I would like a user be able to create a course(so it should belong to one user) and also be able to join another course that it haven't created by him.What is the proper associations between the course and the user ? I want to make the following model associations:
Class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :courses
has_many :comments ,through: :courses
end
Class Course < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users #here i am not sure
has_many :comments
end
Class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :courses
end
I think what you should be able to do something like:
Class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :courses
has_many :course_users
has_many :subscribed_courses, through: :course_users, source: :course # I think you should be able to do foreign_key: :course_id, class_name: 'Course'
has_many :comments ,through: :courses
end
Class Course < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :course_users
has_many :participants, through: :course_users, source: :user # I think you should be able to do foreign_key: :user_id, class_name: 'User'
has_many :comments
end
Class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :courses
end
#course_users is a join table for courses and users
class CourseUser < ActiveRecord::Base
# inside here you could have several other connections e.g grade of a user in a course within this join model
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :course
end
If I'm understanding what you're saying - you need to have a third model - you can call it enrollment
For Course you would use belongs_to :user if each course is created as a user.
Your Enrollment model with have two HABTAM
Class Enrollment < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
has_and_belongs_to_many :courses
end
(An Aside, if a course is going to be offered more than once, you'll have to add an additional model for each instance of the course and the enrollment will belong to that model, and not courses)
Related
Here is my models:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products
has_many :comments
end
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :comments
end
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :product
end
I need to get comment records from current user products only
How do I do that? thanks
If we move the relationships to use a has_many: comments, through: products you can probably get what you're after:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :products
has_many :comments, through: products
end
class Product < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :comments
end
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :product
end
Now you can do user.comments.
The rails docs are here, which say:
A has_many :through association is often used to set up a many-to-many
connection with another model. This association indicates that the
declaring model can be matched with zero or more instances of another
model by proceeding through a third model. For example, consider a
medical practice where patients make appointments to see physicians.
The Ruby on Rails app I am working on allows users to create and share agendas with other users.
In addition, we must be able to:
Display a list of agendas for each user, on his profile
Display a list of users associated with an agenda, on the agenda's page
When sharing an agenda with another user, define a role for this user, and display the role of this user on the list mentioned right above
I was going to go with a has_and_belongs_to_many association between the user and the agenda models, like that:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :agendas
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
But then I wondered whether this would let me get and display the #user.agenda.user.role list of roles on the given agenda page of a given user.
And I thought I should probably go with a has_many :through association instead, such as:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :agendas, through: :roles
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :users, through: :roles
end
And although I was pretty comfortable about the idea of a user having several roles (one for each agenda), I am not sure about the idea of an agenda having several roles (one for each user?).
Finally, to add to the confusion, I read about the polymorphic association and thought it could also be a viable solution, if done this way for instance:
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :definition, polymorphic: true
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, as: :definition
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles, as: :definition
end
Does any of the above solutions sound right for the situation?
UPDATE: Doing some research, I stumbled upon this article (from 2012) explaining that has_many :through was a "smarter" choice than has_and_belongs_to_many. In my case, I am still not sure about the fact that an agenda would have many roles.
UPDATE 2: As suggested in the comments by #engineersmnkyn, a way of solving this would be to go with two join tables. I tried to implement the following code:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :agendas, through: :jointable
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
end
class Jointable < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
has_many :agendaroles through :jointable2
end
class Jointable2 < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :roles
belongs_to :useragenda
end
I am not sure about the syntax though. Am I on the right track? And how should I define the Agenda and the Role models?
UPDATE 3: What if I went with something like:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :agendas, through: :roles
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :roles
has_many :users, through: :roles
end
and then, in the migration file, go with something like:
class CreateRoles < ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
create_table :roles do |t|
t.belongs_to :user, index: true
t.belongs_to :agenda, index: true
t.string :privilege
t.timestamps
end
end
end
Would I be able to call #user.agenda.privilege to get the privilege ("role" of creator, editor or viewer) of a given user for a given agenda?
Conversely, would I be able to call #agenda.user.privilege ?
Okay I will preface by saying I have not tested this but I think one of these 2 choices should work well for you.
Also if these join tables will never need functionality besides a relationship then has_and_belongs_to_many would be fine and more concise.
Basic Rails rule of thumb:
If you need to work with the relationship model as its own entity, use has_many :through. Use has_and_belongs_to_many when working with legacy schemas or when you never work directly with the relationship itself.
First using your example (http://repl.it/tNS):
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :agendas, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles, through: :user_agendas
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def agenda_roles(agenda)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{agenda:agenda})
end
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :users, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles, through: :user_agendas
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def user_roles(user)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{user: user})
end
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgenda < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgendaRoles < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :role
belongs_to :user_agenda
end
This uses a join table to hold the relationship of User <=> Agenda and then a table to join UserAgenda => Role.
The Second Option is to use a join table to hold the relationship of User <=> Agenda and another join table to handle the relationship of User <=> Agenda <=> Role. This option will take a bit more set up from a CRUD standpoint for things like validating if the user is a user for that Agenda but allows a little flexibility.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :agendas, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def agenda_roles(agenda)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{agenda: agenda})
end
end
class Agenda < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agendas
has_many :users, through: :user_agendas
has_many :user_agenda_roles
has_many :roles, through: :user_agenda_roles
def user_roles(user)
roles.where(user_agenda_roles:{user: user})
end
end
class Role < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :user_agenda_roles
end
class UserAgenda < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
class UserAgendaRoles < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :role
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :agenda
end
I know this is a long answer but I wanted to show you more than 1 way to solve the problem in this case. Hope it helps
What would be the best method to model "likes" in rails for my app. I could either to the following:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :things
has_many :likes
has_many :liked_things, through: :likes, source: :thing
end
class Like < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :thing
end
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :likes
has_many :liking_users, through: :likes, source: :user
end
Or
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :things
has_and_belongs_to_many :things
end
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
What approach would be best and why? I plan to have an activity feed in my app as well, if that helps determine the best approach.
The answer to this question depends on whether or not Like will ever have any attributes or methods.
If its only purpose of existence is to be the HABTM relationship between Users and Things, then using the has_and_belongs_to_many relationship would suffice. In your example, having has_many and belongs_to is redundant. All you would need in this case is:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :things
end
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
On the other hand, if you anticipate that a Like will have an attribute (e.g. maybe someone will really like something, or love it, etc.) then you can do
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :likes
has_many :liked_things, through: :likes, source: :thing
end
class Like < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :thing
end
class Thing < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :likes
has_many :liking_users, through: :likes, source: :user
end
Note that I removed has_many :things and belongs_to :user as they are redundant.
A list has one owner (a user). A list also has a number of panelists (also users). I have tried defining the relationships between the three models: User, List, and Panelist. But I'm getting nowhere.
user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :lists
has_many :panelMemberships, :through => :panelists, :source => :lists
end
list.rb
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
has_many :panelMembers, :through => :panelists, :source => :user
end
panelist.rb
class Panelist < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :list
belongs_to :user
end
I've tried all different combinations but nothing seems to work. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
The model also has to have a has_many relationship for whatever the through model is, so wherever you have has_many :x, through: :y, you also need to say has_many :y. You also shouldn't have a panelist model separate from your user model if panelists are users (unless you're doing STI, which you're not). From what I understand, you're trying to do something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_and_belongs_to_many :lists # for the normal panelist / list relationship
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
Then you'll need to make a migration for a users_lists (with user id and list id) table which will be your join table but won't need its own model. But if you really want to keep the through relationship (good for if you do other stuff with the join model), then you'd do:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :owned_lists, class_name: "List", foreign_key: :owner_id # this is for the owner/list relationship
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :lists, through: :panel_memberships
end
class List < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :owner, class_name: "User"
has_many :panel_memberships
has_many :users, through: :panel_memberships
end
class PanelMembership < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :list
I have a model called company that has_many users then users belongs_to company.
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :company
end
If something belongs to users will it also belong to company?
You have to use has_many :through association for this.
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :company
has_many :comments
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
has_many :comments, :through => :users
end
Now you can do the following:
c = Company.first
c.users # returns users
c.comments # returns all the comments made by all the users in the company