If I have a dictionary "dic" like this:
{
"a": {
"b": Any
}
"c": {
"d": Any
}
}
If I want to change the value of key "b", I know I can do it like this:
dic["a"]["b"] = somethingNew
But If the key path is varible, how can I change the value according to the key path? is there some api like this:
dic.updateValueByKeyPath(path: ["a", "b"], updateValue: somethingNew)
Or the idea to achieve this purpose , thanks ~
I recently answered a Q&A that wanted to remove (rather than update) a nested value in a dictionary of nested dictionaries.
Remove nested key from dictionary
We can use a similar approach here: using a recursive method which visits your given key path by repeatedly attempting conversions of (sub-)dictionary values to [Key: Any] dictionaries themselves. The only restriction here is that the Key types much be the same for all dictionaries within the nested dictionary.
Implementation
Recursive "core" function updateValue(_:, inDict:, forKeyPath:) and public updateValue(_:, forKeyPath:) method form key paths on for [Key] (e.g. ["a", "b"] applied to your example):
/* general "key path" extension */
public extension Dictionary {
public mutating func updateValue(_ value: Value, forKeyPath keyPath: [Key])
-> Value? {
let (valInd, newDict) = updateValue(value, inDict: self,
forKeyPath: Array(keyPath.reversed()))
if let dict = newDict as? [Key: Value] { self = dict }
return valInd
}
fileprivate func updateValue(_ value: Value, inDict dict: [Key: Any],
forKeyPath keyPath: [Key]) -> (Value?, [Key: Any]) {
guard let key = keyPath.last else { return (value, dict) }
var dict = dict
if keyPath.count > 1, let subDict = dict[key] as? [Key: Any] {
let (val, newSubDict) = updateValue(value, inDict: subDict,
forKeyPath: Array(keyPath.dropLast()))
dict[key] = newSubDict
return (val, dict)
}
let val = dict.updateValue(value, forKey: key) as? Value
return (val, dict)
}
}
Less general public updateValue(_:, forKeyPath:) method (using the core function above) for keys that conforms to ExpressibleByStringLiteral; key paths on form my.key.path (e.g. "a.b" applied to your example):
/* String literal specific "key path" extension */
public extension Dictionary where Key: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
public mutating func updateValue(_ value: Value, forKeyPath keyPath: String)
-> Value? {
let keyPathArr = keyPath.components(separatedBy: ".")
.reversed().flatMap { $0 as? Key }
if keyPathArr.isEmpty { return self.updateValue(value, forKey: "") }
let (valInd, newDict) = updateValue(value,
inDict: self, forKeyPath:keyPathArr)
if let dict = newDict as? [Key: Value] { self = dict }
return valInd
}
}
Example usage
We'll apply the methods above to the example from the linked thread.
var dict: [String: Any] = [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lat": "35.6895",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "japanese"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
]
Using the ExpressibleByStringLiteral key path method to update the value of an existing key-value pair:
if let oldValue = dict.updateValue("nihongo",
forKeyPath: "countries.japan.language") {
print("Removed old value: ", oldValue)
}
else {
print("Added new key-value pair")
}
print(dict)
/* Removed old value: japanese
[
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "nihongo"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
] */
The same method used to add a new key-value pair at a given key path dictionary:
if let oldValue = dict.updateValue("asia",
forKeyPath: "countries.japan.continent") {
print("Removed old value: ", oldValue)
}
else {
print("Added new key-value pair")
}
print(dict)
/* Added new key-value pair
[
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "nihongo",
"continent": "asia"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
] */
We would get the same result as in the examples above if we used the general [Key] as key path method instead of the ExpressibleByStringLiteral one used above. Using the former, the calls would be changed into:
... = dict.updateValue("nihongo",
forKeyPath: ["countries", "japan", "language"]
... = dict.updateValue("asia",
forKeyPath: ["countries", "japan", "continent"]
Finally note that a call to updateValue using the [Key] as key path method will return nil also in case of an empty array being passed as argument ([]). This could possibly be changed to a throwing case, as a nil return above should tell us that a new key-value pair was added (as inspired by the updateValue(_:, forKey:) method in stdlib).
Performance?
The methods above will make use of some (sub-)dictionary copying along the way, but unless you're working with huge dictionaries, this shouldn't be an issue. Anyhow, no need to worry about performance until a profiler tells you have a bottleneck.
Related
I have the following code and I want to add the likes and retweets, only if the likes are not nil. I came up with the following code but was wondering if there is a better way.
func toDictionary() -> [String: Any] {
var tweetDict = ["userId": userId, "text": text, "dateCreated": dateCreated, "dateUpdated": dateUpdated] as [String : Any]
if let likes {
tweetDict["likes"] = likes
}
if let retweets {
tweetDict["retweets"] = retweets
}
return tweetDict
}
I can initialize likes and retweets to be an empty array but then when I save it in Firebase it create an empty array in Firestore database. I think that extra key in Firebase will take up little space even though it is empty (unless my understanding is wrong) and I am not sure if storing empty array in Firebase is a good idea.
Simplest I can think of is add an extension to dictionary:
extension Dictionary {
mutating func updateValueIfNotNil(_ value: Value?, forKey: Key) {
guard let value = value else {
return
}
updateValue(value, forKey: forKey)
}
}
If the provided value is nil, it's ignored, otherwise normal updateValue is performed (which is the same as assigning a value):
var tweetDict = ["userId": "aa", "text": "bb", "dateCreated": Date(), "dateUpdated": Date()] as [String : Any]
let notNil = "something"
let isNil: String? = nil
tweetDict.updateValueIfNotNil(notNil, forKey: "retweets")
tweetDict.updateValueIfNotNil(isNil, forKey: "likes")
print(tweetDict)
would print
["userId": "aa", "text": "bb", "dateCreated": 2022-07-13 20:13:46 +0000, "dateUpdated": 2022-07-13 20:13:46 +0000, "retweets": "something"]
(i.e. "likes" were not added, since their value is nil)
I need to create a dictionary from array with custom type for first index of the array.
Sample array : ["ABC","ZYZ","123"]
Required result : [{"name" : "ABC", "type:"A"},{"name" : "ZYZ", "type:"B"},{"name" : "123", "type:"B"}]
Note type A for first index.
My code
for url in urlArray {
urlDict["name"] = url
}
You can do a map, and then individually change the type of the first dictionary:
var dicts = urlArray.map { ["name": $0, "type": "B"] }
dicts[0]["type"] = "A"
Seeing how all your dictionary keys are all the same, and that you are sending this to a server, a Codable struct might be a better choice.
struct NameThisProperly : Codable {
var name: String
var type: String
}
var result = urlArray.map { NameThisProperly(name: $0, type: "B") }
result[0].type = "A"
do {
let data = try JSONDecoder().encode(result)
// you can now send this data to server
} catch let error {
...
}
I suppose you can use a high order function such as map or reduce
Here is an example using reduce
var array = ["ABC","ZYZ","123"]
var result = array.reduce([[String: String]](), { (previous, current) -> [[String: String]] in
let type = previous.count == 0 ? "A" : "B"
let dictForCurrent = [
"name": current,
"type": type
]
return previous + [dictForCurrent]
})
print(result)
The result:
[["type": "A", "name": "ABC"], ["type": "B", "name": "ZYZ"], ["name":
"123", "type": "B"]]
Use reduce to convert array to dictionary:
let resultDict: [String: String]
= array.reduce(into: [:]) { dict, url in
dict["name"] = url
}
The result will look like:
[
"name": URL1,
"name": URL2
]
Use map(_:) to convert each element of the array to dictionary like so,
let arr = ["ABC","ZYZ","123"]
let result = arr.map { (element) -> [String:String] in
var dict = [String:String]()
dict["name"] = element
if let char = element.first {
dict["type"] = String(char)
}
return dict
}
print(result)
since you are concern about the index, my approach will be using enumerated() which gives out the index
let array = ["ABC","ZYZ","123"]
var results: [[String: String]] = []
for (i, content) in array.enumerated() {
let type: String = i == 0 ? "A" : "B"
results.append(["name": content, "type": type])
}
print(result)
// [["type": "A", "name": "ABC"], ["name": "ZYZ", "type": "B"], ["type": "B", "name": "123"]]
I have data from server like
[
{
"id": 1,
"name": "16",
"children": "",
"products": [
{...},
{...}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "17",
"children": "",
"products": [
{...},
{...}
]
}
]
so I save it like [[String: Any]], and Any is because there can be Int, String or Dict at the values.
The point is that "children" key can be NSConstantstring and can be casted to String, and also it can be NSArray and can be casted to [[String: Any]] too. So I need to find a way to detect type of that value. But all I tried caused error.
How can i fix this?
UPD
not much code)
inside alamofire response:
let data = responseJSON.result.value! as! [String: Any]
let subCategory = data["children"] as! [[String: Any]]
//check
for item in subCategory {
print(type(of: item["children"]!))//__NSArrayI or __NSCFConstantString
}
if I try something like print(type(of: item["children"] as! String)) it prints String if there is __NSCFConstantString, but if not - it crashes with error Could not cast value of type '__NSArrayI' (0x10934fe48) to 'NSString' (0x1083e8568)
UPD 2
there is no problem with data, all parsed and save correctly and printing out correctly too
You can just cast value from dictionary to needed type:
if let string = dictionary["children"] as? String {
// Do something with string
} else if array = dictionary["children"] as? [Any] {
// Do something with array
}
Let's say I have a rather complex dictionary, like this one:
let dict: [String: Any] = [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lat": "35.6895",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "japanese"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
]
I can access all fields with if let .. blocks optionally casting to something that I can work with, when reading.
However, I am currently writing unit tests where I need to selectively break dictionaries in multiple ways.
But I don't know how to elegantly remove keys from the dictionary.
For example I want to remove the key "japan" in one test, in the next "lat" should be nil.
Here's my current implementation for removing "lat":
if var countries = dict["countries"] as? [String: Any],
var japan = countries["japan"] as? [String: Any],
var capital = japan["capital"] as? [String: Any]
{
capital.removeValue(forKey: "lat")
japan["capital"] = capital
countries["japan"] = japan
dictWithoutLat["countries"] = countries
}
Surely there must be a more elegant way?
Ideally I'd write a test helper that takes a KVC string and has a signature like:
func dictWithoutKeyPath(_ path: String) -> [String: Any]
In the "lat" case I'd call it with dictWithoutKeyPath("countries.japan.capital.lat").
When working with a subscript, if the subscript is get/set and the variable is mutable, then the entire expression is mutable. However, due to the type cast the expression "loses" the mutability. (It's not an l-value anymore).
The shortest way to solve this is by creating a subscript that is get/set and does the conversion for you.
extension Dictionary {
subscript(jsonDict key: Key) -> [String:Any]? {
get {
return self[key] as? [String:Any]
}
set {
self[key] = newValue as? Value
}
}
}
Now you can write the following:
dict[jsonDict: "countries"]?[jsonDict: "japan"]?[jsonDict: "capital"]?["name"] = "berlin"
We liked this question so much that we decided to make a (public) Swift Talk episode about it: mutating untyped dictionaries
I'd to like to follow up on my previous answer with another solution. This one extends Swift's Dictionary type with a new subscript that takes a key path.
I first introduce a new type named KeyPath to represent a key path. It's not strictly necessary, but it makes working with key paths much easier because it lets us wrap the logic of splitting a key path into its components.
import Foundation
/// Represents a key path.
/// Can be initialized with a string of the form "this.is.a.keypath"
///
/// We can't use Swift's #keyPath syntax because it checks at compilet time
/// if the key path exists.
struct KeyPath {
var elements: [String]
var isEmpty: Bool { return elements.isEmpty }
var count: Int { return elements.count }
var path: String {
return elements.joined(separator: ".")
}
func headAndTail() -> (String, KeyPath)? {
guard !isEmpty else { return nil }
var tail = elements
let head = tail.removeFirst()
return (head, KeyPath(elements: tail))
}
}
extension KeyPath {
init(_ string: String) {
elements = string.components(separatedBy: ".")
}
}
extension KeyPath: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
init(stringLiteral value: String) {
self.init(value)
}
init(unicodeScalarLiteral value: String) {
self.init(value)
}
init(extendedGraphemeClusterLiteral value: String) {
self.init(value)
}
}
Next I create a dummy protocol named StringProtocol that we later need to constrain our Dictionary extension. Swift 3.0 doesn't yet support extensions on generic types that constrain a generic parameter to a concrete type (such as extension Dictionary where Key == String). Support for this is planned for Swift 4.0, but until then, we need this little workaround:
// We need this because Swift 3.0 doesn't support extension Dictionary where Key == String
protocol StringProtocol {
init(string s: String)
}
extension String: StringProtocol {
init(string s: String) {
self = s
}
}
Now we can write the new subscripts. The implementation for the getter and setter are fairly long, but they should be straightforward: we traverse the key path from beginning to end and then get/set the value at that position:
// We want extension Dictionary where Key == String, but that's not supported yet,
// so work around it with Key: StringProtocol.
extension Dictionary where Key: StringProtocol {
subscript(keyPath keyPath: KeyPath) -> Any? {
get {
guard let (head, remainingKeyPath) = keyPath.headAndTail() else {
return nil
}
let key = Key(string: head)
let value = self[key]
switch remainingKeyPath.isEmpty {
case true:
// Reached the end of the key path
return value
case false:
// Key path has a tail we need to traverse
switch value {
case let nestedDict as [Key: Any]:
// Next nest level is a dictionary
return nestedDict[keyPath: remainingKeyPath]
default:
// Next nest level isn't a dictionary: invalid key path, abort
return nil
}
}
}
set {
guard let (head, remainingKeyPath) = keyPath.headAndTail() else {
return
}
let key = Key(string: head)
// Assign new value if we reached the end of the key path
guard !remainingKeyPath.isEmpty else {
self[key] = newValue as? Value
return
}
let value = self[key]
switch value {
case var nestedDict as [Key: Any]:
// Key path has a tail we need to traverse
nestedDict[keyPath: remainingKeyPath] = newValue
self[key] = nestedDict as? Value
default:
// Invalid keyPath
return
}
}
}
}
And this is how it looks in use:
var dict: [String: Any] = [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lat": "35.6895",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "japanese"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
]
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan"] // ["language": "japanese", "capital": ["lat": "35.6895", "name": "tokyo", "lon": "139.6917"]]
dict[keyPath: "countries.someothercountry"] // nil
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital"] // ["lat": "35.6895", "name": "tokyo", "lon": "139.6917"]
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital.name"] // "tokyo"
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital.name"] = "Edo"
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital.name"] // "Edo"
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital"] // ["lat": "35.6895", "name": "Edo", "lon": "139.6917"]
I really like this solution. It's quite a lot of code, but you only have to write it once and I think it looks very nice in use.
You could construct recursive methods (read/write) which visits your given key path by repeatedly attempting conversions of (sub-)dictionary values to [Key: Any] dictionaries themselves. Moreover, allow public access to these methods via a new subscript.
Note that you might have to explicitly import Foundation for access to the components(separatedBy:) method of String (bridged).
extension Dictionary {
subscript(keyPath keyPath: String) -> Any? {
get {
guard let keyPath = Dictionary.keyPathKeys(forKeyPath: keyPath)
else { return nil }
return getValue(forKeyPath: keyPath)
}
set {
guard let keyPath = Dictionary.keyPathKeys(forKeyPath: keyPath),
let newValue = newValue else { return }
self.setValue(newValue, forKeyPath: keyPath)
}
}
static private func keyPathKeys(forKeyPath: String) -> [Key]? {
let keys = forKeyPath.components(separatedBy: ".")
.reversed().flatMap({ $0 as? Key })
return keys.isEmpty ? nil : keys
}
// recursively (attempt to) access queried subdictionaries
// (keyPath will never be empty here; the explicit unwrapping is safe)
private func getValue(forKeyPath keyPath: [Key]) -> Any? {
guard let value = self[keyPath.last!] else { return nil }
return keyPath.count == 1 ? value : (value as? [Key: Any])
.flatMap { $0.getValue(forKeyPath: Array(keyPath.dropLast())) }
}
// recursively (attempt to) access the queried subdictionaries to
// finally replace the "inner value", given that the key path is valid
private mutating func setValue(_ value: Any, forKeyPath keyPath: [Key]) {
guard self[keyPath.last!] != nil else { return }
if keyPath.count == 1 {
(value as? Value).map { self[keyPath.last!] = $0 }
}
else if var subDict = self[keyPath.last!] as? [Key: Value] {
subDict.setValue(value, forKeyPath: Array(keyPath.dropLast()))
(subDict as? Value).map { self[keyPath.last!] = $0 }
}
}
}
Example setup
// your example dictionary
var dict: [String: Any] = [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lat": "35.6895",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "japanese"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
]
Example usage:
// read value for a given key path
let isNil: Any = "nil"
print(dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.capital.name"] ?? isNil) // tokyo
print(dict[keyPath: "airports"] ?? isNil) // ["germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]]
print(dict[keyPath: "this.is.not.a.valid.key.path"] ?? isNil) // nil
// write value for a given key path
dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.language"] = "nihongo"
print(dict[keyPath: "countries.japan.language"] ?? isNil) // nihongo
dict[keyPath: "airports.germany"] =
(dict[keyPath: "airports.germany"] as? [Any] ?? []) + ["FOO"]
dict[keyPath: "this.is.not.a.valid.key.path"] = "notAdded"
print(dict)
/* [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lon": "139.6917",
"lat": "35.6895"
],
"language": "nihongo"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL", "FOO"]
]
] */
Note that if a supplied key path does not exist for an assignment (using setter), this will not result in the construction of the equivalent nested dictionary, but simply result in no mutation of the dictionary.
Interesting question. The problem seems to be that Swift's optional chaining mechanism, which is normally capable of mutating nested dictionaries, trips over the necessary type casts from Any to [String:Any]. So while accessing a nested element becomes only unreadable (because of the typecasts):
// E.g. Accessing countries.japan.capital
((dict["countries"] as? [String:Any])?["japan"] as? [String:Any])?["capital"]
… mutating a nested element doesn't even work:
// Want to mutate countries.japan.capital.name.
// The typecasts destroy the mutating optional chaining.
((((dict["countries"] as? [String:Any])?["japan"] as? [String:Any])?["capital"] as? [String:Any])?["name"] as? String) = "Edo"
// Error: Cannot assign to immutable expression
Possible Solution
The idea is to get rid of the untyped dictionary and convert it into a strongly typed structure where each element has the same type. I admit that this is a heavy-handed solution, but it works quite well in the end.
An enum with associated values would work well for our custom type that replaces the untyped dictionary:
enum KeyValueStore {
case dict([String: KeyValueStore])
case array([KeyValueStore])
case string(String)
// Add more cases for Double, Int, etc.
}
The enum has one case for each expected element type. The three cases cover your example, but it could easily be expanded to cover more types.
Next, we define two subscripts, one for keyed access to a dictionary (with strings) and one for indexed access to an array (with integers). The subscripts check if self is a .dict or .array respectively and if so return the value at the given key/index. They return nil if the type doesn't match, e.g. if you tried to access a key of a .string value. The subscripts also have setters. This is key to make chained mutation work:
extension KeyValueStore {
subscript(_ key: String) -> KeyValueStore? {
// If self is a .dict, return the value at key, otherwise return nil.
get {
switch self {
case .dict(let d):
return d[key]
default:
return nil
}
}
// If self is a .dict, mutate the value at key, otherwise ignore.
set {
switch self {
case .dict(var d):
d[key] = newValue
self = .dict(d)
default:
break
}
}
}
subscript(_ index: Int) -> KeyValueStore? {
// If self is an array, return the element at index, otherwise return nil.
get {
switch self {
case .array(let a):
return a[index]
default:
return nil
}
}
// If self is an array, mutate the element at index, otherwise return nil.
set {
switch self {
case .array(var a):
if let v = newValue {
a[index] = v
} else {
a.remove(at: index)
}
self = .array(a)
default:
break
}
}
}
}
Lastly, we add some convenience initializers for initializing our type with dictionary, array or string literals. These are not strictly necessary, but make working with the type easier:
extension KeyValueStore: ExpressibleByDictionaryLiteral {
init(dictionaryLiteral elements: (String, KeyValueStore)...) {
var dict: [String: KeyValueStore] = [:]
for (key, value) in elements {
dict[key] = value
}
self = .dict(dict)
}
}
extension KeyValueStore: ExpressibleByArrayLiteral {
init(arrayLiteral elements: KeyValueStore...) {
self = .array(elements)
}
}
extension KeyValueStore: ExpressibleByStringLiteral {
init(stringLiteral value: String) {
self = .string(value)
}
init(extendedGraphemeClusterLiteral value: String) {
self = .string(value)
}
init(unicodeScalarLiteral value: String) {
self = .string(value)
}
}
And here's the example:
var keyValueStore: KeyValueStore = [
"countries": [
"japan": [
"capital": [
"name": "tokyo",
"lat": "35.6895",
"lon": "139.6917"
],
"language": "japanese"
]
],
"airports": [
"germany": ["FRA", "MUC", "HAM", "TXL"]
]
]
// Now optional chaining works:
keyValueStore["countries"]?["japan"]?["capital"]?["name"] // .some(.string("tokyo"))
keyValueStore["countries"]?["japan"]?["capital"]?["name"] = "Edo"
keyValueStore["countries"]?["japan"]?["capital"]?["name"] // .some(.string("Edo"))
keyValueStore["airports"]?["germany"]?[1] // .some(.string("MUC"))
keyValueStore["airports"]?["germany"]?[1] = "BER"
keyValueStore["airports"]?["germany"]?[1] // .some(.string("BER"))
// Remove value from array by assigning nil. I'm not sure if this makes sense.
keyValueStore["airports"]?["germany"]?[1] = nil
keyValueStore["airports"]?["germany"] // .some(array([.string("FRA"), .string("HAM"), .string("TXL")]))
Pass your dictionary to this function, It will return you a flat dictionary, without any nested dict incorporated .
//SWIFT 3.0
func concatDict( dict: [String: Any])-> [String: Any]{
var dict = dict
for (parentKey, parentValue) in dict{
if let insideDict = parentValue as? [String: Any]{
let keys = insideDict.keys.map{
return parentKey + $0
}
for (key, value) in zip(keys, insideDict.values) {
dict[key] = value
}
dict[parentKey] = nil
dict = concatDict(dict: dict)
}
}
return dict
}
This is on XCode 7.3.
If I build the code with optimization flag -O, it will be crashed. It is working properly without optimization (flag -Onone). However I want to have my code built with optimization.
Is it Swift compiler bug?
This is the code.
import Foundation
extension Dictionary where Key: StringLiteralConvertible, Value: AnyObject {
func multipartFormParams(preFix preFix: String = "") -> [String: AnyObject] {
var params: [String: AnyObject] = [:]
for (key, value) in self {
let subKey = preFix != "" ? "\(preFix)[\(key)]" : String(key)
if let value = value as? [String: AnyObject] {
// params += value.multipartFormParams(preFix: subKey) // this is my original code, however remove the operation extension += to focus on the bug.
value.multipartFormParams(preFix: subKey) // It crash here.
} else {
params[subKey] = value
}
}
return params
}
}
let parameters: [String: AnyObject] = [
"user": [
"first_name": "first",
"last_name": "last"
]
]
parameters.multipartFormParams()
After a while, I found that this is related to this bug: https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1114, change for (key, value) in self { to forEach { key, value in solved the problem.
Full working version:
import Foundation
extension Dictionary where Key: StringLiteralConvertible, Value: AnyObject {
func multipartFormParams(preFix preFix: String = "") -> [String: AnyObject] {
var params: [String: AnyObject] = [:]
forEach { key, value in
let subKey = preFix != "" ? "\(preFix)[\(key)]" : String(key)
if let value = value as? [String: AnyObject] {
// params += value.multipartFormParams(preFix: subKey) // this is my original code, however remove the operation extension += to focus on the bug.
value.multipartFormParams(preFix: subKey) // It crash here.
} else {
params[subKey] = value
}
}
return params
}
}
let parameters: [String: AnyObject] = [
"user": [
"first_name": "first",
"last_name": "last"
]
]
parameters.multipartFormParams()