Poltergeits doesn't working well in rspec tests - ruby-on-rails

I have the following feature tests passing:
require 'rails_helper'
describe "Create a quetsion", type: :feature do
let(:question) { build(:question) }
before do
login_as create(:user, :teacher)
exercise = create(:exercise)
visit new_exercise_question_url(exercise.id)
end
context "whit valid attributes" do
subject do
fill_in "question_score", with: question.score
fill_in "question_description", with: question.description
click_on "Criar"
end
it "create the question" do
expect{ subject }.to change(Question, :count).by(1)
expect(page).to have_current_path(question_path(Question.first.id))
end
end
context "whit invalid attributes" do
subject do
click_on "Criar"
end
it "doesn't create the exercise" do
expect{ subject }.to change(Question, :count).by(0)
expect(page).to have_selector("div.alert.alert-danger")
end
end
end
That works fine, unless I add js: true. In this case, I have the following errors:
1) Create a quetsion whit valid attributes create the question
Failure/Error: fill_in "question_score", with: question.score
Capybara::ElementNotFound:
Unable to find field "question_score"
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/node/finders.rb:44:in `block in find'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/node/base.rb:85:in `synchronize'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/node/finders.rb:33:in `find'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/node/actions.rb:85:in `fill_in'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/session.rb:735:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Session>'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/dsl.rb:52:in `block (2 levels) in <module:DSL>'
# ./spec/features/create_a_question_spec.rb:14:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/features/create_a_question_spec.rb:20:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/features/create_a_question_spec.rb:20:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
2) Create a quetsion whit invalid attributes doesn't create the exercise
Got 0 failures and 2 other errors:
2.1) Failure/Error: visit new_exercise_question_url(exercise.id)
Capybara::Poltergeist::StatusFailError:
Request to 'http://www.example.com/exercises/1/questions/new' failed to reach server, check DNS and/or server status
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/browser.rb:376:in `command'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/browser.rb:35:in `visit'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/driver.rb:97:in `visit'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/session.rb:240:in `visit'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/dsl.rb:52:in `block (2 levels) in <module:DSL>'
# ./spec/features/create_a_question_spec.rb:8:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
2.2) Failure/Error: #socket.send(command.id, command.message, receive_timeout) or raise DeadClient.new(command.message)
Capybara::Poltergeist::DeadClient:
PhantomJS client died while processing {"id":"2928bf26-2dd8-45d7-8822-41b2923fd40d","name":"reset","args":[]}
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/server.rb:38:in `send'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/browser.rb:369:in `command'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/browser.rb:224:in `reset'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/poltergeist-1.13.0/lib/capybara/poltergeist/driver.rb:183:in `reset!'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/session.rb:109:in `reset!'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara.rb:334:in `block in reset_sessions!'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara.rb:334:in `reverse_each'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara.rb:334:in `reset_sessions!'
# /usr/local/rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.10.1/lib/capybara/rspec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
I checked, whit js: true my page html isn't written too (instead the desired HTML, I only receive <html><head></head><body></body></html>).
I added poltergeist gem to test javascritp, and configured it in my rspec rails_helper.rb file:
require 'capybara/poltergeist'
Capybara.javascript_driver = :poltergeist
PhantomJS is already instaled and available in my $PATH. I'm completelly out of ideas, what can be happening here?

There are a number of potential issues here.
If you have set Capybara.server = :puma, make sure you're not running puma 3.7.0 which has a bug in it that will be fixed when 3.7.1 is released. For now use 3.6.9
If this is the first time you're setting up js tests make sure you have setup and correctly configured DatabaseCleaner so that you are no running in transaction mode for js: true tests. See https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara#transactions-and-database-setup and https://github.com/DatabaseCleaner/database_cleaner#rspec-with-capybara-example for the recommended configuration
Once you have #1 and #2 worked out then you'll need to look at your tests and deal with the fact that after a click/click_on type action you need to check for a visible page change to ensure the action has completed before you move on. This is because clicks happen but the actions those clicks trigger can occur asynchronously. In your current example that means you would need something like
...
click_on "Criar"
expect(page).to have_text("Question created!") #whatever message is shown when the action has completed, or check the page etc.
Without something like that the change check will fail because it will check the count before the actual actually occurs.
Default to _path helpers rather than _url helpers when there's no need for a specific host name (99.9% of the time). This lets Capybara fill_in the correct host/port for the server being run. To visit _url helpers there are a number of configuration parameters that need to be carefully set.
Note: It's generally not best practice to be checking database counts in feature tests, they should generally be limited to checking on visible page changes.

Related

rspec spec fails only when run in entire test suite - passes when run individually

I have an almost meaningless worker test spec:
require 'rails_helper'
require 'sidekiq/testing'
Sidekiq::Testing.fake!
RSpec.describe FetchArticleContentWorker, type: :worker do
describe "Sidekiq Worker" do
before(:each) do
allow_any_instance_of(DataSource).to receive(:subscribe).and_return(true)
allow_any_instance_of(FetchArticleContentWorker).to receive(:perform).and_return(true)
end
let(:user) { FactoryBot.create(:user) }
let(:data_source) { FactoryBot.create(:data_source) }
let(:article) { FactoryBot.create(:article, data_source_id: data_source.id) }
it "should respond to #perform" do
expect(FetchArticleContentWorker.new).to respond_to(:perform)
end
describe "fetch article content worker" do
before do
Sidekiq::Worker.clear_all
end
it "increase the worker job size" do
expect { FetchArticleContentWorker.perform_async(article.url) }.to change(FetchArticleContentWorker.jobs, :size).by(1)
end
it "assert that jobs were pushed on to the queue" do
assert_equal 0, FetchArticleContentWorker.jobs.size
FetchArticleContentWorker.perform_async(article.url)
assert_equal 1, FetchArticleContentWorker.jobs.size
end
it "job runs successfully" do
expect(FetchArticleContentWorker.new.perform(article.url)).to eq(true)
end
end
end
end
For whatever reason, this set of specs has suddenly started failing but only when run as a part of the entire test suite. If I run this test directly by itself, it passes every time.
When run with bundle exec rspec (to do the whole suite), I get the following failures for this particular test:
Failures:
1) FetchArticleContentWorker Sidekiq Worker fetch article content worker increase the worker job size
Failure/Error: expect { FetchArticleContentWorker.perform_async(article.url) }.to change(FetchArticleContentWorker.jobs, :size).by(1)
expected `Array#size` to have changed by 1, but was changed by 0
# ./spec/workers/fetch_article_content_worker_spec.rb:29:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:48:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/generic/base.rb:16:in `cleaning'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/configuration.rb:87:in `block (2 levels) in cleaning'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/configuration.rb:88:in `cleaning'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:47:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
2) FetchArticleContentWorker Sidekiq Worker fetch article content worker assert that jobs were pushed on to the queue
Failure/Error: assert_equal 1, FetchArticleContentWorker.jobs.size
Minitest::Assertion:
Expected: 1
Actual: 0
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/minitest-5.14.0/lib/minitest/assertions.rb:183:in `assert'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/minitest-5.14.0/lib/minitest/assertions.rb:218:in `assert_equal'
# ./spec/workers/fetch_article_content_worker_spec.rb:35:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:48:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/generic/base.rb:16:in `cleaning'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/configuration.rb:87:in `block (2 levels) in cleaning'
# /usr/local/bundle/gems/database_cleaner-1.8.4/lib/database_cleaner/configuration.rb:88:in `cleaning'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:47:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
It appears that these worker specs only fail when a feature using turnip is previously run.
I ended up finding what I think is the problem.
In my turnip steps file I was setting sidekick to inline:
# set sidekiq to inline
require 'sidekiq/testing'
Sidekiq::Testing.inline!
And, even though I was setting Sidekiq::Testing.fake! in the above mentioned spec file, it didn't seem to "take".
When I moved fake! into the before block, that seemed to fix the problem:
describe "Sidekiq Worker" do
before(:each) do
allow_any_instance_of(DataSource).to receive(:subscribe).and_return(true)
allow_any_instance_of(FetchArticleContentWorker).to receive(:perform).and_return(true)
Sidekiq::Testing.fake!
end
...
I am not sure why this is the fix, but this fixed it.

RSpec - A JSON text must at least contain two octets

Two failing specs after upgrading rspec-rails (2.5.2 -> 3.8.1) and capybara (2.18.0 -> 3.10.1):
Not really sure what's going on here. Looks like text in the expectation is being truncated?!?
let(:story_attributes) do
{
title: 'Edited title',
description: 'Edited location',
start_year: '2001',
start_month: 'December',
start_day: '5',
end_year: '2001',
end_month: 'October',
end_day: '10',
is_range: true,
cover_image: {
url: 'http://placehold.it/edited.png'
}
}
end
...
within 'section.story-cover' do
expect(page).to have_text 'Edited title'
expect(page).to have_text 'Edited location'
expect(page).to have_text 'December 5th - October 10th, 2001'
end
In first failed example (below) "Edited location" is being truncated.
In second example expect(page).to have_text 'Edited title Edited location' where only "Edited title\nEdited locat" is found.
Then there's this "JSON text must at least contain two octets" issue which may or may not be related but this used to pass before upgrading rspec-rails & capybara.ds
Thoughts?
RSpec Failures:
1) Story editing published edit story
Failure/Error: JSON.parse(response.body)
JSON::ParserError:
A JSON text must at least contain two octets!
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:36:in `post_to_filepicker'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:18:in `convert_format'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:11:in `block in convert'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:10:in `each'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:10:in `convert'
# ./app/models/images/image.rb:5:in `convert'
# ./app/models/images/image.rb:20:in `enqueue_conversion'
# ./app/services/story/updating_service.rb:14:in `update'
# ./app/controllers/stories_controller.rb:58:in `update'
# ------------------
# --- Caused by: ---
# Capybara::ExpectationNotMet:
# expected to find text "Edited location" in "Edited title\nLyla HoegerEditedDecember 5th - October 10th, 2001Download"
# ./spec/features/stories/editing_spec.rb:86:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
2) Story editing private private story should be read after editing
Failure/Error: JSON.parse(response.body)
JSON::ParserError:
A JSON text must at least contain two octets!
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:36:in `post_to_filepicker'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:18:in `convert_format'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:11:in `block in convert'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:10:in `each'
# ./app/services/converter/image_service.rb:10:in `convert'
# ./app/models/images/image.rb:5:in `convert'
# ./app/models/images/image.rb:20:in `enqueue_conversion'
# ./app/services/story/updating_service.rb:14:in `update'
# ./app/controllers/stories_controller.rb:58:in `update'
# ------------------
# --- Caused by: ---
# Capybara::ExpectationNotMet:
# expected to find text "Edited title Edited location" in "Edited title\nEdited locat"
# ./spec/features/stories/editing_spec.rb:115:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
One of the big changes between Capybara 2.x and 3.x was that in Capybara 3.x text is returned as closely to what is displayed as possible. This means that line feeds are now included in the returned text when they would display to the user - https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara/blob/master/UPGRADING.md. You either need to change your expected text to "Edited title\nEdited location" at spec/features/stories/editing_spec.rb:115 or if you don't care about the linefeeds you can use the :normalize_ws option => expect(page).to have_text("Edited title Edited location", normalize_ws: true)

capybara have_title NoMethodError

At the moment, this is a simple project - just a couple of static pages. I'm developing a generic test framework but am struggling to differentiate between the different test options. I have added Rspec, Capybara, Faker, Factory Girl, Spring, and shoulda (though I'm not using the shoulda matchers at the moment).
I have this controller test file:
require 'rails_helper'
RSpec.describe StaticPagesController, type: :controller do
describe "GET #a_page" do
before(:each) { get :a_page }
it "returns http success" do
expect(response).to have_http_status(:success)
end
it "has a page title Static Site" do
expect(response).to have_title('Static Site')
end
end
end
When this runs through guard, it throws an error stack:
23:13:39 - INFO - Run all
23:13:39 - INFO - Running all specs
Running via Spring preloader in process 4498
Running via Spring preloader in process 4506
/home/steve/workspaces/static_site/db/schema.rb doesn't exist yet. Run `rake db:migrate` to create it, then try again. If you do not intend to use a database, you should instead alter /home/steve/workspaces/static_site/config/application.rb to limit the frameworks that will be loaded.
.F
Failures:
1) StaticPagesController GET #a_page has a page title Static Site
Failure/Error: expect(response).to have_title('Static Site')
NoMethodError:
undefined method `match' for nil:NilClass
Did you mean? catch
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.7.1/lib/capybara/queries/title_query.rb:18:in `resolves_for?'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.7.1/lib/capybara/node/document_matchers.rb:20:in `block in assert_title'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.7.1/lib/capybara/node/simple.rb:144:in `synchronize'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.7.1/lib/capybara/node/document_matchers.rb:19:in `assert_title'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/capybara-2.7.1/lib/capybara/rspec/matchers.rb:105:in `matches?'
# ./spec/controllers/static_pages_controller_spec.rb:34:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-commands-rspec-1.0.4/lib/spring/commands/rspec.rb:18:in `call'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/command_wrapper.rb:38:in `call'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:191:in `block in serve'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:161:in `fork'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:161:in `serve'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:131:in `block in run'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:125:in `loop'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application.rb:125:in `run'
# /home/steve/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/spring-1.7.1/lib/spring/application/boot.rb:19:in `<top (required)>'
# -e:1:in `<main>'
Finished in 0.029 seconds (files took 2.54 seconds to load)
2 examples, 1 failure
Failed examples:
rspec ./spec/controllers/static_pages_controller_spec.rb:33 # StaticPagesController GET #a_page has a page title Static Site
The first test runs OK and, without the second, I get a clean result. I've spent a lot of time going over my config and it looks OK. I have also looked at the docs and some support sites.
Can anybody help out?
Capybara matchers need to be called against a html/xml document element (or a string that parses into a document), not against a response object. By default Capybaras matchers are normally only available in feature and view specs (not controller) was there a particular reason you included them into controller specs? Verifying a pages title really should lean more towards being a view spec than controller (by default views aren't rendered in controller specs - https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/controller-specs).
As #Thomas Walpole pointed out, Capybara is not enabled in controller specs by default. One option is to change the type of the test to feature (type: :feature).
To make Capybara's built-in matcher have_title work, you need to use visit from Capybara's API, not get from ActionDispatch::IntegrationTest.

Rspec fails for Name has already been taken

I'm trying to make rspec testcases. But, Rspec fails for Name has already been taken.
It seems "let" evalulated each time "product" called.
How can I fix it?
Console
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:31:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Name has already been taken
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:6:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:20:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:23:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Name has already been taken
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:6:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:12:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
./spec/models/spree/product_decorator_spec.rb:15:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
product_decorator_spec.rb
require 'spec_helper'
describe Spree::Product do
context '#create' do
let(:us) { create(:zone, name: "US") }
let(:china) { create(:zone, name: "China") }
let(:japan) { create(:zone, name: "Japan") }
context "when a product has no ng zone" do
let(:product) { create(:product, zones: [us, china, japan]) }
it "should get ng_zones correctly" do
product.ng_zones.should match_array []
end
end
context "when a product has one ng zone" do
let(:product) { create(:product, zones: [us, china]) }
it "should get ng_zones correctly" do
product.ng_zones.should match_array ["Japan"]
end
end
context "when a product has two ng zone" do
let(:product) { create(:product, zones: [us]) }
it "should get ng_zones correctly" do
product.ng_zones.should match_array ["China", "Japan"]
end
end
end
end
The body of the let is evaluated with every it block. I'm assuming you have a uniqueness constraint on your Zone classes.
You have 2 possibilities
Either build the variables in a before(:all) block and assign them to something like #us
Clean up your database after(:each)
You are testing the Product#create so, you won't need to really create zones for this particular test.
Instead you could just use build_stubbed method.
let(:us) { build_stubbed(:zone, name: "US") }
let(:china) { build_stubbed(:zone, name: "China") }
let(:japan) { build_stubbed(:zone, name: "Japan") }
This way, it's creation process are not going to rely on the database and also the validations for the Zone model and you have an awesome performance boost since you are not hitting the db for for each single test.
You can read about build_stubbed here.
Please let me know if it helps you somehow. ;)

RSpec Application Helper Test: Undefined local variable or method `helper`

This seemed to be a flickering sort of a bug for a while,but now it's appearing consistently: when I run RSpec on a fairly simple ApplicationHelper spec, I get the following error:
% rspec --backtrace
1) ApplicationHelper renders Markdown from plain text
Failure/Error: expect(helper.md(plaintext)).to eq("<h1 id=\"header\">Header</h1>\n")
NameError:
undefined local variable or method `helper' for #<RSpec::ExampleGroups::ApplicationHelper_2:0x000001248d1218>
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-expectations-0f7b78587ab4/lib/rspec/matchers.rb:903:in `method_missing'
# ./spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb:4:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:148:in `instance_exec'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:148:in `block in run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:208:in `call'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:208:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Procsy>'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-rails-480b173c9ad6/lib/rspec/rails/adapters.rb:67:in `block (2 levels) in <module:MinitestLifecycleAdapter>'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:292:in `instance_exec'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:292:in `instance_exec'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:430:in `block (2 levels) in run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:208:in `call'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:208:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Procsy>'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:432:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:485:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:301:in `with_around_example_hooks'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:145:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:494:in `block in run_examples'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:490:in `map'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:490:in `run_examples'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:457:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:112:in `block (2 levels) in run_specs'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:112:in `map'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:112:in `block in run_specs'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/reporter.rb:49:in `report'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:108:in `run_specs'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:86:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:70:in `run'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:38:in `invoke'
# /Users/danielsh/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.1#project-staging-ng/bundler/gems/rspec-core-4219c4786f6f/exe/rspec:4:in `<top (required)>'
# /Users/danielsh/Dropbox/Project/Websites/Angular/bin/rspec:20:in `load'
# /Users/danielsh/Dropbox/Project/Websites/Angular/bin/rspec:20:in `<main>'
Here's the complete spec file (spec_helper is included as part of my .rspec file):
describe ApplicationHelper do
it 'renders Markdown from plain text' do
plaintext = '# Header'
expect(helper.md(plaintext)).to eq("<h1 id=\"header\">Header</h1>\n")
end
end
This was working up until recently, but I'm not certain what I could have done to break such a basic feature. I'm using edge versions of Rails and RSpec, but didn't see anything in their git repos to suggest that helper had been deprecated---and running rails g helper foo still generates a foo_helper_spec.rb file with instructions indicating that helper contains the helper itself. If anyone has any ideas, I'd be grateful for them!
I created a new Rails project with a fresh RSpec installation, and it led me to the problem. Apparently one of the recent betas introduced a configuration directive called config.infer_spec_type_from_file_location! that was missing from my slightly older spec_helper file; without it, RSpec wasn't guessing the spec type and mixing in the associated methods. Beware breaking changes!
add :type => :helper
so your code should look like
describe ApplicationHelper, type: :helper do
...
end
That's a weird error !! are you sure you required spec_helper in your spec ?
Anyway you could try without the helper method:
First you should first add to /spec/spec_helper.rb the following:
RSpec.configure do |config|
...
config.include ApplicationHelper
end
Then test without helper , so it will be:
describe ApplicationHelper do
it 'renders Markdown from plain text' do
plaintext = '# Header'
expect(md(plaintext)).to eq("<h1 id=\"header\">Header</h1>\n")
end
end
From the backtrace, it doesn't look like you're using the rspec-rails gem - just rspec-core and rspec-expectations.
rspec-rails is what provides the helper method to your helper specs. From inside a spec in my codebase:
(rdb:1) self.method(:helper).source_location
["/home/becky/.gem/ruby/2.0.0/gems/rspec-rails-2.14.1/lib/rspec/rails/example/helper_example_group.rb", 19]

Resources