I want to show product description on product page.
Is posible to change product.tpl to show it? Is necessary to develop a module or change core clases?
To show the manufacturer description on product page, the best way is to create an override to ProductController like:
class ProductController extends ProductControllerCore
{
public function initContent(){
$manufacturer_description = "";
if($this->product->id_manufacturer > 0)
{
$manufacturer = new Manufacturer($this->product->id_manufacturer, $this->context->language->id);
$manufacturer_description = $manufacturer->description;
}
$this->context->smarty->assign('manufacturer_description', $manufacturer_description);
parent::initContent();
}
}
Then in the product.tpl of the theme place the {$manufacturer_description} where you want it to show.
Don't forget to clear cache, and delete the file cache/class_index.php after these changes to take effect.
Related
In my application i have a class like:
public class Team {
private Country teamId;
private Set<Player> playerSet;
private Set<Player> substitutes;
private Set<Coach> coachSet;
}
When i instantiate a grid like:
Grid<Team> grid = new Grid<>(Team.class);
and set allTeam() from database it shows object for playerSet and coachSet.
My question is i just want to show players name and coach name concate by ,or \n.
Any idea how can i do that?As a beginner it is complicated for me
I see three options.
The first option is the one you already found yourself: concatenate their names in a single String. This can be done like this:
grid.addColumn(team -> {
Set<String> coachNames = new HashSet<>();
for (Coach coach : team.getCoaches()){
coachNames.add(coach.getName());
}
return String.join(", ", coachNames);
});
The second one would be to make use of the Grid item Detail - you could show a coaches grid in the item details. Since you want to display both coaches and players, this option is probably not the best but I wanted to mention the possibility. (Placing two grids inside the item details is possible, but quite strange. Not optimal user experience.)
grid.setItemDetailsRenderer(new ComponentRenderer<>(team -> {
Grid<Coach> coachGrid = new Grid<>(Coach.class);
coachGrid.setItems(team.getCoaches());
return coachGrid;
}));
A third option would be to have the team grid on one side of the view, and on the other you show some relevant stuff of the selected item of the team grid. You can have a separate Grid for the coaches, one for the players, one for the substitutes. You could implement this team detail layout also as a separate view if you wish. If your Team object will get more complicated with more sets, collections and other relative properties, the more will this option become appealing, as this is quite scalable/expandable.
grid.addSelectionListener(event -> {
if(event.getFirstSelectedItem().isPresent()){
buildTeamDetails(event.getFirstSelectedItem().get())
}
})
private void buildTeamDetails(Team team){
// build your team detail layouts here
}
You can configure which columns are shown in the grid by using grid.removeAllColumns() and then adding all columns you want to have in the grid with grid.addColumn(). Within addColumn() you can create a renderer that defines how the fields (coachName and playerSet) are displayed in the grid.
Let's have a class Team like
public class Team {
private String coachName;
private Set<Player> playerSet;
private Set<Object> objects;
//getters and setters
}
and a class Player like
public class Player {
private String firstName;
private String lastName;
// getters and setters
}
Now you want to only have coach and player names in the grid. So (in my example) for coachName we can just use the field's getter and we can create a comma separated String for the playerSet with java streams easily.
Configure the grid like:
grid.setItems(team);
grid.removeAllColumns();
grid.addColumn(new TextRenderer<>((ItemLabelGenerator<Team>) Team::getCoachName))
.setHeader("Coach");
grid.addColumn(new TextRenderer<>((ItemLabelGenerator<Team>) team1 -> team1.getPlayerSet().stream()
.map(player1 -> player1.getFirstName() + " " + player1.getLastName())
.collect(Collectors.joining(", "))))
.setHeader("Players")
.setFlexGrow(1);
Then the result looks like:
I have a domain class called Product. I have saved the information and image in database. But while retrieving information, I retrieved the all the information but could not retrieve image.
Domain Class
class Product {
String productName
String description
int price
byte [] photo
String phototype
}
I have saved the information and image in database using this action in ProductController. In gsp page, I used <g:uploadForm> tag to get information.
def saveProduct(){
def pic = request.getFile('picture')
product.properties['productName','description','price'] = params
product.photo=pic.bytes
product.phototype=pic.contentType
if(!product.save()){
render (view: "/adminPanel", model: [upload: "Product Failed to Upload",product:product])
return
}
else {
render (view: "/adminPanel", model: [upload: "Product Successfully Saved!!",product: product])
}
}
This code saved the information and image in database. Now, how can I display image and product informations in adminPanel.gsp page? What sort of code should I write in controller and gsp page?
Try using plugin for that.
Avatar uploader is a good one.
Simple avatar uploader - Grails makes the upload and display of these images almost trivial.
Well you can show your image which is stored in DB pretty simply.
Just add one action for retrieving the image from table and sent it to GSP
class ProductController {
def saveProduct(){
.......
}
/** Action for fetching the image byte array
Assuming that you have passed the "productName" from UI
to fetch the particular product image
*/
def fetchProductImage(){
def product = Product.findByProductName(params.productName)
byte[] imageInByte = product.photo
response.contentType = 'image/png' // or the appropriate image content type
response.outputStream << imageInByte
response.outputStream.flush()
}
}
And give call to this controller action from GSP View like below :
<img src="${createLink(controller: 'product', action: 'fetchProductImage', params: ['productName': 'Some_product_name'])}"/>
My web interface has an ajax call to update a photo's caption. A post sends the caption and the publicId of the photo to a service.
The service has
Photo photo = Photo.findByPublicId(params.publicId)
photo.caption = params.caption
photo.save()
However I have read in Burt Beckwith's grails book this is not secure. As-is a hacker could post any publicId to my service and update the
caption of a photo that doesn't not belong to their session. I need some GORM advice on how to write the update query to update only photos belonging
to the current user's session. Due to the number of joins involved I am lost. I am familiar with getting the profile/user:
User user = User.load(springSecurityService.principal.id)
Profile profile = Profile.findByUser(user, [lock:true])
but not the one query that would join everything for the entire update, instead of Profile.findByUser(user, [lock:true]).photoAlbum.getPhotoWherePublicId(publicId) or something that seems it would make 4 different sql calls.
The domain schema I have with the hierarchy in question is :
//user from springsecurity for session/login management
class User {
//no reference to profile
}
class Profile {
PhotoAlbum photoAlbum
User user //reference to user
static constraints = {
photoAlbum(nullable:true)
}
}
class PhotoAlbum {
static hasMany = [photos:Photo]
static belongsTo = [profile:Profile]
}
class Photo {
static belongsTo = PhotoAlbum
String caption
String publicId
}
Maybe with a criteria or namedQuerie this could be done.
Something like this may work:
First make a small change to your Photo class
class Photo {
PhotoAlbum photoAlbum
static belongsTo = [photoAlbum: PhotoAlbum]
String caption
String publicId
}
and try with this criteria
Photo.withCriteria{
eq 'id',params.publicId
photoAlbum {
eq 'profile',profile
}
}
I got a simple POJO class that i wish to display / update in a form
Using the BeanItem class and the binding of component data, i was able to quickly display the first attributes of may data class. However i've hit a wall for tow related attributes :
my class posses a set of available status, as a list of object 'AppStatus'. it also possess a current status, that is one of the status in the 'available' list.
I would like to display the list in the form as a combobox, with the current status selected.
I'we managed to associate the 'available' attribute with a combobox, but i can't seem to be able to fill this combobox when setting the data source (method setItemDataSource). How do i get the avalaible status list and the current status from my Item ?
I could always use a workaround and add a parameter to the method to get the source objet in addition to the BeanItem, but i would prefer to avoid this if the Item properties can give me my attribute.
Regards
Edit : shortened exemple, with code from Eric R.
class Status {
String id;
Sting label
+ setter /getter
}
class App {
String AppId;
String AppLabel
ArrayList<Status> availablestatus;
Status currentStatus
+setter/getter
}
in the form extension, in the createField of the fieldfactory i added the following lines
if ("status".equals(propertyId)) {
// create the combobox
ComboBox status = new ComboBox(
texts.getString("application.label.status"));
status.setItemCaptionMode(AbstractSelect.ITEM_CAPTION_MODE_PROPERTY);
status.setItemCaptionPropertyId("label");
status.setImmediate(true);
status.setNullSelectionAllowed(false);
IndexedContainer container = new IndexedContainer(
(Collection<ApplicationStatus>) item.getItemProperty(
"availableStatus").getValue());
status.setContainerDataSource(container);
status.setPropertyDataSource(item.getItemProperty("currentStatus"));
return status;
} else...
this didn't work, i do get a combobox, with the correct number of lines, but all empties.
i tried to use a beanContainer instead of a IndexedContainer
BeanContainer<String, ApplicationStatus> container =
new BeanContainer<String, ApplicationStatus>(ApplicationStatus.class);
container.addAll((Collection<ApplicationStatus>) item
.getItemProperty("availableStatus").
container.setBeanIdProperty("id");
the result is slightly better, since i do have the available values in the combobox.
only the currentValue is not selected...
I also tried to use a nestedbean property to get the id of the currentstatus, but the result is still not valid... i get a combobox, with the correct value selected, but i can not see others values anymore, since the combobox is readonly ?(even with setReadOnly(false);)
I suggest my way to resolve this. I don't think this is the nicest way, but it's works.
The beanItem class contains all you need.
I did the following in a simple project and it's work verry well :
ComboBox status = new ComboBox("ComboBox");
status.setImmediate(true);
status.setNullSelectionAllowed(false);
for(Status st : (Collection<Status>)item.getItemProperty("availableStatus").getValue()) {
status.addItem(st);
status.setItemCaption(st, st.getLabel());
}
status.setPropertyDataSource(item.getItemProperty("currentStatus"));
Hope it's works.
Regards Éric
From the vaadin demo site you can get this sample that show how to fill a combobox with countries. You could do the same i would guess (not sure I understand your problem 100%):
myForm.setFormFieldFactory(new MyFormFieldFactory ());
private class MyFormFieldFactory extends DefaultFieldFactory {
final ComboBox countries = new ComboBox("Country");
public MyFormFieldFactory () {
countries.setWidth(COMMON_FIELD_WIDTH);
countries.setContainerDataSource(ExampleUtil.getISO3166Container());
countries
.setItemCaptionPropertyId(ExampleUtil.iso3166_PROPERTY_NAME);
countries.setItemIconPropertyId(ExampleUtil.iso3166_PROPERTY_FLAG);
countries.setFilteringMode(ComboBox.FILTERINGMODE_STARTSWITH);
}
#Override
public Field createField(Item item, Object propertyId,
Component uiContext) {
Field f = (Field)item;
if ("countryCode".equals(propertyId)) {
// filtering ComboBox w/ country names
return countries;
}
return f;
}
}
I'm having an issue with grails. I have a domain that looks like:
class Book {
static belongsTo = Author
String toString() { title }
Author bookAuthor
String title
String currentPage
static constraints = {
bookAuthor()
title(unique:true)
currentPage()
}
}
The main thing to note is that I have title(unique:true) to avoid from adding the same book twice. However, this is causing issues. In the controller I have created:
def populate = {
def bookInstance = new Book()
def dir = 'C:/currentBooks.txt'
def bookList
bookList = readFile(dir) //read file and push values into bookList
int numOfBooks = bookList.size()
numOfBooks.times {
bookInstance.setBookAuthor(bookList.author[it])
bookInstance.setTitle(bookList.title[it])
bookInstance.setCurrentPage(bookList.title[it])
bookInstance.save()
}
}
I call populate to read a file and populate the database with new Books. The problem is that I want to update it with new values. For instance, lets say that the book already exists in the database but I have read farther into the book and want to change the currentPage so the data is changed in the file and populate is called but doesn't update the page because the title already exists.
Can someone explain how to update the results with the new values?
First of all, you need a key for your Book domain object. You have the title marked as unique, which suggests you want to use that to uniquely identify a Book. I'd recommend against that (what happens when two books have the same title?) and use the id grails provides by default. That means you'll have to store the id in your currentBooks.txt in addition to your other fields.
Once you've got an id, you can try loading an existing record from the database. If not, create a new one. For Example:
def dir = 'C:/currentBooks.txt'
def bookList
bookList = readFile(dir) //read file and push values into bookList
int numOfBooks = bookList.size()
numOfBooks.times {
def bookInstance.get(bookList.id[it])
if (!bookInstance) {
bookInstance = new Book()
}
bookInstance.setBookAuthor(bookList.author[it])
bookInstance.setTitle(bookList.title[it])
bookInstance.setCurrentPage(bookList.title[it])
bookInstance.save()
}
Alternatively, you could use the title as the id. This is a bad idea as indicated above, but it saves having to keep track of a separate id and change the format of currentBooks.txt. With Book defined as below, you could call Book.get(bookList.title[it]):
class Book {
static belongsTo = Author
String toString() { title }
Author bookAuthor
String title
String currentPage
static constraints = {
bookAuthor()
title(unique:true)
currentPage()
}
static mapping = {
id name: 'title', generator: 'assigned'
}
}