I'm wondering how to link docker containers that are already running. Is this possible?
For example if I have 2 app (app1 and app2) images and a single running mongo container, I can link them pretty easily when I run the them by doing the following:
docker run -d -name app1 --link mongo:mongo -p 8080:8080 app1
docker run -d -name app2 --link mongo:mongo -p 8081:8081 app2
This works great. However, suppose I have already ran app1 and app2 without linking them to the mongo container at the start, how do I go about linking the applications' containers to the running mongo container?
You need to expose port from your container to host, then container can ping each other via your HOST_IP (from inside container- default is 172.0.0.1).
Example: your app is running on 8080 and your mongo is running on 8000 (exposed port to host)
exec inside your app container and get $HOST_IP using ifconfig
After that, try to ping to your mongo service
curl $HOST_IP:8000 (I'm not sure about this command ^^ if it's not ok, google it)
Related
I am trying to make a portable solution to having my application container connect to a postgres container. By 'portable' I mean that I can give the user two docker run commands, one for each container, and they will always work together.
I have a postgres docker container running on my local PC, and I run it like this,
docker run -p 5432:5432 -v $(pwd)/datadir:/var/lib/postgresql/data -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=qwerty -d postgres:11
and I am able to access it from a python flask app, using the address 127.0.0.1:5432.
I put the python app in a docker container as well, and I am having trouble connecting to the postgres container.
Address 127.0.0.1:5432 does not work.
Address 172.17.0.2:5432 DOES work (172.17.0.2 is the address of the docker container running postgres). However I consider this not portable because I can't guarantee what the postgres container IP will be.
I am aware of the --add-host flag, but it is also asking for the host-ip, which I want to be the localhost (127.0.0.1). Despite several hits on --add-host I wasn't able to get that to work so that the final docker run commands can be the same on any computer they are run on.
I also tried this: docker container port accessed from another container
My situation is that the postgres and myApp will be containers running on the same computer. I would prefer a non-Docker compose solution.
The comment from Truong had me try that approach (again) and I got it working. Here are my steps in case it helps out another. The crux of the problem was needing one container to address another container in a way that was static (didn't change). Using user defined network was the answer, because you can name a container, and thus reference that container IP by that name.
My steps,
docker network create mynet
docker run --net mynet --name mydb -v $(pwd)/datadir:/var/lib/postgresql/data -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=qwerty -d postgres:11
Now the IP address of the postgres database is mydb, and all the ports of this container are exposed to any other container running in this network.
Now add the front end app,
docker run --net mynet -ti -p 80:80 -v mydockerhubaccount/myapp
Ok, I am pretty new to Docker world. So this might be a very basic question.
I have a container running in Docker, which is running RabbitMQ. Let's say the name of this container is "Rabbit-container".
RabbitMQ container was started with this command:
docker run -d -t -i --name rmq -p 5672:5672 rabbitmq:3-management
Python script command with 2 args:
python ~/Documents/myscripts/migrate_data.py amqp://rabbit:5672/ ~/Documents/queue/
Now, I am running a Python script from my host machine, which is creating some messages. I want to send these messages to my "Rabbit-container". Hence I want to connect to this container from my host machine (Mac OSX).
Is this even possible? If yes, how?
Please let me know if more details are needed.
So, I solved it by simply mapping the RMQ listening port to host OS:
docker run -d -t -i --name rmq -p 15672:15672 -p 5672:5672 rabbitmq:3-management
I previously had only -p 15672:15672 in my command. This is mapping the Admin UI from Docker container to my host OS. I added -p 5672:5672, which mapped RabbitMQ listening port from Docker container to host OS.
If you're running this container in your local OSX system then you should find your default docker-machine ip address by running:
docker-machine ip default
Then you can change your python script to point to that address and mapped port on <your_docker_machine_ip>:5672.
That happens because docker runs in a virtualization engine on OSX and Windows, so when you map a port to the host, you're actually mapping it to the virtual machine.
You'd need to run the container with port 5672 exposed, perhaps 15672 as well if you want WebUI, and 5671 if you use SSL, or any other port for which you add tcp listener in rabbitmq.
It would be also easier if you had a specific IP and a host name for the rabbitmq container. To do this, you'd need to create your own docker network
docker network create --subnet=172.18.0.0/16 mynet123
After that start the container like so
docker run -d --net mynet123--ip 172.18.0.11 --hostname rmq1 --name rmq_container_name -p 15673:15672 rabbitmq:3-management
note that with rabbitmq:3-management image the port 5672 is (well, was when I used it) already exposed so no need to do that. --name is for container name, and --hostname obviously for host name.
So now, from your host you can connect to rmq1 rabbitmq server.
You said that you have never used docker-machine before, so i assume you are using the Docker Beta for Mac (you should see the docker-icon in the menu bar at the top).
Your docker run command for rabbit is correct. If you now want to connect to rabbit, you have two options:
Wrap your python script in a new container and link it to rabbit:
docker run -it --rm --name migration --link rmq:rabbit -v ~/Documents/myscripts:/app -w /app python:3 python migrate_data.py
Note that we have to link rmq:rabbit, because you name your container rmq but use rabbit in the script.
Execute your python script on your host machine and use localhost:5672
python ~/Documents/myscripts/migrate_data.py amqp://localhost:5672/ ~/Documents/queue/
I'm using Docker version 1.9.1 build a34a1d5 on an Ubuntu 14.04 server host and I have 4 containers: redis (based on alpine linux 3.2), mongodb (based on alpine linux 3.2), postgres (based on ubuntu 14.04) and the one that will run the application that connects to these other containers (based on alpine linux 3.2). All of the db containers expose their corresponding ports in the Dockerfile.
I did the modifications on the database containers so their services don't bind to the localhost IP but to all addresses. This way I would be able to connect to all of them from the app container.
For the sake of testing, I first ran the database containers and then the app one with a command like the following:
docker run --rm --name app_container --link mongodb_container --link redis_container --link postgres_container -t localhost:5000/app_image
I enter the terminal of the app container and I verify that its /etc/hosts file contains the IP and names of the other containers. Then I am able to ping all the db containers. But I cannot connect to their ports to any of the db containers.
A simple: telnet mongodb_container 27017 simply sits and waits forever, and the same happens if I try to connect to the other db containers. If I run the application, it also complains that it cannot connect to the specified db services.
Important note: I am able to telnet the corresponding ports of all the db containers from the host.
What might be happening?
EDIT: I'll include the run commands for the db containers:
docker run --rm --name mongodb_container -t localhost:5000/mongodb_image
docker run --rm --name redis_container -t localhost:5000/redis_image
docker run --rm --name postgres_container -t localhost:5000/postgres_image
Well, the problem with telnet seems to be related to the telnet client on alpine linux since the following two commands showed me that the ports on the containers were open:
nmap -p27017 172.17.0.3
nc -vz 172.17.0.3 27017
Being focused mainly on the telnet command I issued, I believed that the problem was related to the ports being closed or something; and I overlooked the configuration file on the app that was being used to connect it to the services (it was the wrong filename), my bad.
All works fine now.
Consider:
docker run -p 5000:5000 -v /host/:/host appimage
it forwards 5000 to 50000
even in multiple:
docker run -p 5000:5000 -p 5001:5001 -v /host/:/host appimage
What I want to know is:
docker run -p allports:allports
is there any command available that allows to forward all ports in container? Because in my case I am running flask app. For testing purpose I want to run multiple flask instances. So for each flask instance I want to run it in different ports. This auto multi-port forwarding would help.
You can expose a range of ports using the -p option, for example:
docker run -p 2000-5000:2000-5000 -v /host/:/host appimage
See the docker run reference documentation for more details.
You might have a working set-up by using docker run --net host ..., in which case host's network is directly exposed to the continer and all port bindings are "public". I haven't tested this with multiple containers simultaneously but it might work just fine.
I have found a similar thread, but failed to get it to work. So, the use case is
I start a container on my Linux host
docker run -i -t --privileged -p 8080:2375 mattgruter/doubledocker
When in that container, I want to start another one with GAE SDK devserver running.
At that, I need to access a running app from the host system browser.
When I start a container in the container as
docker run -i -t -p 2375:8080 image/name
I get an error saying that 2375 port is in use. I start the app, and can curl 0.0.0.0:8080 when inside both containers (when using another port 8080:8080 for example) but cannot preview the app from the host system, since lohalhost:8080 listens to 2375 port in the first container, and that port cannot be used when launching the second container.
I'm able to do that using the image jpetazzo/dind. The test I have done and worked (as an example):
From my host machine I run the container with docker installed:
docker run --privileged -t -i --rm -e LOG=file -p 18080:8080
jpetazzo/dind
Then inside the container I've pulled nginx image and run it with
docker run -d -p 8080:80 nginx
And from the host environment I can browse the nginx welcome page with http://localhost:18080
With the image you were using (mattgruter/doubledocker) I have some problem running it (something related to log attach).