Decision Trees combined with Logistic Regression - machine-learning

Basicly my question is related to the following paper (it is enough to read only sections 1.Introduction, beginning of section 3.Prediction model structure and section 3.1 Decision tree feature transforms, everything else could be skipped)
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/daf9/ed5dc6c6bad5367d7fd8561527da30e9b8dd.pdf
This paper suggests that binary classification could show better performance in case of combined decision trees + linear classification (e.g. logistic regression) compared to using ONLY decision trees or linear classification (not both)
Simply speaking, the trick is that we have several decision trees (assume 2 trees for simplicity, 1st tree with 3 leaf nodes and 2nd tree with 2 leaf nodes) and some real-valued feature vector x which goes as an input to all decision trees
So,
- if first tree's decision is leaf node 1 and second tree's decision is leaf node 2 then linear classifier will receive binary string [ 1 0 0 0 1 ]
- if first tree's decision is leaf node 2 and second tree's decision is leaf node 1 then linear classifier will receive binary string [ 0 1 0 1 0 ]
and so on
If we used only decision trees (without linear classif.), clearly we would have either class 100/ class 010/class 001 for 1st tree and class 10/ class 01 for 2nd tree, but in this scheme the outputs of trees are combined into binary string which is fed to linear classifier. So it's not clear how to train these decision trees? What we have is aforementioned vector x and click/no-click, which is output of linear classif., not tree
Any ideas?

For me, You need to perform boosting decisions trees by minimizing the log-loss criteria (binary classification). Once you trained your trees (assume you have 2 trees with 3 and 2 leaves). Then for each instance you predict the leaf index for each tree.
Example
If for an instance you get the leaf 1 for tree 1 and leaf 2 for the second tree. IE you get a vector of (1, 0, 0, 0 , 1) , it is a binary vector not String. Then you have two strategies:
You train a linear classifier (ex: logistic regression) on the result of your trees prediction, your dataset has dimension (N*5), where N is number of your instances. You will train a logistic regression on binary data.
You concatenate your vector for dimension 5 with your initial vector of features, and you perform a linear classifier. You will train logistic regression on both real and binary data.

Related

What is the difference between a GBM continuous prediction in [0, 1] and a Logistic Regression continous prediction in [0, 1]

From a Gradient Boosted Model, if you get a continuous prediction between 0 and 1, what is the difference in the meaning of this compared to the probability derived from Logistic Regression?
For example, if I had an LR model output .6 for predicting variable Y, and I had a GBM output .7 for predicting variable Y, is there any significance to the higher value?
Both GBM and logistic regression are probabilistic classifiers; this means that the outputs of both models can (and usually are) interpreted as probabilities. So, there is actually no difference in the meaning of their outputs.
is there any significance to the higher value?
"Significance" is not the right term here; in your example, it is simply that GBM makes a different estimation for the class probability of the specific sample (could be higher, lower, or roughly equal). These two algorithms being different, it is only logical that their probability estimations for the same sample can (and usually do) differ.

Regression, classification on Machine Learning

I have a classification and regression question on machine learning.
First question, the following dataset
http://it.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=oh3gj7&s=8#.VIjhRDGG_lF
Can we say, the data set is linearly separable?
In order to apply a linear model for classication, a transformation of the input space is not needed for this dataset, or is not possible for this dataset?
My answer is no, but I am not sure for the second, I am not sure a transformation is possible for the dataset.
Second question about regression probl:
Give the following data set f : R -> R
http://it.tinypic.com/view.php?pic=madsmr&s=8#.VIjhVjGG_lE
Can we say that :
A linear model for regression can be used to learn the function associated to this data set ?
Given this data set, it is not possible to determine an optimal conguration of the linear model?
I am reading the book of Tom Mitchell Machine learning, and Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Bishop, but I still have trouble giving the right answer.
Thanks in advance.
Neither of this datasets can be modeled using linear classification/regression.
In case of the "input data transfromation" if only dataset is consistent (there are no two exact same points with two different labels) there always exists transformation after which data is linearly separable. In particular one can construct it with:
phi(x) = 1 iff label of x is "1"
in other words, you map all positive samples to "1" and negatives to "0", so your data is now trivialy linearly separable. Or simply map your N points into N unit vectors in R^N space in such a way that i'th point is mapped to [0 0 0 ... 1 ... 0 0 0]^T where this "1" appears at i'th place. Such dataset is trivialy linearly separable for any labeling.

How does AUC of decision tree being calculated?

Suppose I have a dataset which only has one continuous variable, and I try to use decision tree algorithm to build a model which classify the +ve and -ve label from the dataset. I run 10-fold cross-validation.
How does the AUC being calculated for the Decision Tree classifier? Will the algorithm check different threshold value of the classifier, and determine the AUC?
What about I have more than 2 continuous variable?
Thanks!
Off topic, but hey:
AUC only makes sense for binary classification. The number of predictors does not matter.
Decision trees do not inherently have a 'threshold' but typically in a classification problem, the leaves contain a probability distribution over the 2 classes, and so does the tree's prediction. So you could conceive of picking the positive class only if its probability is >= p, not just >= 0.5. Then you could draw an AUC curve.
So it's a little unnatural to apply this to a decision tree but can be done.

disciriminative subspace Fisher discriminative analysis

I have only 2 classes.
Fisher Discrimination Analysis project the data into a low dimensional discriminative subspace. According to the papers, I can find atmost C-1 non-zero eigen values. That means if my initial data has a dimension d the projected data will have a dimension of atmost c-1.
If the number of classes are only 2, I will get a feature vector with only one dimension.
My problem is I would like to project my data into a discriminative subspace and then I would like to get a feature vector of size m (m < d, m~=1).
Are there any way to do these kind of discriminative projection?

What is the difference between linear regression and logistic regression? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
When we have to predict the value of a categorical (or discrete) outcome we use logistic regression. I believe we use linear regression to also predict the value of an outcome given the input values.
Then, what is the difference between the two methodologies?
Linear regression output as probabilities
It's tempting to use the linear regression output as probabilities but it's a mistake because the output can be negative, and greater than 1 whereas probability can not. As regression might actually
produce probabilities that could be less than 0, or even bigger than
1, logistic regression was introduced.
Source: http://gerardnico.com/wiki/data_mining/simple_logistic_regression
Outcome
In linear regression, the outcome (dependent variable) is continuous.
It can have any one of an infinite number of possible values.
In logistic regression, the outcome (dependent variable) has only a limited number of possible values.
The dependent variable
Logistic regression is used when the response variable is categorical in nature. For instance, yes/no, true/false, red/green/blue,
1st/2nd/3rd/4th, etc.
Linear regression is used when your response variable is continuous. For instance, weight, height, number of hours, etc.
Equation
Linear regression gives an equation which is of the form Y = mX + C,
means equation with degree 1.
However, logistic regression gives an equation which is of the form
Y = eX + e-X
Coefficient interpretation
In linear regression, the coefficient interpretation of independent variables are quite straightforward (i.e. holding all other variables constant, with a unit increase in this variable, the dependent variable is expected to increase/decrease by xxx).
However, in logistic regression, depends on the family (binomial, Poisson,
etc.) and link (log, logit, inverse-log, etc.) you use, the interpretation is different.
Error minimization technique
Linear regression uses ordinary least squares method to minimise the
errors and arrive at a best possible fit, while logistic regression
uses maximum likelihood method to arrive at the solution.
Linear regression is usually solved by minimizing the least squares error of the model to the data, therefore large errors are penalized quadratically.
Logistic regression is just the opposite. Using the logistic loss function causes large errors to be penalized to an asymptotically constant.
Consider linear regression on categorical {0, 1} outcomes to see why this is a problem. If your model predicts the outcome is 38, when the truth is 1, you've lost nothing. Linear regression would try to reduce that 38, logistic wouldn't (as much)2.
In linear regression, the outcome (dependent variable) is continuous. It can have any one of an infinite number of possible values. In logistic regression, the outcome (dependent variable) has only a limited number of possible values.
For instance, if X contains the area in square feet of houses, and Y contains the corresponding sale price of those houses, you could use linear regression to predict selling price as a function of house size. While the possible selling price may not actually be any, there are so many possible values that a linear regression model would be chosen.
If, instead, you wanted to predict, based on size, whether a house would sell for more than $200K, you would use logistic regression. The possible outputs are either Yes, the house will sell for more than $200K, or No, the house will not.
Just to add on the previous answers.
Linear regression
Is meant to resolve the problem of predicting/estimating the output value for a given element X (say f(x)). The result of the prediction is a continuous function where the values may be positive or negative. In this case you normally have an input dataset with lots of examples and the output value for each one of them. The goal is to be able to fit a model to this data set so you are able to predict that output for new different/never seen elements. Following is the classical example of fitting a line to set of points, but in general linear regression could be used to fit more complex models (using higher polynomial degrees):
Resolving the problem
Linear regression can be solved in two different ways:
Normal equation (direct way to solve the problem)
Gradient descent (Iterative approach)
Logistic regression
Is meant to resolve classification problems where given an element you have to classify the same in N categories. Typical examples are, for example, given a mail to classify it as spam or not, or given a vehicle find to which category it belongs (car, truck, van, etc ..). That's basically the output is a finite set of discrete values.
Resolving the problem
Logistic regression problems could be resolved only by using Gradient descent. The formulation in general is very similar to linear regression the only difference is the usage of different hypothesis function. In linear regression the hypothesis has the form:
h(x) = theta_0 + theta_1*x_1 + theta_2*x_2 ..
where theta is the model we are trying to fit and [1, x_1, x_2, ..] is the input vector. In logistic regression the hypothesis function is different:
g(x) = 1 / (1 + e^-x)
This function has a nice property, basically it maps any value to the range [0,1] which is appropiate to handle propababilities during the classificatin. For example in case of a binary classification g(X) could be interpreted as the probability to belong to the positive class. In this case normally you have different classes that are separated with a decision boundary which basically a curve that decides the separation between the different classes. Following is an example of dataset separated in two classes.
You can also use the below code to generate the linear regression
curve
q_df = details_df
# q_df = pd.get_dummies(q_df)
q_df = pd.get_dummies(q_df, columns=[
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"6",
"7",
"8",
"9"
])
q_1_df = q_df["1"]
q_df = q_df.drop(["2", "3", "4", "5"], axis=1)
(import statsmodels.api as sm)
x = sm.add_constant(q_df)
train_x, test_x, train_y, test_y = sklearn.model_selection.train_test_split(
x, q3_rechange_delay_df, test_size=0.2, random_state=123 )
lmod = sm.OLS(train_y, train_x).fit() lmod.summary()
lmod.predict()[:10]
lmod.get_prediction().summary_frame()[:10]
sm.qqplot(lmod.resid,line="q") plt.title("Q-Q plot of Standardized
Residuals") plt.show()
Simply put, linear regression is a regression algorithm, which outpus a possible continous and infinite value; logistic regression is considered as a binary classifier algorithm, which outputs the 'probability' of the input belonging to a label (0 or 1).
The basic difference :
Linear regression is basically a regression model which means its will give a non discreet/continuous output of a function. So this approach gives the value. For example : given x what is f(x)
For example given a training set of different factors and the price of a property after training we can provide the required factors to determine what will be the property price.
Logistic regression is basically a binary classification algorithm which means that here there will be discreet valued output for the function . For example : for a given x if f(x)>threshold classify it to be 1 else classify it to be 0.
For example given a set of brain tumour size as training data we can use the size as input to determine whether its a benine or malignant tumour. Therefore here the output is discreet either 0 or 1.
*here the function is basically the hypothesis function
They are both quite similar in solving for the solution, but as others have said, one (Logistic Regression) is for predicting a category "fit" (Y/N or 1/0), and the other (Linear Regression) is for predicting a value.
So if you want to predict if you have cancer Y/N (or a probability) - use logistic. If you want to know how many years you will live to - use Linear Regression !
Regression means continuous variable, Linear means there is linear relation between y and x.
Ex= You are trying to predict salary from no of years of experience. So here salary is independent variable(y) and yrs of experience is dependent variable(x).
y=b0+ b1*x1
We are trying to find optimum value of constant b0 and b1 which will give us best fitting line for your observation data.
It is a equation of line which gives continuous value from x=0 to very large value.
This line is called Linear regression model.
Logistic regression is type of classification technique. Dnt be misled by term regression. Here we predict whether y=0 or 1.
Here we first need to find p(y=1) (wprobability of y=1) given x from formuale below.
Probaibility p is related to y by below formuale
Ex=we can make classification of tumour having more than 50% chance of having cancer as 1 and tumour having less than 50% chance of having cancer as 0.
Here red point will be predicted as 0 whereas green point will be predicted as 1.
Cannot agree more with the above comments.
Above that, there are some more differences like
In Linear Regression, residuals are assumed to be normally distributed.
In Logistic Regression, residuals need to be independent but not normally distributed.
Linear Regression assumes that a constant change in the value of the explanatory variable results in constant change in the response variable.
This assumption does not hold if the value of the response variable represents a probability (in Logistic Regression)
GLM(Generalized linear models) does not assume a linear relationship between dependent and independent variables. However, it assumes a linear relationship between link function and independent variables in logit model.
| Basis | Linear | Logistic |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Basic | The data is modelled using a straight line. | The probability of some obtained event is represented as a linear function of a combination of predictor variables. |
| Linear relationship between dependent and independent variables | Is required | Not required |
| The independent variable | Could be correlated with each other. (Specially in multiple linear regression) | Should not be correlated with each other (no multicollinearity exist). |
In short:
Linear Regression gives continuous output. i.e. any value between a range of values.
Logistic Regression gives discrete output. i.e. Yes/No, 0/1 kind of outputs.
To put it simply, if in linear regression model more test cases arrive which are far away from the threshold(say =0.5)for a prediction of y=1 and y=0. Then in that case the hypothesis will change and become worse.Therefore linear regression model is not used for classification problem.
Another Problem is that if the classification is y=0 and y=1, h(x) can be > 1 or < 0.So we use Logistic regression were 0<=h(x)<=1.
Logistic Regression is used in predicting categorical outputs like Yes/No, Low/Medium/High etc. You have basically 2 types of logistic regression Binary Logistic Regression (Yes/No, Approved/Disapproved) or Multi-class Logistic regression (Low/Medium/High, digits from 0-9 etc)
On the other hand, linear regression is if your dependent variable (y) is continuous.
y = mx + c is a simple linear regression equation (m = slope and c is the y-intercept). Multilinear regression has more than 1 independent variable (x1,x2,x3 ... etc)
In linear regression the outcome is continuous whereas in logistic regression, the outcome has only a limited number of possible values(discrete).
example:
In a scenario,the given value of x is size of a plot in square feet then predicting y ie rate of the plot comes under linear regression.
If, instead, you wanted to predict, based on size, whether the plot would sell for more than 300000 Rs, you would use logistic regression. The possible outputs are either Yes, the plot will sell for more than 300000 Rs, or No.
In case of Linear Regression the outcome is continuous while in case of Logistic Regression outcome is discrete (not continuous)
To perform Linear regression we require a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables. But to perform Logistic regression we do not require a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables.
Linear Regression is all about fitting a straight line in the data while Logistic Regression is about fitting a curve to the data.
Linear Regression is a regression algorithm for Machine Learning while Logistic Regression is a classification Algorithm for machine learning.
Linear regression assumes gaussian (or normal) distribution of dependent variable. Logistic regression assumes binomial distribution of dependent variable.
The basic difference between Linear Regression and Logistic Regression is :
Linear Regression is used to predict a continuous or numerical value but when we are looking for predicting a value that is categorical Logistic Regression come into picture.
Logistic Regression is used for binary classification.

Resources