I currently use ZK for web-development. Here is my case:
I implement instant search, once text change=> perform search.
Zul File
<textbox id="textSearch" sclass="search_text">
<attribute name="onChanging">
lbOnChangingSearch.setValue(event.getValue());
vm.onChangingTextSearch();
</attribute>
</textbox>
<label id="lbOnChangingSearch" visible="false"></label>
<grid id="gridChapter" model="#load(vm.chapterInPage)">
....
</grid>
Controller code
ListModelList<ChapterJoinComic> chapterInPage;
public ListModelList<ChapterJoinComic> getChapterInPage() {
return chapterInPage;
}
#NotifyChange({ "topComics", "chapterInPage"} )
#Command
public void onChangingTextSearch() {
FilterObject fo = getFilterObject();
fo.setSearch_str(lbOnChangingSearch.getValue());
//
doSearch(fo); // Change chapterInPage
// Manually post Not
BindUtils.postNotifyChange(null,null,this.chapterInPage,"chapterInPage");
}
Problem
After call onChangingText search, Grid dont update databinding.
But if I continue change text (more call onChangingTextSearch ). The Grid will update, but the updated value is the previous value.
It seems the Grid is a-step slower than my latest Model object.
Note If I use onOK instead of onChanging event, the databinding works well.
Anyone can help me. Thanks in advance!
In addition of Malte his answer.
Textbox only sends data to the server with the onChange event to avoid needless network traffic.
If you want to send data to the server with the onChanging event, you need to do :
<textbox instant="true" />
In this case the client will update almost instantly to the server (if you type fast, it will be when you stop typing)
You should remove the BindUtils.postnotifyChange when you use #NotifyChange already, and you use it wrong anyway: the third parameter should be this instead of this.chapterInPage. The JavaDoc explains that you need to specify the bean whose property is changing and the name of the property.
Furthermore, replace your onChanging attribute with the proper way to call a command:
<textbox id="textSearch" sclass="search_text"
onChanging="#command('onChangingTextSearch')" />
Consult the documentation for more information on how to use commands. I think because you do not use the command as a command, the #NotifyChange is not triggered. And your postNotifyChange is wrong, as I said.
Let me know if that works or if there are other problems remaining.
EDIT
I just re-created an example on my own, and it seems to work. Try it like this:
ViewModel --------------------------------
private String searchText = "";
#NotifyChange({"chapterInPage", "searchText"})
#Command
public void onChangingTextSearch(#BindingParam("text") String searchText)
{
this.searchText = searchText;
}
public String getSearchText()
{
return searchText;
}
public ListModelList<String> getChapterInPage()
{
return new ListModelList<>(searchText.split(""));
}
zul --------------------------------------
<textbox onChanging="#command('onChangingTextSearch', text=event.value)" />
<label id="lbl" value="#load(model.searchText)" />
<listbox model="#load(model.chapterInPage)" />
Note that I use command binding to call the search method in the model instead of calling it "manually" in an onChanging listener. This way, I actually execute it as a command, which triggers the notifyChange. When you call it like vm.onChangingTextSearch() in a listener, the #NotifyChange is ignored.
This way, it works as expected, and with every character typed (well, after a couple of millisenconds delay), the list updates. Another advantage is that you do not have to bind your label into the view model, something that zk's documentation discourages.
Can you try to link your zul and model like this and tell me if it works. If it doesn't, you might want to try to create an example on zkFiddle that re-produces your code's behavior.
Related
I have a custom component location. I want that, when a change is done, the model is update so another component (an autocomplete) is to show only results related to the location value. Also, that component is rerendered to reset it.
I have a page with the following code (simplified):
<h:form id="ticketForm">
...
<loc:location id="locationId" <-- CUSTOM COMPONENT
hiddenFieldValue="#{ticketCtrl.ticket.location}"
visibleFieldValue="#{ticketCtrl.ticket.locationDescription}"
rendered="#{ticketCtrl.ticketModifiable}">
<f:ajax event="changeLocation" render=":ticketForm:gfhId" <-- AJAX CALL.
execute=":ticketForm:locationId" listener="#{ticketCtrl.locationListener}"/>
</loc:location>
...
</h:form>
When the value in the component is changed, the model is updated and :ticketForm:gfhId is rendered as needed, but the listener(which performs additional resets) is not executed.
Attaching the ajax to a simpler control results in the listener being executed; v.g.
<h:inputText id="contactId"
value="#{ticketCtrl.ticket.contactPerson}"
disabled="#{not ticketCtrl.ticketModifiable}">
<f:ajax event="change" render=":ticketForm:gfhId"
execute=":ticketForm:locationId" listener="#{ticketCtrl.locationListener}"/>
</h:inputText>
works perfectly.
I do not know if it may be related as how the changeLocation event is fired; inside my component I define it as
<composite:interface>
...
<composite:clientBehavior name="changeLocation" event="change" targets="visibleId"/>
</composite:interface>
with visibleId being a readonly text; when it is changed by javascript I fire the change event on it with JS.
function launchEvent(fieldName) {
if ("fireEvent" in fieldName) {
fieldName.fireEvent("onchange");
} else {
var evt = document.createEvent("HTMLEvents");
evt.initEvent("change", false, true);
fieldName.dispatchEvent(evt);
}
}
The info I find in other questions is about making ajax an inner part of the composite component, here I want ajax detached because I probably won't need it in other uses of the component.
I am using JBoss 6.1 wih Mojarra 2.1.9 and Richfaces 4.
Thanks in advance.
UPDATE:
Even after finding jarek.jpa's answer right, if someone wants to check the code it is here:
The composite component
http://pastebin.com/9wqMVfR5
The main form
http://pastebin.com/i39ys2D9
This may have to do with the "readonly" attribute set to true. Though you manage to send the change-event by hand (JS), the server-side processing of the listener may be dropped due to the readonly state. See e.g. jsf (richfaces) readonly input text validation.
Below is my Code:
<ui:repeat var="status" value="#{showUpdatedAction.statusUpdates}">
<h:panelGroup>
#{status.content}
<h:form>
<h:commandLink value="Like" action="#{statusAction.likeStatus(status.id,1)}" />
</h:form>
</h:panelGroup>
<ui:repeat>
#{status.content} shows correct values. When I print id of status using #{status.id}, it also gives correct value. But when I click the command link, value passed is always 0 for status.id.
Can someone tell me why this happens and how can I avoid this?
Thank you.
Edit 1
Interestingly, when instead of passing the parameter in function, I pass it using <f:param>, it works perfectly. Can anyone comment on that?
I think you should try using <c:forEach> instead of <ui:repeat>.
I can't tell you exactly, why status.id is 0 in your case but you can directly pass the whole status object in your EL expression. Like so:
<h:commandAction value="Like" action="#{statusAction.likeStatus(status)}" />
Then in your likeStatus you simply do a int statusId = status.getId() or similar and you have what you want.
As an addition: Using <c:forEach> should actually be just a fallback, because people say you shouldn't mix JSTL with JSF for whatsoever reasons.
Your code in the JSF page is just fine, just checked it... (generated the beans at my side too : showUpdatedAction, statusAction , and a simple class Status)
public void likeStatus(String id,long someVal){
System.out.println(id+"___"+someVal);
}
which prints the ids just fine
id1___1
id4___1
Maybe its something to do with the type of the id or something with your beans?
I have used the following template in my project:
<DataTemplate
x:Key="textBoxDataTemplate">
<TextBox
Name="textBox"
ToolTip="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=(Validation.Errors)[0].ErrorContent}"
Tag="{Binding}"
PreviewKeyDown="cellValueTextBoxKeyDown">
<TextBox.Text>
<MultiBinding
Converter="{StaticResource intToStringMultiConverter}">
<Binding
Path="CellValue"
Mode="TwoWay">
<Binding.ValidationRules>
<y:MatrixCellValueRule
MaxValue="200" />
</Binding.ValidationRules>
</Binding>
<Binding
RelativeSource="{RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type y:MatrixGrid}}"
Path="Tag"
Mode="OneWay" />
</MultiBinding>
</TextBox.Text>
</TextBox>
</DataTemplate>
I used this template to create an editable matrix for the user. The user is able to navigate from cell to cell within the matrix and I would like to highlight the data in the selected textbox but it doesn't work. I called TextBox.Focus () and TextBox.SelectAll () to achieve the effect but nothing. The Focus () works but the text never gets highlighted.
Any help is welcome and appreciated.
Okay, if anyone is interested, the solution to this problem of mine was to include the statement e.Handled = true; in the event handler method where the textBox.SelectAll() and textBox.Focus() are called.
The problem was that I attached an event handler to the textbox's PreviewKeyDown event which handles a tunneling event and probably the SelectAll() and Focus() calls are ignored without calling the e.Handled = true; statement.
Hope it'll help someone.
Without the rest of your code it's difficult to say whether this will work for you, but I put together a small sample using your DataTemplate (minus the parts that refer to code that wasn't posted).
I was able to select all the text in the text boxes by adding a GotFocus event handler to the TextBox in the DataTemplate:
<TextBox
...
GotFocus="textBox_GotFocus"
...>
...
</TextBox>
And the code-behind:
private void textBox_GotFocus(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
TextBox textBox = sender as TextBox;
if (textBox != null)
{
textBox.SelectAll();
}
}
Let me know if you are attempting to select all under different circumstances (not when the box receives focus).
Here's a very good very simple solution (I don't know if it works for your template, but give it a try): http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/wpf/thread/564b5731-af8a-49bf-b297-6d179615819f
I have a page made of custom components. In that page I have a button. If I click the button I have to call another page (page.mxml consisting of custom components). Then click event handler is written in Action-script, in a separate file.
How to make a object of an MXML class, in ActionScript? How to display the object (i.e. the page)?
My code:
page1.mxml
<comp:BackgroundButton x="947" y="12" width="61" height="22"
paddingLeft="2" paddingRight="2" label="logout" id="logout"
click="controllers.AdminSession.logout()"
/>
This page1.mxml has to call page2.mxml using ActionScript code in another class:
static public function logout():void {
var startPage:StartSplashPage = new StartSplashPage();
}
Your Actionscript class needs a reference to the display list in order to add your component to the stage. MXML is simply declarative actionscript, so there is no difference between creating your instance in Actionscript or using the MXML notation.
your function:
static public function logout():void {
var startPage:StartSplashPage = new StartSplashPage();
}
could be changed to:
static public function logout():StartSplashPage {
return new StartSplashPage();
}
or:
static public function logout():void {
var startPage:StartSplashPage = new StartSplashPage();
myReferenceToDisplayListObject.addChild( startPage );
}
If your actionscript does not have a reference to the display list, than you cannot add the custom component to the display list. Adding an MXML based custom component is no different than adding ANY other DisplayObject to the display list:
var mySprite:Sprite = new Sprite();
addChild(mySprite)
is the same as:
var startPage:StartSplashPage = new StartSplashPage();
myReferenceToDisplayListObject.addChild( startPage );
Both the Sprite and the StartSplashPage are extensions of DisplayObject at their core.
You reference MVC in the comments to another answer. Without knowing the specific framework you've implemented, or providing us with more code in terms of the context you are trying to perform this action in, it is difficult to give a more specific answer.
I assume that you are on a page with a set of components and want to replace this set of components on the page with a different set of components. My apologies in advance if this is not what you are trying to do.
You can do this using ViewStacks and switching the selected index on selection -- this can be done either by databinding or by firing an event in controllers.AdminSession.logout() and listening for that event in the Main Page and switching the selectedIndex of the view stack in the handler function.
MainPage.mxml
<mx:ViewStack>
<views:Page1...>
...
<comp:BackgroundButton x="947" y="12" width="61" height="22"
paddingLeft="2" paddingRight="2" label="logout" id="logout"
click="controllers.AdminSession.logout()"/>
</views:Page1...>
<views:Page2 ...>
...
<comp:Comp1 .../>
<comp:Comp2 .../>
</views:Page2>
I think you may use state to do you work.
You may take a look at http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/10/05/creating-view-states-in-a-flex-application/#more-221
Edit:
I am not sure I fully understand your case.
As I know, you may make a new state in page1.mxml, and name it, eg. secondPageState, and then put the custom component page2.mxml in the secondPageState.
In the controller, you need an import statement to import the page1 component and make a public var for the page1 component, eg. firstPage.
Then, the code will similar to:
public function logout():voild
{
firstPage.currentState = "secondPageState";
}
Another solution:
If you don't like the change state solution, you may try to use the addchild, to add the custom component to your application.
I am developing a Grails (1.0.4) app where I want to edit a collection of collections on a single page in a grid view. I got it to work quite well depending only on the indexed parameter handling of Spring MVC, except for one thing:
boolean (or, for that matter, Boolean) values in the grid can be set via checkbox, but not unset, i.e. when I check the checkbox and update, the value is set to true, but afterwards when I edit again, uncheck the checkbox and update, it remains true.
This is the GSP code of the checkbox:
<g:checkBox name="tage[${indexTag}].zuweisungen[${indexMitarb}].fixiert" value="${z.fixiert}" />
And this is the HTML that is generated:
<input type="hidden" name="tage[0].zuweisungen[0]._fixiert" />
<input type="checkbox" name="tage[0].zuweisungen[0].fixiert" checked="checked" id="tage[0].zuweisungen[0].fixiert" />
I've found a Grails bug that describes exactly this effect, but it's marked as fixed in 1.0.2, and the problem mechanism described there (underscore in hidden field name is put in the wrong place) is not present in my case.
Any ideas what could be the reason?
This is the solution a guy named Julius Huang proposed on the grails-user mailing list. It's reusable but relies on JavaScript to populate a hidden field with the "false" response for an unchecked checkbox that HTML unfortunately does not send.
I hack GSP to send "false" when
uncheck the box (true -> false) with
custom TagLib.
By default checkBox send nothing when
uncheck, so I use the checkBox as
event handler but send hidden field
instead.
"params" in Controller can handle
"false" -> "true" without any
modification. eg. Everything remain
same in Controller.
The Custom Tag Usage in GSP (sample usedfunc_F is "true"),
<jh:checkBox name="surveyList[${i}].usedfunc_F" value="${survey.usedfunc_F}"></jh:checkBox>
Here is what the Tag generate,
<input type="hidden" name="surveyList[#{i}].usedfunc_F" id="surveyList[#{i}].usedfunc_F" value="false" />
<input type="checkbox" onclick="jhtoggle('surveyList[#{i}].usedfunc_F')" checked="checked" />
The Javascript
<script type="text/javascript">
function jhtoggle(obj) {
var jht = document.getElementById(obj);
jht.value = (jht.value !='true' ? 'true' : 'false');
}
</script>
This is my own solution, basically a workaround that manually does what the grails data binding should be doing (but doesn't):
Map<String,String> checkboxes = params.findAll{def i = it.key.endsWith("._fixiert")} // all checkboxes
checkboxes.each{
String key = it.key.substring(0, it.key.indexOf("._fixiert"))
int tagIdx = Integer.parseInt(key.substring(key.indexOf('[')+1, key.indexOf(']')))
int zuwIdx = Integer.parseInt(key.substring(key.lastIndexOf('[')+1, key.lastIndexOf(']')))
if(params.get(key+".fixiert"))
{
dienstplanInstance.tage[tagIdx].zuweisungen[zuwIdx].fixiert = true
}
else
{
dienstplanInstance.tage[tagIdx].zuweisungen[zuwIdx].fixiert = false
}
}
Works, requires no change in grails itself, but isn't reusable (probably could be made so with some extra work).
I think that the simplest workaround would be to attach a debugger and see why Grails is failing to populate the value. Considering Grails is open source you'll be able to access the source code and once you figure out the solution for it you can patch your version.
I have also found this other bug GRAILS-2861 which mentions the issue related to binding to booleans (see Marc's comment in the thread). I guess that is exactly the problem you are describing.
I would create a small sample app that demonstrates the problem and attach it to the Grails bug (or create a new one). Someone here may be able to debug your sample app or you'll have shown the bug isn't really fixed.
Try this out, set the logs to DEBUG, frist try the first 3 if they don't show the problem up, flip them all to DEBUG:
codehaus.groovy.grails.web.servlet="error" // controllers
codehaus.groovy.grails.web.pages="error" // GSP
codehaus.groovy.grails.web.sitemesh="error" // layouts
codehaus.groovy.grails."web.mapping.filter"="error" // URL mapping
codehaus.groovy.grails."web.mapping"="error" // URL mapping
codehaus.groovy.grails.commons="info" // core / classloading
codehaus.groovy.grails.plugins="error" // plugins
codehaus.groovy.grails.orm.hibernate="error" // hibernate integration
This should allow you to see exactly when and how the parameters setting is failing and probably figure out a work around.