I am trying to connect and run a device (LiDAR) through Docker container since it needs Ubuntu 16 while my computer is Ubunutu 20.
I got the device to ping inside the docker container, but it is not recognised when I try to use it.
What I did:
Made Dockerfile with requirements (Added EXPOSE to expose all ports)
Built docker image using:
docker build -t testLidar
I then made a container using
docker run -d -P --name test_Lidar (imagename)
Then
docker exec -t test_Lidar (device_ip) works
I am able to ping my LiDAR IP inside the container, but when I do ip a I cannot see the interfaces connected to my machine.
Been stuck on this for 3 days, any suggestions?
Note: I have done the exact same steps but on an Ubuntu 16 machine. The only change was the docker run command had --net host instead of -P tag and my device worked perfectly. I feel like this is the root of my problem.
Use --net host flag with docker run to attach the container to your host's networking stack and make it available in for other hosts in your network.
When you use --net host, you actually attach the container to your host's networking stack. By default, containers are attached to the default network of type bridge and can communicate with each other. You can then reach them only from your host using its ip addresses typically in subnet 172.17.0.0/16.
Using -P actually binds exposed ports from a container with randomly selected free ports on your host. It should be used for exposing network services (eg. web server with port 80), but not for ICMP ping.
We have swarm running on 6 hosts and about 15 containers. There are one accesspoint open as port 3010.
On every host, which are nodes of swarm, there is local isolated network with 3 docker containers. On each host, one of this containers want to connect to that publish port 3010.
I like to use port on that host, which is currently running that container. I do not know, if this is wise?
How to solve the name of host to use on docker container to connect to the local swarm port. Localhost and 127.0.0.1 are not available. I can connect container on overlay network on swarm, but it is not possible, when starting container, because of local isolated network.
How to solve the name of host to use on docker container to connect to the local swarm port.
It the name of your service name.
E.g. when docker service create --name blue --network dev markuman/color
then you can attache to this service container with figuring out the exactly name id
docker ps| grep blueeb46c52d0568 markuman/color:latest
"/bin/sh -c '/bin/..." 51 seconds ago Up 49 seconds 80/tcp blue.1.o5w76smq3kh5jlomltf6yohj3
and simply do
docker exec -ti blue.1.o5w76smq3kh5jlomltf6yohj3 bash
That's it. From there you can ping or ssh into other serivces which are assigned to the same network.
E.g. when docker service create --name apache ... is running in the same network, just do a ping apache. That's sufficient
I have docker machine installed on windows OS and have pulled in Jenkins image from docker hub. I then run the below commands:
docker volume created myjenkins-data
docker run -p 8080:8080 -p 50000:50000 -v myjenkins-data:/var/jenkins_home jenkins
I received the admin key for Jenkins in the logs. I've confirmed that my container is still running status:
$ docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
2854c7d83879 jenkins "/bin/tini -- /usr..." About a minute ago Up About a minute 0.0.0.0:8080->8080/tcp, 0.0.0.0:50000->50000/tcp quizzical_cray
Now, I need to log into 8080 port to view the Jenkins web app. But I do not know which host ip to use. I identified the docker host ip with the command "docker-machine ip" and got the ip address: 192.168.99.100. But using 192.168.99.100:8080 did not bring up Jenkins app. I also tried using docker inspect to get the container's ip, but port 8080 didn't work on those ips as well. Which ip address do i use to see the Jenkins app that is running in the container?
First, double-check if http://localhost:8080 is not enough.
Hyper-V (through vpnkit, if you are using Docker for Windows) should have done the port-forwarding for you.
If you are using the legacy docker toolbox (VirtualBox), then you need port-forwarding (issue 4115).
I want to be able to access a docker container via its Ip eg the one I can see when I do docker container inspect foo
The reason is I am using zookeeper inside a docker container that is managing two other docker containers running solr. My code (not in docker and I don't at this stage want it to be) calls zookeeper to get the urls of the solr servers which zookeeper reports as the docker containers ip. My code then falls over because calling the docker containers ip from the host fails as it should be calling localhost.
So how can I allow a call to the docker containers ip from the host to be routed correctly. (I am using Docker native for Mac)
I'm not using Docker for Mac, so I'm not sure the newest version Docker for Mac is still based on Docker-machine (which based on VirtualBox) or not.
If you can confirm your Docker for Mac is based on VirtualBox, then you probably could get the inet IP of vboxnet0 network interface via ifconfig command. This IP should be used as your calling IP.
Besides, you should know the port number of your Zookeeper container. Normally the exposed port of a container could be configured in docker run command, for example:
docker run -p 5000:5001 -i -t ubuntu /bin/bash
Where -p indicated the exposed port of the container.
I'm running under boot2docker 1.3.1.
I have a Docker container running a web server via uwsgi --http :8080.
If I attach to the container I can browse the web site using lynx http://127.0.0.1:8080 so I know the server is working.
I ran my container with:
$ docker run -itP --expose 8080 uwsgi_app:0.2
It has the following details:
$ docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
5248ad86596d uwsgi_app:0.2 "bash" 11 minutes ago Up 11 minutes 0.0.0.0:49159->8080/tcp cocky_hypatia
$ docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' 5248ad86596d
172.17.0.107
I thought I could access that web site from my host by going to http://172.17.0.107:49159.
This does not work. I just see 'connecting...' in Chrome, getting nowhere.
What am I doing wrong?
Extending Anentropic's answer: boot2docker is the old app for Mac and Windows, docker-machine is the new one.
Firstly, list your machines:
$ docker-machine ls
NAME ACTIVE DRIVER STATE URL SWARM
default * virtualbox Running tcp://192.168.99.100:2376
Then select one of the machines (the default one is called default) and:
$ docker-machine ip default
192.168.99.100
Ok, stupid me, I found the answer in the docs for boot2docker
https://docs.docker.com/installation/mac/#container-port-redirection
I needed to use the ip address of the boot2docker vm, rather than the ip of the container, i.e.
$ boot2docker ip
192.168.59.103
and I am able to browse my site from the host at http://192.168.59.103:49159/
I did not need to add any route on the host
To find the IP address of your container, you should need NO additional installs:
docker inspect <container>
This provides a wealth of info. grep it for the IPAddress.
You could use boot2docker port mapping option -L, as described here.
So, in your case it would be
boot2docker ssh -L 0.0.0.0:8080:localhost:8080
and then
docker run -it -p 8080:8080 uwsgi_app:0.2
That way, you do not have to use boot2docker's IP address: you can use localhost or your own IP address (and your docker container can be accessed from outside).
Boot2docker is outdated, but you may still have this problem on Docker for Windows or Mac, even though the same container works on Linux. One symptom is that trying to access a page on the server inside the container gives the error "didn't send any data" as opposed to "could not connect."
If so, it may be because on Win/Mac the container host has its own IP, it's not localhost as it is on linux. Try running Django on IP 0.0.0.0, meaning accept connections from all IPs, like this:
python manage.py runserver 0.0.0.0:8000
Alternatively, if you need to make sure the server only responds to local requests (such as from your local proxy like nginx, apache, or gunicorn) you can use the host IP returned by hostname -i.
And make sure you are using the -p port forwarding option correctly in the docker run command.
Assuming all is well, you should be able to access your server at http://localhost in a browser running on the host machine.
docker build -t {imagename} .
docker build -t api-rest-test .
docker run -dp {localport}:{exposeport} image:name
docker run -dp 8080:8080 api-rest-test:latest
make sure you are using the same port for yourlocalport and exposeport
then you can access your rest service in your local machine http://localhost:8080
[EDIT: original version was ignoring the -P in question]
If you want to get to the containers without having to 'publish' the port (which changes its number)
there is a good run-through here.
The key is this line:
sudo route -n add 172.17.0.0/16 172.16.0.11
which tells the Mac how to route to the private network inside the VirtualBox VM that the Docker containers are on.
Had the same issue and in my case i was using AWS EC2 instance. I was trying with the container IP which did not work. Then I used the actual public IP of the AWS host as the IP, which worked.
How to troubleshoot the issue on hosting application on local host browser
For this launch the container with below command, in my case it was:
[root#centoslab3 ~]# docker ps -a
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
1b81d8a0e3e1 centos:baseweb "/bin/bash" 8 minutes ago Exited (0) 24 seconds ago webtest
[root#centoslab3 ~]# docker run --name=atul -v /root/dockertest:/var/www/html -i -t -p 5000:8000 centos:baseweb /bin/bash
In the httpd configuration:
[root#adb28b08c9ed /]# cd /etc/httpd/conf
[root#adb28b08c9ed conf]# ll
total 52
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34419 Sep 19 15:16 httpd.conf
edit the file with the port 8000 in listner and update the container ip and port under Servername.
Restart the httpd service and you are done.
Hope this helps