I am using avro-maven-plugin 1.8.1 to generate java code from schema,and all the fields are public and deprecated,like this:
public class data_elements extends org.apache.avro.specific.SpecificRecordBase implements org.apache.avro.specific.SpecificRecord {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 2829359487251568000L;
public static final org.apache.avro.Schema SCHEMA$ = new org.apache.avro.Schema.Parser().parse("......");
public static org.apache.avro.Schema getClassSchema() { return SCHEMA$; }
#Deprecated public java.lang.CharSequence timestamp;
#Deprecated public double value;
#Deprecated public java.lang.CharSequence op;
...
}
It makes confused and uncomfortable, does anyone know why it is like that?
If you pass in the fieldVisibility=private parameter then the #Deprecated should disappear and your fields will be private.
Related
Little background: I am working on a topology using Apache Storm, I thought why not use dependency injection in it, but I was not sure how it will behave on cluster environment when topology deployed to cluster. I started looking for answers on if DI is good option to use in Storm topologies, I came across some threads about Apache Spark where it was mentioned serialization is going to be problem and saw some responses for apache storm along the same lines. So finally I decided to write a sample topology with google guice to see what happens.
I wrote a sample topology with two bolts, and used google guice to injects dependencies. First bolt emits a tick tuple, then first bolt creates message, bolt prints the message on log and call some classes which does the same. Then this message is emitted to second bolt and same printing logic there as well.
First Bolt
public class FirstBolt extends BaseRichBolt {
private OutputCollector collector;
private static int count = 0;
private FirstInjectClass firstInjectClass;
#Override
public void prepare(Map map, TopologyContext topologyContext, OutputCollector outputCollector) {
collector = outputCollector;
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new Module());
firstInjectClass = injector.getInstance(FirstInjectClass.class);
}
#Override
public void execute(Tuple tuple) {
count++;
String message = "Message count "+count;
firstInjectClass.printMessage(message);
log.error(message);
collector.emit("TO_SECOND_BOLT", new Values(message));
collector.ack(tuple);
}
#Override
public void declareOutputFields(OutputFieldsDeclarer outputFieldsDeclarer) {
outputFieldsDeclarer.declareStream("TO_SECOND_BOLT", new Fields("MESSAGE"));
}
#Override
public Map<String, Object> getComponentConfiguration() {
Config conf = new Config();
conf.put(Config.TOPOLOGY_TICK_TUPLE_FREQ_SECS, 10);
return conf;
}
}
Second Bolt
public class SecondBolt extends BaseRichBolt {
private OutputCollector collector;
private SecondInjectClass secondInjectClass;
#Override
public void prepare(Map map, TopologyContext topologyContext, OutputCollector outputCollector) {
collector = outputCollector;
Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new Module());
secondInjectClass = injector.getInstance(SecondInjectClass.class);
}
#Override
public void execute(Tuple tuple) {
String message = (String) tuple.getValue(0);
secondInjectClass.printMessage(message);
log.error("SecondBolt {}",message);
collector.ack(tuple);
}
#Override
public void declareOutputFields(OutputFieldsDeclarer outputFieldsDeclarer) {
}
}
Class in which dependencies are injected
public class FirstInjectClass {
FirstInterface firstInterface;
private final String prepend = "FirstInjectClass";
#Inject
public FirstInjectClass(FirstInterface firstInterface) {
this.firstInterface = firstInterface;
}
public void printMessage(String message){
log.error("{} {}", prepend, message);
firstInterface.printMethod(message);
}
}
Interface used for binding
public interface FirstInterface {
void printMethod(String message);
}
Implementation of interface
public class FirstInterfaceImpl implements FirstInterface{
private final String prepend = "FirstInterfaceImpl";
public void printMethod(String message){
log.error("{} {}", prepend, message);
}
}
Same way another class that receives dependency via DI
public class SecondInjectClass {
SecondInterface secondInterface;
private final String prepend = "SecondInjectClass";
#Inject
public SecondInjectClass(SecondInterface secondInterface) {
this.secondInterface = secondInterface;
}
public void printMessage(String message){
log.error("{} {}", prepend, message);
secondInterface.printMethod(message);
}
}
another interface for binding
public interface SecondInterface {
void printMethod(String message);
}
implementation of second interface
public class SecondInterfaceImpl implements SecondInterface{
private final String prepend = "SecondInterfaceImpl";
public void printMethod(String message){
log.error("{} {}", prepend, message);
}
}
Module Class
public class Module extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
bind(FirstInterface.class).to(FirstInterfaceImpl.class);
bind(SecondInterface.class).to(SecondInterfaceImpl.class);
}
}
Nothing fancy here, just two bolts and couple of classes for DI. I deployed it on server and it works just fine. The catch/problem though is that I have to initialize Injector in each bolt which makes me question what is side effect of it going to be?
This implementation is simple, just 2 bolts.. what if I have more bolts? what impact it would create on topology if I have to initialize Injector in all bolts?
If I try to initialize Injector outside prepare method I get error for serialization.
I have one List box and I would like to set code type of it.
I create new AbstractCodeType :
public class MyCodeType extends AbstractCodeType<String, String> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6808664924551155395L;
public static final String ID = null;
#Override
public String getId() {
return ID;
}
#Order(10.0)
public static class UnknownCode extends AbstractCode<String> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = -1307260056726644943L;
public static final String ID = "Unknown";
#Override
protected String getConfiguredText() {
return TEXTS.get("Unknown");
}
#Override
public String getId() {
return ID;
}
}
}
and I set this code type in list box :
#Override
protected Class<? extends ICodeType<?, String>> getConfiguredCodeType() {
return MyCodeType.class;
}
But doesn't work. It return empty box.
While I was debugging I noticed that in AbstractListBox.class in initConfig method it call this code type and set code type in m_lookupCall inside setCodeTypeClass. Then inside execLoadTableData, it get call but this call return empty array when called call.getDataByAll().
I suspect that converting between code type and Lookup call does not work properly.
EDIT
I try to debug where is the problem and if follow the path :
initConfig() -> CodeLookupCall.newInstanceByService(m_codeTypeClass); (line 581)
and if you look inside CodeLookupCall ;
getDataByAll() in line 221 `resolveCodes(v)` -> BEANS.opt(m_codeTypeClass) -> bean.getInstance() -> m_producer.produce(this) -> return (T) getCache().get(createCacheKey(type));
This is in class CodeService.class in line 97 :
Class<T> type is right class and createCacheKey(type) return not null object but then getCache().get(...) return null. From this point on everything is null (what is reasonable regarding that getCodeType return null.)
This is what I found out while debugging, if it helps someone to figure out what is wrong.
It looks like your codetype class is not found by the bean manager. CodeService only finds CodeTypes in its classpath (accessible in the server).
-> You might need to move your class to the shared project.
You can find examples for code types in the contacts demo application:
https://github.com/BSI-Business-Systems-Integration-AG/org.eclipse.scout.docs/tree/releases/5.2.x/code/contacts
I tested your code snippet with Eclipse Scout Neon M4 and I could reproduce your described error.
However, it seems that this bug has been fixed with Scout Neon M5. So I suggest that you upgrade to the latest milestone version, which is recommended anyway.
I am new to JMX and now I wished to monitor my project with JMX. Is there any way to return user defined class via MBeans/MXBean? I know that OpentType can help but don't know how to used it. I also went through Composite and Tabular data types but it may not work for me because I need to convert each and every class into respective data types.
Please provide your help.
Thank you in advance!!
You have to create an Interface SomethingMBean and a class that implement that interface.
public interface HelloMBean {
public void sayHello();
public int add(int x, int y);
public String getName();
public int getCacheSize();
public void setCacheSize(int size);
}
public class Hello ...
implements HelloMBean {
public void sayHello() {
System.out.println("hello, world");
}
public int add(int x, int y) {
return x + y;
}
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
public int getCacheSize() {
return this.cacheSize;
}
public synchronized void setCacheSize(int size) {
...
this.cacheSize = size;
System.out.println("Cache size now " + this.cacheSize);
}
...
private final String name = "Reginald";
private int cacheSize = DEFAULT_CACHE_SIZE;
private static final int
DEFAULT_CACHE_SIZE = 200;
}
And then, you have to register your MBean...
MBeanServer mbs = ManagementFactory.getPlatformMBeanServer();
ObjectName name = new ObjectName("com.example:type=Hello");
Hello mbean = new Hello();
mbs.registerMBean(mbean, name);
Take a look at Java Tutorial
If your project is using Spring, then it is quite easy to expose any user-defined class to JMX by simply using annotations:
#ManagedResource - to expose the class to JMX
#ManagedAttribute - to expose any fields of a ManagedResource class as attributes
#ManagedOperation - to expose any method of a ManagedResource class
as an operation
Have a look at the official Spring documentation which contains quite a few illustrative examples as well.
So basically, I have a situation where I want to inject primitive types into a class (i.e. a String and an Integer). You can think of a URL and port number for an application as example inputs. I have three components:
Now say I have a class, which does take in these params:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private Integer b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(String a, Integer b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
So my question here is simple. How do I inject a and b into class PrimitiveParamsDIExample?
In general, this is also asking how to inject parameters that are decided on runtime as well. If I have a and b above, read from STDIN or from an input file, they're obviously going to be different from run to run.
All the more, how do I do the above within the HK2 framework?
EDIT[02/23/15]: #jwells131313, I tried your idea, but I'm getting the following error (this one for the String param; similar one for int):
org.glassfish.hk2.api.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: There was no object available for injection at Injectee(requiredType=String,parent=PrimitiveParamsDIExample,qualifiers
I set up classes exactly as you did in your answer. I also overrode the toString() method to print both variables a and b in PrimitiveParamsDIExample. Then, I added the following in my Hk2Module class:
public class Hk2Module extends AbstractBinder {
private Properties properties;
public Hk2Module(Properties properties){
this.properties = properties;
}
#Override
protected void configure() {
bindFactory(StringAFactory.class).to(String.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bindFactory(IntegerBFactory.class).to(Integer.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bind(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).to(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).in(Singleton.class);
}
}
So now, I created a test class as follows:
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class TestPrimitiveParamsDIExample extends Hk2Setup {
private PrimitiveParamsDIExample example;
#Before
public void setup() throws IOException {
super.setupHk2();
//example = new PrimitiveParamsDIExample();
example = serviceLocator.getService(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class);
}
#Test
public void testPrimitiveParamsDI() {
System.out.println(example.toString());
}
}
where, Hk2Setup is as follows:
public class Hk2Setup extends TestCase{
// the name of the resource containing the default configuration properties
private static final String DEFAULT_PROPERTIES = "defaults.properties";
protected Properties config = null;
protected ServiceLocator serviceLocator;
public void setupHk2() throws IOException{
config = new Properties();
Reader defaults = Resources.asCharSource(Resources.getResource(DEFAULT_PROPERTIES), Charsets.UTF_8).openBufferedStream();
load(config, defaults);
ApplicationHandler handler = new ApplicationHandler(new MyMainApplication(config));
final ServiceLocator locator = handler.getServiceLocator();
serviceLocator = locator;
}
private static void load(Properties p, Reader r) throws IOException {
try {
p.load(r);
} finally {
Closeables.close(r, false);
}
}
}
So somewhere, the wiring is messed up for me to get an UnsatisfiedDependencyException. What have I not correctly wired up?
Thanks!
There are two ways to do this, but one isn't documented yet (though it is available... I guess I need to work on documentation again...)
I'll go through the first way here.
Basically, you can use the HK2 Factory.
Generally when you start producing Strings and ints and long and scalars like this you qualify them, so lets start with two qualifiers:
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface A {}
and
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface B {}
then write your factories:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class StringAFactory implements Factory<String> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#A // Your qualifier
public String provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
and for the Integer:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class IntegerBFactory implements Factory<Integer> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#B // Your qualifier
public Integer provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
Now lets re-do your original class to accept these values:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private int b;
#Inject
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(#A String a, #B int b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
Note I changed Integer to int, well... just because I can. You can also just use field injection or method injection in the same way. Here is field injection, method injection is an exercise for the reader:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
#Inject #A
private String a;
#Inject #B
private int b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample() {
}
}
There are several ways to bind factories.
In a binder: bindFactory
Using automatic class analysis: addClasses
An EDSL outside a binder: buildFactory
We got a Jetty/Jersey application. We are converting it to use Guice for DI. The problem: We need more than one instance of a Singleton classes. The catch: The number of instances is determined dynamically from a configuration file. Therefore we cant use annotations for different instances.
final InjectedClass instance = injector.getInstance(InjectedClass.class);
This is the standard syntax of the injector. I need something like
final String key = getKey();
final InjectedClass instance = injector.getInstance(InjectedClass.class, key);
There is a way to get an instance from a Guice Key.class
final InjectedClass instance = injector.getInstance(Key.get(InjectedClass.class, <Annotation>);
but the problem is that I need some dynamic annotation, not predefined one.
You could try to use Provider, or #Provides method that would have map of all instances already created. When the number of instances is reached number defained in config file, you wont create any new instances, instead you return old instance from map.
For example something like this could help you.
public class MyObjectProvider implements Provider<MyObject> {
private final Injector inj;
private int counter;
private final int maxNum = 5;
private List<MyObject> myObjPool = new ArrayList<MyObject>();
#Inject
public MyObjectProvider(Injector inj) {
this.connection = connection;
}
public MyObject get() {
counter = counter+1%maxNum;
if(myObjPool.size()=<maxNum) {
MyObject myobj = inj.getInstance(MyObject.class);
myObjPool.add(myobj);
return myobj;
} else {
return myObjPool.get(counter);
}
}
}
P.S.
I wrote this from my head so maybe it does not compile, this is just an idea.
You can solve this by creating a factory. In my example I have used the guice extension called multibindings
interface InjectedClassFactory {
public InjectedClass get(String key);
}
class InjectedClass {}
class InjectedClassFactoryImpl implements InjectedClassFactory{
private final Map<String, InjectedClass> instances;
#Inject
InjectedClassFactoryImpl(Map<String, InjectedClass> instances) {
this.instances = instances;
}
#Override
public InjectedClass get(String key) {
return instances.get(key);
}
}
class MyModule extends AbstractModule {
#Override
protected void configure() {
MapBinder<String, InjectedClass> mapBinder =
MapBinder.newMapBinder(binder(), String.class, InjectedClass.class);
//read you config file and retrieve the keys
mapBinder.addBinding("key1").to(InjectedClass.class).in(Singleton.class);
mapBinder.addBinding("key2").to(InjectedClass.class).in(Singleton.class);
}
}