graph snippet
I have a Shape with a list of Points.
I have the following requirements:
1) retrieve an ordered set of Points;
2) insert/remove a Point and preserve the order of the rest of the Points
I can achieve this by:
A) Point has a sequence integer property that could be used to order;
B) Add a :NEXT relationship between each Point to create a linked list.
I'm new to Neo4j so not sure which approach is preferable to satisfy the requirements?
For the first requirement, I wrote the following queries and found the performance for the traversal to be poor but Im sure its a badly constructed query:
//A) 146 ms
Match (s:Shape {id: "1-700-y11-1.1.I"})-[:POINTS]->(p:Point)
return p
order by p.sequence;
//B) Timeout! Bad query I know, but dont know the right way to go about it!
Match path=(s:Shape {id: "1-700-y11-1.1.I"})-[:POINTS]->(p1:Point)-[:NEXT*]->(p2:Point)
return collect(p1, p2);
To get ordered list of points use a slightly modified version of the second query:
Match path=(s:Shape {id: "1-700-y11-1.1.I"})-[:POINTS]->(P1:Point)
-[:NEXT*]-> (P2:Point)
WHERE NOT (:Point)-[:NEXT]->(P1) AND
NOT (P2)-[:NEXT]->(:Point)
RETURN TAIL( NODES( path) )
And for example query to delete:
WITH "id" as pointToDelete
MATCH (P:Point {id: pointToDelete})
OPTIONAL MATCH (Prev:Point)-[:NEXT]->(P)
OPTIONAL MATCH (P)-[:NEXT]->(Next:Point)
FOREACH (x in CASE WHEN Prev IS NOT NULL THEN [1] ELSE [] END |
MERGE (Prev)-[:NEXT]->(Next)
)
DETACH DELETE P
Related
I have multiple nodes and relationships in neo4j, certain nodes have relationship depth as 4, while certain have 2. I'm using neo4j's HTTP API to get the data in graph format
Sample query:
MATCH p= (n:datasource{resource_key:'ABCD'})-[:is_dataset_of]-(c:dataset)-[q]-(v:dataset_columns)-[s]-(b:component)-[w]-(e:dashboard) return p
If i use this query then i can get output if this exact relationship is present but I also want to get the output if the 2nd relationship is not available, Any pointers on how to achieve this?
Here is one way:
MATCH p = (:person1 {hobby: 'gamer'})-[:knows]-(:person2)
RETURN p
UNION ALL
MATCH p = (:person1 {hobby: 'gamer'})-[:knows]-(:person2)--(:person3)
RETURN p
The UNION clause combines the results of 2 queries. And the ALL option tells UNION to not bother to remove duplicate results (since the 2 subqueries will never produce the same paths).
If you really want the path to be returned, you can do something along these lines, using apoc (https://neo4j-contrib.github.io/neo4j-apoc-procedures/3.4/nodes-relationships/path-functions/)
MATCH requiredPath=(n)-[r]->(m)
OPTIONAL MATCH optionalPath = (m)-[q]->(s)
RETURN apoc.path.combine(requiredPath,optionalPath) AS p
I have a graph which looks like this:
Here is the link to the graph in the neo4j console:
http://console.neo4j.org/?id=av3001
Basically, you have two branching paths, of variable length. I want to match the two paths between orange node and yellow nodes. I want to return one row of data for each path, including all traversed nodes. I also want to be able to include different WHERE clauses on different intermediate nodes.
At the end, i need to have a table of data, like this:
a - b - c - d
neo - morpheus - null - leo
neo - morpheus - trinity - cypher
How could i do that?
I have tried using OPTIONAL MATCH, but i can't get the two rows separately.
I have tried using variable length path, which returns the two paths but doesn't allow me to access and filter intermediate nodes. Plus it returns a list, and not a table of data.
I've seen this question:
Cypher - matching two different possible paths and return both
It's on the same subject but the example is very complex, a more generic solution to this simpler problem is what i'm looking for.
You can define what your end node by using WHERE statement. So in your case end node has no outgoing relationship. Not sure why you expect a null on return as you said neo - morpheus - null - leo
MATCH p=(n:Person{name:"Neo"})-[*]->(end) where not (end)-->()
RETURN extract(x IN nodes(p) | x.name)
Edit:
may not the the best option as I am not sure how to do this programmatically. If I use UNWIND I get back only one row. So this is a dummy solution
MATCH p=(n{name:"Neo"})-[*]->(end) where not (end)-->()
with nodes(p) as list
return list[0].name,list[1].name,list[2].name,list[3].name
You can use Cypher to match a path like this MATCH p=(:a)-[*]->(:d) RETURN p, and p will be a list of nodes/relationships in the path in the order it was traversed. You can apply WHERE to filter the path just like with node matching, and apply any list functions you need to it.
I will add these examples too
// Where on path
MATCH p=(:a)-[*]-(:d) WHERE NONE(n in NODES(p) WHERE n.name="Trinity") WITH NODES(p) as p RETURN p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3]
// Spit path into columns
MATCH p=(:a)-[*]-(:d) WITH NODES(p) as p RETURN p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3]
// Match path, filter on label
MATCH p=(:a)-[*]-(:d) WITH NODES(p) as p RETURN FILTER(n in p WHERE "a" in LABELS(n)) as a, FILTER(n in p WHERE "b" in LABELS(n)) as b, FILTER(n in p WHERE "c" in LABELS(n)) as c, FILTER(n in p WHERE "d" in LABELS(n)) as d
Unfortunately, you HAVE to explicitly set some logic for each column. You can't make dynamic columns (that I know of). In your table example, what is the rule for which column gets 'null'? In the last example, I set each column to be the set of nodes of a label.
I.m.o. you're asking for extensive post-processing of the results of a simply query (give me all the paths starting from Neo). I say this because :
You state you need to be able to specify specific WHERE clauses for each path (but you don't specify which clauses for which path ... indicating this might be a dynamic thing ?)
You don't know the size of the longest path beforehand ... but you still want the result to be a same-size-for-all-results table. And would any null columns then always be just before the end node ? Why (for that makes no real sense other then convenience) ?
...
Therefore (and again i.m.o.) you need to process the results in a (Java or whatever you prefer) program. There you'll have full control over the resultset and be able to slice and dice as you wish. Cypher (exactly like SQL in fact) can only do so much and it seems that you're going beyond that.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Tom
P.S. This may seem like an easy opt-out, but look at how simple your query is as compared to the constructs that have to be wrought trying to answer your logic. So ... separate the concerns.
I've got a graph where each node has label either A or B, and an index on the id property for each label:
CREATE INDEX ON :A(id);
CREATE INDEX ON :B(id);
In this graph, I want to find the node(s) with id "42", but I don't know a-priori the label. To do this I am executing the following query:
MATCH (n {id:"42"}) WHERE (n:A OR n:B) RETURN n;
But this query takes 6 seconds to complete. However, doing either of:
MATCH (n:A {id:"42"}) RETURN n;
MATCH (n:B {id:"42"}) RETURN n;
Takes only ~10ms.
Am I not formulating my query correctly? What is the right way to formulate it so that it takes advantage of the installed indices?
Here is one way to use both indices. result will be a collection of matching nodes.
OPTIONAL MATCH (a:B {id:"42"})
OPTIONAL MATCH (b:A {id:"42"})
RETURN
(CASE WHEN a IS NULL THEN [] ELSE [a] END) +
(CASE WHEN b IS NULL THEN [] ELSE [b] END)
AS result;
You should use PROFILE to verify that the execution plan for your neo4j environment uses the NodeIndexSeek operation for both OPTIONAL MATCH clauses. If not, you can use the USING INDEX clause to give a hint to Cypher.
You should use UNION to make sure that both indexes are used. In your question you almost had the answer.
MATCH (n:A {id:"42"}) RETURN n
UNION
MATCH (n:B {id:"42"}) RETURN n
;
This will work. To check your query use profile or explain before your query statement to check if the indexes are used .
Indexes are formed and and used via a node label and property, and to use them you need to form your query the same way. That means queries w/out a label will scan all nodes with the results you got.
Anyone know of a fast way to query multiple paths in Neo4j ?
Lets say I have movie nodes that can have a type that I want to match (this is psuedo-code)
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
OR
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE]-(x:Genre)<-[:G_TYPE*1..3]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
OR
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->(x)<-[:SUB_TYPE*1..3]-(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
The problem is, the first "m:Movie" nodes to be matched must match one of the paths specified, and the second SubGenre is depenedent on the first match.
I can make a query that works using MATCH and WHERE, but its really slow (30 seconds with a small 20MB dataset).
The problem is, I don't know how to OR match in Neo4j with other OR matches hanging off of the first results.
If I use WHERE, then I have to declare all the nodes used in any of the statements, in the initial MATCH which makes the query slow (since you cannot introduce new nodes in a WHERE)
Anyone know an elegant way to solve this ?? Thanks !
You can try a variable length path with a minimal length of 0:
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE|:SUBGENRE*0..4]-(g)
WHERE g:Genre and g.name = 'action' OR g:SubGenre and g.name='comedy'
For the query to use an index to find your genre / subgenre I recommend a UNION query though.
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE*0..4]-(g:Genre { name:'action' })
RETURN distinct m
UNION
(m:Movie)-[:SUBGENRE]->(x)<-[:SUB_TYPE*1..3]-(sg:SubGenre {name: 'comedy'})
RETURN distinct m
Perhaps the OPTIONAL MATCH clause might help here. OPTIONAL MATCH beavior is similar to the MATCH statement, except that instead of an all-or-none pattern matching approach, any elements of the pattern that do not match the pattern specific in the statement are bound to null.
For example, to match on a movie, its genre and a possible sub-genre:
OPTIONAL MATCH (m:Movie)-[:IS_GENRE]->(g:Genre)<-[:IS_SUBGENRE]-(sub:Genre)
WHERE m.title = "The Matrix"
RETURN m, g, sub
This will return the movie node, the genre node and if it exists, the sub-genre. If there is no sub-genre then it will return null for sub. You can use variable length paths as you have above as well with OPTIONAL MATCH.
[EDITED]
The following MATCH clause should be equivalent to your pseudocode. There is also a USING INDEX clause that assumes you have first created an index on :SubGenre(name), for efficiency. (You could use an index on :Genre(name) instead, if Genre nodes are more numerous than SubGenre nodes.)
MATCH
(m:Movie)<-[:TYPE*0..4]-(g:Genre { name:'action' }),
(m)-[:SUBGENRE]->()<-[:SUB_TYPE*0..3]-(sg:SubGenre { name: 'comedy' })
USING INDEX sg:SubGenre(name)
Here is a console that shows the results for some sample data.
I have a scenario where I have more than 2 random nodes.
I need to get all possible paths connecting all three nodes. I do not know the direction of relation and the relationship type.
Example : I have in the graph database with three nodes person->Purchase->Product.
I need to get the path connecting these three nodes. But I do not know the order in which I need to query, for example if I give the query as person-Product-Purchase, it will return no rows as the order is incorrect.
So in this case how should I frame the query?
In a nutshell I need to find the path between more than two nodes where the match clause may be mentioned in what ever order the user knows.
You could list all of the nodes in multiple bound identifiers in the start, and then your match would find the ones that match, in any order. And you could do this for N items, if needed. For example, here is a query for 3 items:
start a=node:node_auto_index('name:(person product purchase)'),
b=node:node_auto_index('name:(person product purchase)'),
c=node:node_auto_index('name:(person product purchase)')
match p=a-->b-->c
return p;
http://console.neo4j.org/r/tbwu2d
I actually just made a blog post about how start works, which might help:
http://wes.skeweredrook.com/cypher-it-all-starts-with-the-start/
Wouldn't be acceptable to make several queries ? In your case you'd automatically generate 6 queries with all the possible combinations (factorial on the number of variables)
A possible solution would be to first get three sets of nodes (s,m,e). These sets may be the same as in the question (or contain partially or completely different nodes). The sets are important, because starting, middle and end node are not fixed.
Here is the code for the Matrix example with added nodes.
match (s) where s.name in ["Oracle", "Neo", "Cypher"]
match (m) where m.name in ["Oracle", "Neo", "Cypher"] and s <> m
match (e) where e.name in ["Oracle", "Neo", "Cypher"] and s <> e and m <> e
match rel=(s)-[r1*1..]-(m)-[r2*1..]-(e)
return s, r1, m, r2, e, rel;
The additional where clause makes sure the same node is not used twice in one result row.
The relations are matched with one or more edges (*1..) or hops between the nodes s and m or m and e respectively and disregarding the directions.
Note that cypher 3 syntax is used here.