I am building an API for my rails app. Through that API I will log users in and allow them to interact with their data.
On top of that users authentication, I will also like to make sure only my iOS app has access to the API, and eventually my own web app.
I want to make sure no one else will be using the API, so on top of the user authentication, I will like to protect my API with a token for each of my apps.
How do you usually solve this problem? Would I have to pass that token over on each call in order to authenticate that the call is coming from a valid client and identify which client it is (web vs iOS).
I will very much appreciate any pointers or if you know of an article explaining how to deal with this.
As you are already using jwt's to authenticate your user, why not just use the functionality of jwt to include additional information in the token, in this instance some form of hashed string that you can verify server side if it is a valid "client id".
On each request you could refresh the string.
Kind of dual authentication in each request. the user and the client.
Related
So I have an application that currently logs the user using linkedin. We are using several oauth services to register and login the user into our application, however we do need to validate the authentication in our own server to make sure any requests to our API are valid.
Currently the linkedIn SDK is not functional in our application due to minimum API level restrictions, so we are using a different library (LinkedIn-J), I am able to retrieve the user access token and secret, I cannot find any reference as to validate them in the server.
How can we go around to making this work? Is it even possible to achieve such a thing?
Thank you very much.
LinkedIn does not have a token validation endpoint. Your best bet is to make a simple non-destructive call like https://api.linkedin.com/v1/people/~ and watch the response to determine whether the token is still valid.
I see that when connecting services to twitter/facebook, sometimes apps are storing the user access token in the server. What is the most common purpose of doing this? I've read several twitter/fb documents and just don't seem to get it. Twitter also has an xAuth which can basically provide you with the user 'access_token', so what is the purpose of doing this?
You don't want 3RD parties pretending to be users. You want signed transactions so that authenticity is validated.
What if some application just started posting shit on your wall? This has a pretty obvious purpose.
Your app has to provide the token when making API requests that have been approved by the user. That's what OAuth is made for.
Instead of the service storing your facebook/twitter username/password on the server (which the service shouldn't know) it stores the access_token. The access_token can be used to make requests to the API. This is the purpouse of Oauth. It will enable you to write services which uses an external api like facebook without the user ever telling you theire username/password
I have a webapp which does a lot of ajax requests with the php server and database server. I have also created an iPhone app and an Android app, which have been working as offline apps till now.
Now I want to create an API which will be used to sync data between web server and smartphone apps. Should I be using OAuth for this? What I have read about OAuth - it seems like it is used if I want to open my API to be used by third party apps. But here I just want to ensure secure transfer of data between API and my own apps.
Can somebody shed some light on this?
The main usage of OAuth is to make third-party apps authorized to access private resources of a user on a website without giving user credentials to the third-party app. For example, suppose that Twitter wants to get the list of contacts from your Yahoo account. The traditional way is to give your username and password to Twitter. But with OAuth, you give them a temporary token (called Access Token) which authorizes Twitter to access your contacts on Yahoo for a limited amount of time (until either this token expires or you, as the owner of private resource, explicitly revoke it).
That said, OAuth is not about securely transmitting data on the web. That's another story which is usually achieved using SSL. Even when you use OAuth, you have to use SSL alongside to make sure data is sent and received securely.
So in your case, you have to see what the API is used for. If it's public API which doesn't give any private data to the callers, there is no need to use OAuth. If the API is for accessing private resources of individual users however, You may consider using OAuth. If you opt to implement OAuth, you may allow other third-party apps to access your API in future without any concern.
Well a lot depends on how you are securing your API. Is your API open to public specially the post urls? If your data is not something which every user should see, then how are you checking the authentication of the user credentials?
Most the important thing is that we should avoid sharing the username and password over the wire to check for authentication all the time. This means, your API should not require username and password to validate if the user is valid. Which you can do by sending the username and password from mobile or device id or some other thing.
In such situation, the OAuth server comes to the rescue. Basically, on one URL a user will send his username and password to get his access token. Once that is acquired, we can use the access token to validate each request and take necessary actions.
You can refer the videos where I have implemented OAuth server in Laravel 5 using bshaffer which is one of the best OAuth library for any PHP framework to user. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vGXbWdtjls
Goal:
Allow a user to authentication with Facebook into an iOS application which requires access to a protected web service that I'm running.
Assumptions:
There is a native authentication (and registration) system in place for those users that opt not to use Facebook for sign in.
Details:
Assume we want to offer the option for a user to sign in with Facebook without creating a separate account/credential for our system.
Because we support our own native auth mechanism (username and password) we have our own user IDs and issue an authentication token that is used for subsequent interactions after the initial credential validation.
I'm surprised that Facebook doesn't have best practices for this in their developer documentation. All the existing documentation is either assuming you are building FB auth into a website, or a standalone mobile app with no service that requires authentication.
Here's my initial thoughts on how this would be designed but want validation on whether it's correct.
Client pops the Facebook iOS Login
UI User signs in with Facebook credentials and gets access token
iOS App passes access token to our server
Our server talks to FB graph API using access token to (a) validate the token and (b) get the FB user ID for that access token.
e.g. Our server would call https://graph.facebook.com/me/?access_token=XYZ which would return profile info in a JSON object
Assuming it's valid, our server extracts the User ID from the JSON object and checks whether the user already has an account. If so, we issue our own auth ticket to client to use for that session. If user doesn't have an account, we create a new one with the Facebook User ID, assign our own unique UserID and issue our auth ticket.
Client then passes auth ticket back on subsequent interactions that need authentication.
This seems like the right approach to me but not sure if I'm missing something insanely basic and going down the wrong (complicated) path.
I just dealt with this myself, and here's the part that bit me:
In your step 5... It's possible for a user to register for an account with you entirely separate from their Facebook ID, right? Then some other time they log in with Facebook.... And you just created them a second account and lost their first one.
There needs to be a way to be logged in to your web service, then log in to facebook, and capture the association between the facebook ID and the local account.
Apart from that, your plan sounds solid.
Update: Facebook has added a doc outlining such a scenario HERE
Use https to transmit the auth token to your server, as stated by Facebook
Sharing of Access Tokens
Our Data Policies explicitly prohibit any sharing of an Access Token
for your app with any other app. However, we do allow developers to
share Tokens between a native implementation and a server
implementation of the same App (ie. using the same App ID) as long as
the transfer takes place using HTTPS.
One problem I can see with this strategy, is that somebody can give you an access token obtained for a different facebook app. As far as I know, there's no way to verify that the access token is for your application, so you'll just go on and use it.
It doesn't sound very harmful, though. Generally people/apps try to protect the access tokens, rather than sharing them.
One possible exploit of this would be, for somebody to create their own site or mobile app, obtain access tokens for their users and try to authenticate them, using your API. If this succeeds (the user is has a facebook account in your site), the malicious site will be able to use your API impersonating the user.
It's a bit of a long shot, but I think it could work.
Edit: It looks like there is a way to validate the access token after all. See the answer by #Daaniel on question Get application id from user access token (or verify the source application for a token).
your solution totally works.
Maybe an alternative: why not just get the email on the client from the initial social service request and send to your web service? The web service could just store the email, and maybe a social_provider as well. I understand that your web service will not be able to validate where the email came from, but isn't there a high-trust relationship between your web service and your client? If there is, seems like you can depend on the email coming from the right place. Someone please let me know what obvious thing I'm missing that makes the email-based approach silly...
I'm trying to use OAuth with .NET (DotNetOpenAuth) to send updates to a Twitter account via a web application. I understand the basic workflow of OAuth and Twitter.
Where I'm confused if is it useful in a server web application? I don't want any user interaction.
But how it seems after an application start, the request token needs to be recreated and also an access token. This involves user interaction.
What is the correct workflow for my case?
Storing the request token or access token in config file?
Or the easist way, using HTTP basic authentication?
Thanks
If I understand you correctly your application will not be interacting with Twitter on behalf of your users but will be acting as the Twitter account for your application.
In this case there are 2 main factors to consider.
1) Do you want "from API" attached to each status as will be if you use basic auth or your applications name will happen if you use OAuth.
2) Do you want to put in the extra effort to implement OAuth.
If you decide to go with OAuth you would store your apps consumer key/secret and the accounts access token in configuration just like you would store the accounts screenname/password.
Your "request token needs to be recreated" phrase suggests you might be running into the problem where every time your user visits you need to re-authorize to Twitter, and perhaps you're looking for a way to access the user's Twitter account while he's not at your web site, and how can you do this when their token isn't fresh from being re-authorized. Is that right?
If so, the user isn't supposed to have to re-authorize Twitter every time they visit your site. The token is supposed to last a long time, which would also allow your site to access their Twitter account when they are not directly interacting with your web site. The problem may be that you haven't implemented the IConsumerTokenManager interface, but are instead using the default InMemoryTokenManager, which is for sample use only, since this memory-only token manager loses tokens every time the web app is restarted. Your own implementation of this simple interface should store and read the tokens out of some persistent storage such as a database.