i have Account Model,Asset, Capital and Revenue this table are all inherited in my Account model. i have 3 kind of attributes in my Account model. name, code and type. when i create an account where will be to insert will happen one in my account and the other one is in my type for example
Account.create(name: "test123", code:"test123", type:"Asset")
sql will run Two Insert one for Account model and one for Asset Table
and my sunspot work well it will reindex my database and i can search my params
but when i update my model Account my sql run one insert and one update
my question is how can i reindex my model when i update. with a particular data. i can do Sunspot.reindex but this is will load all data in my sql. that will cause me to slow
sql will run Two Insert one for Account model and one for Asset Table
FYI you use STI when you want to share same database table between multiple models because they are similar in attributes and behavior. Like AdminUser model is likely to have almost same attributes/columns as PublisherUser or ReaderUser. Therefore you might wish to have a common table called users or model User and share this table among the above mentioned models.
Point is: ActiveRecord will run a single SQL query not two, like:
INSERT INTO "accounts" ("name", "code", "type") VALUES ('test123', 'test123', 'Asset')
my question is how can i reindex my model when i update. with a particular data. i can do Sunspot.reindex but this is will load all data in my sql. that will cause me to slow
Actually sunspot_rails is designed to auto-reindex whenever you make changes to your model/record. It listens to the save callbacks.
But you need to make sure that you are not using methods like update_column(s). See the list of silent create/update methods which do not trigger callbacks and validations at all.
In addition, you need to understand the concept of batch size in terms of Solr. For performance reasons, all of your new indexes are not immediately committed. Committed means, writing indexes to database like in RDBMS commits.
By default the batch_size for commits is 50. Meaning after 50 index method executions only the indexes will be committed and you will be able to search the records. To change it, use following
# in config/initializers/sunspot_config.rb
Sunspot.config.indexing.default_batch_size = 1 # or any number
or
# in models; its not considered good though
after_commit do
Sunspot.commit
end
For manual re-indexing, you can use like #Kathryn suggested.
But, I don't think you need to intervene in the auto-operation. I think you were not seeing immediate results so you were worrying.
According to the documentation, objects will be indexed automatically if you are on Rails. But it also mentions you can reindex a class manually:
Account.reindex
Sunspot.commit
It also suggests using Sunspot.index on individual objects.
i put this to my model
after_update do
Sunspot.index Account.where(id: self.id)
end
Related
I took a look a this question and didn't found any answer that worked for me.
I have, for example a Project model, which has_many tasks. I would like to create, from an array of attributes, many tasks for some project. So, in my project model, I would have a method like this (simplified example):
def create_tasks(tasks)
tasks.map{|t| Task.create(project: self, name: t.name)}
end
The problem is, for each task, it will make a hit on my db, and for a large number of records that wouldn't be desirable. How could I do that so ActiveRecord will make only one call to my database?
Thanks in advance!
Each call for insertion into database will be done separately (in different transactions). But you could decrease a total delay wrapping all creations in a single transaction.
Task.transaction do
tasks.each{ |task| Task.create(...) }
end
In this case all your creations will be wrapped in one atomic db transaction.
Take a look at transaction documentation.
Also you could try accepts_nested_attributes_for.
Nested attributes allow you to save attributes on associated records through the parent.
Hope it helps.
We have a users table. Users have many listings.
We'd like to shard the association model Listing such that all users stay on database "master" shard. Users will get a shard_id column and listings will be split into different databases "shard1", "shard2".
We can augment our code to access the listings on the correct shard using the using method:
Listing.where(user: current_user).using(current_user.shard_id)
However that is a big code change. Ideally we want to just keep using our existing association statements like this:
current_user.listings
And have it automatically use current_user.shard_id beneath the hood.
Any suggestions for doing this?
According to the documentation, current_user.listings should work out of the box.
Octopus also handles associations. When you try to get a object that is associated to another object, you could use normal ActiveRecord syntax to get the objects
https://github.com/thiagopradi/octopus/wiki/How-Octopus-Works
I am working on a project that has the following cucumber step:
Given /^no registered users$/ do
User.delete_all
end
As a new RoR user this looks a little dangerous even though I'd be testing on our development database because our User table has actual data. What is the line of code doing?
Thanks!
delete_all is from activerecord library not from FactoryGirl.
And the difference between these two is :
delete_all(conditions = nil) public
Deletes the records matching conditions without instantiating the records first, and hence not calling the destroy method nor invoking callbacks.
This is a single SQL DELETE statement that goes straight to the database, much more efficient than destroy_all.
Be careful with relations though, in particular :dependent rules defined on associations are not honored.
Returns the number of rows affected.
destroy_all(conditions = nil) public
Destroys the records matching conditions by instantiating each record and calling its destroy method.
Each object’s callbacks are executed (including :dependent association options and before_destroy/after_destroy Observer methods).
Returns the collection of objects that were destroyed; each will be frozen, to reflect that no changes should be made (since they can’t be persisted).
Note
Instantiation, callback execution, and deletion of each record can be time consuming when you’re removing many records at once. It generates at least one SQL DELETE query per record . If you want to delete many rows quickly, without concern for their associations or callbacks, use delete_all instead.
delete_all is not from FactoryGirl, it is an active record command and it deletes the users from your database. If you are running this from cucumber then it should run against your test database, not development.
A better alternative is destroy_all since that version will run any associated callbacks. For example, if users have posts, and you have a before_destroy callback to remove posts if users are deleted.
Here's a link to more info about delete_all
delete_all will forceably remove records from the corresponding table without activating any rails callbacks.
destroy_all will remove the records but also call the model callbacks
Based on your example, it's probably deleting all users in order to allow the next Cucumber step to register new users. The ActiveRecord::Base#delete_all method says, in part:
Deletes the records matching conditions without instantiating the
records first, and hence not calling the destroy method nor invoking
callbacks. This is a single SQL DELETE statement that goes straight to
the database, much more efficient than destroy_all.
There are probably better ways to write that test, but the intent is clearly to remove the user records as efficiently as possible.
As for it being dangerous, your tests should be running against the test database, not the development or production databases. Since it's possible to misconfigure your testing framework to use the wrong database, you could certainly add a step or conditional that tests if Rails.env.test? is true. That's a fairly small price to pay for peace of mind.
I am new to ruby and rails and I am having difficulty conceptualizing the MVC techniques in conjunction with database views. I am dealing with a legacy database that has several viiews that are used to generate reports.
Where I get lost is how do I actually use a database view. Should it be put in a model? If so what exactly would that look like?
As an example the legacy db has a view called qryTranscriptByGroup. It is used in the legacy application in an SQL statement such as "SELECT * FROM qryTranscriptByGroup WHERE group='test_group'". This returns a small number of records usually less than 100.
If i create a model, Transcript, how would I define a method like Transcript.find_by_group(group)? As well, it would seem that I might need to prevent any other "find" methods as they would be invalid in this context.
There is also the the fact that the view is read-only and I would need to prevent any attempts to create, update or destroy it.
Perhaps I am going about this entirely the wrong way. The bottom line is that I need to get information from several tables (models?) that represent the information about a user (a transcript). Actually one or more users (transcripts plural).
-Thanks!
You can use a database view like a normal model.
In your case:
class Transcript < ActiveRecord::Base
set_table_name "qryTranscriptByGroup"
set_primary_key "if_not_id"
end
The query will be then:
Trascript.find_by_group('test_group')
without you need to declare anything.
Rails uses the method_missing method to magically generate find_by_column_name methods.
For the create/update/delete action you can simply delete them or not create them in the controller.
I have a standard rails application, that uses a mysql database through Active Record, with data loaded through a separate parsing process from a rather large XML file.
This was all well and good, but now I need to load data from an Oracle database, rather than the XML file.
I have no control how the database looks, and only really need a fraction of the data it contains (maybe one or two columns out of a few tables). As such, what I really want to do is make a call to the database, get data back, and put the data in the appropriate locations in my existing, Rails friendly mysql database.
How would I go about doing this? I've heard* you can (on a model by model basis) specifiy different databases for Rails Models to use, but that sounds like they use them in their entirety, (that is, the database is Rails friendly). Can I make direct Oracle calls? Is there a process that makes this easier? Can Active Record itself handle this?
A toy example:
If I need to know color, price, and location for an Object, then normally I would parse a huge XML file to get this information. Now, with oracle, color, price, and location are all in different tables, indexed by some ID (there isn't actually an "Object" table). I want to pull all this information together into my Rails model.
Edit: Sounds like what I'd heard about was ActiveRecord's "establish_connection" method...and it does indeed seem to assume one model is mapped to one table in the target database, which isn't true in my case.
Edit Edit: Ah, looks like I might be wrong there. "establish_connection" might handle my situation just fine (just gotta get ORACLE working in the first place, and I'll know for sure... If anyone can help, the question is here)
You can create a connection to Oracle directly and then have ActiveRecord execute a raw SQL statement to query your tables (plural). Off the top of my head, something like this:
class OracleModel < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection(:oracle_development)
def self.get_objects
self.find_by_sql("SELECT...")
end
end
With this model you can do OracleModel.get_objects which will return a set of records whereby the columns specified in the SELECT SQL statement are attributes of each OracleModel. Obviously you can probably come up with a more meaningful model name than I have!
Create an entry named :oracle_development in your config/database.yml file with your Oracle database connection details.
This may not be exactly what you are looking for, but it seems to cover you situation pretty well: http://pullmonkey.com/2008/4/21/ruby-on-rails-multiple-database-connections/
It looks like you can make an arbitrarily-named database configuration in the the database.yml file, and then have certain models connect to it like so:
class SomeModel < ActiveRecord::Base
establish_connection :arbitrary_database
#other stuff for your model
end
So, the solution would be to make ActiveRecord models for just the tables you want data out of from this other database. Then, if you really want to get into some sql, use ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(sql). If you need it as a the actual active_record object, do SomeModel.find_by_sql(sql).
Hope this helps!
I don't have points enough to edit your question, but it sounds like what you really need is to have another "connection pool" available to the second DB -- I don't think Oracle itself will be a problem.
Then, you need to use these alternate connections to "simply" execute a custom query within the appropriate controller method.
If you only need to pull data from your Oracle database, and if you have any ability to add objects to a schema that can see the data you require . . . .
I would simplify things by creating a view on the Oracle table that projects the data you require in a nice friendly shape for ActiveRecord.
This would mean maintaining code to two layers of the application, but I think the gain in clarity on the client-side would outweigh the cost.
You could also use the CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW Object AS SELECT tab1., tab2. FROM tab1,tab2 syntax so the view returned every column in each table.
If you need to Insert or Update changes to your Rails model, then you need to read up on the restrictions for doing Updates through a view.
(Also, you may need to search on getting Oracle to work with Rails as you will potentially need to install the Oracle client software and additional Ruby modules).
Are you talking about an one-time data conversion or some permanent data exchange between your application and the Oracle database? I think you shouldn't involve Rails in. You could just make a SQL query to the Oracle database, extract the data, and then just insert it into the MySQL database.