We are trying to run all the vstest unit test cases as part of our CI.
I want to generate fake dll once after the actual dll is built in Jenkins.
is there any msbuild command to generate fakes dll out of C# dll that i can configure in Jenkins?
Right now we are actually generating the fake dll from visual studio 2013 and copying it to jenkins machine(predefined location).
This will be really helpful as i'm trying to get rid of manually generating the fake dll and copying it to jenkins machine every time there is a change in the actual dll.
Could you elaborate on your question a little bit more? I think that will help us narrow down a good answer for you.
In general, Jenkins can easily execute 2 compile steps in succession to generate both of your dlls before testing.. For example, in 2 different build steps, as a batch/shell/bash script, as downstream/pipeline jobs, or within a build scripting language like ant/maven/gradle.
Related
We are migrating 50+ .net project from TFS to GitHub, at the same, we want to use Jenkins to automate the build. Currently all the builds are done inside the Visual Studio manually. I know how to automate this build using MSBuild and we already have a lot of these projects building inside Jenkins.
My question: is there a way to set up these 50+ project quickly w/o creating them one by one manually? Anyway to script them? e.g. a Jenkins project has everything inside a folder, I can copy a sample project/folder to create a new one and modify something. Or create a Jenkins project using a script reading a config file? Any idea can save some time is appreciated.
Not a direct answer but too long for a comment so here it goes anyway. Following the Joel test (which in no way is dogmatic for me but does make a lot of good points), and in my experience, you should already have an msbuild file now to build all those projects 'in one click'. Then, setting up a build server, in fact any build server, is just a matter of making it build that single parent project. This might not work for everyone, but for several projects I've worked on this had the following advantages:
the entire build process gets defined by developpers, working locally on their machine, using 'standard' tools
as such they don't need to spend hours in a web interface figuring out the appropriate build steps, dependencies and whatnot (also those hours would have been worthless in the end if switching to a different build server)
since a complete build is now just a matter of msbuild master.proj, possibly along with some options to define configuration/platform/output directories getting this running on any build server should be painless and quick
in the same manner this makes it easy to test different build servers with a minimum of time and migrate between them (also no need to ask SO questions on how to set everything up :)
this also makes it easy for other developpers to get complete builds as well without having to go round via a build server
Anecdote: we once had Jenkins running on multiple different projects as well. It took us days to get everything running, with the templates etc, and we found the web intercae slow and cumbersome (and getting to know the API would have taken even more days). Then one day I got sick of this and made a bunch of msbuild scripts which could build everything from one msbuild command. That took much less time than setting up Jenkins, a couple of hours or so. Then I took a TeamCity installation we already had and made it build the new master project. Took like an hour and everything worked. Just recently I took the same project and got it working on Visual Studio Online, again in no time.
If those projects are more or less similar to build, you will probably be interested in using the template plug-in for jenkins. There you configure a dummy project such that it does what is common to (most of) the 50+ projects.
Afterwards you create a separate project for each: Create the first project and make it use the template project for each of the steps which can be shared with the template project (use build step from other project). All subsequent projects can be created as slightly adopted copy of this first 'real' project.
I use it such that the variable $JOB_NAME (the actual project name in jenkins that is) is part of the repository path and I can thus clone from http://example.org/$JOB_NAME/
Configured that way, I can include the source code management step in the templating job and use it unmodified. Similar with the build step and post-build step: they are run by a script which is somewhat universal accross all my projects (mostly calling make and guessing deployment / publication paths upon $JOB_NAME again).
I am trying to setup Jenkins to automate a build. We have one enormous repository with approximately 100 solution files. To build this repository we have a build program which finds all the solutions and builds in a specified order.
I would like to change that to use Jenkins. Is there a way to setup msbuild and specify a build order for all of these solution files?
p.s. I am trying to avoid creating one mammoth solution file which contains all of the projects.
If in fact all of your projects use ProjectReferences to other VS projects, you should be able to use MSBuild to extract all those references via the ResolveProjectReferences MSBuild task. You can then build an MSBuild script build those dependent projects in order. There's a pretty good example of this here. The example given there goes so far as constructing a specialized MSBuild task that builds a dependency graph, which I must say is pretty cool.
Currently I'm in the progress of updating TFS 2012 to 2013. My plan is to use the default build process template and stick to it, if possible. The existing build definitions use the old TFS method with TFSBuild.proj files. In thse proj files everything happens. Initializing the solution directory, build, clean, run unit test, drop files, etc. Compared to the 2013 build process template this is incorrect, since the workflow has activities for build, clean, run tests, drop files, etc. As well it seems that the targets file used in the TFSBuild.proj files is of a previous TFS version and hasn't been updated to a 2013 version.
The problem is that besides the build, clean, run test an drop files activities there are other activities needed. Version numbers are changed in certain files, obfuscation for dlls, check procedures if the source doesn't contain any unwanted files, zipping of pdb files, etc.
Of course it is possible to execute these tasks/activities with PowerShell scripts. On the other hand working with tasks in the a project file also seems logical. My concern with performing extra tasks in a project files is that TFS is running the activities for test, dropping files, etc. after calling the MSBuild activity.
Can someone point me in the right direction? Do I need custom developed activities that I can use in the build process template? Or is working with PowerShell scripts best practice?
I think you've answered your own question! Poweshell is the way forward!
I would say that modifying the XAML and writing a custom activity should only be considered if powershell isn't working for you, or if your scripts are becoming so big and difficult to debug that it makes sense to turn them in to code. As you mention, some of these tasks will need to be performed well after the MSbuild activity has completed so that's not going to work.
It looks like you want to do some fairly simple steps at defined points in the process and the powershell extensibility points are perfect for this.
A simple script for versioning in the pre-build step. Checking the source for unwanted files could happen here as well.
The obfuscation, zipping and copying stuff can happen post test.
From a Maintainability point of view, I would say that powershell has a much bigger user base than Windows Workflow and MSBuild so that's another advantage to this approach.
I am creating a build definition in visual studio 2013. As you know, while creating build definition we can also set the assembly (in "Automated Tests" section) which contains the unit test methods to run. I am able to create the definition till this point. Now, what I want is once the test run is over, I want to call an exe that will parse the Trx file generated as a result of test run and send the run results in an email.
Can anyone have an idea about where I can set the path to the exe and pass some arguments to it while creating build definition? If this cannot be done while creating definition, what else is the other way to achieve it?
Thanks!
What you ask involves multiple steps, especially if you want to pull the tool from version control (which is IMHO the best option).
See the ALM Rangers' Team Foundation Build Customization Guide for help and guidance on this topic.
Or you can just setup an email notification when the TFS Build completes. That should include the test run results, and a clickable link to go to the full build report.
I'm picking up support on a project that is currently built with MyEclipse and has a decent sized development team that has been working without any CI processes.
From what I can tell, the MyEclipse folks don't see any value in being able to build outside of the Eclipse platform, which makes no sense at all to me. Continuous Integration is extremely helpful when you have to integrate changes into a codebase from more than one development environment, and it's pretty tough to automate builds when you're tied to a GUI.
Does anyone have continuous integration processes set up around MyEclipse style project-sets? If so, what strategy did you use to accomplish it?
AFAIKT there is no OOTB feature that can generate an Ant script (or equivalent headless-build script) from MyEclipse, nor is there an exposed way to invoke MyEclipse builders from a build-script platform.
This would lead me to believe that I'll need to reverse engineer the scripts based on what MyEclipse generates, which I'd rather not have to do.
I'm not particularly concerned with a Maven-style solution for my needs, but if you know of one I'd like to hear about it. From my initial research it looks like Maven/MyEclipse integration is even worse.
This is remarkably similar to the problems I had working with a websphere 5.1 application that could only be built from WSAD6 running on build machine built from a disk image from the company IT dept. WSAD did have a headless mode. It was a real pain to get that working from Hudson.
I would not be surprised if there was a Maven plugin and/or Ant task for each of the builders you are using. I would start there.
Here is a Maven based solution so maybee a bit off topic for you..
In our company, we use MyEclipse as IDE and Hudson and Team City for continuous integration. The projects are Maven based, so Hudson and TC can work with them.
When you want to open the project in Eclipse, you have to check out the sources, setup maven repository path for eclipse with mvn eclispse:add-maven-repo, build them with mvn install and then run target mvn eclipse:eclipse, which creates the Eclipse project setup from the maven's POM configuration. Then it is possible to import the project into Eclipse and work with it seamlessly..
More information can be found on maven-eclipse-plugin project page
..seamlessly until you change something in the POM configuration - then you have to run the mvn eclipse:eclipse again and have the eclipse project configuration recreated acording to the new POM.. it's important not to forget about this step, unless your project in the IDE won't work properly and you'll be wondering why ;)
Me personally don't find this solution the best, but that's the way how Eclipse folks work with Maven :/
Hope this should inspire you at least :)
This is another reason why I intensely dislike Eclipse. The fact that an IDE can force you away from something that's acknowledged to be a best practice is shameful.
"AFAIKT there is no OOTB feature that can generate an Ant script (or equivalent headless-build script) from MyEclipse" - I'm not sure I understand why this is a problem. It's possible to write a simple Ant build.xml in an hour or two that would do the job for most Java EE apps packaged as WAR files. I don't know if you're using EJBs, but even adding app server specific tasks such as EJB and JSP compilation wouldn't be much of a challenge. If you can agree on a common directory structure it would even be reusable across projects.
With that Ant build.xml in hand, you should be able to drive your CI process simply by checking into Subversion. The Eclipse plug-ins to do that work well, I hear.
If it's really a problem, I'd recommend IntelliJ. It works nicely with CI based on either Cruise Control or Hudson or Jet Brains' own Team City. The cost isn't excessive, and it'll pay for itself quickly.
If I'm misreading your question, I apologize. But if I've got it right, there's no way I'd let the IDE dictate to the team this way.