I want to prevent a descendant of TPageControl from having a Style property except tsTabs.
At first glance I tried to override SetStyle, but it is declared private in the base class. anyone have ideas?
TPageControl does not natively support what you are asking for. To accomplish what you are asking for, you would have to either:
have your component re-declare the Style property with new getter/setter methods, and then have the setter exit without doing anything. However, the inherited Style property will still technically be accessible at runtime if the user of the component really wants to access it.
derive your component from TCustomTabControl instead of TPageControl, and re-implement everything that TPageControl does, but without promoting the protected Style property. However, the inherited Style property will still technically be accessible at runtime if the user of the component really wants to access it.
have your component override the virtual CreateParams() method and force the TCS_TABS window style in the TCreateParams.Style field. The Style property will still have whatever value the user assigns (which will also affect the behavior of the TabPosition property), but at least the underlying window will always behave as if the tsTabs style were being used.
use a detouring library to hook TCustomTabControl.SetStyle() directly at runtime and make it return without doing anything.
Related
I have a huge VCL Forms application in delphi and there is an option to display or hide a certain control (MyControl) on each form. Right now the traditional option is enabled, so MyControl should be hidden at runtime.
In Delphi Designer both Controls are visible. Every form is derived from a MyForm-class and in its OnCreate-Procedure the Visible-property of a MyControl (if available) is set to false (according to the traditional option enabled). This does work (as I can see with breaking points and watching expressions). For almost all forms this results in the MyControl not showing.
However for one certain form at some point the MyControl-component itself or any other part of the program sets the MyControls' visibility to true again. How do I find out where this happens?
I am using Delphi 10.1.
my approach:
I've tried to watch the visible-property through the watching-expressions-window using several breaking points. But of course the watching-expression is not available anywhere in the Code (myControl.Visible will only work if the breakingpoint is somewhere myControl is defined). I set a breaking-point anywhere I could evalute myControl.Visible but the magic seems to happen somewhere in between.
So my question: is there some kind of a global variable name, so that I can evalute and watch the visible-property wherever the debugger pauses the program?
a different approach:
I set a data- and an address-breakingpoint but they never fire. Only when I close the program they pause the program a few times.
As advised in the comments, if this is your code you can modify the property to use a Setter and then set a breakpoint on the setter. However if this is not your code and it simply exposes the variable (field) then changing the code to include a setter can be anywhere from triovial to impossible depending on what else needs to be recompiled when you make the change.
If this is your own custom component then you can redeclare an inherited property to use a setter.
If this is not your own custom component - you could make it a custom component and simply change the setter for the property.
You can set a memory breakpoint to alert you to when a memory location changes but your success with this may vary.
I encourage you to experiment with the conditions you can put on breakpoints, get the debugger to work for you.
I created in Lazarus a new component based on TPaintBox. Now in Object Inspector I have all Properties and Events which belong to this base component (TPaintBox).
My question is: can I hide chosen Properties and Events for my component?
For example I would like to leave visible only Width and Height properties.
Can you help me?
Once a property/event has been published, it cannot be un-published.
However, it can be hidden from the Object Inspector, at least (it is still accessible to code).
After your design-time code has registered the component with the IDE, it can then:
in Delphi, call UnlistPublishedProperty() from the DesignIntf unit.
in Lazarus, call RegisterPropertyEditor() from the PropEdits unit to register the THiddenPropertyEditor class for the property/event (see Hide Properties (UnlistPublishedProperty) in the Lazarus forum).
Not sure about Lazarus, but in Delphi TPaintBox is a lightweight descendant of TGraphicControl. The majority of its declaration is just publishing properties. I don't know what your component is doing, but it might be easier to derive it directly from TGraphicControl and duplicate the TPaintBox code wherever it actually is needed. Then you can publish only the properties you want. Note that you still have those properties declared published in TControl and TComponent.
No, you can't hide (unpublish) published properties.
In Delphi most objects are based on a parent classes with all the same properties, but mostly hidden.
So while you can't hide exposed properties you can usually achieve what you want by basing your class on the TCustomxxx instead.
Sadly, TPaintbox is an exception. It is descended from TGraphicControl, but that in turn is descended from TControl which already has a number of published properties, including AlignWithMargins, CustomHint and several others, and that in turn is descended from TComponent which has Name and Tag published. To be fair, you need name for sure, and Tag is not a problem I would think.
If you just had to go back to TGraphicControl, that is not too bad. Just one member and a couple of routines to copy. But to go back to TComponent, which is what you would need to do to hide a number of properties is not really viable.
Hi I'm developing a TControl descendant, lets name it THTMLBaseControl, at runtime that control only generates and output HTML code based on the settings of that control, so all the additional properties of the base TControl class and methods, including Windows Messaging system is really not used at runtime and causes memory overhead.
I need that control to be inherited from TControl so at design time I can use all the IDE designer stuff.
But at runtime almost all of those properties that at desingtime are needed i dont need them.
I also have all my controls inherited from that THTMLBaseControl, so creating a wrapper class per control class is not an option because it will duplicate the code a lot.
So what i need is something that at runtime, before the class is instantiated I can change the parent class so it will be instantiated based on another TControl-like class, maybe named TmyBaseControl inherited from "TComponent" as TControl Does, but that will not have all that TControl memory overhead and will only have the properties and methods needed by my THTMLBaseControl.
I really dont have a GUI at rutime is a web server that will serve only HTML, is some thing that intraweb and Raudus do, but always the issue is that all are based on TControl, so they have to be created at run time and generate a lot memory and process overhead that is not used. and maybe there could a solution so any THTMlBaseControl descendant instantiated at runtime will inherit the all properties and methods from TmyBaseControl and not from TControl.
I have seen there are ways to hack the VMT but maybe there are other solution and have not seen it. I already done changing the NewInstance, ClassParent and TnstanceSize class methods but i have to specify from which class and obviously i have to do the same steps per each inherited THTMLBaseControl class
And for the sake of all:
This is just a doubt, I need the components to be controls like TEdit, TPanel, visible and editable by the designer IDE I even could create my own TControl class but I was just thinking if I can reuse the code already existing.
Regards
You cannot change the class a run time. Once an object is instantiated, its class is fixed. You could hack the object to change its VMT pointer, making it refer to a different class, but that would still not address your main concern, which is memory usage — even if you change the VMT pointer, all the memory for the object has already been allocated; changing the VMT pointer doesn't magically make the object occupy less memory.
The first thing you could do is stop descending from TControl. As you've noted, you don't need any of the things it provides. All you want is something you can drop on a form at design time to set its properties. For that, all you need is TComponent, so make that your base class instead of TControl. Then you'll get something more like TTimer, which has no GUI. Once you've done that, you no longer need TForm, either. Instead, you can put your component on a TDataModule, which is specifically designed for managing non-visual components at design time.
i have a property editor (descendant of TPropertyEditor) that is used to edit a property.
When it comes time to edit my property, how do i know what property of what object i'm editing? If i'm going to edit a property, i have to know what property i'm editing.
i've been pulling my hair out, sifting through the Delphi help, the online help, and the TPropertyEditor and descendant source code, and i can't find the answer.
i expected something like:
TPropertyEditor = class(...)
public
procedure Initialize(TheObject: TObject; ThePropertyName: string);
end;
As far as i can tell, my property editor is created, and i will be told to "Edit", and i just have to divine what property they wanted me to edit.
From the help:
Editing the property as a whole
You can optionally provide a dialog
box in which the user can visually
edit a property. The most common use
of property editors is for properties
that are themselves classes. An
example is the Font property, for
which the user can open a font dialog
box to choose all the attributes of
the font at once.
To provide a
whole-property editor dialog box,
override the property-editor class’s
Edit method.
Edit methods use the same
Get and Set methods used in writing
GetValue and SetValue methods. In
fact, an Edit method calls both a Get
method and a Set method. Because the
editor is type-specific, there is
usually no need to convert the
property values to strings. The editor
generally deals with the value “as
retrieved.”
When the user clicks the ‘...’ button
next to the property or double-clicks
the value column, the Object Inspector
calls the property editor’s Edit
method.
Within your implementation of
the Edit method, follow these steps:
Construct the editor you are using
for the property.
Read the current
value and assign it to the property
using a Get method.
When the user
selects a new value, assign that value
to the property using a Set method.
Destroy the editor.
Answer
It's tucked away, and not documented, but i found out how. The property i'm editing that i edit:
TheCurrentValue := TMyPropertyThing(Pointer(GetOrdValue));
Now that i have the value, i can edit it. If i want to replace the property with some other object:
SetOrdValue(Longint(TheNewValue));
The full code:
Create a property editor that descends from TClassProperty:
TMyPropertyEditor = class(TClassProperty)
public
procedure Edit; override;
function GetAttributes: TPropertyAttributes; override;
end;
First is the housekeeping, telling Delphi's object inspector that my property editor will display a dialog box, this will make a "..." appear next to the property:
function TMyPropertyEditor.GetAttributes: TPropertyAttributes;
begin
//We show a dialog, make Object Inspector show "..."
Result := [paDialog];
end;
Next is the actual work. When the user clicks the "..." button, the object inspector calls my Edit method. The trick that i was missing is that i call my GetOrdValue method. Even though my property isn't an ordinal, you still use it, and just cast the resulting thing to an object:
procedure TMyPropertyEditor.Edit;
var
OldThing: TMyPersistentThing;
NewThing: TMyPersistentThing;
begin
//Call the property's getter, and return the "object" i'm editing:
OldThing:= TMyPersistentThing(Pointer(GetOrdValue));
//now that i have the thing i'm editing, do stuff to "edit" it
DoSomeEditing(OldThing);
//i don't have to, but if i want to replace the property with a new object
//i can call the setter:
NewThing := SomeVariant(OldThing);
SetOrdValue(Longint(NewThing));
end;
If I understand your question right, you're wondering how you're supposed to actually find the value you need to be editing, especially if the object in question contains more than one of them. The answer is that the IDE sets that up for you and the property editor comes "preloaded" by the time Edit is called. TPropertyEditor comes with a bunch of GetValue methods that your Edit function can use to retrieve the value. Or if it's not one of those types, (if it's an object descended from TPersistent, for example,) then you can call GetOrdValue and cast the result to a TPersistent.
Also, you might want to check out TJvPersistentPropertyEditor in the JvDsgnEditors unit of the JVCL to use as a base class. It provides some of the functionality for you.
BTW if you really need it, you can use the GetName method, which will give you the name of the property, but you usually shouldn't have to. And be careful if you're inheriting from something other than TPropertyEditor itself, as GetName is virtual and can be overridden.
A property editor keeps the information about which objects and properties it's editing in the private FPropList variable. The IDE fills that in by calling your editor's SetPropEntry method. You're then generally supposed to call the various methods of TPropertyEditor to find out the properties' values.
It's not really supposed to matter which property you were asked to edit. Your property editor edits properties of a particular type. For in-place editing, your editor provides an implementation of SetValue that translates the string from the Object Inspector into a value of the proper type for the property, and then you call the appropriate Set function, such as SetOrdValue or SetIntfValue. For whole-property editing, the IDE won't call SetValue. Instead, it will call Edit, and you're expected to call GetOrdValue or GetIntfValue (for example) yourself, since your editor already knows what type of property it's designed to edit.
Remember that property editors, in general, can edit multiple properties simultaneously. The name of the property will be the same for all of them, but the type of component they belong to may vary, and thus so may their getters and setters. Call your property editor's GetName method to find out the name. To get the objects, call GetComponent for each index from 0 to PropCount - 1. (Be careful; there's no range checking in those Get functions.) You can also check whether a specific object is in the list by calling HasInstance. The GetPropInfo method will tell you the PPropInfo pointer for the first property, but I don't think that will necessarily be equal to the pointers of all the other properties. Aside from that, you don't get direct access to the PPropInfo data, but again, it really shouldn't matter. If you think you need that for your editor, you're probably doing something wrong; post a new question with more specific information about your underlying task.
Property editors only care about (and are registered for) the type of the property, not the specific property itself.
To avoid singletons and global variables I'd like to be able to pass parameters to a TFrame component. However since a TFrame normally is included on form at design time it is only possible to use the default constructor.
The parent form can of course set some properties in the OnCreate callback after the TFrame has been created. However this does not ensure that a property is not forgotten, and the dependencies are not as clear as using a constructor.
A nice way would be if it was possible to register a factory for creating components while the dfm file is being read. Then the required parameters could be passed to the TFrame constructor when created by the factory. Is there a way of accomplishing this?
Or does anyone have a better solution on how to pass parameters to a TFrame?
All components, including descendants of TFrame, need to be able to be constructed using the constructor inherited from TComponent. Otherwise, they can't be used properly at design time. If the restriction of design-time use is acceptable to you, then you could override that constructor and raise an exception. That would prevent the component from being placed on a form at design time. Simply provide some other constructor that requires other parameters.
Because of the design-time requirement, all components need to be able to exist with some or all of their properties still at their default values. That doesn't mean the components have to do useful things while they're in that state, but they do need to be able to stay in that state indefinitely. It should be OK, for example, to place a component on a form, save the form, and close Delphi, with the intention of resuming the form-designing at a later time. The component should allow itself to be saved and restored, even if all its properties haven't been set up for final use yet.
My preferred option is to enforce the component's rules only at run time. Check that all the properties are set to sensible values before you allow them to be used. You can use assertions to enforce the proper use of your components. Consumers of your classes will learn very quickly if they haven't finished setting up your components on their forms.
I would normally add a public, non-virtual "Initialise" or (Initialize to Americans) procedure which requires all parameters to be provided. This will then set the properties.
Make the properties protected or private if possible, so the only way they can be set is from calling Initialise(AFoo, ABar : integer).
Then in TFormXXX.FormCreate or TformXXX.Create, have:
inherited;
Initialise(foo, bar);
could you create/registercomponent your own tFrame component and
place that on the form - it's create could have anything passed to it.
If a factory could provide the parameters that you need, why don't you just override the default constructor for your frame, and ask the factory-class for parameters?
I usually make my own constructor. I don't like to create frames at designtime anyway.
a) a frame can be created dynamically when required and destroyed when not needed
b) give the frame a public property with either the parameter data type or a data structure and pass the values to the form through the property.
Example:
TAddress - a class to hold the usual elements of an address.
TAddressFra - a frame with the visual controls to display the address
populate an instance of TAddress with values
create an instance of TAddressFra
assign the TAddressFra.address property with the TAddress instance
use the procedure setAddress(o_address : TAddress) to assign the values of the TAddress attributes to the corresponding visual components on the TAddressFra