I have some difficulties to configure Jenkins to run test on a dockerized application.
First here is my set up: the project is on bitbucket and I have a docker-compose that run my application which is composed of 3 three conmtainers for now (one for mongo, one for redis, one for my node app).
The webhook of bitbucket works well and Jenkins is triggered when I push.
However what i would like to do for a build is:
get a repo where my docker-compose is, run the docker-compose in order to have my cluster running, and then run a "npm test" inside the repo (my test use mocha), and finally having Jenkins notified if the test have passed or not.
If someone could help me to get this chain of operation applied by Jenkins, it would be awesome.
The simplest way is use jenkins pipeline plugin or shell script.
To build docker image and run compose you could use docker-compose command. Important thing is that you need rebuild docker image from compose level (because if you run docker-compose run only jenkins can use previous bilded image). So you need run docker-compose build before.
Your dockerfile should copy all files of your application.
Next when your service is ready you could run command in docker image using: docker exec {CONTAINER_ID} {COMMAND_TO_RUN_TESTS}.
Related
Since I do not have lots of experience with DevOps yet, I am struggling with finding an answer for the following question:
I'm setting up the CI/CD pipeline for my project (Python, FastAPI, Redis), which will have test and build stages. It can be described as follows:
Before stages: Install all dependencies (install python, copy files for testing, etc.)
The test stage uses docker-compose for running the Redis server, which is
necessary to launch the application for testing (unit test).
The build stage creates a new docker container
and pushes it to the Docker Hub if there is a new Gitlab tag.
The GitLab Runner is located on the AWS EC2 instance, the runner executor is a "docker" with an "Ubuntu:20.04" image. So, the question:
How to run "docker-compose"/"docker build" inside the docker executor and whether it can be done at all without any negative consequences?
I thought about several options:
Switch from docker executor to something else (maybe to shell or docker+ssh)
Use Docker-in-Docker, but I see cautions that it can be dangerous and not sure exactly why in my case.
What I've tried:
To use Redis as "services" in Gitlab job instead of docker-compose file, but I can't find a way to bind my application (host and port) to a server that runs inside the docker executor as a service.
Our application has a Dockerfile that describes a custom image we'd like to use for to build and test application.
Basically, for every git push we want to:
Build an image from a Docker file.
Run a container based on this image.
Run build and tests in a container.
Get test results back to GitLab.
While it seems to be absolutely doable with GitLab CI's Shell Executor, I'm wondering if there is a recommended way to do such a thing?
Also, does this plan sounds appropriate for GitLab CI + Docker combination?
I have GoCD deployed in my Kubernetes cluster with the standard Helm chart, which configures it to use the Kubernetes elastic agent plugin and provides an example elastic profile which uses the gocd-agent-docker-dind docker image to provide docker-in-docker functionality.
What I'd like to do is to have my first stage build the Dockerfile in the repo, then have another stage execute the unit tests in the previously built docker image and parse the JUnit XML test result output. I managed to get the build and test execution working, but I'm having trouble extracting the test result files afterward.
I'm running a shell command like the following inside the elastic agent's image:
docker run -v "/test-results:/test-results" \
test-image:v${GO_PIPELINE_LABEL} \
--junit-xml /test-results/results.xml
But the directory is empty after the run, suggesting an issue with mounting a volume in a docker-in-docker situation.
Has anyone tried to accomplish anything like this before, or do you have any ideas how to resolve this?
I'm having issues getting a Jenkins pipeline script to work that uses the Docker Pipeline plugin to run parts of the build within a Docker container. Both Jenkins server and slave run within Docker containers themselves.
Setup
Jenkins server running in a Docker container
Jenkins slave based on custom image (https://github.com/simulogics/protokube-jenkins-slave) running in a Docker container as well
Docker daemon container based on docker:1.12-dind image
Slave started like so: docker run --link=docker-daemon:docker --link=jenkins:master -d --name protokube-jenkins-slave -e EXTRA_PARAMS="-username xxx -password xxx -labels docker" simulogics/protokube-jenkins-slave
Basic Docker operations (pull, build and push images) are working just fine with this setup.
(Non-)Goals
I want the server to not have to know about Docker at all. This should be a characteristic of the slave/node.
I do not need dynamic allocation of slaves or ephemeral slaves. One slave started manually is quite enough for my purposes.
Ideally, I want to move away from my custom Docker image for the slave and instead use the inside function provided by the Docker pipeline plugin within a generic Docker slave.
Problem
This is a representative build step that's causing the issue:
image.inside {
stage ('Install Ruby Dependencies') {
sh "bundle install"
}
}
This would cause an error like this in the log:
sh: 1: cannot create /workspace/repo_branch-K5EM5XEVEIPSV2SZZUR337V7FG4BZXHD4VORYFYISRWIO3N6U67Q#tmp/durable-98bb4c3d/pid: Directory nonexistent
Previously, this warning would show:
71f4de289962-5790bfcc seems to be running inside container 71f4de28996233340c2aed4212248f1e73281f1cd7282a54a36ceeac8c65ec0a
but /workspace/repo_branch-K5EM5XEVEIPSV2SZZUR337V7FG4BZXHD4VORYFYISRWIO3N6U67Q could not be found among []
Interestingly enough, exactly this problem is described in CloudBees documentation for the plugin here https://go.cloudbees.com/docs/cloudbees-documentation/cje-user-guide/index.html#docker-workflow-sect-inside:
For inside to work, the Docker server and the Jenkins agent must use the same filesystem, so that the workspace can be mounted. The easiest way to ensure this is for the Docker server to be running on localhost (the same computer as the agent). Currently neither the Jenkins plugin nor the Docker CLI will automatically detect the case that the server is running remotely; a typical symptom would be errors from nested sh commands such as
cannot create /…#tmp/durable-…/pid: Directory nonexistent
or negative exit codes.
When Jenkins can detect that the agent is itself running inside a Docker container, it will automatically pass the --volumes-from argument to the inside container, ensuring that it can share a workspace with the agent.
Unfortunately, the detection described in the last paragraph doesn't seem to work.
Question
Since both my server and slave are running in Docker containers, what kid of volume mapping do I have to use to make it work?
I've seen variations of this issue, also with the agents powered by the kubernetes-plugin.
I think that for it to work the agent/jnlp container needs to share workspace with the build container.
By build container I am referring to the one that will run the bundle install command.
This could be possibly work via withArgs
The question is why would you want to do that? Most of the pipeline steps are being executed on master anyway and the actual build will run in the build container. What is the purpose of also using an agent?
I have a Gitlab server running on a Docker container: gitlab docker
On Gitlab there is a project with a simple Makefile that runs pdflatex to build pfd file.
On the Docker container I installed texlive and make, I also installed docker runner, command:
curl -sSL https://get.docker.com/ | sh
the .gitlab-ci.yml looks like follow:
.build:
script: &build_script
- make
build:
stage: test
tags:
- Documentation Build
script: *build
The job is stuck running and a message is shown:
This build is stuck, because the project doesn't have any runners online assigned to it
any idea?
The top comment on your link is spot on:
"Gitlab is good, but this container is absolutely bonkers."
Secondly looking at gitlab's own advice you should not be using this container on windows, ever.
If you want to use Gitlab-CI from a Gitlab Server, you should actually be installing a proper Gitlab server instance on a proper Supported Linux VM, with Omnibus, and should not attempt to use this container for a purpose it is manifestly unfit for: real production way to run Gitlab.
Gitlab-omnibus contains:
a persistent (not stateless!) data tier powered by postgres.
a chat server that's entire point in existing is to be a persistent log of your team chat.
not one, but a series of server processes that work together to give you gitlab server functionality and web admin/management frontend, in a design that does not seem ideal to me to be run in production inside docker.
an integrated CI build manager that is itself a Docker container manager. Your docker instance is going to contain a cache of other docker instances.
That this container was built by Gitlab itself is no indication you should actually use it for anything other than as a test/toy or for what Gitlab themselves actually use it for, which is probably to let people spin up Gitlab nightly builds, probably via kubernetes.
I think you're slightly confused here. Judging by this comment:
On the Docker container I installed texlive and make, I also installed
docker runner, command:
curl -sSL https://get.docker.com/ | sh
It seems you've installed docker inside docker and not actually installed any runners? This won't work if that's the case. The steps to get this running are:
Deploy a new gitlab runner. The quickest way to do this will be to deploy another docker container with the gitlab runner docker image. You can't run a runner inside the docker container you've deployed gitlab in. You'll need to make sure you select an executor (I suggest using the shell executor to get you started) and then you need to register the runner. There is more information about how to do this here. What isn't detailed here is that if you're using docker for gitlab and docker for gitlab-runner, you'll need to link the containers or set up a docker network so they can communicate with each other
Once you've deployed and registered the runner with gitlab, you will see it appear in http(s)://your-gitlab-server/admin/runners - from here you'll need to assign it to a project. You can also make it as "Shared" runner which will execute jobs from all projects.
Finally, add the .gitlab-ci.yml as you already have, and the build will work as expected.
Maybe you've set the wrong tags like me. Make sure the tag name with your available runner.
tags
- Documentation Build # tags is used to select specific Runners from the list of all Runners that are allowed to run this project.
see: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#tags