I'm trying to understand how eCQM’s QDM Data Elements listed in the html provided with each eCQM map to actual QRDA Cat 1 measure entries.
For example, do all six Medication, Discharge listed for CMS100v5 in the QDM section actually map to six Discharge Medication (V3) urn:hl7ii:2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.24.3.105:2016-02-01 QDRA Cat 1 entries? What if a particular EHR/EMR does not have data for all six Discharge Medication or other QDM entries listed for eCQM, can such entries be safely omitted?
The Medication Discharged you highlighted in the eCQM are criteria for data elements that should be reported as entries in the QRDA Category 1. However the section you highlighted is just the data criteria section. To know whether or not you need all six, you'll need to look at how the Medication Discharged data criteria are applied in the population criteria section.
Hope that helps
Related
I have some personal data with first/last names, e-mails, institutions people work at, etc. There are many, many duplicates because this was collected from a few sources over 2-3 years. Sometimes the same person provided different versions of their name, a different e-mail address, etc. I'd like to have a compact version of this data, where a single person (identified by a PersonID) is listed on a single row, with unique variants of their name, e-mail, etc. listed in each cell. Bonus points if the values in every cell are sorted, but far from required.
Example above also available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jizgysC1dntZHg8pZ0--dSAPevSfyXyiVyenj02GiwQ/edit#gid=0
I'm looking for a way to display the unique values in each column of a filter result, ideally staying away from =QUERY if at all possible.
This is easy to do when working with just one resulting column:
=FILTER(A4:A9,D4:D9=1) --> =JOIN(", ",UNIQUE(FILTER(A4:A9,D4:D9=1)))
...but the moment the filter spits out results in multiple columns:
=FILTER(A4:C9,D4:D9=1) --> ???
...I have no clue what to do, other than doing the code above for each column separately (which would be a hassle, given the number of columns involved). Is this possible?
Here's one way to do that using MAP:
=MAP(UNIQUE(D4:D),LAMBDA(id,BYCOL(FILTER(A4:D,D4:D=id),LAMBDA(col,JOIN(CHAR(10),UNIQUE(col))))))
By stablishing a column in I with unique values (=UNIQUE(D4:D)), you can use this MAKE ARRAY:
=MAKEARRAY(COUNTA(I4:I),COUNTA(F3:H3),LAMBDA(r,c,
JOIN(CHAR(10),FILTER(INDEX(A4:C,,c),D4:D=INDEX(I4:I,r)))))
My goal: Report all events occurring in a city (+details) to a separate tab, from a master spreadsheet with events in 20+ cities
If column R says "Boston" report [client name, date of event, time of event, number of participants, video link, moderator, notes, etc.] into the next available row of Sheet8. Boston will use Sheet8 to see all events happening there as well as relevant details for them.
The formula I have so far is
=INDEX(Sheet1!$A:$T, MATCH("Boston", Sheet1!$R:$R, 0))
It returns the entire row as desired, but there are two problems:
I don't need the ENTIRE row, just certain data points
It doesn't return ALL Boston events
I've tried regular LOOKUP and VLOOKUP with a hidden first column (doubled from Column R). I'm no good with Pivot Tables, but I tried those too. INDEX/MATCH seems to be the closest I've come to what I need. Just needs a LITTLE bit more fine-tuning.
try:
=FILTER({RAFTs!C:H, RAFTs!M:M, RAFTs!U:V}, RAFTs!$R:$R="CHI")
I am creating a Google Data Studio report for a car dealership and I have a problem.
I have made these 3 screenshots to illustrate:
If you see on the first screenshot, the datasource is pretty simple, used/new indicates weather the car being sold is new or used and if it is a sportscar or family car, and exchange/clean deal indicates weather the dealership takes/buys the customers old car in for a trade off in price. The rest should be self explanatory.
On screenshot2-3 you see my report, I have one table for each salesperson and it shows the amount of sales for each combination that has sales.
The problem is this, I want the tables to show each combination even if it does not have any sales at all, it should just show 0 then in record count. Like Mike on the left has more combinations than john, I still want Johns table to show those combinations just with a 0 then, and it should be sorted the same on each table so they look the same, just different data in the cells.
Is this possible to do?
To solve this problem, you need to make a combination of data, from the database with itself. Your main analysis dimension, which will generate your combinations, is used/new and Exchange/Clean deal. So your combination should be:
The filter defined in the second database (right base) must contain a filter telling which person the table will be destined for. So, for each table, you must make a new combination that contains the person-specific filter.
I just took a sample from your original database (10 first lines) and the result is:
I have this data set (example)
It shows different responses for different towns and what industries the respondent thinks has job openings (e.g Akron has 2 rows (2 respondents), with different industries given)
Now I want to chart/gather from that data set, the count of each industry for each town: So using this table setup, I want a formula that shows, for example, how many times "restaurant" was listed for Akron...
So here's what I want a formula to give me, in cell B63, ("Akron" row, "restaurant" column) for ex. This is paraphrasing in plain English what I want it to do. I have tried countless variations of COUNTIFS, IFS, MATCH, SUM, INDIRECT, LOOKUPS... etc and have not been able to get the numbers that reflect the data given.
=count if ("restaurant" appears in the range B53:D60 AND if those occurrences are in rows starting with "Akron" (in the range A53:A60))
The main hang-up, obviously is that these 2 different criteria encompass 2 different sized ranges (not something countifs like...) So how can I get around that barrier?
A final note: the imgs/ex given are small representations of a much larger range that I'm actually working on... so yes, I could make a nifty formula for each town that has just the town rows as my range...(COUNTIF likes this approach!) but I've got many more towns of various row counts... it takes too long to make a town specific range or diff formula for each town... I prefer 1 formula that looks through all the town rows/range and all the "Industries" range...
=COUNTIF(FILTER(DATA_RANGE,TOWN_NAME="TARGET_TOWN_NAME"),"=TARGET_INDUSTRY")
Example use
=COUNTIF(FILTER(A2:C,A2:A="A"),"=1")
Counts the responses of 1 under town A.
Example Screengrab
I have an excel sheet which shows the names of 1,900 borrowers. The sheet is not sorted out in alphabetical order (and it does not need to be sorted in alphabetical order). What I am trying to perform is that I want to compare the two column and see if they match. If the two columns do not match I want that result to be shown either in separate column or those names of the countries and responsible person to be highlighted.
For example, the below screen shot shows that there are various countries in the list and there is various responsible person associated with each country. The idea is to identify the countries whose responsible person are not the same. So in this example countries USA & AUSTRALIA should not show up because they have the same responsible person but all other countries and responsible person should be identified. I appreciate and thanks for all the help.
You can solve this by creating a pivot table of your data. Insert pivot table and then add Country name and count of responsible person as grouping (assuming no duplicates) then anything with a count greater than 2 is an issue.