I have two ubuntu os in my system . I install docker in both ubuntu and create a containers in both the dockers and i need to communicate with the networks ...
Run your container using option --net=host. This way, both containers will have an IP address in your local network.
An example for a container called ubuntu:
docker run -d --name ubuntu --net=host ubuntu
Related
I am writing a simple nodejs container to forward requests on localhost to a port, the container exposes port 4433
docker build . -t myproxy
when i run the container by publishing ports like
docker run --rm -p 4433:4433 myproxy
I am able to access my server through http://localhost:4433 as expected but if i try to run the container with --network host i.e
docker run --rm --net host myproxy
I cannot access the container and get site cannot be reached error.
why is container not binding to my host network?
if i provide both options i.e.
docker run --rm --net host -p 4433:4433 myproxy
then i do get warning on console that
WARNING: Published ports are discarded when using host network mode which means it does recognize that i am trying to use host network.
OS: MAC
From the Docker docs:
The host networking driver only works on Linux hosts, and is not supported on Docker Desktop for Mac, Docker Desktop for Windows, or Docker EE for Windows Server.
I have an app that launches a docker container and automates a few of the routines.
Now I have dockerized this app which is not able to talk to other containers over localhost. I tried setting
--network host
when launching the container and now not able to access the containerized webapp over localhost:.
Any pointers?
localhost won't work. Suppose, you are running a VM and try to talk to your host/ other VMs running in your machine. If you call localhost from one of the VMs, it's localhost for that VM only, not to your host. So, you won't be able to talk from one VM to another by calling localhost. Docker works same in regard to the localhost. You have two options,
Use a network
If you are using network, create a network and add all the containers to that network. This is the new suggested way by docker.
docker network create <your-network-name>
docker run --network <your-network-name> --name <container-name1> <image>
docker run --network <your-network-name> --name <container-name2> <image>
Then use the container name (container-name1) to talk to that service from other service (container-name2).
Use --link option
Or you could use --link option, which is a legacy system for docker. Docker docs says, unless you have a specific reason to use, don't use --link anymore.
docker run --name <container1> <image>
docker run --name <container2> <image>
You could use container1 to talk from container2 and vice versa. You could use these container name in places like DB host, etc.
did you try creating a common bridge network and attach your containers to the same network:
create network :-
docker network create networkname
and then in docker run command add this switch --network=networkname
I figured it later after going over a lot of other documents.
Step 1: install docker inside the container. Added following line to my dockerfile
RUN curl -sSL https://get.docker.com/ | sh
Step 2: provide volume-mapping in docker run command
-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
Now hosts' docker commands are accessible from within my current container and without changing the --network for current docker container, I'm able to access other containers over localhost
I have installed docker compose and used it a little. Then decided I did not need it it. Now when I create containers by hand they are assigned a network with an ip address, gateway and other things. When I inspected older containers before i installed docker compose they do not have these network settings.
I have tried unoinstalling docker compose and reinstalling docker which did not work. Is there anything I can do? The reason I am asking is I can't link containers together because every new container is assigned an ip address and other network settings.
Docker always does that, nothing to do with compose. Compose doesn't modify your Docker installation in any way, purely connects to the daemon to run commands under the hood.
By linking containers together I'm assuming you mean just so they can communicate with each other? --link is deprecated for some time now in favor of docker network .... Try the following:
$ docker network create test-net
$ docker run -d --name c1 --net test-net alpine:3.3 sleep 20000
$ docker run -it --name c2 --net test-net alpine:3.3 ping c1
I have an app listening on port 4000 and have a need to run it in a container with --net=host for simplified access to services on the host. According to docs and lots of similar questions about --net=host, I should be able to get to my app as easy as telnet localhost 4000, but that's not the case: the app in container is not accessible. If I run the container w/out --net=host and with -p 4000:4000, it works, but unfortunately I can't go with it.
Docker Version: 17.03.1-ce-mac5 (16048)
OS: OS X 10.12.4
docker run command: docker run --rm -it --net=host -v /app/dir:/opt/app --name app-dev bitwalker/alpine-elixir-phoenix:1.4.2 iex -S mix phx.server
Keep in mind that on Mac/Windows a thin VM is used as Docker needs a Linux kernel to operate. So using --net=host will not work as you expect, essentially this will use the host network of the VM. You should be able to verify this by accessing port 4000 of the docker VM.
For your use case I would recommend porting the other services to docker, if that is not an option running a local DNS resolver like dnsmasq should do the trick. Just let some domain names resolve to your Mac host ip.
I have a CentOS docker container on a CentOS docker host. When I use this command to run the docker image docker run -d --net=host -p 8777:8777 ceilometer:1.x the docker container get host's IP but doesn't have ports assigned to it.
If I run the same command without "--net=host" docker run -d -p 8777:8777 ceilometer:1.x docker exposes the ports but with a different IP. The docker version is 1.10.1. I want the docker container to have the same IP as the host with ports exposed. I also have mentioned in the Dockerfile the instruction EXPOSE 8777 but with no use when "--net=host" is mentioned in the docker run command.
I was confused by this answer. Apparently my docker image should be reachable on port 8080. But it wasn't. Then I read
https://docs.docker.com/network/host/
To quote
The host networking driver only works on Linux hosts, and is not supported on Docker for Mac, Docker for Windows, or Docker EE for Windows Server.
That's rather annoying as I'm on a Mac. The docker command should report an error rather than let me think it was meant to work.
Discussion on why it does not report an error
https://github.com/docker/for-mac/issues/2716
Not sure I'm convinced.
The docker version is 1.10.1. I want the docker container to have same ip as the host with ports exposed.
When you use --net=host it tells the container to use the hosts networking stack. So you can't expose ports to the host, because it is the host (as far as the network stack is concerned).
docker inspect might not show the expose ports, but if you have an application listening on a port, it will be available as if it were running on the host.
On Linux, I have always used --net=host when myapp needed to connect to an another docker container hosting PostgreSQL.
myapp reads an environment variable DATABASE in this example
Like Shane mentions this does not work on MacOS or Windows...
docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:5432:5432 postgres:latest
So my app can't connect to my other other docker container:
docker run -e DATABASE=127.0.0.1:5432 --net=host myapp
To work around this, you can use host.docker.internal instead of 127.0.0.1 to resolve your hosts IP address.
Therefore, this works
docker run -e DATABASE=host.docker.internal:5432 -d myapp
Hope this saves someone time!