has_many :participations, as: :participant
end
class TeamMembership < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :team
belongs_to :user
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :team_memberships
has_many :teams, through: :team_memberships
has_many :participations, as: :participant
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :participant, polymorphic: true
belongs_to :document
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
# if desired create a users method to conveniently get a list of users with access to the document
def users
#users ||= participations.flat_map do |participation|
case participation.partipant
when User
[participation.participant]
when Team
participation.participant.users
end
end
end
end
I would only add has_many :through associations as you discover a benefit/need to having them. That will reduce complexity of maintaining them unless you have specific use case for them. In the case of User having a teams association, it's pretty obvious that you'll be likely to want to get the teams that the user is a part of and since there's no specific information in the TeamMembership object that you are likely to need in that determination, it's a good has_many :through to have.
EDIT: Added Document model.
Since you already have a participation model, you can use that as the join model between users and teams. Since a user can belong to multiple teams, and a document can have multiple teams, you can use a has_many through relationship between teams and documents. We'll call it the DocumentTeam model.
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :documents, through: :participations
has_many :teams, through: :participations
end
class Participation < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :document
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :team, optional: true
enum role: [ :admin, :editor, :viewer ]
end
class Team < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
has_many :document_teams
has_many :document, through: :document_teams
end
class Document < ApplicationRecord
has_many :participations
has_many :users, through: :participations
has_many :document_teams
has_many :teams, through: :document_teams
end
class DocumentTeam < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :document
belongs_to :team
end
I have 4 Models and i am not sure what is the correct way to write my relationships/associations.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :boards
has_many :lists
has_many :cards
end
class Board < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :lists
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :board
has_many :cards
end
class Card < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :list
end
If you want to be more explicit about your relationships, feel free to do the following (preferred in most every case):
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :boards, inverse_of: :user, dependent: :destroy
has_many :lists, inverse_of: :user, dependent: :destroy
has_many :cards, inverse_of: user, dependent: :destroy
end
class Board < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user, inverse_of: :boards
has_many :lists, inverse_of: :board
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user, inverse_of: :lists
belongs_to :board, inverse_of :lists
has_many :cards, inverse_of :list
end
class Card < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user, inverse_of: :cards
belongs_to :list, inverse_of :cards
end
Finally, make sure any of your models that are dependent on another (e.g. Board belongs_to User) have the appropriate foreign key in their table. So, for example, Board will need to have a user_id foreign key to correctly create the association.
You can create a migration for any of those entities if you haven't already like so:
rails generate migration AddUserRefToBoards user:references
A list has one owner (a user). A list also has a number of panelists (also users). I have tried defining the relationships between the three models: User, List, and Panelist. But I'm getting nowhere.
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :lists
has_many :panelMemberships, :through => :panelists, :source => :lists
end
list.rb
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :panelMembers, :through => :panelists, :source => :user
end
panelist.rb
class Panelist < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :list
belongs_to :user
end
I've tried all different combinations but nothing seems to work. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
The model also has to have a has_many relationship for whatever the through model is, so wherever you have has_many :x, through: :y, you also need to say has_many :y. You also shouldn't have a panelist model separate from your user model if panelists are users (unless you're doing STI, which you're not). From what I understand, you're trying to do something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_and_belongs_to_many :lists # for the normal panelist / list relationship
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
Then you'll need to make a migration for a users_lists (with user id and list id) table which will be your join table but won't need its own model. But if you really want to keep the through relationship (good for if you do other stuff with the join model), then you'd do:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :lists, through: :panel_memberships
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :users, through: :panel_memberships
end
class PanelMembership < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :list
I have the following models
Class User
has_many :memberships
Class Membership
belongs_to :user
The membership table has two columns, user_id and organization_id.
However the organization_id is also a user id.
How can I specificy an association so that:
#user.organizations returns a list of organizations(other users) of which this user is a member.
I think the correct way of doing this would be to create three models as follows:
#user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :memberships
has_one :organization
end
#organization.rb
class Organization < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :user_id
belongs_to :user
has_many :memberships
end
#membership.rb
class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :user_id, :organization_id
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :organization
end
Figured it out:
class Membership < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :organization, class_name: "User"
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :memberships
has_many :organizations, through: :memberships
end