I am trying to draw a 6 column table in LaTeX which fits normal page margins, and which has the data centered under each column heading. Wrapping of column headings is fine. I have spent the last 3 hours reading various threads of answers, and it seems there is a different solution for each question related to drawing a table. As a result I am lost on how to do it. My table presently extends off the page margin to the right. I am not permitted to use any packages like tabularx, etc., so the table must be drawn in the tabular environment, and no additional packages are loaded in the document above the begin table call. Here is the present code used to draw the table:
\begin{table}
\caption{Experimental Details for PRE1}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
\hline
PRE1 Interval & Elapsed Time (min) & Flow (lps) & Sediment Feed (kg/min) & Avg. Flux (kg/min) & DEM/Photo\\
\hline
1 & 19 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.009 & yes\\
2 & 50 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.027 & yes \\
3 & 110 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.064 & yes \\
4 & 230 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.048 & yes \\
5 & 470 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.027 & yes \\
6 & 710 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.050 & yes \\
7 & 950 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.030 & yes \\
8 & 1190 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.016 & yes \\
9 & 1430 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.099 & yes \\
10 & 1670 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.058 & yes \\
11 & 1910 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.055 & yes \\
12 & 2150 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.031 & yes \\
13a & 2180 & 60 & 0.50 & 4.284 & no \\
13b & 2195 & 60 & 0.80 & 7.113 & no \\
13c & 2225 & 60 & 0.80 & 3.670 & yes \\
14a & 2270 & 60 & 0.80 & 2.296 & no \\
14b & 2390 & 60 & 0.80 & 0.917 & yes \\
15a & 2405 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.848 & no \\
15b & 2429 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.840 & no \\
15c & 2450 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.303 & yes \\
16a & 2480 & 80 & 1.00 & 2.554 & no \\
16b & 2525 & 80 & 1.00 & 1.336 & no \\
16c & 2570 & 80 & 1.00 & 0.927 & yes \\
17 & 2630 & 80 & 1.00 & 1.067 & yes \\
18 & 2870 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.033 & yes \\
19 & 3110 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.016 & yes \\
20 & 3350 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.013 & yes \\
21 & 3590 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.018 & yes \\
22 & 3830 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.022 & yes \\
23 & 4070 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.143 & yes \\
24 & 4310 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.509 & yes \\
25a & 4336 & 60 & 0.80 & 4.488 & no \\
25b & 4351 & 60 & 0.80 & 9.622 & no \\
25c & 4370 & 60 & 0.80 & 5.479 & no \\
25d & 4385 & 60 & 0.80 & 4.527 & yes \\
26a & 4430 & 60 & 0.80 & 2.436 & no \\
26b & 4550 & 60 & 0.80 & 0.595 & yes \\
27a & 4565 & 80 & 0.80 & 2.231 & no \\
27b & 4589 & 80 & 0.80 & 6.212 & no \\
27c & 4610 & 80 & 0.80 & 5.062 & yes \\
28a & 4640 & 80 & 0.80 & 2.069 & no \\
28b & 4685 & 80 & 0.80 & 1.132 & no \\
28c & 4730 & 80 & 0.80 & 0.892 & yes \\
29 & 4790 & 80 & 0.80 & 0.600 & yes \\
\hline
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$^{a}$The repeat phase of PRE1 began at elapse time 2630 minutes.}\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$^{b}$The elapse time indicates the end time for the specified experimental interval.}
\label{tab1}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
I attempted to use the following type of syntax from the Wikibooks help page as the columns could be treated as identical, but with no luck:
\begin{tabular}{l*{6}{c}r}
I would appreciate any help that can be offered. Thanks in advance.
I figured my problem. The difficulty was with the footnotes. In the footnotes I was only specifying a value of 2 for the first multicolumn argument, and thus columns 3-6 were getting shoved to the right depending on how much text was in footnotes a and b. Here is the corrected working code.
\begin{table}
\caption{Experimental Details for PRE1}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l*{5}{c}r}
\hline
PRE1 Interval & Elapsed Time (min) & Flow (lps) & Sediment Feed (kg/min) & Avg. Flux (kg/min) & DEM/Photo\\
\hline
0 & 0 & - & - & - & yes\\
1 & 19 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.009 & yes\\
2 & 50 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.027 & yes \\
3 & 110 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.064 & yes \\
4 & 230 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.048 & yes \\
5 & 470 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.027 & yes \\
6 & 710 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.050 & yes \\
7 & 950 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.030 & yes \\
8 & 1190 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.016 & yes \\
9 & 1430 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.099 & yes \\
10 & 1670 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.058 & yes \\
11 & 1910 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.055 & yes \\
12 & 2150 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.031 & yes \\
13a & 2180 & 60 & 0.50 & 4.284 & no \\
13b & 2195 & 60 & 0.80 & 7.113 & no \\
13c & 2225 & 60 & 0.80 & 3.670 & yes \\
14a & 2270 & 60 & 0.80 & 2.296 & no \\
14b & 2390 & 60 & 0.80 & 0.917 & yes \\
15a & 2405 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.848 & no \\
15b & 2429 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.840 & no \\
15c & 2450 & 80 & 1.00 & 3.303 & yes \\
16a & 2480 & 80 & 1.00 & 2.554 & no \\
16b & 2525 & 80 & 1.00 & 1.336 & no \\
16c & 2570 & 80 & 1.00 & 0.927 & yes \\
17 & 2630 & 80 & 1.00 & 1.067 & yes \\
18 & 2870 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.033 & yes \\
19 & 3110 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.016 & yes \\
20 & 3350 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.013 & yes \\
21 & 3590 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.018 & yes \\
22 & 3830 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.022 & yes \\
23 & 4070 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.143 & yes \\
24 & 4310 & 42 & 0.50 & 0.509 & yes \\
25a & 4336 & 60 & 0.80 & 4.488 & no \\
25b & 4351 & 60 & 0.80 & 9.622 & no \\
25c & 4370 & 60 & 0.80 & 5.479 & no \\
25d & 4385 & 60 & 0.80 & 4.527 & yes \\
26a & 4430 & 60 & 0.80 & 2.436 & no \\
26b & 4550 & 60 & 0.80 & 0.595 & yes \\
27a & 4565 & 80 & 0.80 & 2.231 & no \\
27b & 4589 & 80 & 0.80 & 6.212 & no \\
27c & 4610 & 80 & 0.80 & 5.062 & yes \\
28a & 4640 & 80 & 0.80 & 2.069 & no \\
28b & 4685 & 80 & 0.80 & 1.132 & no \\
28c & 4730 & 80 & 0.80 & 0.892 & yes \\
29 & 4790 & 80 & 0.80 & 0.600 & yes \\
\hline
\multicolumn{6}{l}{$^{a}$The repeat phase of PRE1 began at elapse time 2630 minutes.}\\
\multicolumn{6}{l}{$^{b}$The elapse time indicates the end time for the specified experimental interval.}
\label{tab1}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Note that I used the multiple identical columns solution in the \begin{tabular} call. here is an image of the corrected table.
This question has been answered.
Related
I have a table in latex. here is the code for it. My problem is the table is huge and and the content of it is not clear. My paper texts are shown in two columns and the table locates in one of those columns. I appreciate if anyone can help me how can I make the table content more clear for example is it good to expand it in a new page?
\begin{table}[]
\centering
\caption{Comparing accuracy of }
\label{table1}
\resizebox{\columnwidth}{!}{%
\begin{tabular}{|cccccccccccc|}
\hline
\rowcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}
\multicolumn{12}{|c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}out\_1} \\ \hline
\rowcolor[HTML]{00D2CB}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{00D2CB}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{00D2CB}} & \multicolumn{5}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{00D2CB}Accuracy result} & \multicolumn{5}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{00D2CB}Precision result} \\ \hline
\rowcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}row} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}Train-Test percentage} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}TP} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}FP} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}FN} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}TN} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}Accuracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}TP} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}FP} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}FN} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\cellcolor[HTML]{C0C0C0}TN} & Accuracy \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{1} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{10-90} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17508} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5433} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{35961} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.907638771} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{18715} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4226} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{35961} & 0.928127652 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{20-80} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17313} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5433} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{29610} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.896092735} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{18476} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4270} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{29610} & 0.918302651 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{30-70} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17097} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5433} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{23281} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.881250136} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{18223} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4307} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{23281} & 0.905825094 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{4} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{40-60} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{16587} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5429} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17256} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.86171513} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17760} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{1255} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17256} & 0.891582217 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{5} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{50-50} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{16155} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5428} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{16942} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.834056465} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{17338} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4245} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{11142} & 0.870202884 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{6} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{60-40} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{15654} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5416} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5109} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.793025891} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{16817} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4253} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{5109} & 0.837445573 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{7} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{70-30} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{14240} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{8977} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.725161685} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{15373} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4264} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & 0.782858889 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{8} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{80-20} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{9340} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3752} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.713412771} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{9502} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{3950} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & 0.72578676 \\ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{9} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{90-10} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4736} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{1809} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0.723605806} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{4766} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{1223} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{0} & 0.722993452 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\end{table}
The table in the paper is shown like the following:
I edit my code according to what you have written,
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{threeparttable}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\sisetup{
table-format=1.3,
round-mode = places,
round-precision = 3,
}
\begin{table*}[ht]
\renewcommand*{\arraystretch}{1.1}
\centering
\begin{threeparttable}
\caption{Comparing accuracy}\label{tab:table}
\begin{tabular}{c #{\hspace{12pt}} *5{c} S #{\hspace{12pt}} *4{c} S #{\hspace{6pt}}}
\toprule
\multicolumn{12}{c}{out\_1} \\
\cmidrule(lr){1-12}
& & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Accuracy result}
& \multicolumn{5}{c}{Precision result} \\
\cmidrule(lr){3-7}\cmidrule(r){8-12}
& TTP\tnote{1} & TP & FP & FN & TN & {ACC\tnote{3}} & TP & FP & FN & TN & {ACC\tnote{3}} \\
\midrule
1 & 10-90 & 17508 & 5433 & 8 & 35961 & 0.907638771 & 18715 & 4226 & 8 & 35961 & 0.928127652 \\
2 & 20-80 & 17313 & 5433 & 8 & 29610 & 0.896092735 & 18476 & 4270 & 8 & 29610 & 0.918302651 \\
3 & 30-70 & 17097 & 5433 & 8 & 23281 & 0.881250136 & 18223 & 4307 & 8 & 23281 & 0.905825094 \\
4 & 40-60 & 16587 & 5428 & 3 & 17256 & 0.86171513 & 17760 & 4255 & 3 & 17256 & 0.891582217 \\
5 & 50-50 & 16155 & 5428 & 3 & 11142 & 0.834056465 & 17338 & 4245 & 3 & 11142 & 0.870202884 \\
6 & 60-40 & 15654 & 5416 & 3 & 5109 & 0.793025743 & 16817 & 4253 & 3 & 5109 & 0.837445573 \\
7 & 70-30 & 14240 & 5397 & 0 & 0 & 0.725161685 & 15373 & 4264 & 0 & 0 & 0.782858889 \\
8 & 80-20 & 9340 & 3752 & 0 & 0 & 0.713412771 & 9502 & 3590 & 0 & 0 & 0.72578674 \\
9 & 90-10 & 4736 & 1809 & 0 & 0 & 0.723605806 & 4732 & 1813 & 0 & 0 & 0.722994652 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\par\tnote{1} Test Train Percentage
\par\tnote{2} Accuracy
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table*}
\end{document}
You just have to make sure tables aren't too wordy; "the long" column names and insane number of decimal places are mostly the culprits!
I managed to fit the table within a page of a regular two column document. However, I changed some names to acronyms and added annotation to explain what they represent. I also reduced accuracy to 3 decimal places (I don't think you need more than 2).
There are a few additional packages in the code
siunitx to round some numbers
threeparttable to split the table into three parts: a caption, the main table, footnotes (*)
booktabs for much better rules (**).
* If you insist on using colours, then you will have to get back to regular \hline due to gaps between background colours and rules defined by booktabs. I think a well designed table doesn't need colours
** The caption width will be reduced to the width of your table, which IMO has much better effect; move caption outside the threeparttable if you prefer captions to have the full page width .
Here's the result with dummy texts
and code
\documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{threeparttable}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\sisetup{
table-format=1.3,
round-mode = places,
round-precision = 3,
}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
\section{One}
\kant[1-2]
\begin{table*}
\renewcommand*{\arraystretch}{1.1}
\centering
\begin{threeparttable}
\caption{Comparing accuracy}\label{tab:table}
\begin{tabular}{c #{\hspace{12pt}} *5{c} S #{\hspace{12pt}} *4{c} S #{\hspace{6pt}}}
\toprule
\multicolumn{12}{c}{out\_1} \\
\cmidrule(lr){1-12}
& & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Accuracy result}
& \multicolumn{5}{c}{Precision result} \\
\cmidrule(lr){3-7}\cmidrule(r){8-12}
& TTP\tnote{1} & TP & FP & FN & TN & {ACC\tnote{2}} & TP & FP & FN & TN & {ACC\tnote{2}} \\
\midrule
1 & 10-90 & 17508 & 5433 & 8 & 35961 & 0.907638771 & 18715 & 4226 & 8 & 35961 & 0.928127652 \\
2 & 20-80 & 17313 & 5433 & 8 & 29610 & 0.896092735 & 18476 & 4270 & 8 & 29610 & 0.918302651 \\
3 & 30-70 & 17097 & 5433 & 8 & 23281 & 0.881250136 & 18223 & 4307 & 8 & 23281 & 0.905825094 \\
4 & 40-60 & 16587 & 5428 & 3 & 17256 & 0.86171513 & 17760 & 4255 & 3 & 17256 & 0.891582217 \\
5 & 50-50 & 16155 & 5428 & 3 & 11142 & 0.834056465 & 17338 & 4245 & 3 & 11142 & 0.870202884 \\
6 & 60-40 & 15654 & 5416 & 3 & 5109 & 0.793025743 & 16817 & 4253 & 3 & 5109 & 0.837445573 \\
7 & 70-30 & 14240 & 5397 & 0 & 0 & 0.725161685 & 15373 & 4264 & 0 & 0 & 0.782858889 \\
8 & 80-20 & 9340 & 3752 & 0 & 0 & 0.713412771 & 9502 & 3590 & 0 & 0 & 0.72578674 \\
9 & 90-10 & 4736 & 1809 & 0 & 0 & 0.723605806 & 4732 & 1813 & 0 & 0 & 0.722994652 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\par\tnote{1} Test Train Percentage
\par\tnote{2} Accuracy
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table*}
\kant[3-5]
\section{Two}
\kant[1-2]
\end{document}
Update
In order to achieve top alignment of a float on a single empty page, add the following to your preamble
\makeatletter
\setlength\#dblfptop{0pt}
\makeatother
I have a table that I would like to split over pages, but I can't seem to figure out how I can do it with my current lay-out or commands that I use.
At this time, I used landscape and minipage so that it would fit on one page:
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{makecell}
\begin{document}
\begin{landscape}
\centering
\begin{table}[!htb]
\caption{\label{CH2_tab:P80L} Empirical power from the simulation study with the indicators having an overall reliability of 80\% and a linear relationship with the latent variable. The highest power per setting is indicated in bold.}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
\begin{minipage}{.5\linewidth}
\centering
\medskip
\scalebox{0.45}{
\begin{tabular}{rcccccc}
\hline
& \multicolumn{6}{c}{\textbf{Linear}} \\
\cline{2-7}
& \makecell{\textbf{WMW -- max rel} } & \makecell{\textbf{WMW -- mean }} & \makecell{\textbf{\textit{t} test -- max rel }} & \makecell{\textbf{\textit{t} test -- mean }} & \makecell{\textbf{SEM} } & \makecell{\textbf{SEM -- corrected}} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{$\mathcal{N}(0,1)$} \\
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=15$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 29.7 & 31.0 & \textbf{33.2} & 32.9 & 32.4 & 32.1 \\
Setting 2 & 28.4 & 29.2 & 30.7 & \textbf{31.3} & 30.0 & 30.3 \\
Setting 3 & 29.5 & 29.3 & 31.8 & \textbf{32.3} & 32.0 & 31.9 \\
Setting 4 & 25.8 & 26.2 & 28.5 & 27.4 & \textbf{29.4} & 28.6 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=50$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 78.7 & 79.1 & 81.7 & 81.4 & \textbf{83.2} & 83.1 \\
Setting 2 & 79.5 & 78.8 & 81.0 & 80.4 & 82.0 & \textbf{82.1} \\
Setting 3 & 79.2 & 79.9 & 81.2 & 81.8 & \textbf{82.2} & 82.0 \\
Setting 4 & 74.8 & 72.3 & 77.6 & 74.4 & \textbf{80.0} & \textbf{80.0} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=100$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 98.2 & 98.1 & 98.5 & 98.6 & \textbf{98.7} & \textbf{98.7} \\
Setting 2 & 97.7 & 97.7 & 98.2 & \textbf{98.3} & \textbf{98.3} & \textbf{98.3} \\
Setting 3 & 97.6 & 97.5 & 98.1 & \textbf{98.2} & \textbf{98.2} & \textbf{98.2} \\
Setting 4 & 97.4 & 95.1 & 98.1 & 95.8 & 98.1 & \textbf{98.2} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{$t_5$} \\
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=15$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 23.5 & 23.9 & 24.2 & 24.1 & \textbf{24.4} & 23.9 \\
Setting 2 & 24.0 & \textbf{24.1} & 23.1 & 22.6 & 22.0 & 22.2 \\
Setting 3 & 23.7 & \textbf{23.8} & 22.4 & 23.1 & 22.5 & 23.3 \\
Setting 4 & 22.1 & 22.4 & 22.2 & 22.4 & 22.4 & \textbf{23.5} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=50$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 65.8 & \textbf{66.1} & 60.8 & 60.9 & 61.8 & 61.4 \\
Setting 2 & \textbf{68.7} & \textbf{68.7} & 62.2 & 62.2 & 63.7 & 63.4 \\
Setting 3 & 67.3 & \textbf{67.6} & 61.1 & 61.4 & 62.7 & 62.2 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{63.9} & 58.4 & 57.6 & 53.7 & 60.2 & 60.0 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=100$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 92.3 & \textbf{92.4} & 87.6 & 87.6 & 88.0 & 88.1 \\
Setting 2 & \textbf{91.7} & \textbf{91.7} & 87.0 & 87.4 & 87.9 & 87.8 \\
Setting 3 & 93.2 & \textbf{93.4} & 88.9 & 88.7 & 89.4 & 89.5 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{90.6} & 86.8 & 85.7 & 83.4 & 87.4 & 87.4 \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{minipage}\hfill
\begin{minipage}{.5\linewidth}
\centering
\medskip
\scalebox{0.45}{
\begin{tabular}{rcccccc}
\hline
& \multicolumn{6}{c}{\textbf{Linear}} \\
\cline{2-7}
& \makecell{\textbf{WMW -- max rel} } & \makecell{\textbf{WMW -- mean }} & \makecell{\textbf{\textit{t} test -- max rel }} & \makecell{\textbf{\textit{t} test -- mean }} & \makecell{\textbf{SEM} } & \makecell{\textbf{SEM -- corrected}} \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{$Laplace(0,1.25)$} \\
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=15$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 21.5 & \textbf{22.3} & 19.6 & 20.4 & 19.3 & 19.0 \\
Setting 2 & \textbf{21.9} & 21.4 & 21.0 & 21.1 & 19.8 & 21.0 \\
Setting 3 & 22.0 & \textbf{22.5} & 20.6 & 20.3 & 20.1 & 20.3 \\
Setting 4 & 17.3 & \textbf{19.8} & 16.5 & 18.8 & 19.4 & 19.3 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=50$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 61.8 & \textbf{62.0} & 53.2 & 53.2 & 55.0 & 54.6 \\
Setting 2 & 62.2 & \textbf{63.2} & 52.7 & 53.3 & 54.5 & 53.8 \\
Setting 3 & 64.6 & \textbf{66.0} & 52.9 & 52.8 & 54.7 & 54.2 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{58.9} & 56.9 & 51.7 & 49.8 & 56.0 & 56.1 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=100$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & \textbf{92.3} & 92.2 & 83.2 & 82.9 & 83.5 & 83.4 \\
Setting 2 & \textbf{88.1} & 87.9 & 77.7 & 77.5 & 78.2 & 78.1 \\
Setting 3 & \textbf{91.0} & 90.7 & 82.6 & 82.9 & 82.9 & 83.0 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{85.5} & 80.4 & 77.7 & 74.2 & 79.3 & 79.3 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{Exp} \\
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=15$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 22.2 & \textbf{23.1} & 18.1 & 18.2 & 18.7 & 18.3 \\
Setting 2 & 19.7 & \textbf{19.8} & 17.0 & 17.5 & 17.2 & 17.5 \\
Setting 3 & 19.4 & \textbf{20.2} & 16.9 & 17.6 & 16.9 & 17.0 \\
Setting 4 & 15.7 & \textbf{16.0} & 13.4 & 14.9 & 14.8 & 14.9 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=50$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 61.9 & \textbf{62.0} & 40.8 & 41.8 & 42.6 & 42.6 \\
Setting 2 & 56.2 & \textbf{57.6} & 38.0 & 38.2 & 39.9 & 39.3 \\
Setting 3 & 63.0 & \textbf{63.5} & 42.6 & 42.6 & 44.9 & 44.8 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{50.1} & 45.0 & 36.9 & 36.7 & 40.6 & 40.4 \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\bm{$m=n=100$}} \\
\hline
Setting 1 & 86.7 & \textbf{87.2} & 67.2 & 67.5 & 67.7 & 67.8 \\
Setting 2 & 85.4 & \textbf{85.6} & 65.5 & 66.0 & 66.6 & 66.8 \\
Setting 3 & 88.2 & \textbf{88.4} & 66.4 & 66.3 & 67.3 & 67.6 \\
Setting 4 & \textbf{83.5} & 76.1 & 65.2 & 61.1 & 66.9 & 67.7 \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{minipage}\hfill
\end{table}
\end{landscape}
\end{document}
However, I would like to split this table nicely over multiple pages (and thus by using e.g. longtable), in such way that on one page, I have the results for the N(0,1) and Laplace distribution (side by side), and then on the second page the t_5 and Exp distribution (side by side), i.e. split each table over 2 pages, but have 2 tables side by side by using minipage inside long table.
I know I could converge them and just make one large table and then use long table, however, I would really like not to rewrite the code (since I have 10 more tables like this). Does someone know how I could do this? I tried several ways, but none of them produce the result I am looking for.
Thank you for all your feedback!
Heidelinde
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I met this problem in LaTex. Although I know what is the error message meaning, I have no idea about how to solve this error in my task.
\newcommand*{\MinNumber}{0}%
\newcommand*{\MaxNumber}{1.2}%
\pgfmathsetmacro{\MidNumber}{(0.8}%
\def\test#1{\ifdim#1pt>\MidNumber\textcolor{gray!70}{#1}\else{#1}\fi}
\newcommand{\ApplyGradient}[2]{\centering %
\pgfmathsetmacro{\PercentColor}{100.0*(#1-\MinNumber)/(\MaxNumber-\MinNumber)}%
\edef\x{\noexpand\cellcolor{black!\PercentColor}}\x\test{#1}
}
\newcolumntype{R}{>{\collectcell\ApplyGradient}p{1.1cm}<{\endcollectcell}}
\newcolumntype{S}{>{\collectcell\ApplyGradient}p{0.6cm}<{\endcollectcell}}
%
\begin{table}[!ht]
\centering
\small
% \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.9}
% \begin{adjustbox}{width=0.8\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{>{\centering}p{1.3cm}|>{\centering}p{0.9cm}|R R R R R }
\multicolumn{2}{c}{testing in$\rightarrow$}& \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\ang{40}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\ang{20}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\ang{0}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c} {$-\ang{20}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c} {$-\ang{40}$} \\ \midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 0.52 & 0.44 & 0.27 & 0.10 & -0.01 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.47 & 0.49 & 0.35 & 0.19 & 0.07 \\
spider9 & $\ang{0}$ & 0.25 & 0.47 & 0.63 & 0.46 & 0.24 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.05 & 0.17 & 0.35 & 0.55 & 0.54 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.0 & 0.05 & 0.21 & 0.47 & 0.77 \\
\midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 0.75 & 0.69 & 0.40 & 0.17 & 0.04 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.72 & 0.82 & 0.59 & 0.30 & 0.10 \\
gecko7 & $\ang{0}$ & 0.31 & 0.65 & 1.06 & 0.96 & 0.56 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.16 & 0.45 & 0.86 & 1.18 & 0.98 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.03 & 0.15 & 0.40 & 0.74 & 0.96 \\
\midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 1.09 & 0.75 & 0.39 & 0.14 & 0.02 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.54 & 0.55 & 0.33 & 0.15 & 0.04 \\
babyA & $\ang{0}$ & 0.29 & 0.58 & 0.88 & 0.74 & 0.42 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.18 & 0.47 & 0.85 & 1.09 & 0.71 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.02 & 0.11 & 0.33 & 0.65 & 0.91 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
%
\begin{tabular}{p{0.4cm} S}
& 0.0 \\
& 0.1 \\
& 0.2 \\
& 0.3 \\
& 0.4 \\
& 0.5 \\
& 0.6 \\
& 0.7 \\
& 0.8 \\
& 0.9 \\
& 1.0 \\
& 1.1 \\
& 1.2 \\
\end{tabular}
% \end{adjustbox}
\caption{Robustness of the top learned controllers for different directions in the real world.
The data shows the fitness that the top controllers of three robots in 5 directions (the second column) perform in another directions (the first row).
The fitness value in a cell is averaged over three controller and three repetitions for each controller.
The dark and light color represent the high and low fitness value respectively.}
\label{tab:robustness}
\end{table}
The table shows as the picture:
But I got a lot errors like:
Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
\protect
l.1545 & $\ang{40}$ & 0.52 &
0.44 & 0.27 & 0.10 & -0.01 \
Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)
! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted).
\protect
l.1545 ... & $\ang{40}$ & 0.52 & 0.44 &
0.27 & 0.10 & -0.01 \
Dimensions can be in units of em, ex, in, pt, pc,
cm, mm, dd, cc, nd, nc, bp, or sp; but yours is a new one!
I'll assume that you meant to say pt, for printer's points.
To recover gracefully from this error, it's best to
delete the erroneous units; e.g., type `2' to delete
two letters. (See Chapter 27 of The TeXbook.)
Could you give me hands to solve this problem? Thanks!
Here are some considerations:
While \MinNumber is defined to be 0, you have a number that is smaller than that in the table (-0.01).
If you're performing a test on dimensions (\ifdim <dimA><relation><dimB>) you need to make sure both <dimA> and <dimB> are dimensions. In your case you have
\ifdim#1pt>\MidNumber
and \MidNumber is clearly not a dimension. It is just a number (0.8). That's the main cause of the problem.
\ApplyGradient should only take a single argument, not two.
It's awkward to use booktabs together with vertical rules in a tabular. There's no real need for them; I've kept them in the output, but you don't need them.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}% Just for this example
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{booktabs,collcell,xfp}
\newcommand*{\ang}[2]{#1^\circ}
\newcommand*{\MinNumber}{-0.01}%
\newcommand*{\MaxNumber}{1.2}%
\newcommand*{\MidNumber}{0.8}%
\newcommand{\test}[2]{\ifdim#1pt>\MidNumber pt\textcolor{gray!70}{#1}\else #1\fi}
\newcommand{\ApplyGradient}[2]{\centering %
\edef\x{\noexpand\cellcolor{black!\fpeval{100*(#1-\MinNumber)/(\MaxNumber-\MinNumber)}}}\x\test{#1}
}
\newcolumntype{R}{>{\collectcell\ApplyGradient}p{1.1cm}<{\endcollectcell}}
\newcolumntype{S}{>{\collectcell\ApplyGradient}p{0.6cm}<{\endcollectcell}}
%
\begin{document}
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{
>{\centering}p{1.3cm} |
>{\centering}p{0.9cm} |
*{5}{R}
}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{testing in$\rightarrow$} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\ang{40}$} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\ang{20}$} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\ang{0}$} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$-\ang{20}$} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{$-\ang{40}$} \\
\midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 0.52 & 0.44 & 0.27 & 0.10 & -0.01 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.47 & 0.49 & 0.35 & 0.19 & 0.07 \\
spider9 & $\ang{0}$ & 0.25 & 0.47 & 0.63 & 0.46 & 0.24 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.05 & 0.17 & 0.35 & 0.55 & 0.54 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.0 & 0.05 & 0.21 & 0.47 & 0.77 \\
\midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 0.75 & 0.69 & 0.40 & 0.17 & 0.04 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.72 & 0.82 & 0.59 & 0.30 & 0.10 \\
gecko7 & $\ang{0}$ & 0.31 & 0.65 & 1.06 & 0.96 & 0.56 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.16 & 0.45 & 0.86 & 1.18 & 0.98 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.03 & 0.15 & 0.40 & 0.74 & 0.96 \\
\midrule
& $\ang{40}$ & 1.09 & 0.75 & 0.39 & 0.14 & 0.02 \\
& $\ang{20}$ & 0.54 & 0.55 & 0.33 & 0.15 & 0.04 \\
babyA & $\ang{0}$ & 0.29 & 0.58 & 0.88 & 0.74 & 0.42 \\
& $-\ang{20}$ & 0.18 & 0.47 & 0.85 & 1.09 & 0.71 \\
& $-\ang{40}$ & 0.02 & 0.11 & 0.33 & 0.65 & 0.91 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\hspace{4mm}
\begin{tabular}{ S }
0.0 \\ 0.1 \\ 0.2 \\ 0.3 \\ 0.4 \\ 0.5 \\
0.6 \\ 0.7 \\ 0.8 \\ 0.9 \\ 1.0 \\ 1.1 \\
1.2
\end{tabular}
\caption{Robustness of the top learned controllers for different directions in the real world.
The data shows the fitness that the top controllers of three robots in~5 directions (the second column) perform in another directions (the first row).
The fitness value in a cell is averaged over three controller and three repetitions for each controller.
The dark and light color represent the high and low fitness value respectively.}
\end{table}
\end{document}
'tabularx' solves the problem of long headers (does not fit otherwise in width). 'longtable' solves the problem of table length (does not fit in length). But how to solve both problems?
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{|X|X|X|X|X|}
\hline
Район & Количество заявок & Количество заявок на тыс. человек & Место по количеству заявок & Место по количеству заявок на тыс. человек \\
\hline
Невский & 1185 & 2.28 & 1 & 1 \\
\hline
Фрунзен-ский & 655 & 1.63 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline
Примор-ский & 559 & 0.99 & 3 & 8 \\
\hline
Калинин-ский & 458 & 0.85 & 5 & 9 \\
\hline
Красносель-ский & 284 & 0.74 & 6 & 11 \\
\hline
Василеос-тровский & 213 & 1.02 & 9 & 7 \\
\hline
Кировский & 275 & 0.82 & 7 & 10 \\
\hline
Централь-ный & 231 & 1.04 & 8 & 6 \\
\hline
Пушкин-ский & 472 & 2.27 & 4 & 2 \\
\hline
Красногвар-дейский & 132 & 0.37 & 12 & 16 \\
\hline
Московский & 153 & 0.44 & 11 & 14 \\
\hline
Выборгский & 182 & 0.36 & 10 & 17 \\
\hline
Петрог-радский & 91 & 0.67 & 14 & 12 \\
\hline
Адмирал-тейский & 68 & 0.42 & 15 & 15 \\
\hline
Петрод-ворцовый & 65 & 0.46 & 16 & 13 \\
\hline
Курортный & 100 & 1.30 & 13 & 5 \\
\hline
Кронштад-ский & 60 & 1.36 & 17 & 4 \\
\hline
Колпинский & 55 & 0.29 & 18 & 18 \\
\hline
\end{tabularx}
\begin{longtable}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
\caption{Заголовок большой таблицы.}\\
\hline
\textbf{Район} & \textbf{кол-во заявок} & \textbf{кол-во заявок на тыс. чел.} & \textbf{место по кол-ву заявок} \textbf{место по кол-ву заявок на тыс. чел.} \\ \hline
\endfirsthead
\hline
RND1 & RND2 & RND3 & RND4 \\ \hline
\endhead
\hline
\multicolumn{4}{r}{продолжение следует\ldots} \
\endfoot
\hline
\endlastfoot
\hline
Невский & 911 & 1.75 & 1 & 6 \\
\hline
Фрунзен-ский & 722 & 1.80 & 3 & 5 \\
\hline
Примор-ский & 503 & 0.89 & 7 & 10 \\
\hline
Калинин-ский & 251 & 0.47 & 11 & 13-14 \\
\hline
Красносель-ский & 499 & 1.30 & 8 & 8 \\
\hline
Василеос-тровский & 614 & 2.94 & 4 & 2 \\
\hline
Кировский & 396 & 1.18 & 10 & 9 \\
\hline
Централь-ный & 498 & 2.24 & 9 & 4 \\
\hline
Пушкинс-кий & 155 & 0.74 & 12 & 11 \\
\hline
Красногвар-дейский & 598 & 1.67 & 5 & 7 \\
\hline
Московский & 905 & 2.58 & 2 & 3 \\
\hline
Выборгский & 123 & 0.24 & 13 & 16 \\
\hline
Петрог-радский & 571 & 4.24 & 6 & 1 \\
\hline
Адмирал-тейский & 89 & 0.54 & 14 & 12 \\
\hline
Петрод-ворцовый & 55 & 0.39 & 15 & 15 \\
\hline
Курортный & 36 & 0.47 & 17 & 13-14 \\
\hline
Кронштад-ский & 10 & 0.23 & 18 & 17-18 \\
\hline
Колпинский & 44 & 0.23 & 16 & 17-18 \\
\hline
\end{longtable}
Please show how to make a table that will be moved to the next page, but fit in width
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a way to align tables in LaTeX?
I was writing a document with several tables in the same page, and often the edges don't match.
I would like to have tables aligned in both left and right edge.
\paragraph{Articoli}
\begin{large}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo}
\\ \hline
& & & 1500 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(7) & 7 & 10,7 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \hline
Marca & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \hline
Prezzo & Money & 8 & 12,2 kB \\ \hline
Disponibile & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Soglia & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Reparto & Char (4) & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 321 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 322 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\paragraph{Reparti}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo}
\\ \hline
& & & 120 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,5 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 12.1 kB \\ \hline
Sezione & Char(4) & 4 & 0.5 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 12.2 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 12.3 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\paragraph{Pagamenti}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\ \hline
& & & 10 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,1 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 1 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 1.1 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 1.2 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
There are a number of ways to achieve this alignment:
Use a single tabular that would contain everything. This ensures the columns all use the same width:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{ l | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\cline{2-5}
& \textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\cline{2-5}
& & & & 1500 occorrenze \\ \cline{2-5}
& Codice & Char(7) & 7 & 10,7 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Marca & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\textbf{Articoli} & Prezzo & Money & 8 & 12,2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Disponibile & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Soglia & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Reparto & Char (4) & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Totale & & & 321 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Dati + Block Header & & & 322 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\multicolumn{1}{l}{}\\[\bigskipamount]
\cline{2-5}
& \textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\cline{2-5}
& & & & 120 occorrenze \\ \cline{2-5}
& Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,5 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\textbf{Reparti} & Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 12.1 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Sezione & Char(4) & 4 & 0.5 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Totale & & & 12.2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Dati + Block Header & & & 12.3 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\multicolumn{1}{l}{}\\[\bigskipamount]
\cline{2-5}
& \textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\cline{2-5}
& & & & 10 occorrenze \\ \cline{2-5}
& Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,1 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\raisebox{.5\normalbaselineskip}[0pt][0pt]{\textbf{Pagamenti}} &
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 1 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Totale & & & 1.1 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
& Dati + Block Header & & & 1.2 kB \\ \cline{2-5}
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
Drawbacks here are the tables don't break across the page boundary (unless you use something like longtable or ltxtable).
Use boxes/overlapping/phantoms to adjust the appropriate entries so they align:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\leavevmode\rlap{\textbf{Articoli}}%
\phantom{\textbf{Pagamenti}}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\hline
& & & 1500 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(7) & 7 & 10,7 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \hline
Marca & Varchar (100) & 100 & 150 kB \\ \hline
Prezzo & Money & 8 & 12,2 kB \\ \hline
Disponibile & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Soglia & Integer & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Reparto & Char (4) & 4 & 6.2 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 321 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 322 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\bigskip
\leavevmode\rlap{\textbf{Reparti}}%
\phantom{\textbf{Pagamenti}}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\hline
& & & 120 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,5 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 12.1 kB \\ \hline
Sezione & Char(4) & 4 & 0.5 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 12.2 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 12.3 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\bigskip
\textbf{Pagamenti}
\begin{tabular}{ | l | l | l | p{3cm} |}
\hline
\textbf{Attributo} & \textbf{Tipo} & \textbf{Byte} & \textbf{Complessivo} \\
\hline
& & & 10 occorrenze \\ \hline
Codice & Char(4) & 4 & 0,1 kB \\ \hline
Nome & Varchar (100) & 100 & 1 kB \\ \hline
Totale & & & 1.1 kB \\ \hline
Dati + Block Header & & & 1.2 kB \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
Note the use of % at the end of the overlapping line; this is to avoid a spurious space. See What is the use of percent signs (%) at the end of lines?
Here is another presentation using booktabs and siunitx, foregoing the excessive use of horizontal rules and no vertical rules at all:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{booktabs,siunitx,etoolbox}
\newcommand{\tipochar}[1]{Char~(#1)}
\newcommand{\tipovarchar}[1]{Varchar~(#1)}
\newcommand{\tipomoney}{Money}
\newcommand{\tipointeger}{Integer}
\sisetup{%
round-integer-to-decimal,
round-precision = 1,
round-mode = places
}%
\robustify\bfseries
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{
>{\hspace*{1em}\itshape}l
l
S[table-format = 3.1]
S[table-format = 3.2]}
\toprule
\multicolumn{1}{l}{\bfseries Attributo} &
\bfseries Tipo &
\multicolumn{1}{l}{\bfseries Byte} &
\multicolumn{1}{l}{\bfseries Complessivo [kB]} \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Articoli} & & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\num{1500} occorrenze} \\
Codice & \tipochar{7} & 7 & 10.7 \\
Nome & \tipovarchar{100} & 100 & 150 \\
Marca & \tipovarchar{100} & 100 & 150 \\
Prezzo & \tipomoney & 8 & 12.2 \\
Disponibile & \tipointeger & 4 & 6.2 \\
Soglia & \tipointeger & 4 & 6.2 \\
Reparto & \tipochar{4} & 4 & 6.2 \\
Totale & & & 321 \\
Dati + Block Header & & & 322 \\[.5\normalbaselineskip]
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Reparti} & & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\num{120} occorrenze} \\
Codice & \tipochar{4} & 4 & 0.5 \\
Nome & \tipovarchar{100} & 100 & 12.1 \\
Sezione & \tipochar{4} & 4 & 0.5 \\
Totale & & & 12.2 \\
Dati + Block Header & & & 12.3 \\[.5\normalbaselineskip]
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Pagamenti} & & & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\num{10} occorrenze} \\
Codice & \tipochar{4} & 4 & 0.1 \\
Nome & \tipovarchar{100} & 100 & 1 \\
Totale & & & 1.1 \\
Dati + Block Header & & & 1.2 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{document}