I have three models - Company, User and CompanyUser. The associations are as follows.
Company.rb
has_many :company_users
has_many :users, :through => :company_users
User.rb
has_many :company_users, :dependent => :destroy
belongs_to :company
CompanyUser.rb
belongs_to :company
belongs_to :user
For fetching current_user.company, what moddifications are to be made in the model association?
Any help would be appreciated.
It should be:
has_many :companies, through: :company_users
A has_many :through association is often used to set up a many-to-many
connection with another model. This association indicates that the
declaring model can be matched with zero or more instances of another
model by proceeding through a third model.
So if you are creating three models and making a has_many :through association I believe that User will have many Companies and Company will have many Users.
But if you need that the user belongs to only one company instead of creating the third model save the company_id in the users table itself.
Update:
Now as your scenario is A company can have may users and User belongs to a single company, you need two models: User and Company. Your User model should have an attribute company_id and then company_id should be saved in users table only. Then the associations as follows:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :company
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
end
Then you can do current_user.company
You can get more information on associations in the RailsGuides
According to the associations you have taken,
user already have as association with the company through the Company User model, so user may have many companies according to your associations.
so,
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :company_users, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :companies, :through => :company_users
end
current_user.companies will give you the companies.
But if you need only one company for a user then,
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :company
end
take belongs_to company and save company_id in users table,
then you can call,
`current_user.company`
According to your logic,
I think you may need to create a new variable session current_company_user which is object CompanyUser.
And then, to fetch company by :
current_company_user.company
Related
I have searched and searched and found only partial solutions to my current question.
The thing is, I'd like to know if it is possible to use has_many :through along with a polymorphic association in Ruby on Rails.
I have a system where students can create travel plans (that can belong to many students) and refund claims (that can belong to only one student) for their projects. In this system, both admin users and students are able to comment on the plans and claims.
My associations are:
class Student < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :travel_plans
has_many :refund_claims
has_many :comments, through: :travel_plans
has_many :comments, through: :refund_claims
end
class AdminUser < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments
end
class TravelPlan < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :students
has_many :comments, as: :commentable
end
class RefundClaim < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :student
has_many :comments, as: :commentable
end
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :commentable, polymorphic: true
end
My questions are:
Is it correct to associate comments twice in the Student model?
I don't want the AdminUsers to have travel plans and refund claims, how can I identify their comments as being made on a travel plan or on a refund claim?
Would there be a better approach?
Thanks a lot in advance for everyone!
Cheers,
You probably want to add an polymorphic author attribute to the Comment model. Than you just need has_many :comments, as: :author to the Student and AdminUser model.
If this is a new application and you are starting on the green field you might want to rethink your models a bit and add a Role and a User model. Student would than be a role of user as would AdminUser be.
Is it correct to associate comments twice in the Student model?
No, not really. If you have duplicate association name, you can only use one of them. If you want to use both, you have to name them differently.
I have two models User and UserRelation. The case is that User has several related users with himself(recommended by him), but he has only one person related_to(person who recommended him).
I would like to return from User object collection of recommended users and user who recommended him. I have written association for returning users collection and it works but I have no idea how should I write has_one association.
I get this error:
ActiveRecord::HasOneThroughCantAssociateThroughCollection: Cannot have a has_one :through association 'User#relation' where the :through association 'User#user_relations' is a collection. Specify a has_one or belongs_to association in the :through option instead
User model:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_relations
has_many :related_users, through: :user_relations, source: :related_user
has_one :relation, through: :user_relations, source: :user
end
UserRelation model:
class UserRelation < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :related_user, class_name: 'User'
end
UserRelation columns:
user_id
related_user_id
My choice would be to put a foreign key in your User table for the possible related_to field.
If the requirement is that it can only be one (or none) then why not?
You still keep the other "user_relations" for all other types. All the time in rails, we map to the same entity in different ways. It's not uncommon at all
I'm beginning a project with rails where there are products, clients and sellers. Each seller has_many products. Each Client has_many products. (And in my case, each client only buys one product at a time).
I want to know who are my clients' seller and my Seller's clients, knowing that, they'll be linked by, the purchase, of one product.
Should I use a has_and_belongs_to_many association between clients and sellers ? Or a double has_many through :products, like :
Seller :
has_many :clients through :products
Belongs_to :products
Client :
has_many :sellers through :products
Belongs_to :products
In order to avoid two belongs_to in the product class, could this work ?
class Client < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products, as: :productable
has_many :sellers, through: :products
end
class Seller < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products, as: :productable
has_many :clients, through: :products
end
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :productable, polymorphic: true
end
Thanks in advance for your answer.
I would go with has_many :through here.
class Client < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products
has_many :sellers, through: :products
end
class Seller < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :prodcuts
has_many :clients, through: :products
end
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :client
belongs_to :seller
end
The simplest rule of thumb is that you should set up a has_many
:through relationship if you need to work with the relationship model
as an independent entity. If you don't need to do anything with the
relationship model, it may be simpler to set up a
has_and_belongs_to_many relationship (though you'll need to remember
to create the joining table in the database).
You should use has_many :through if you need validations, callbacks,
or extra attributes on the join model.
And also see these Guides for choosing between HABTM and a has_many :through
I want to approach your question from the other end: let us start from the product. I think this will clarify a lot of things.
So you have three models: Seller, Client and Product.
A Product has a seller and client. In your model that would like this:
class Product
belongs_to :seller
belongs_to :client
end
This means that in the products table we have a column seller_id and client_id.
Afaik a product needs to have both, always. So this also means you cannot use a polymorphic association here. At least not the way you proposed it. If you write
belongs_to :productable, polymorphic: true
you will add the fields productable_id and productable_typeto yourProduct` model. But that is only 1 link (so either a seller or a client, but never both). You could introduce a link table here, so a product could be linked to many "productables" but in your case i think it is besides the point. You know a product has one seller and one client.
Secondly, now this is established, your Product is exactly the link-table between clients and sellers. So you do not have to introduce a new link-table, just use the one already there.
class Seller
has_many :products
has_many :clients, through: :products
end
class Client
has_many :products
has_many :sellers, through: :products
end
So in conclusion:
use the has_many :through because you already have the link table as a model. Only use a habtm if you do not care about the join-table (link-table).
you can't use a polymorphic association here, as you need two links (without introducing a link-table, which seems overkill imho). I like the explicitness, clarity, readability of having an explicit seller_id and client_id, and it is also easier to manage.
I'm new to Rails and have some doubts about the kind of relationship do I need to use. Here is the case.
I have two models Offer and User, a user could belong to to many offers and offers can have many user. Also the users create the offers.
I think I have to use a has_many :through ralationship. For example I've created another model "Applicant". Applicant belongs_to user and belongs_to offer. But how is the relationship from the user and offer model? For example:
User Model
has_many :offer, :through => :applicant
Offer Model
has_many :user, :through => :applicant
My doubt is because I already have this two relationship
User Model
has_many :offers, :dependent => :destroy
Offer Model
belongs_to :user
After solve this, I guest I have to save the record in the applicant model from the applicanst_controller, right?
Thanks in advance
What you have described is a many-to-many relationship using a join table. You're actually pretty close but you just need to remove the has_many :offers, :dependent => :destroy from your user model and the blongs_to :user in your offer model. It should look something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :offers, :through => :applicants
end
class Applicant < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :users
belongs_to :offers
end
class Offer < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :applicants
end
You don't have to worry about the dependent destroy part as associations are automatically removed as the corresponding objects are removed. With a many to many association it doesn't really matter how you go about building the relationship. Either of the following will work:
#user.offers << #offer
#offers.users << #user
If you don't need to store any information specific to your applicant join table (e.g., time stamps, descriptions) you might instead want to look at a has_and_belongs_to_many relationship. Check out choosing between has_many_through and has_and_belongs_to_many for reference.
Edit
Heres the code for a HABTM relationship:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :offers
end
class Offer < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
I have a User model, Person model and Company model.
a User has many companies through Person and vice versa.
But i would like to be able to populate People and Companies that are not tied to Users that can be tied later.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name
has_many :people
has_many :companies, :through => :people
end
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :user_id, :company_id
belongs_to :users
belongs_to :companies
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name
has_many :people
has_many :users, :through => :person
end
now in the console i want to be doing the following
User.find(1).companies
then it should find me the companies in which user(1) is a person of interest.
Have I got this wrong, is there a small change that I should be making.
Your Person model can't directly "belong_to" more than one, your belongs_to :users and belongs_to :companies associations won't work that way. Companies-to-people need to be connected through another join table that describes the relationship between them, for example Employment which points to one instance of each model:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :employments
has_many :companies, :through => :employments
end
class Employment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :person
belongs_to :company
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :employments
has_many :people, :through => :employments
end
You can then use the :through option to associate the many companies/people on the other side of that employment relationship in the middle.
Similarly, if a Person can be owned by more than one User then you will need a join model between those two entities as well.
Just as a followup, in a has_many :through relationship, there is nothing that says you cannot use your join table (in your case, Person) independently. By nature of the relationship, you are joining through a completely separate ActiveRecord model, which is what most notably distinguishes it from the has_and_belongs_to_many relationship.
As Brad pointed out in his comment, you need to pluralize 'person' to 'people' in your relationship. Other than that, it looks like you set it up correctly. Exposing :user_id and :company_id with attr_accessible will enable you to mass-assign these values later from a postback, but often times you want to shy away from doing so with role-based associations, as you may not want to leave them exposed to potential HTTP Post attacks.
Remember, in your controller you can always do something like this with or without attr_accessible:
#person = Person.new
#person.user = User.find(...)
#person.company = Company.find(...)
#person.save
Hope that helps.