Related
I have following three array of hashes.
customer_mapping = [
{:customer_id=>"a", :customer_order_id=>"g1"},
{:customer_id=>"b", :customer_order_id=>"g2"},
{:customer_id=>"c", :customer_order_id=>"g3"},
{:customer_id=>"d", :customer_order_id=>"g4"},
{:customer_id=>"e", :customer_order_id=>"g5"}
]
customer_with_products = [
{:customer_order_id=>"g1", :product_order_id=>"a1"},
{:customer_order_id=>"g2", :product_order_id=>"a2"},
{:customer_order_id=>"g3", :product_order_id=>"a3"},
{:customer_order_id=>"g4", :product_order_id=>"a4"},
{:customer_order_id=>"g5", :product_order_id=>"a5"}
]
product_mapping = [
{:product_id=>"j", :product_order_id=>"a1"},
{:product_id=>"k", :product_order_id=>"a2"},
{:product_id=>"l", :product_order_id=>"a3"}
]
What i want is a new hash with only customer_id and product_id
{:product_id=>"j", :customer_id=>"a"},
{:product_id=>"k", :customer_id=>"b"},
{:product_id=>"l", :customer_id=>"c"}
I tried to loop over product_mapping and select the customer_order_id that match product_order_id in customer_with_products and then thought of looping over customer_mapping but not able to get desired output from the first step.
How can i achieve this?
Using
def merge_by(a,b, key)
(a+b).group_by { |h| h[key] }
.each_value.map { |arr| arr.inject(:merge) }
end
merge_by(
merge_by(customer_mapping, customer_with_products, :customer_order_id),
product_mapping,
:product_order_id
).select { |h| h[:product_id] }.map { |h| h.slice(:product_id, :customer_id) }
#=>[{:product_id=>"j", :customer_id=>"a"},
# {:product_id=>"k", :customer_id=>"b"},
# {:product_id=>"l", :customer_id=>"c"}]
Definitely not the cleanest solution, if your initial arrays come from SQL queries, I think those queries could be modified to aggregate your data properly.
merge_by(customer_mapping, customer_with_products, :customer_order_id)
# => [{:customer_id=>"a", :customer_order_id=>"g1", :product_order_id=>"a1"},
# {:customer_id=>"b", :customer_order_id=>"g2", :product_order_id=>"a2"},
# {:customer_id=>"c", :customer_order_id=>"g3", :product_order_id=>"a3"},
# {:customer_id=>"d", :customer_order_id=>"g4", :product_order_id=>"a4"},
# {:customer_id=>"e", :customer_order_id=>"g5", :product_order_id=>"a5"}]
Then merge it similarly with your last array and cleanup the result selecting only the elements for which :product_id was found, slicing wanted keys.
Alternatively, a much more readable solution, depending on your array sizes might be slower as it keeps iterating over the hashes:
product_mapping.map do |hc|
b_match = customer_with_products.detect { |hb| hb[:product_order_id] == hc[:product_order_id] }
a_match = customer_mapping.detect { |ha| ha[:customer_order_id] == b_match[:customer_order_id] }
[hc, a_match, b_match].inject(:merge)
end.map { |h| h.slice(:product_id, :customer_id) }
Following your handling of the problem the solution would be the following:
result_hash_array = product_mapping.map do |product_mapping_entry|
customer_receipt = customer_with_products.find do |customer_with_products_entry|
product_mapping_entry[:product_order_id] == customer_with_products_entry[:product_order_id]
end
customer_id = customer_mapping.find do |customer_mapping_entry|
customer_receipt[:customer_order_id] == customer_mapping_entry[:customer_order_id]
end[:customer_id]
{product_id: product_mapping_entry[:product_id], customer_id: customer_id}
end
Output
results_hash_array => [{:product_id=>"j", :customer_id=>"a"},
{:product_id=>"k", :customer_id=>"b"},
{:product_id=>"l", :customer_id=>"c"}]
Other option, starting from customer_mapping, one liner (but quite wide):
customer_mapping.map { |e| {customer_id: e[:customer_id], product_id: (product_mapping.detect { |k| k[:product_order_id] == (customer_with_products.detect{ |h| h[:customer_order_id] == e[:customer_order_id] } || {} )[:product_order_id] } || {} )[:product_id] } }
#=> [{:customer_id=>"a", :product_id=>"j"},
# {:customer_id=>"b", :product_id=>"k"},
# {:customer_id=>"c", :product_id=>"l"},
# {:customer_id=>"d", :product_id=>nil},
# {:customer_id=>"e", :product_id=>nil}]
cust_order_id_to_cust_id =
customer_mapping.each_with_object({}) do |g,h|
h[g[:customer_order_id]] = g[:customer_id]
end
#=> {"g1"=>"a", "g2"=>"b", "g3"=>"c", "g4"=>"d", "g5"=>"e"}
prod_order_id_to_cust_order_id =
customer_with_products.each_with_object({}) do |g,h|
h[g[:product_order_id]] = g[:customer_order_id]
end
#=> {"a1"=>"g1", "a2"=>"g2", "a3"=>"g3", "a4"=>"g4", "a5"=>"g5"}
product_mapping.map do |h|
{ product_id: h[:product_id], customer_id:
cust_order_id_to_cust_id[prod_order_id_to_cust_order_id[h[:product_order_id]]] }
end
#=> [{:product_id=>"j", :customer_id=>"a"},
# {:product_id=>"k", :customer_id=>"b"},
# {:product_id=>"l", :customer_id=>"c"}]
This formulation is particularly easy to test. (It's so straightforward that no debugging was needed).
I would recommended to rather take a longer but more readable solution which you also understand in some months from now by looking at it. Use full names for the hash keys instead of hiding them behind k, v for more complexe lookups (maybe its just my personal preference).
I would suggest somethink like:
result = product_mapping.map do |mapping|
customer_id = customer_mapping.find do |hash|
hash[:customer_order_id] == customer_with_products.find do |hash|
hash[:product_order_id] == mapping[:product_order_id]
end[:customer_order_id]
end[:customer_id]
{ product_id: mapping[:product_id], customer_id: customer_id }
end
Given data:
data = [
{"id":14, "sort":1, "content":"9", foo: "2022"},
{"id":14, "sort":4, "content":"5", foo: "2022"},
{"id":14, "sort":2, "content":"1", foo: "2022"},
{"id":14, "sort":3, "content":"0", foo: "2022"},
{"id":15, "sort":4, "content":"4", foo: "2888"},
{"id":15, "sort":2, "content":"1", foo: "2888"},
{"id":15, "sort":1, "content":"3", foo: "2888"},
{"id":15, "sort":3, "content":"3", foo: "2888"},
{"id":16, "sort":1, "content":"8", foo: "3112"},
{"id":16, "sort":3, "content":"4", foo: "3112"},
{"id":16, "sort":2, "content":"4", foo: "3112"},
{"id":16, "sort":4, "content":"9", foo: "3112"}
]
Got the contents concatenated by their sort and ids with:
formatted = data.group_by { |d| d[:id]}.transform_values do |value_array|
value_array.sort_by { |b| b[:sort] }
.map { |c| c[:content] }.join
end
puts formatted
#=> {14=>"9105", 15=>"3134", 16=>"8449"}
I know that foo exists inside value_array but wondering how can I include foo to exist inside the formatted variable so I can map through it to get the desired output or if it's possible?
Desired Output:
[
{"id":14, "concated_value":"9105", foo: "2022"},
{"id":15, "concated_value":"3134", foo: "2888"},
{"id":16, "concated_value":"8449", foo: "3112"}
]
Since :foo is unique to :id. You can do this as follows:
data.group_by {|h| h[:id]}.map do |_,sa|
sa.map(&:dup).sort_by {|h| h.delete(:sort) }.reduce do |m,h|
m.merge(h) {|key,old,new| key == :content ? old + new : old }
end.tap {|h| h[:concated_value] = h.delete(:content) }
end
#=> [
# {"id":14, foo: "2022", "concated_value":"9105"},
# {"id":15, foo: "2888", "concated_value":"3134"},
# {"id":16, foo: "3112", "concated_value":"8449"}
# ]
First we group by id. group_by {|h| h[:id]}
Then we dup the hashes in the groups (so as not to destory the original). map(&:dup)
Then we sort by sort and delete it at the same time. .sort_by {|h| h.delete(:sort) }
Then we merge the groups together and concatenate the content key only.
m.merge(h) {|key,old,new| key == :content ? old + new : old }
Then we just change the key for content to concated_value tap {|h| h[:concated_value] = h.delete(:content) }
We can use first value from value_array to get our :id & :foo values
formatted = data.group_by { |d| d[:id]}.values.map do |value_array|
concated_value = value_array.sort_by { |b| b[:sort] }
.map { |c| c[:content] }.join
value_array.first.slice(:id, :foo)
.merge concated_value: concated_value
end
I think this is a good usecase for reduce, since after grouping you need first to get rid of the ID in the resulting [ID, VALUES] array from group_by and just return a reduced version of the VALUES part - this can all be done without any ActiveSupport etc. dependencies:
data
.group_by{ |d| d[:id] } # Get an array of [ID, [VALUES]]
.reduce([]) do |a, v| # Reduce it into a new empty array
# Append a new hash to the new array
a << {
id: v[1].first[:id], # Just take the ID of the first entry
foo: v[1].first[:foo], # Dito for foo
concatenated: v[1]
.sort_by{ |s| s[:sort] } # now sort all hashes by its sort key
.collect{ |s| s[:content] } # collect the content
.join # and merge it into a string
}
end
Output:
[{:id=>14, :foo=>"2022", :concatenated=>"9105"},
{:id=>15, :foo=>"2888", :concatenated=>"3134"},
{:id=>16, :foo=>"3112", :concatenated=>"8449"}]
EDIT
I had some other approach in mind when i started to write the previous solution, reduce was not really necessary, since the size of the array after group_by does not change, so a map is sufficient.
But while rewriting the code, i was thinking that creating a new hash with all the keys and copying all the values from the first hash within VALUES was a bit too much work, so it would be easier to just reject the overhead keys:
keys_to_ignore = [:sort, :content]
data
.group_by{ |d| d[:id] } # Get an array of [ID, [VALUES]]
.map do |v|
v[1]
.first # Take the first hash from [VALUES]
.merge({'concatenated': v[1] # Insert the concatenated values
.sort_by{ |s| s[:sort] } # now sort all hashes by its sort key
.collect{ |s| s[:content] } # collect the content
.join # and merge it into a string
})
.select { |k, _| !keys_to_ignore.include? k }
end
Output
[{:id=>14, :foo=>"2022", :concatenated=>"9105"},
{:id=>15, :foo=>"2888", :concatenated=>"3134"},
{:id=>16, :foo=>"3112", :concatenated=>"8449"}]
Online demo here
This will work even without Rails:
$irb> formatted = []
$irb> data.sort_by!{|a| a[:sort]}.map {|z| z[:id]}.uniq.each_with_index { |id, index| formatted << {id: id, concated_value: data.map{|c| (c[:id] == id ? c[:content] : nil)}.join, foo: data[index][:foo]}}
$irb> formatted
[{:id=>14, :concated_value=>"9105", :foo=>"2022"},
{:id=>15, :concated_value=>"3134", :foo=>"2888"},
{:id=>16, :concated_value=>"8449", :foo=>"3112"}]
data.sort_by { |h| h[:sort] }.
each_with_object({}) do |g,h| h.update(g[:id]=>{ id: g[:id],
concatenated_value: g[:content].to_s, foo: g[:foo] }) { |_,o,n|
o.merge(concatenated_value: o[:concatenated_value]+n[:concatenated_value]) }
end.values
#=> [{:id=>14, :concatenated_value=>"9105", :foo=>"2022"},
# {:id=>15, :concatenated_value=>"3134", :foo=>"2888"},
# {:id=>16, :concatenated_value=>"8449", :foo=>"3112"}]
This uses the form of Hash#update (aka merge!) that employs a block to determine the values of keys (here the value of :id) that are present in both hashes being merged. See the doc for the description of the three block variables (here _, o and n).
Note the receiver of values (at the end) is the following.
{ 14=>{ :id=>14, :concatenated_value=>"9105", :foo=>"2022" },
15=>{ :id=>15, :concatenated_value=>"3134", :foo=>"2888" },
16=>{ :id=>16, :concatenated_value=>"8449", :foo=>"3112" } }
Given an array of hashes, I want to create a method that returns a hash where the keys are the unique values of the hashes in the array.
For example, I'd like to take
[
{foo: 'bar', baz: 'bang'},
{foo: 'rab', baz: 'bang'},
{foo: 'bizz', baz: 'buzz'}
]
and return
{
foo: ['bar', 'rab', 'bizz'],
baz: ['bang', 'buzz']
}
I am currently accomplishing this using:
def my_fantastic_method(data)
response_data = { foo: [], baz: []}
data.each { |data|
data.attributes.each { |key, value|
response_data[key.to_sym] << value
}
}
response_data.each { |key, value| response_data[key] = response_data[key].uniq }
response_data
end
Is there a more elegant way of doing this? Thanks!
Your current approach is already pretty good; I don't see much room for improvement. I would write it like this:
def my_fantastic_method(data_list)
data_list.each_with_object(Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = Set.new }) do |data, result|
data.attributes.each do |key, value|
result[key.to_sym] << value
end
end
end
By setting a default value on each hash value, I have eliminated the need to explicitly declare foo: [], bar: [].
By using each_with_object, I have eliminated the need to declare a local variable and explicitly return it at the end.
By using Set, there is no need to call uniq on the final result. This requires less code, and is more performant. However, if you really want the final result to be a mapping to Arrays rather than Sets, then you would need to call to_a on each value at the end of the method.
I have used different variable names for data_list and data. Call these whatever you like, but it's typically considered bad practice to shadow outer variables.
Here are a couple of one-liners. (I'm pretty sure #eiko was being facetious, but I'm proving him correct)
This one reads well and is easy to follow (caveat: requires Ruby 2.4+ for transform_values):
array.flat_map(&:entries).group_by(&:first).transform_values{|v| v.map(&:last).uniq}
Here's another, using the block form of merge to specify an alternate merge method, which in this case is combining the values into a uniq array:
array.reduce{|h, el| h.merge(el){|k, old, new| ([old]+[new]).flatten.uniq}}
You already have a pretty good answer, but I felt golfy and so here is a shorter one:
def the_combiner(a)
hash = {}
a.map(&:to_a).flatten(1).each do |k,v|
hash[k] ||= []
hash[k].push(v)
end
hash
end
Try this:
array.flat_map(&:entries)
.group_by(&:first)
.map{|k,v| {k => v.map(&:last)} }
OR
a.inject({}) {|old_h, new_h|
new_h.each_pair {|k, v|
old_h.key?(k) ? old_h[k] << v : old_h[k]=[v]};
old_h}
If, as in the example, all hashes have the same keys, you could do as follows.
arr = [{ foo: 'bar', baz: 'bang' },
{ foo: 'rab', baz: 'bang' },
{ foo: 'bizz', baz: 'buzz' }]
keys = arr.first.keys
keys.zip(arr.map { |h| h.values_at(*keys) }.transpose.map(&:uniq)).to_h
#=> {:foo=>["bar", "rab", "bizz"], :baz=>["bang", "buzz"]}
The steps are as follows.
keys = arr.first.keys
#=> [:foo, :baz]
a = arr.map { |h| h.values_at(*keys) }
#=> [["bar", "bang"], ["rab", "bang"], ["bizz", "buzz"]]
b = a.transpose
#=> [["bar", "rab", "bizz"], ["bang", "bang", "buzz"]]
c = b.map(&:uniq)
#=> [["bar", "rab", "bizz"], ["bang", "buzz"]]
d = c.to_h
#=> <array of hashes shown above>
I have an array of hashes, something like
[ {:type=>"Meat", :name=>"one"},
{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"two"},
{:type=>"Fruit", :name=>"four"} ]
and I want to convert it to this
{ "Meat" => ["one", "two"], "Fruit" => ["Four"]}
I tried group_by but then i got this
{ "Meat" => [{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"one"}, {:type=>"Meat", :name=>"two"}],
"Fruit" => [{:type=>"Fruit", :name=>"four"}] }
and then I can't modify it to leave just the name and not the full hash. I need to do this in one line because is for a grouped_options_for_select on a Rails form.
array.group_by{|h| h[:type]}.each{|_, v| v.replace(v.map{|h| h[:name]})}
# => {"Meat"=>["one", "two"], "Fruit"=>["four"]}
Following steenslag's suggestion:
array.group_by{|h| h[:type]}.each{|_, v| v.map!{|h| h[:name]}}
# => {"Meat"=>["one", "two"], "Fruit"=>["four"]}
In a single iteration over initial array:
arry.inject(Hash.new([])) { |h, a| h[a[:type]] += [a[:name]]; h }
Using ActiveSuport's Hash#transform_values:
array.group_by{ |h| h[:type] }.transform_values{ |hs| hs.map{ |h| h[:name] } }
#=> {"Meat"=>["one", "two"], "Fruit"=>["four"]}
array = [{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"one"}, {:type=>"Meat", :name=>"two"}, {:type=>"Fruit", :name=>"four"}]
array.inject({}) {|memo, value| (memo[value[:type]] ||= []) << value[:name]; memo}
I would do as below :
hsh =[{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"one"}, {:type=>"Meat", :name=>"two"}, {:type=>"Fruit", :name=>"four"}]
p Hash[hsh.group_by{|h| h[:type] }.map{|k,v| [k,v.map{|h|h[:name]}]}]
# >> {"Meat"=>["one", "two"], "Fruit"=>["four"]}
#ArupRakshit answer, slightly modified (the function has been added for sake of clarity in the final example):
def group(list, by, at)
list.group_by { |h| h[by] }.map { |k,v| [ k , v.map {|h| h[at]} ] }.to_h
end
sample =[
{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"one", :size=>"big" },
{:type=>"Meat", :name=>"two", :size=>"small" },
{:type=>"Fruit", :name=>"four", :size=>"small" }
]
group(sample, :type, :name) # => {"Meat"=>["one", "two"], "Fruit"=>["four"]}
group(sample, :size, :name) # => {"big"=>["one"], "small"=>["two", "four"]}
Please, notice that, although not mentioned in the question, you may want to preserve the original sample as it is. Some answers kept provision on this, others not as.
After grouping (list.group_by {...}) the part that does the transformation (without modifying the original sample's values) is:
.map { |k,v| [ k , v.map {|h| h[at]} ] }.to_h
Some hints:
iterating the pairs of the Hash of groups (first map), where
for each iteration, we receive |group_key, array] and return an Array of [group_key, new_array] (outer block),
and finally to_h transforms the Array of Arrays into the Hash (this [[gk1,arr1],[gk2,arr2]...] into this { gk1 => arr1, gk2 => arr2, ...})
There is one missing step not explained at step (2) above. new_array is made by v.map {|h| h[at]}, which justs casts the value at of each original Hash (h) element of the array (so we move from Array of Hashes to an Array of elements).
Hope that helps others to understand the example.
I have a condition that gets a hash.
hash = {"_id"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018", .....}
Yet, I want to rename the key of that hash as follows.
hash = {"id"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018", ......}
P.S. I don't know what keys are in the hash; they are random. Some keys are prefixed with an underscore that I would like to remove.
hash[:new_key] = hash.delete :old_key
rails Hash has standard method for it:
hash.transform_keys{ |key| key.to_s.upcase }
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Hash.html#method-i-transform_keys
UPD: ruby 2.5 method
If all the keys are strings and all of them have the underscore prefix, then you can patch up the hash in place with this:
h.keys.each { |k| h[k[1, k.length - 1]] = h[k]; h.delete(k) }
The k[1, k.length - 1] bit grabs all of k except the first character. If you want a copy, then:
new_h = Hash[h.map { |k, v| [k[1, k.length - 1], v] }]
Or
new_h = h.inject({ }) { |x, (k,v)| x[k[1, k.length - 1]] = v; x }
You could also use sub if you don't like the k[] notation for extracting a substring:
h.keys.each { |k| h[k.sub(/\A_/, '')] = h[k]; h.delete(k) }
Hash[h.map { |k, v| [k.sub(/\A_/, ''), v] }]
h.inject({ }) { |x, (k,v)| x[k.sub(/\A_/, '')] = v; x }
And, if only some of the keys have the underscore prefix:
h.keys.each do |k|
if(k[0,1] == '_')
h[k[1, k.length - 1]] = h[k]
h.delete(k)
end
end
Similar modifications can be done to all the other variants above but these two:
Hash[h.map { |k, v| [k.sub(/\A_/, ''), v] }]
h.inject({ }) { |x, (k,v)| x[k.sub(/\A_/, '')] = v; x }
should be okay with keys that don't have underscore prefixes without extra modifications.
you can do
hash.inject({}){|option, (k,v) | option["id"] = v if k == "_id"; option}
This should work for your case!
If we want to rename a specific key in hash then we can do it as follows:
Suppose my hash is my_hash = {'test' => 'ruby hash demo'}
Now I want to replace 'test' by 'message', then:
my_hash['message'] = my_hash.delete('test')
For Ruby 2.5 or newer with transform_keys and delete_prefix / delete_suffix methods:
hash1 = { '_id' => 'random1' }
hash2 = { 'old_first' => '123456', 'old_second' => '234567' }
hash3 = { 'first_com' => 'google.com', 'second_com' => 'amazon.com' }
hash1.transform_keys { |key| key.delete_prefix('_') }
# => {"id"=>"random1"}
hash2.transform_keys { |key| key.delete_prefix('old_') }
# => {"first"=>"123456", "second"=>"234567"}
hash3.transform_keys { |key| key.delete_suffix('_com') }
# => {"first"=>"google.com", "second"=>"amazon.com"}
h.inject({}) { |m, (k,v)| m[k.sub(/^_/,'')] = v; m }
hash.each {|k,v| hash.delete(k) && hash[k[1..-1]]=v if k[0,1] == '_'}
I went overkill and came up with the following. My motivation behind this was to append to hash keys to avoid scope conflicts when merging together/flattening hashes.
Examples
Extend Hash Class
Adds rekey method to Hash instances.
# Adds additional methods to Hash
class ::Hash
# Changes the keys on a hash
# Takes a block that passes the current key
# Whatever the block returns becomes the new key
# If a hash is returned for the key it will merge the current hash
# with the returned hash from the block. This allows for nested rekeying.
def rekey
self.each_with_object({}) do |(key, value), previous|
new_key = yield(key, value)
if new_key.is_a?(Hash)
previous.merge!(new_key)
else
previous[new_key] = value
end
end
end
end
Prepend Example
my_feelings_about_icecreams = {
vanilla: 'Delicious',
chocolate: 'Too Chocolatey',
strawberry: 'It Is Alright...'
}
my_feelings_about_icecreams.rekey { |key| "#{key}_icecream".to_sym }
# => {:vanilla_icecream=>"Delicious", :chocolate_icecream=>"Too Chocolatey", :strawberry_icecream=>"It Is Alright..."}
Trim Example
{ _id: 1, ___something_: 'what?!' }.rekey do |key|
trimmed = key.to_s.tr('_', '')
trimmed.to_sym
end
# => {:id=>1, :something=>"what?!"}
Flattening and Appending a "Scope"
If you pass a hash back to rekey it will merge the hash which allows you to flatten collections. This allows us to add scope to our keys when flattening a hash to avoid overwriting a key upon merging.
people = {
bob: {
name: 'Bob',
toys: [
{ what: 'car', color: 'red' },
{ what: 'ball', color: 'blue' }
]
},
tom: {
name: 'Tom',
toys: [
{ what: 'house', color: 'blue; da ba dee da ba die' },
{ what: 'nerf gun', color: 'metallic' }
]
}
}
people.rekey do |person, person_info|
person_info.rekey do |key|
"#{person}_#{key}".to_sym
end
end
# =>
# {
# :bob_name=>"Bob",
# :bob_toys=>[
# {:what=>"car", :color=>"red"},
# {:what=>"ball", :color=>"blue"}
# ],
# :tom_name=>"Tom",
# :tom_toys=>[
# {:what=>"house", :color=>"blue; da ba dee da ba die"},
# {:what=>"nerf gun", :color=>"metallic"}
# ]
# }
Previous answers are good enough, but they might update original data.
In case if you don't want the original data to be affected, you can try my code.
newhash=hash.reject{|k| k=='_id'}.merge({id:hash['_id']})
First it will ignore the key '_id' then merge with the updated one.
Answering exactly what was asked:
hash = {"_id"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018"}
hash.transform_keys { |key| key[1..] }
# => {"id"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018"}
The method transform_keys exists in the Hash class since Ruby version 2.5.
https://blog.bigbinary.com/2018/01/09/ruby-2-5-adds-hash-transform_keys-method.html
If you had a hash inside a hash, something like
hash = {
"object" => {
"_id"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018"
}
}
and if you wanted to change "_id" to something like"token"
you can use deep_transform_keys here and do it like so
hash.deep_transform_keys do |key|
key = "token" if key == "_id"
key
end
which results in
{
"object" => {
"token"=>"4de7140772f8be03da000018"
}
}
Even if you had a symbol key hash instead to start with, something like
hash = {
object: {
id: "4de7140772f8be03da000018"
}
}
you can combine all of these concepts to convert them into a string key hash
hash.deep_transform_keys do |key|
key = "token" if key == :id
key.to_s
end
If you only want to change only one key, there is a straightforward way to do it in Ruby 2.8+ using the transform_keys method. In this example, if you want to change _id to id, then you can:
hash.transform_keys({_id: :id})
Reference: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16274