Since the begining of my adventure with OpenLayers I have my map controls outside of map and can't get them on despite what I do.
I checked examples and can't make it right. I see that many people want to get these controls outside of the map but I never had them on.
It is possible. Just add control to external div
HTML
<div id="map" class="map"></div>
<div id="contrls" style="position:absolute"></div>
JS
var ctrl = new ol.control.Zoom({
target: document.querySelector('#contrls')
});
map.addControl(ctrl);
DEMO
It may be too late but may help others.
Please import ol CSS like this:
import 'ol/ol.css';
Related
I am using Shield ASP.NET MVC charts on a page. I need the charts to initially show data for my visitors, and I need to provide the user the possibility to hide the charts by clicking on the corresponding button(s). For this purpose I use the following function:
<script>
function HideChart() {
document.getElementById("DataSpot").innerHTML = "";
}
</script>
And I am placing the charts as follows:
<p id="DataSpot">
#(Html.ShieldChart()
.Name("chart")
.PrimaryHeader(header => header.Text("Profile Hits"))
.Export(false)
.AxisX(axisX => axisX
………..
)
</p>
<button onclick="HideChart()">Hide Chart</button>
The problem is, that when I click on the button, nothing happens.
#user2492467,
Do you need to hide the chart or do you need to wipe out its content? If just hiding the chart, the approach suggested by Chris would work just fine. However, if you need to irrevocably wipe out the chart from the page altogether, then clearing its content is not enough. Only removing the rendered chart markup would open the door for memory leaks, as references to the DOM nodes may remain in the chart javascript component.
A better approach would be to find the javascript component instance and call its .destroy() method. This will ensure the component is fully destroyed and no memory is leaked:
$("#DataSpot").swidget().destroy();
Note that you still need to give your chart a name using the MVC wrapper's .Name("DataSpot") method just like Ed suggests. This will give your chart's HTML element an ID that you can use with jQuery to find the chart instance.
The .swidget() method is a standard jQuery extension method added by the Shield UI javascript framework. It returns the javascript component instance associated with the element matched by the jQuery selector. This is how you find the chart instance.
How about:
<script>
function HideChart() {
document.getElementById('DataSpot').style.display='none';
}
</script>
You should also update your button:
<button type="button" onclick="HideChart()" value="Hide Chart" />
Actually there is something happening, obviously not the thing that you need. This is because you need to wipe out the rendered chart by referencing its container.
The element is fine and if you put some text in your function and execute it you will see that it will appear on the appropriate spot. However to hide the chart you need to use it’s name. In other words the following statement:
document.getElementById("DataSpot").innerHTML = "";
should be changed to
document.getElementById("chart").innerHTML = "";
or you may rename the chart to
.Name("DataSpot ")
and remove the P element in both cases since it makes no use.
A question similar to this has been posted several time, but I cannot find a solution that works. Hopefully, someone can help!
I am using jQuery Mobile 1.1 and jQuery 1.7.2, so I'm on the most recent stable releases. I want to create a dynamic page header. Using this HTML code, it works fine:
<div data-role="page" id="levela">
<div data-role="header" id="hdr_levela">
<h1>Title</h1>
</div>
</div>
So I then go to dynamically create the title. I change the HTML to this:
<div data-role="page" id="levela">
<div data-role="header" id="hdr_levela">
</div>
</div>
And added the following jQuery code:
// Set the header
var dirHeader = $('#hdr_levela');
dirHeader.append('<h1>' + title+ '</h1>');
The title appears, but is not styled. I have found several posts about this. In the jQuery Mobile Documentation, it says:
"However, if you generate new markup client-side or load in content via Ajax and inject it into a page, you can trigger the create event to handle the auto-initialization for all the plugins contained within the new markup. This can be triggered on any element (even the page div itself), saving you the task of manually initializing each plugin (listview button, select, etc.).
For example, if a block of HTML markup (say a login form) was loaded in through Ajax, trigger the create event to automatically transform all the widgets it contains (inputs and buttons in this case) into the enhanced versions. The code for this scenario would be:
$( ...new markup that contains widgets... ).appendTo( ".ui-page" ).trigger( "create" );
So I tried several things. After the above code, I added the following:
dirHeader.trigger("create");
This had no effect. So I tried to put it on the actual append itself:
dirHeader.append('<h1>' + folderName + '</h1>').trigger("create");
This had no effect. I then tried the process on the parent element (in this case, the id of the parent div is "levela"). So I tried this:
$('#levela').trigger("create");
This also had no effect. At this point, I am completely lost. Every solution involves doing one of the things I have tried and is just not working. I must be missing something incredibly basic but I just can't seem to find it.
Thanks in advance for your help!
You can update the content by calling .page:
See this working Fiddle Example!
// Set the header
var title = 'super hyper BuBu',
$dirHeader = $('#hdr_levela');
$dirHeader.append('<h1>' + title+ '</h1>').page();
I just solved a similar problem -- it appears that jQM headers and footers do not have the "create" method, so as far as I can tell, the css classes and roles need to be added manually.
For reference, I posted an example fix on this (old) question: JQuery Mobile trigger('create') command not working
(Follows on from Can you define tooltips in Dojo wijit template?)
I'd like to be able to popup some help text if a user hovers or keeps the focus on a Dojo wijit for some time. I know that these wijits come with some prompt behaviours such as when they are empty or on validation errors, but I'd like to be able to prompt regardless of the content of the control. For example:
<input name="tooltipTesting"
data-dojo-attach-point="tooltipMe"
data-dojo-type="dijit.form.ValidationTextBox"
data-dojo-props="placeHolder:'Type Something',
required:true,
value: '${blah}'" />
<div data-dojo-type="dijit.Tooltip" data-dojo-props="connectId:'tooltipMe'">
Got to love hovering over links. Sometimes you a get a free tooltip.
</div>
Programmatic definition of the tooltips works for plain HTML elements like anchors, but nothing I do appears to associate a tooltip with other Dojo controls. Advice?
You can programatically connect the widget to the tooltip using
tooltip.addTarget(widget.domNode);
dijit.Tooltip connects to the DOM node(s), not to Dijit Widgets (i.e. javascript objects), but you can always use widget's reference to its root DOM node accessible via widget.domNode.
There is also a problem with your markup: dojo-dojo-attach-point does not assign an id to the widget (you reference from the Tooltip via connectedId). Define id property <input id="tooltipMe"> to do so, then the ValidationTextBox itself and also the root DOM node of the ValidationTextBox will have the same id. Note that you cannot use hardcoded IDs in the widget templates.
I am trying to understand how the integration between jQueryUI and Emberjs should be done. I am new to both libs and to javascript so this might be a newbie question.
I have this jsfiddle set up: http://jsfiddle.net/pSKgV/1/ and it renders this resulting document:
<body class="ember-application">
<div id="ember129" class="ember-view">
<div id="ember163" class="ember-view ui-draggable"></div>
</div>
</body>
The code is mostly taken from this blog post: http://www.lukemelia.com/blog/archives/2012/03/10/using-ember-js-with-jquery-ui/
Questions: How do I put something inside the inner div? I want to put some content that i can bind to something.
I have tried the following:
{{view App.Draggable}}Drag Me{{/view}} but that gives an error. I’ve also tried
adding this to the App.Draggable object:
didInsertElement: function() {
this.$().html(“Drag Me”)
}
but that did not give the expected results. How is the best way to use/access the jquery/jqueryui functions such as .html() in this situation?
Also, is the outer div necessary or can I make this view only render one div element?
regards
Oskar
http://jsfiddle.net/ud3323/XMgwV/
You forget the # symbol {{#view App.Draggable}}Drag me{{/view}}. You should also create namespaces in Ember using Ember.Namespace.create() instead of just using an empty {}
I've been trying to get a Dojo (1.6) dijit.Tooltip to work when defined in a wijit template.
So, if I have wijit template that includes the following:
<a data-dojo-attach-point="tooltipMe" href="" onclick="return false;">
Show a Tooltip
</a>
<div data-dojo-type="dijit.Tooltip" data-dojo-props="connectId:'tooltipMe'">
Got to love hovering over links. Sometimes you a get a free tooltip
</div>
I can see the link of course, but nothing happens when I hover. Scouting round the newsgroups it seems there might be a problem with defining tooltips in wijit templates, but it's not mentioned in the Dojo docs.
Is it possible to define tooltips inline like this? Or am I just doing something wrong, it seems like the obvious place to do it.
If not, is there an accepted approach for creating and linking tooltips to DOM nodes defined in wijit templates?
Tooltips connectId property has to be the id of a DOM node. data-dojo-attach-point is not an id, it just creates a reference in the instantiated widget.
So in your case you need to assign an id to the a-node and use the same id in connectId. To avoid id clashes when creating multiple instances of your widget you can use the ${id} variable substitution to ensure that all ids are unique:
Your code should look something like this:
<a id="${id}_link" data-dojo-attach-point="tooltipMe" href="" onclick="return false;">
Show a Tooltip
</a>
<div data-dojo-type="dijit.Tooltip" data-dojo-props="connectId:'${id}_link'">
Got to love hovering over links. Sometimes you a get a free tooltip
</div>
I've had problems doing it this way before. I used script to create them on my page after I had done some other work, maybe something like this will help you out if you use it in the template postCreate method.
var span = dojo.query('.hasEntry span').forEach(function(node, index, nodelist)
{
new dijit.Tooltip({
connectId:node,
position:"above",
label: toolTipLabel
});
});
Responding to an old thread here, but just wanted to share a solution for people looking to use tooltips without IDs on their custom widget elements. It's not as pretty as just using tooltip, but it works. It uses the "dijit/popup" and "dijit/TooltipDialog" modules.
this.editTooltipDialog = new TooltipDialog({
content: "<p>I love tooltips</p>",
onMouseLeave: function(){
popup.close(this.editTooltipDialog);
}
});
on(this.targetDiv, 'mouseover', lang.hitch(this, function(){
popup.open({
popup: this.editTooltipDialog,
around: this.targetDiv
});
}));
I tried to replicate the issue in jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/phusick/EcLLb/.
I found out that dijit.Tooltip widget from the template is instantized, but it does not connect mouse events, presumably because DOM node it attempts to connect to does not exist yet (i.e. has not been added to document DOM tree).
To prove the aforementioned I tried to connect the tooltip in widget's postCreate method, when all DOM building is done and it worked:
postCreate: function() {
this.inherited(arguments);
this.tooltip1.set("connectId", this.tooltipMe); // w/o this the tooltip won't show
}
So you can instantize tooltips via a template markup and then just connect then to DOM nodes in postCreate method.