I have a clients.css and jobs.css in the assets/stylesheets location.
Each has a respective controller. Jobs was created with a scaffold after clients. The scaffolds.scss file is blank.
application.css is blank
When I code a change such as body{color:black} in the jobs.css, it changes the clients/index.html.erb view and the jobs/index.html.erb view.
What could be the reason for this? I would like to have separate .css files for jobs and clients..
From the documentation:
Sprockets concatenates all JavaScript files into one master .js file
and all CSS files into one master .css file.
What this means, of course, is that when you make a change to jobs.css, you'll see the same css being applied to every matching element throughout your application. All of those separate .css files are there to help you keep things organized from a human perspective, rather than from the perspective of your application.
You might want to just come up with different IDs and classes depending on your page (like #body_client and #body_job) to differentiate them, but you can see how this naming convention could get unwieldy as your app grows.
Having separate assets is possible, but not without some pain.
In application.js, remove:
//= require_tree
In application.css, remove:
*= require_tree
In application.html.erb, add the following:
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", params[:controller], :media => "all" %>
<%= javascript_include_tag "application", params[:controller] %>
Create a new initializer file at config/initializers/assets.rb and add the following code:
%w( clients_controller jobs_controller ).each do |controller|
Rails.application.config.assets.precompile += ["#{controller}.js.coffee", "#{controller}.css"]
end
That should get you set up with separate per page assets. Check the original blog post for more details.
Related
New to Rails (Have used it for 3 weeks). I have several views and their corresponding scss file.
For example,
Views
view1.html.erb
view2.html.erb
view3.html.erb
Stylesheet
view1.scss
view2.scss
view3.scss
When I load view1.html inside <head> of the page all three stylesheet file are been loaded (I actually do now need view2.css and view3.css at this moment).
Is there a reason behind it? Why not just load the static file the current page need? For example, only load view1.css in page view1.html.
I do know in production environment all these will be combined into one single file. Is that because all these static assets will be cached by the browser so load a single file at the first time make the subsequent visit much faster?
The reason I ask this question is because I would like only include controller specific stylesheets in the page. I have tried code below but which cause non ppreprocess error.
<%= javascript_include_tag params[:controller] %>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag params[:controller] %>
I am still reading the doc at link below,
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/asset_pipeline.html#precompiling-assets
Thanks for your time viewing the question.
You can try achieve that in this way,
If you generate a controller named Userscontroller
Rails adds new files at app/assets/javascripts/users.js.coffee and another at app/assets/stylesheets/users.css.scss.
You should put any JavaScript or CSS unique to a controller inside their respective asset files, as these files can then be loaded just for these controllers with lines such as
<%= javascript_include_tag params[:controller] %>
or
<%= stylesheet_link_tag params[:controller] %>
First, disable the default loading of all stylesheets by removing any extra requires in the application.css manifest.
*= require_tree .
Remove this line or change to,
* require_tree . // removed '='
Tell Rails to compile our controller assets
By default, the asset pipeline only compiles application.js/.css and any files they require. Because we removed the require_tree . directive, we need to tell Rails about our controller-specific assets or they won’t get compiled.
Create a new initializer file called config/initializers/assets.rb and add the following (replacing the controller names with your own):
%w( controller_one controller_two controller_three ).each do |controller|
Rails.application.config.assets.precompile += ["#{controller}.js.coffee", "#{controller}.css.scss"]
end
Note: You can rename the css.scss to css also.
Check this link for details
Explicitly declare all controllers make me feel bad, therefore, we replace #Sravan 's solution to the code below,
Rails.application.config.assets.precompile << /(^[^_\/]|\/[^_])[^\/]*$/
Rails.application.config.assets.precompile += ["*.js.es6", "*.scss"]
This is a question that several people have asked before, but none of the questions were quite asked or answered in a way that I found helpful, so I'm writing the question and answer that I would have found helpful.
I have a Rails 3.1+ app using the asset pipeline. There's one specific action that I want to have use different CSS. (In my specific case, I have a page that is intended to be printed, so it truly needs completely different CSS and does not need any Javascript.) Currently, I have only one application-specific CSS file. How do I add the new CSS file and direct the asset pipeline to use my file?
For example, right now, my app/assets looks like
app/assets
/javascript
application.js
custom.js.coffee
/css
application.css
custom.css.scss
I want to add a print.css file that is used by the view of a specific action. This view will not use the application.css file. How do I add print.css?
I found this blog post to be very helpful: http://blog.seancarpenter.net/2012/11/05/page-specific-javascript-with-the-asset-pipeline/. My answer paraphrases what this blogger already wrote and fills in a few missing details.
First, it's important that you've read and understood the Rails Guide to the Asset Pipeline. Unfortunately, this guide doesn't clearly explain how to add action-specific assets, but it does cover some concepts you need to know. Made sure you understand these ideas:
That the asset pipeline compiles Javascript, CSS, and other assets so that Rails servers can cache assets for better performance.
That manifest files use commands like require, require_tree, and require_self to indicate which files are compiled together.
That in order for the asset pipeline to work properly in production, you need to manually run rake assets:precompile to produce the compiled, minified assets in the public directory.
These ideas are the minimum "need-to-know" pieces of information about the asset pipeline. If you don't already understand these ideas, you don't have an "expert or enthusiast" level of knowledge about the pipeline, and unfortunately, SO isn't the right place to learn this stuff. Fortunately, the the Rails Guide to the Asset Pipeline is a short 15-minute read and can get you up to speed quickly if you need it.
Second, these are the changes you need to make in order to ensure that the asset pipeline correctly sees and handles your new print.css file.
Follow these steps:
Add your print.css file to app/assets/css.
You'll need to create a manifest file that will show Rails where to find print.css. You need to do this, even though you only have a single CSS file you're adding. This is an easy step:
Add a file called print.js to app/assets/javascript.
Add this line to print.js:
//= require print
This will be the only line in the entire print.js file. If I understand correctly, Rails expects manifest files to have the file extension .js, which is why we aren't using print.css as the manifest file.
We now need to instruct Rails to find and use the print.js manifest. Add the following line in your config/application.rb file:
config.assets.precompile += %w( print.js )
We're almost finished! However, the already-present application.js manifest includes the line //= require_tree . which means that it will include your print.css file. This will cause your print.css styling to affect your entire site, not just the single view. There are two ways of dealing with this:
If application.js and print.js do not share any assets, you can use the stub command in your application.js to exclude the assets used in print.js. What this does is instruct application.js to remove any of the assets that print.js references from its own list of referenced files. Our modified application.js looks like:
(snip...)
require_tree .
stub print
See this answer for more information.
If your print.js and application.js files share some assets, you'll need to move all of the assets used by application.js into subdirectories. I didn't do this myself, so I'm not the most help in this area. Look at this answer for instructions.
Now we have included print.css in the asset pipeline. We now need to direct Rails to use print.css in your specific view.
Let's say your action is in the reports controller, and that the action is named print_reports. This means we have a reports_controller.rb file and a print_reports.html.erb (or .haml) file. We need to make several changes to these files.
To start, add a new layout in app/views/layouts. Perhaps call it print.html.erb. We'll use this new layout for your print_reports.html.erb file. Set it up as you desire. For a page intended to be printed, this will likely be very simple, such as
<html>
<head>
<title="Print">
</head>
<body>
<%= yield %>
</body>
</html>
Using a separate layout the disadvantage that it's difficult to keep this layout and the layout used by the rest of the application in sync, but if you are using separate CSS files for the action, it's unlikely that you want the layout to be the same anyway.
Add a stylesheet_link_tag in the layout's header pointing to your print.css:
<html>
<head>
<title="Print"/>
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "print" %>
</head>
<body>
<%= yield %>
</body>
</html>
In the controller, we'll tell Rails to use our new layout for the action. Add the line layout 'print', only: [:print_reports] to your controller:
class reports_controller < ApplicationController
layout 'print', only: [:print_reports]
#snip
See this question for more information and a few different approaches.
At this point, when you run the app, your print_reports action should be using print.css correctly!
Remember to run rake assets:precompile before deploying on the server.
Official Solution
It is documented in the official Rails Guides here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/asset_pipeline.html#controller-specific-assets
Actually you can leave out the require_tree directive (located in application.css and application.js) then use this in your template:
For controller specific JavaScript:
<%= javascript_include_tag params[:controller] %>
For controller specific CSS:
<%= stylesheet_link_tag params[:controller] %>
All of you are putting very complicated answers.
1 Go to app/assets/stylesheets
2.Make a file with the extension .css
3.Go to config/initializers/assets.rb
4.Put this line of of code Rails.application.config.assets.precompile += %w( file.css )
5.Replace file.css with the file you created
6.Go to your html.erb file
7.Type this in the <head>, <%= stylesheet_link_tag "file" %>
8.Replace file with the filename(no extension in the name)
Good Job you linked the file!
There's one specific action that I want to have use different CSS.
Here's an alternative way to accomplish what you're looking for:
Add the controller name and action name to the app body in your /views/layouts/application.html.rb:
<body class="<%= controller_name %>-<%= action_name %>">
<%= yield %>
</body>
Then in your .scss file:
.controller_name-action_name {
// your css goes here
}
So if your controller was static_pages and your action was home:
.static_pages-home {
// your css goes here
}
Tada! Your css only appears for that specific action.
In your layout
<head>
// ...
<%= yield :stylesheets %>
</head>
In your view
<%= provide :stylesheets do %>
// your page-specific css
<% end %>
I am reading rails guides documentation for asset pipeline.
It states that coffeescript page specific generated files
are by default ready to user if there is a require_tree directive on the manifest.
This is not working with me I have to do include this
<%= javascript_include_tag params[:controller] %>
on the specific controller.
What am I missing ?
The asset pipeline will compress all of your JS into a single file, application.js. In order to call JS for a specific page, you will need to organize your JS by controller and action. There is a gem, RailsScript that does this automatically and it's compatible with Turbolinks which can give you a single page application feel.
RailsScript only takes a few minutes to learn, https://github.com/gemgento/rails_script.
A specific example using rails script:
# app/assets/javascripts/users.js.coffee
window.App ||= {}
class App.Users extends App.Base
show: ->
alert('The users#show action!')
I think you are misunderstanding the asset-pipeline in general. It doesn't load the javascript-files individually, but rather all the .js.coffee files will get compiled into one big js-file, which you have to include in your views/layout like this
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application", media: "all", "data-turbolinks-track" => true %>
If you want some js-code that is only available in one view, you definitely should not include that into the asset-pipeline.
Not sure if I've misunderstood your first paragraph, but I think what the line means is that if your application.js manifest contains a line like:
//= require_tree .
Then yes indeed, page specific javascript, or coffeescript will be loaded, not only for that specific page, for for all pages. If you want to constrain assets to certain pages like you've described, you will need a file located in app/assets/javascripts/ with the pluralized name of the controller, and .js.
I would personally create this as another manifest for that specific page, that way I can load multiple assets. Lets say you have a controller called UsersController, with various assets used by that controller's views. What you then need, in order for the line you wrote in your question to work, is a .js filed users.js or users.js.coffee in the app/assets/javascript directory.
Alternatively, to maintain the naming convention, I do something like this:
<%= javascript_include_tag "application-#{params[:controller]}"%>
and then of course name my file appropriate (application-users.js).
Also, when you do this, you'll want to stop your page-specific assets from loading for all controllers. Simply remove the //= require_tree . line and replace it with explicit //= require lines as needed.
Here's a way to do page-specific javascript in rails.
Install the jquery-readyselector.js plugin. (It's 18 lines)
a. Copy the contents of https://raw.github.com/Verba/jquery-readyselector/master/jquery.readyselector.js
b. Paste the contents to a new file at assets/javascripts/jquery_readyselector.js
c. Require jquery-readyselector
// assets/javascripts/application.js
//= require jquery_readyselector
//= require_tree .
Create CSS classes so we have a way to reference each page individually.
<%# views/layouts/application.html.erb %>
<body class="<%= controller_name %> <%= action_name %>">
Now we can scope our javascript to our page using CSS.
// assets/javascripts/posts.js
$(".posts.index").ready(function() {
});
Due to a specific setup, I would like to split the compiled stylesheets in two files. This is because (a part of) the CSS is needed for a Java application which can parse the CSS, but it is a bit buggy and can't handle some css-(hack)-syntax. Because I am unable to modify this Java application, I want to feed it only the CSS which it needs and of which I can make sure it is correct.
So, normally the assets pipeline would produce just one '/assets/application-[..].css' file. It would to let it also generate '/assets/custom-[..].css', based on a file selection I make. This still can be pre-compiled.
Is there a way to do this? Although I understand this is not the ideal setup..
To tell rails about additional files you wish to have precompiled, you can add them to the config.assets.precompile setting.
config.assets.precompile += ["other_application.css"]
You only see application.css in your HTML because that's the only file you're including
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application" %>
If you have some custom.css.scss in your apps/assets/stylesheets directory, it will be compiled just like application.css.
For example, I might have
- _common.css.scss
- application.css.erb.scss
- other_application.css.erb.scss
in app/assets/stylesheets. In the top of the non-partial files I will put
#import "common";
to include _common.css.scss. I can now reference either stylesheet independent of one another in a layout.
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "application" %>
# or
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "other_application" %>
I was wondering if there was a way to ignore a css file from being added to the manifest application.css file.
The reason why I want to do this is that I have two versions of the site, a mobile version, an an web version. The mobile version's css is currently being added to the manifest, and messing with the style of the main page.
Is there anyway to configure the manifest file to exclude a certain css file?
Remove the require_tree directive and add just the files you want, in the order you want them to application.css. Leave out the mobile CSS file.
To access the mobile CSS file you need to add it to the precompile list in
production.rb:
config.assets.precompile += ['mobile.css']
This will allow you to use the standard rails helper to access the mobile css:
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "mobile" %>
as distinct from the application.css file.
One tip for these situations is that you can share CSS files between manifests. For example, if you have a CSS reset in a separate file this can be added to both manifests (assuming you make the mobile css a manifest too).
What I ended up doing was creating subdirectories under app/assets/stylesheets called app/assets/stylesheets/web and app/assets/stylesheets/mobile
Then place an application.css with the standard:
/* ...
*= require_self
*= require_tree .
*/
inside each of your new web and mobile folders. Then to access them:
# just use this
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "web/application", :media => "all" %>
# or this as needed
<%= stylesheet_link_tag "mobile/application", :media => "all" %>