Nested Jira Search on two independent projects - jira

I need to get a nested Jira search. I am okay with JQL query but I have a usecase that I don't know how to solve
Company uses project=XTBOW for reporting purpose for executives (Epic)
The company also uses project=XTA for underling development work (Task)
The XTA task are linked to the XTBOW Epic for a subset of task, but not all. (There is a large body of XTA task that are not linked to XTBOW)
I need to get a filter going for all XTA projects that are linked to XTBOW Epics only. I would like to use a filter like this:
project = XTA and "Epic Link" in (<project = XTBOW.key>)
I can manually prove this filter works. But need a way to automate this filter, because the number of tickets being created/tracked in growing exponentially, and if someone deletes a key for XTBOW that is in the "Epic Link" field, the JQL search throws and error because the "Key" is missing.
Example - FYI cf[10231] is the "Epic Link" field:
project in (XTA,XTWOF) and cf[10231] in (XTBOW-42,XTBOW-59)
The overall objective is to download the data to a dataframe. So if there is a better suggestion to even avoid JQL and do it through python. I am all ears. Just need so pointers to start. I am just going this route because I have already built a JIRA-Downloader/Parser using Python.

The easiest way to get subsets of issues is with:
search_issues(jql_str, startAt=0, maxResults=50, validate_query=True, fields=None, expand=None, json_result=None)
You should be able to just pull the issue sets using the queries you already created, just make them into strings.
DOC

Related

ServiceNow Rest API (using PowerBI)

I'm on a project in which I need to get data from a ServiceNow instance and treat all data with PowerBI. I'm able to retrieve a big amount of data (Snow collect a lot of data), but I still need a way to filter data correctly. I'm calling to this URL:
Besides, I want also to apply a filter to retrieve just some specific registries from the table Requested Items. For that, I use the sysparm_query parameter to filter the field "cmdb_ci" and more specifically it's "name", something like:
&sysparm_query=cmdb_ci=What I need to Filter
Apart from this, I have also tried:
&sysparm_query=cmdb_ci.value=What I need to Filter
&sysparm_query=cmdb_ci.display_value=What I need to Filter
&sysparm_query=cmdb_ci.sys_id=What I need to Filter
&sysparm_query=cmdb_ci.name=What I need to Filter
But still not found the solution... as all these does not respond the solution needed.
Does someone know how I can manage this?
Thanks!!
JLG
There are two "Configuration item" fields in sc_req_item: cmdb_ci and configuration_item. Make sure that you are using the correct one. Either cmdb_ci.name=value or configuration_item.name=value should work, depending on which of the two fields you are using. cmdb_ci.value and cmdb_ci.display_value will not work as there are no fields on the record with these names. cmdb_ci.sys_id should work if you are supplying a sys_id (although it is redundant to type .sys_id for a reference field).
You should first verify your query through the ServiceNow UI before attempting to use it in an API call.
Type sc_req_item.list in the Filter navigator
On the filter list select "Show related fields"
Get your filter to work correctly
Right-click on the filter and select "Copy query"
The next step is to test it using the REST API Explorer.
Final step is to configure your client tool (PowerBI).

Retrieving More columns as Part of VSTS query

I'm trying to fetch details from VSTS using VSTS query API. So to get all Portfolio Epics I created a custom query and used its ID to get that in JSON format. the query looks like this
https://dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/{team}/_apis/wit/wiql/{id}?api-version=5.0-preview.2
But the issue is its not giving me many details about each of the work items in JSON. It only lists the ID and URL. Like this
WorkItems:[
{ID:234,URL:"workitemurl"},
{ID:235,URL:"workitemurl"},
{ID:236,URL:"workitemurl"},
...
]
So if I need more details about an item I need to execute those individual URl for each PE and thus I can get its details. instead of I am just checking is there is any way of getting an ID (keyedinID of each work item along with the ID and URL) like this. Please note KID is a field if we execute the URL separately. So to avoid that extra process, I would like to get that along with the WorkItems.
WorkItems:[
{ID:234,URL:"workitemurl",KID:002},
{ID:235,URL:"workitemurl",KID:023},
{ID:236,URL:"workitemurl",KID:033},
...
]
So how can we make this possible?
The Web UI uses a different API to get query results (/_api/_wit/_query), which allows query+data in a single pass. This is an old __v5 type call, which means it's considered internal.
The proper way to do this now is to first do the query as you're doing it right now and then call /_api/wit/workitems?ids=1,2,3,4 using the IDs from the references you got from the first call. That will also allow you to load the details dynamically and in small batches which will result in a more responsive UI.
See:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/azure/devops/wit/work%20items/list?view=azure-devops-rest-4.1

Querying targetTypes in Schema Extensions of Microsoft Graph

The documentation page at https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/docs/api-reference/v1.0/resources/schemaextension did not sport the usual "Supports $filter" as on other objects so I had to give it a try:
https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/schemaExtensions/?$filter=targetTypes/any(c:c eq 'User')
Listing status=Available and eg targetTypes=User would be handy in our case without retrieving the whole list beforehand (Graph Explorer for the demo tenant has already a nice long list). I take there's then (at least at the moment) no way around just grabbing the whole list even though I only need a subset or targetTypes?
Thanks for the feedback. We do support filtering on status, but not on targetTypes currently (although it's weird that we don't error that that filter is not supported, and simply return everything). This is something that we could add.
Hope this helps,

Meteor publish-with-relations VS collection-helpers for joins?

What's the best way to do joins in Meteor/mongo? Use one of these packages, or something else:
publish-with-relations
https://github.com/erundook/meteor-publish-with-relations/blob/master/publish_with_relations.coffee
collection-helpers
https://github.com/dburles/meteor-collection-helpers
I'm very familiar with PWR, but collection-helpers is new to me. It looks like the two are complimentary.
PWR solves the somewhat complex problem of publishing documents to the client via a reactive join based on arbitrarily complex relationships. See this question for more details.
collection-helpers appears to be a set of convenience functions added to the client to be used when traversing collection relationships inside of a template (given that the required documents have already been published). For example, if you have books and authors in separate (but related) collections, you can immediately get myBook.author.fullName inside of a template without having to type out the extra find for the author.
currently the top popular solution in atmosphere seems to be publish-composite https://atmospherejs.com/reywood/publish-composite

Delphi Search Edit Component

I need a delphi component for Delphi 2007 win32 that have features like Google search text box.
** While User writing search key it should fill/refresh the list with values, and user can select one of them.
**User can go up and down list and can select one of them.
**List should contain codes and text pair, so user can select text and I can get code for database operations.
(Google can highlight the search text in List but I think it is not possible with Delphi 2007, so it is not expected.)
I tried Dev Express TcxMRUEdit, however it doesn't meet my needs
Since you have DevExpress, why don't you try the cxLookupComboBox in lsEditMode and with ImmediateDropDown = True?
Check out woll2woll components. The TLookupcombobox has done this since Delphi 3 (or earlier). This is not spam, I just use the library.
http://www.woll2woll.com/
I also had the same problem and unfortunately didn't find a suitable component. I was also inspired from google.
So it turned out to be easier for me to "simulate a component" by using an editbox and a grid placed under it. As the user types something in the editbox the query refreshes and the proper resulst are shown in the grid. I have many columns in the grid, the query results try to match all the fields (so if I type 'po', the query will return all records where any field is like 'po%'). I also added a delay of 500ms after the user types to avoid to run too many unnecessary queries (another aproach could be to kill the thread as the user strikes a new key, if the query is run in a thread).
In this way I obtained the required functionality, even if without higlighting the search text, anyway my users are delighted by this.
In every place I am using this "component" I am attaching a query at runtime so it can be used in many different forms.
I somehow was also inspired by the skype UI: when you display the lsit of contacts you can type something and the contacts will be filtered accordingly (skype uses an editbox + grid/listbox).

Resources