Processing cv::RotatedRect width and height - opencv

I need to define a rotated rectangle from its 4 corners. The rotated rectangle is defined by a center point, a size couple (width, height), and an angle.
How is it decided which size is the height, and which one is the width?
The width is not the length of the most horizontal edge, is it? E.g. if the angle is bigger than 90°, does it swap?

height should be the largest side, width is the other one, and angle is the rotation angle (in degrees) in a clockwise direction.
Otherwise, you can get an equivalent rectangle with height and width swapped, rotated by 90 degrees.
You can use minAreaRect to find a RotatedRect:
vector<Point> pts = {pt1, pt2, pt3, pt4}
RotatedRect box = minAreaRect(pts);
// Be sure that largest side is the height
if (box.size.width > box.size.height)
{
swap(box.size.width, box.size.height);
box.angle += 90.f;
}

Ok, with Miki's help, and with some tests, I got it clearer...
It seems that the rotated rectangle is an upright rectangle (width and height are clearly defined, then)... that is rotated!
In image coords, y is directed to the bottom, the angle is given clockwise. In usual math coords (y to the top), the angle is given counter-clockwise. Then, it fits with c++ <math.h> included atan2(y,x) function for example (except that it returns radians).
Then, to summarize, if we consider one given edge of the rectangle (two corners), its length can be considered as the width if we retrieve the angle with atan2 on its y difference and x difference. Something like:
Point pt1, pt2, pt3, pt4;
RotatedRect rect;
rect.center = (pt1 + pt2 + pt3 + pt4)/4;
// assuming the points are already sorted
rect.size.width = distance(pt1, pt2); // sqrt(...)
rect.size.height = distance(pt2, pt3);
rect.angle = atan2(pt2.y-pt1.y, pt2.x-pt1.x);
and this can be improved with width being the mean value of dist(pt1,pt2) and dist(pt3,pt4) for example. The same for height.
angle can also be calculated as being the mean value of atan for (pt1, pt2) and atan for (pt3, pt4).

Related

Flutter - How to rotate an image around the center with canvas

I am trying to implement a custom painter that can draw an image (scaled down version) on the canvas and the drawn image can be rotated and scaled.
I get to know that to scale the image I have to scale the canvas using scale method.
Now the questions is how to rotate the scaled image on its center (or any other point). The rotate method of canvas allow only to rotate on top left corner.
Here is my implementation that can be extended
Had the same problem, Solution was simply making your own rotation method in three lines
void rotate(Canvas canvas, double cx, double cy, double angle) {
canvas.translate(cx, cy);
canvas.rotate(angle);
canvas.translate(-cx, -cy);
}
We thus first move the canvas towards the point you want to pivot around. We then rotate along the the topleft (default for Flutter) which in coordinate space is the pivot you want and then put the canvas back to the desired position, with the rotation applied. Method is very efficient, requiring only 4 additions for the translation and the rotation cost is identical to the original one.
This can achieve by shifting the coordinate space as illustrated in figure 1.
The translation is the difference in coordinates between C1 and C2, which are exactly as between A and B in figure 2.
With some geometry formulas, we can calculate the desired translation and produce the rotated image as in the method below
ui.Image rotatedImage({ui.Image image, double angle}) {
var pictureRecorder = ui.PictureRecorder();
Canvas canvas = Canvas(pictureRecorder);
final double r = sqrt(image.width * image.width + image.height * image.height) / 2;
final alpha = atan(image.height / image.width);
final beta = alpha + angle;
final shiftY = r * sin(beta);
final shiftX = r * cos(beta);
final translateX = image.width / 2 - shiftX;
final translateY = image.height / 2 - shiftY;
canvas.translate(translateX, translateY);
canvas.rotate(angle);
canvas.drawImage(image, Offset.zero, Paint());
return pictureRecorder.endRecording().toImage(image.width, image.height);
}
alpha, beta, angle are all in radian.
Here is the repo of the demo app
If you don't want to rotate the image around the center of the image you can use this way. You won't have to care about what the offset of the canvas should be in relation to the image rotation, because the canvas is moved back to its original position after the image is drawn.
void rotate(Canvas c, Image image, Offset focalPoint, Size screenSize, double angle) {
c.save();
c.translate(screenSize.width/2, screenSize.height/2);
c.rotate(angle);
// To rotate around the center of the image, focal point is the
// image width and height divided by 2
c.drawImage(image, focalPoint*-1, Paint());
c.translate(-screenSize.width/2, -screenSize.height/2);
c.restore();
}

Get the actual angle after the superview is rotated

I have 5 subviews(White) added to the superview(Gray), when I rotate the superview I want to know the angle(like 1 and 2) of each of the subview with the red circle.(the center of the subviews and the red circle are ON the same circle)
Start Position:
Rotated Position:
From your comment you appear to want to determine the coordinates of the centres of your five circles for a given rotation. The centres will all lie on a circle. So your question boils down to what are the coordinates of a point on a circle of radius r for an angle θ. The parametric equations for a circle give you that:
x = r cos θ
y = r sin θ
The angle, θ, in these equations is measured in radians from the positive x-axis in an anti-clockwise direction. If your angle are in degrees you will find the M_PI constant for π useful as:
360 degrees = 2 π radians
The rest is simple math, take your angle of rotation to give you the angle for A (remembering to adjust for 0 being the x-axis and measuring anti-clockwise if needed), the other centres are multiples of 72 degrees (0.4 π radians) from this.
HTH
I'm not sure I completely understand your question, but if you just need to take a known point and rotate it a certain number of degrees, check out the docs for CGAffineTransform.
For example:
CGAffineTransform rotation = CGAffineTransformMakeRotation (angle);
CGPoint rotatedPoint = CGPointApplyAffineTransform (startingPoint, rotation);
This rotation matrix is around (0, 0) and the angle is in radians, so you will need to subtract the center of your superview's bounds to get an offset relative to the center, do the rotation, and add back in the center. Or you can build an affine transform made up of that translation, rotation, and inverse translation, and then apply that to your starting point as above.
Given that you already seem to know the main rotation angle, this will give you the angles in the range -180 .. +180 and positions of each of the white discs:
GCFloat toRads = M_PI / 180.0;
CGFloat angleA = self.rotationInDegrees;
if (angleA > 180) angleA -= 360;
CGFloat xA = self.radius * sinf(angleA * toRads);
CGFloat yA = self.radius * cosf(angleA * toRads);
CGFloat angleB = angleA + 72;
if (angleB > 180) angleB -= 360;
CGFloat xB = self.radius * sinf(angleB * toRads);
CGFloat yB = self.radius * cosf(angleB * toRads);
etc...
(This assumes your zero degrees is from the vertical. If it's from the horizontal swap cos and sin over).

OpenCV's RotatedRect angle does not provide enough information

From my experiments, the angle returned by RotatedRect's angle variable goes from -90 to 0 degrees, which is not sufficient to determine if the object is leaned to the left or right.
For example, if the angle is -45 degrees, we cannot say if we need to rotate +45 or -45 degrees to deskew it.
An excerpt of the code I'm using:
RotatedRect rotated_rect = minAreaRect(contour);
float blob_angle_deg = rotated_rect.angle;
Mat mapMatrix = getRotationMatrix2D(center, blob_angle_deg, 1.0);
Leaning the object in one direction I get angles from 0 to -90 degrees, while leaning the object to the other direction I get angles from -90 to 0 degrees.
How can I find the angle by which I should rotate my image to deskew it?
After learning from Sebastian Schmitz and Michael Burdinov answers this is how I solved it:
RotatedRect rotated_rect = minAreaRect(contour);
float blob_angle_deg = rotated_rect.angle;
if (rotated_rect.size.width < rotated_rect.size.height) {
blob_angle_deg = 90 + blob_angle_deg;
}
Mat mapMatrix = getRotationMatrix2D(center, blob_angle_deg, 1.0);
So, in fact, RotatedRect's angle does not provide enough information for knowing an object's angle, you must also use RotatedRect's size.width and size.height.
I explained how you can convert the angle of the rectangle into [0-180] in this thread.
The Angle is always calculated along the longer side.
Switching values of width and height of rectangle is the same as rotating it by 90 degrees. So if the range of angles was 180 degrees instead of 90 than same rectangle would have 2 representations (width, height, angle) and (height, width, angle+90). Having range of 90 degrees you can represent every rectangle and you can do that in only one way.
This is what I use (c is my contour). Basically, I get the longest line's du and dv, and then use atan2()
rect = cv2.minAreaRect(c)
box = cv2.boxPoints(rect)
origin = box[0]
rect_width, rect_height = rect[1]
if rect_width > rect_height:
target = box[3]
else:
target = box[1]
dv = target[1] - origin[1]
du = target[0] - origin[0]
angle_rads = math.atan2(dv, du)

Rounding Corners: How to calculate Fillet radius?

How do I find the maximum rounding I can apply to either corner for any amount of rounding on the other corner?
Answers to questions from the comments:
1) The inner and outer large arcs (those that are 90 degrees wide here) always have the same center
2) When asking for the maximum rounding that you can do, what are the constraints on the other, smaller circle? Does it need to be at least some radius? Otherwise you are doing to end up with just one rounding.
One of the two rounding circle's radius is given. There are no other constraints other than the maximum of the other circle which I just can't find.
If the "fixed" corner that I refer to has zero rounding then I'm searching for the maximum rouding that can be applied with only the other corner.
3) What constitutes as the maximum rounding? Are you trying to choose between the two examples above? Or is finding either of those cases considered a solution?
Either of the shown cases is a perfect solution. E.g. in the first image the the radius of the smaller circle might be given. Then I'm looking for the maximum radius of the larger one.
These images are just examples for perfect solutions.
4) is there any constraints on the two arcs? What happens if the arcs can't fit a full circle? Would the answer be the largest that fits?
How exactly do you mean that the arcs can't fit a full circle?
The all circles are perfect circles, but I can't figure out the max size of the rounding possible, or how to calculate it's position. Here's some images that describe the problem.
Given that the origin of the coordinate system is at the center point of the inner and outer large arcs...
For the first case where the large circle is tangent to the outer edge, the center point of the large circle is
x = R cos(t) / (1 + cos(t))
y = R sin(t) / (1 + cos(t))
where R is the radius of the outer arc segment, and t is the angle between the x-axis and the ray from the origin through the center of the large circle.
For the second case where the large circle is tangent to the inner edge, the center point of the large circle is
x = R cos(t) / (1 - cos(t))
y = R sin(t) / (1 - cos(t))
where R is the radius of the inner arc segment, and t is the angle...
In both cases, the radius of the circle is equal to its x coordinate. The range of t is between some minimum angle and PI/2. At PI/2, the circle is vanishingly small. At the minimum angle, the y value is equal to the opposite radius. In other words, for the first case where the large circle is tangent to the outer edge, the minimum angle is such that y is equal to the inner radius. Whereas if the circle is tangent to the inner edge, the minimum angle is such that y is equal to the outer radius. It can be proven mathematically that the minimum angle is the same for both cases (tangent to inner and tangent to outer both have the same minimum angle for a given inner and outer radius). However, computing the minimum angle is a bit of a challenge. The only way I know how to do it is by playing the high/low game, e.g.
- (CGFloat)computeAngleForOuterTangentGivenY:(CGFloat)Y
{
CGFloat y;
double high = M_PI_2;
double low = 0;
double mid = M_PI_4;
while ( high - low > 1e-9 )
{
y = (self.outerRadius * sin( mid )) / (1.0 + cos( mid ));
if ( y > Y )
high = mid;
else
low = mid;
mid = (low + high) / 2.0;
}
return( mid );
}
- (CGFloat)computeAngleForInnerTangentGivenY:(CGFloat)Y
{
CGFloat y;
double high = M_PI_2;
double low = 0;
double mid = M_PI_4;
while ( high - low > 1e-9 )
{
y = (self.innerRadius * sin( mid )) / (1.0 - cos( mid ));
if ( y > Y )
low = mid;
else
high = mid;
mid = (low + high) / 2.0;
}
return( mid );
}
It takes about 30 passes for the loop to converge to an answer.
To find the coordinates of the small circle, note that the small circle has the same y value as the large circle, and is tangent to the opposite edge of the arc segment. Therefore, compute the angle t for the small circle based on its y value using the appropriate high/low algorithm, and then compute the x value using the formulas above.
QED
The question isn't posed correctly without showing both ends of the line segment. Suppose for a moment that each line segment is a data structure that maintains not only the end points, but also cap radius in each point, and also knows the angle going out to the next endpoint that this line will attach to. Each cap radius will subtract from the length of the line segment that has to be stroked as a rectangle. Assume you have a line of interest between points B and C, where B joins to another (longer) segment A, and C joins to another (longer) segment D. If line BC is length 10, with cap radius B and cap radius C both set to 4, then you will only render rectangle of length 2 for the straight part of the line segment, while length 4 is used to draw the arc to A, and another length 4 is used to draw the arc to D.
Furthermore, the maximum cap radius for C is constrained not only by BC and B's cap radius, but also by CD and D's cap radius.

How to draw line given a center point and angle in iOS?

This is so much an iOS question as it is my current inability to do coordinate geometry. Given a CGPoint to act as a point that the line will pass through and an angle in radians. How do I draw a line that extends across to the bounds of the screen (infinite line)?
I am using Quartz2d to do this and the API for creating a line is limited to two points as input. So how do I convert a point and angle to two points on the bounds of the iOS device?
This begins with simple trigonometry. You need to calculate the x and y coordinate of the 2nd point. With an origin of 0,0 and treating a line that goes straight to the right as 0 degrees, and going counterclockwise (anti-clockwise for some of you), you do:
double angle = ... // angle in radians
double newX = cos(angle);
double newY = sin(angle);
This assumes a radius of 1. Multiply each times a desired radius. Pick a number that will be bigger than the screen such as 480 for an iPhone or 1024 for an iPad (assuming you want points and not pixels).
Then add the original point to get the final point.
Assuming you have CGPoint start, double angle, and a length, your final point is:
double endX = cos(angle) * length + start.x;
double endY = sin(angle) * length + start.y;
CGPoint end = CGPointMake(endX, endY);
It's OK if the end point is off the screen.

Resources