Can someone tell me which iOS devices use which image sizes (1x,2x,3x)? and when creating an image would it be best to make it small and upscale it or make it bigger and downscale it?
If you are supporting iOS8+ iPhones 1x images are not required any more, but still required only for iPad2.
For scalable images, i think that you should use bigger image and downscale it.
Related
In my app I am using images of size 155*155pts so I am supplying it with an image of 310*310px resolution. I know that I can use image.png image#2x.png and image#3x.png and then [UIImage imageNamed: image] to select the image appropriate for the resolution. My question is do I really need to include a lower resolution version of size 155*155px, won't the UIImageView it's displayed in just scale it appropriately? A similar question for the iphone6+, if I don't include the #3x version will it just use the #2x and display it as clearly as a standard retina screen would?
Even though there are plenty of answers at SO discussing this topic
(Google them) e.g. How to handle image scale on all the available iPhone resolutions?
Its just a recommendation to to use scaled up images with #2x and #3x in your app. You don't have to create them. From my experience in making apps, in almost all of them I have never used multiple images. I create one UIImage and use it for all the phone sizes. I then either use auto layout or manually adjust the width height of UIImages myself.
There is a reason I do that is lets say one of your sample1.png image is 1MB then you will need to create 3 of them.
sample1.png
sample1#2x.png
sample1#3x.png
You just doubled or tripled your binary size which is bad for downloads. There always be users running non-retina devices and it would be shame to not support them. Can you only make retina enabled apps, of course you can and Apple will approve those as they will be testing your apps on the latest devices but the best approach is to support all devices.
It depends, if you only support non-retina devices you don´t have to add the normal image size anymore.
The scaling for the 6+ works with the #2x images but i guess you will see a quality difference
This question might be a duplicate, but I couldn't find any reasonable answer.
I am developing an app that supports all iOS devices, for which I have to import image resources for every device.
If I use image optimizer, it will destroy quality of images.
Currently my app consists of iPhone 5, 6, 6+, iPad and iPad retina images, which costs me about 20 MB space in my application.
How can I reduce this size? E.g. by removing iPhone 5 or iPhone 6 images, will the application work fine or not?
This will all entirely depend on the design of your application. #3x graphics are for the iPhone 6+ only (for now), and the resolution on the device is so high some users might not notice that the #3x graphics are missing. You might also be able to "re-use" some of your iPhone graphics for the iPad (for example you could use the iPhone #2x graphics for the iPad non-retina). But again, depends on your graphics design.
I don't know how you use this images, but
If you want reduce the size of your app there are, for me, two solution.
Check if the size of your images are not too big (the size of your UIImageView x2 will be enough).
Get the images by downloading the right image and store it in the device.
No, you have to store iPhone 5,6,6+ startup images just to disable scaling.
Remove redundant orientations from startup images.
Try to use ImageOptim to minimise png images. It uses lossless optimisations.
Try to use lossy optimisations for images if they are still too big.
If you use clean background in your app, save startup images with only background colour without UI, and make sure that app start fast. It will look OK.
I'm releasing a new update for one of my apps and I was disappointed to see that it just barely surpasses 20MB estimated size (20MB is the point where it can no longer be downloaded over cell data).
My app contains a lot of images, so I could greatly reduce the size if I didn't have all those non-retina images. I know that there are some non-retina devices that will be running my app. So here are my questions:
How will a non-retina device react if I have an image with the #2x suffix but no non-retina image without it.
If I use a retina sized image without the #2x suffix and scale it down to the size I want to display it at programmatically and/or
through interface builder, will it still maintain full quality on
retina devices? Will the quality be worse on a non-retina device
than using an image I downscaled from the original using GIMP
instead?
How will a non-retina device react if I have an image with the #2x suffix but no non-retina i
image without it.
I use that approach on a couple of apps of mine and it works flawlessly. I am not able to detect any performance or visual issues on non-retina display devices (concretely, iPad 1/2 and mini).
I am not sure what can happen on older iOS version, since I only support iOS5+ on those apps.
If I use a retina sized image without the #2x suffix and scale it down to the size I want to display it at programmatically and/or through interface builder, will it still maintain full quality on retina devices? Will the quality be worse on a non-retina device than using an image I downscaled from the original using GIMP instead?
This comes down to how you set interpolation options while doing the scaling. See this other question for more details on how interpolation quality affects scaling down an image. In GIMP or Photoshop you also have control on the interpolation to be used for scaling, btw.
But in the end I don't think you need to go this way.
Most importantly, that bandwidth limit has been raised to 50MB.
OK.
If you only provide one image then you have one of two possibilities.
The image is a non-retina image. This will look fine on the non-retina. It will look identical on a retina device. But will look low quality next to a retina image.
The image is a retina image. On the retina device it will still load as a retina image. It will look fine. However, on the non-retina device it will have to scale down the image. This takes extra cycles of the CPU so could affect performance and it may not look how you want. It may shrink the image using a different method than you want and so may make the image look odd.
This is the same with or without a suffix.
The best solution is to create retina images and then use your editor of choice to create the standard versions. Nothing will stop you only providing one image but it may lead to a look and performance that you don't want.
On a side note. The size for downloading over cellular data was increased to 50MB.
Try these things using the simulator and find out for yourself.
I think the answer is that UIImage will ignore the #2x choice if you're relying on [UIImage imageNamed:#"without2xSuffix.png"] and not find anything, but I haven't tried it. Deliberately requesting the #2x file will work, but whether the image will be scaled, tiled, stretched or centered (or something else) is up to the place where it's used.
Note that the documentation says that unless you use the name without the #2x suffix and let iOS find the 2x version for you, it will set the scale of the image to 1.0 rather than 2.0, which complicates drawing. You'd have to load the image using imageWithData:scale: to fix this.
I am developing a cocos2d game. I need to make it universal. Problem is that I want to use minimun amount of images to keep the universal binary as small as possible. Is there any possibility that I can use same images I am using for iphone, retina and iPad somehow? If yes, how can I do that? What image size and quality should it be? Any suggestion?
Thanks and Best regards
As for suggestions: provide HD resolution images for Retina devices and iPad, provide SD resolution images for non-Retina devices. Don't think about an all-in-one solution - there isn't one that's acceptable.
Don't upscale SD images to HD resolution on Retina devices or iPad. It won't look any better.
Don't downscale HD images for non-Retina devices. Your textures will still use 4x the memory on devices that have half or even a quarter of the memory available. In addition, downscaling images is bad for performance because it has to be done by the CPU on older devices. While you could downscale the image and save the downscaled texture, it adds a lot more complexity to your code and will increase the loading time.
There's not a single right answer to this question. One way to do it is to create images that are larger than you need and then scale them down. If the images don't have a lot of fine detail, that should work pretty well. As an example, this is the reason that you submit a 512x512 pixel image of your app icon along with your app to the App Store. Apple never displays the image at that size, but uses it to create a variety of smaller sizes for display in the App Store.
Another approach is to use vector images, which you can draw perfectly at any size that you need. Unfortunately, the only vector format that I can think of that's supported in iOS is PDF.
This has been bugging me for a while. I don't understand why one should include low-res images. If a 3GS, for example, can't find the low-res image, it just uses the #2x version anyway and displays it at it's native resolution. So why add to the filesize of your app by including all the half-res images?
Halley had it right. The system does not automatically downsample #2x images to non-retina size, and it shouldn't. The 3Gs does not have enough memory to load retina images. It will likely choke your app and cause it to exit with an out of memory error.
The problem gets even worse with the iPad 1. The iPad 1 has very low memory relative to it's screen size, and if you tried to make it load retina sized images, it would choke and die very quickly.
To scale an image the system has to load it at full size and do a complex scaling operation each time it draws it. It's the worst of all possible worlds - slower, 4x as much memory, and the images don't look as good.
In most cases, you can make an icon look better when created at the low-res resolution, instead of having the system scale it. If you don't care too much about how your icons look when scaled, then using the #2x version only is probably fine.
The other posters mentioned some excellent points, but here's one more for posterity: as mentioned several times in http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/IconsImages/IconsImages.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40006556-CH14-SW1, a 2x image may be more detailed. In other words, the low-res image isn't simply a scaled-down version of the 2x image; the 2x image may contain details not present in the smaller image.
#2x filenames are intended for Retina Display enabled devices.
If you intend to use them for display on the iPhone 3GS make sure to properly test that they look as acceptable as the low-res image Apple wants you to use.
The reason being, is when images are scaled up if there is no #2x available, they can become pixelated and blurry, so you would prob think that making the original image twice as big would solve the problem.
But no, because the retina devices would still scale it up (in my experience) and non retina devices would display the image incorrectly.
It's got a lot to do with the quality standards Apple wants for the Apps on their app store