umbraco MVC custom routes using a dot in url - umbraco

I have a problem with using a dot in url umbraco MVC custom routes.
/logo/images/image.jpg?width=100 gives following errors:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.]
Umbraco.Web.Mvc.UmbracoVirtualNodeByIdRouteHandler.FindContent(RequestContext requestContext, UmbracoContext umbracoContext) +18
Umbraco.Web.Mvc.UmbracoVirtualNodeRouteHandler.GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext) +48
System.Web.Routing.UrlRoutingModule.PostResolveRequestCache(HttpContextBase context) +11987058
System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +141
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +91
/logo/images/image.jpg/?width=100
Works, but this isn’t a good solution for me.
I have tried adding this in webconfig
<location path="logo">
<!-- This only applies it to the relevant path and keeps the protection in place for elsewhere -->
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add path="/images/*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" />
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
<!-- Required for IIS 7.0+ -->
<system.webServer>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" />
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
<handlers>
<add name="ApiURIs-ISAPI-Integrated-4.0" path="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" verb="GET,HEAD,POST,DEBUG,PUT,DELETE,PATCH,OPTIONS" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
</location>
taken from https://average-joe.info/allow-dots-in-url-iis/
but it won't work:(
My custom route looks like this:
protected override void ApplicationStarted(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication, ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
//custom route
RouteTable.Routes.MapUmbracoRoute(
"images",
"logo/{action}/{key}",
new
{
controller = "Image",
key = UrlParameter.Optional,
},
new ProductsRouteHandler(4884));
}
}
public class ProductsRouteHandler : UmbracoVirtualNodeByIdRouteHandler
{
public ProductsRouteHandler(int realNodeId) : base(realNodeId)
{
}
protected override IPublishedContent FindContent(RequestContext requestContext, UmbracoContext umbracoContext, IPublishedContent baseContent)
{
return base.FindContent(requestContext, umbracoContext, baseContent);
}
}
I'am using umbraco vs.7.4.3

The UmbracoModule ignores Urls with a file extension, so an UmbracoContext will never get created for a request containing a file extension.
You can create a context using UmbracoContext.EnsureContext, however if you did this in FindContent method of your handler, you'd encounter this exception. This is caused by a stale variable on line 18 of the UmbracoVirtualNodeRouteHandler holding a reference to a null UmbracoContext, and doesn't pick up the freshly created context.
The following is how worked around it so I could call EnsureContext before the VirtualNodeRouteHandler gets called.
var route = routes.MapRoute("RouteName", "some/url/file.ext", new
{
controller = "MyController",
action = "Index"
}
route.RouteHandler = new UrlWithExtensionHandler();
Notice its not the MapUmbracoRoute, but the standard MVC Map Route, and a standard MVC IRouteHandler which calls EnsureContext before returning an instance of a UmbracoVirtualNodeRouteHandler.
public class UrlWithExtensionHandler : IRouteHandler
{
#region Implementation of IRouteHandler
public IHttpHandler GetHttpHandler(RequestContext requestContext)
{
// init umbraco context
var httpContext = new HttpContextWrapper(HttpContext.Current);
UmbracoContext.EnsureContext(
httpContext,
ApplicationContext.Current,
new WebSecurity(httpContext, ApplicationContext.Current),
UmbracoConfig.For.UmbracoSettings(),
UrlProviderResolver.Current.Providers,
false);
var handler = new UrlWithExtensionVirtualNodeRouteHandler();
return handler.GetHttpHandler(requestContext);
}
#endregion
}
public class UrlWithExtensionVirtualNodeRouteHandler : UmbracoVirtualNodeRouteHandler
{
protected override IPublishedContent FindContent(RequestContext requestContext,
UmbracoContext umbracoContext)
{
return someIPublishedContent;
}
}
Not an ideal solution, but a valid workaround until the stale variable issue gets merged into core - I've submitted a PR to fix it
A few others have had the same issue too http://issues.umbraco.org/issue/U4-9384

Related

Serving static files in ASP.NET to authorized users only

I am trying to secure a folder under my project that just has some static files, a combination of .htm and .js files. I have tried creating a custom HttpHandler like:
public class StaticFilesHttpHandler : IHttpHandler
{
public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)
{
if (context.Request.IsAuthenticated)
{
// continue with the request
}
else
{
throw new HttpResponseException(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized);
}
}
public bool IsReusable => false;
}
Then register it to be used with a route via Route.Config
routes.RouteExistingFiles = true;
routes.Add("helpRoute", new Route("folder/*.htm", new StaticFilesRouteHandler ()));
and a route handler to provide the
public class StaticFilesRouteHandler : IRouteHandler
{
public IHttpHandler GetHttpHandler(RequestContext context)
{
return new StaticFilesHttpHandler ();
}
}
and also via web.config under system.webServer
<handlers>
<add name="StaticFileHandler" verb="GET" path="~/help/default.htm" type="StaticFilesHttpHandler "/>
</handlers>
Files in the folder are provided by a 3rd party. I am to call a function inside a js file in the folder which then redirects the user to a proper .htm file inside it's sub structure. I do not want users to be able to type the url and access any of the files. What am I doing wrong?
can you change the type to TransferRequestHandler and make sure your path is correct.
<handlers>
<add name="StaticFileHandler" verb="GET" path="~/help/default.htm" type="TransferRequestHandler" />
</handlers>
in your global.asax file you can access the request in Application_BeginRequest to verify if the request is authenticated or not.

SimpleMembership: AuthorizeAttribute and User.IsInRole not working

I've been racking my brain over this for the past week, and none of the answers I've found here or elsewhere seem to be doing anything. I have an ASP.NET MVC5 application that uses SimpleMembership. I have a controller called OrganisationsController that has the following attribute:
[Authorize(Roles = "Administrator")]
I've checked the database and the user I'm logging in with is indeed in the "Administrator" role. However, neither the Authorize attribute nor User.IsInRole() return "true" for this role.
In Authorize attribute not working with roles it is suggested that
The AuthorizeAttribute calls the IsInRole method on the IPrincipal instance stored in HttpContext.User. By default IPrincipal has no roles, and in this case IsInRole will always return false. This is why access to your action is denied.
I've used the following code as suggested in that answer, but authTicket.UserData remains empty.
protected void Application_AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e)
{
HttpCookie authCookie = Context.Request.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName];
if (authCookie != null)
{
FormsAuthenticationTicket authTicket = FormsAuthentication.Decrypt(authCookie.Value);
string[] roles = authTicket.UserData.Split(',');
GenericPrincipal userPrincipal = new GenericPrincipal(new GenericIdentity(authTicket.Name), roles);
Context.User = userPrincipal;
}
}
I can't figure out what's going wrong. Why can I log in, but can't any of the roles be found?
Here's some relevant parts of the web.config:
<roleManager enabled="true" defaultProvider="SimpleRoleProvider">
<providers>
<add name="SimpleRoleProvider" type="WebMatrix.WebData.SimpleRoleProvider, WebMatrix.WebData" />
</providers>
</roleManager>
<membership defaultProvider="SimpleMembershipProvider">
<providers>
<add name="SimpleMembershipProvider" type="WebMatrix.WebData.SimpleMembershipProvider, WebMatrix.WebData" />
</providers>
</membership>
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms loginUrl="~/Account/Login" timeout="2880" cookieless="UseCookies" />
</authentication>
and this is the InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute I've defined:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
private static SimpleMembershipInitializer _initializer;
private static object _initializerLock = new object();
private static bool _isInitialized;
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
{
// Ensure ASP.NET Simple Membership is initialized only once per app start
LazyInitializer.EnsureInitialized(ref _initializer, ref _isInitialized, ref _initializerLock);
}
private class SimpleMembershipInitializer
{
public SimpleMembershipInitializer()
{
Database.SetInitializer<UsersContext>(null);
try
{
using (var context = new UsersContext())
{
if (!context.Database.Exists())
{
// Create the SimpleMembership database without Entity Framework migration schema
((IObjectContextAdapter)context).ObjectContext.CreateDatabase();
}
}
if (!WebSecurity.Initialized)
{
WebSecurity.InitializeDatabaseConnection("VerhaalLokaalDbContext", "UserProfile", "UserId", "UserName", autoCreateTables: true);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("The ASP.NET Simple Membership database could not be initialized. For more information, please see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=256588", ex);
}
}
}
}
The InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute is only set on the AccountController.
What's exactly is going on here? Why can't the roles, which are defined and tied to users in the database, be found?
We used the System.Web.Security.Roles.GetRolesForUser(...) call and then brute force check those role arrays for an intersection. In our case this all happens inside a custom AuthorizeAttribute classes' () call. An extended attribute may not necessary for you but I wanted to give the following code snippet some context. We only used the principal to get the user name.
e.g.,
var userRoles = System.Web.Security.Roles.GetRolesForUser(username);
var allowedRoles = Roles.Split(','); // Roles is a property on the Authorize attribute
var matches = userRoles.Intersect(allowedRoles).ToArray();
if ( matches.Length > 0 ) // true if user is in an allowed role, otherwise it is not
Hope that helps! I'm sure there is a more efficient way, I just dusted off what we have been using for two years now.

Custom Authentication Module inside MVC3 web app

Context:
We have an internal Asp.Net web application which is configured to use windows authentication. As part of this authentication aspect, we have an HttpModule that essentially grabs the HttpContext.Current.Identity.Name and returns a UserInfo object which get dropped into the HttpContext.Items collection.
In migrating this over MVC3, I have a base controller and OnActionExecuting, I am unable to see this UserInfo item in the collection at all. Any insight would be great. Here's my setup:
BaseController:
protected override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext ctx)
{
if (ctx.HttpContext.Items["UserInfo"] != null)
{
UserInfo currentUser = (UserInfo)ctx.HttpContext.Items["UserInfo"];
dynamic viewBag = ctx.Controller.ViewBag;
viewBag.CurrentUser = currentUser;
}
else
{
// Unauthorized do something
}
base.OnActionExecuting(ctx);
}
web.config:
<system.web>
<httpModules>
<add type="WFS.SIG.Client.Security.Authentication.WindowsAuthentication, WFS.SIG.Client.Security" name="AuthenticationModule"/>
</httpModules>
</system.web>....
<system.webServer>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true">
<add name="AuthenticationModule" type="WFS.SIG.Client.Security.Authentication.WindowsAuthentication, WFS.SIG.Client.Security" />
</modules>
</system.webServer>
I think your code should look like this:
protected override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext ctx)
{
if (ctx.HttpContext.Items["UserInfo"] != null)
{
UserInfo currentUser = (UserInfo)ctx.HttpContext.Items["UserInfo"];
ViewBag.CurrentUser = currentUser;
}
else
{
// Unauthorized do something
}
base.OnActionExecuting(ctx);
}
The access to HttpContext should work like this. But you can access the ViewBag directly.
Can you check whether your authenticaton module is really called and does store an object in the HttpContext? Can you set a breakpoint?

asp.net mvc 2, httpmodule routedata redirect

I tried to do redirect from w/i httpmodule. I have the following code in place, and hooked up in the httpModules section. This Error event is fired as expected, but this didn't go to the /Error/Index page.
public class MyHttpModule : IHttpModule {
public void Dispose() { }
public void Init(HttpApplication context) {
context.Error += delegate {
var exception = context.Server.GetLastError();
context.Response.Clear();
context.Response.TrySkipIisCustomErrors = true;
context.Server.ClearError();
var routeData = new RouteData();
routeData.Values.Add("controller", "Error");
routeData.Values.Add("action", "Index");
IController errorController = new ErrorController();
errorController.Execute(new RequestContext(new HttpContextWrapper(HttpContext.Current), routeData));
};
}
}
Please advice,
Thanks
I created a new ASP.NET MVC 2 and ASP.NET MVC 3 application.
I added a new HttpModule and copy/pasted your code.
I registered the new HttpModule in the Web.config.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpModules>
<add name="MyHttpModule"
type="MvcApplication.MyHttpModule, MvcApplication" />
</httpModules>
</system.web>
</configuration>
I throw an exception in one of the action methods of my controller, e.g.:
throw new InvalidOperationException("An exception occured.");
Whenever an unhandled exception occurs I get redirected to the Error/Index page without a problem.
Have you correctly registered the HttpModule? I only get the described behavior if the module is not registered correctly. Keep in mind that for the Visual Studio Development Web Server (Cassini) and IIS 7.X you need to register the HttpModule in different sections of the Web.config.
For IIS 7.X please use:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<add name="MyHttpModule"
type="MvcApplication.MyHttpModule, MvcApplication" />
</modules>
</system.webServer>
</configuration>

Where to put view-specific javascript files in an ASP.NET MVC application?

What is the best place (which folder, etc) to put view-specific javascript files in an ASP.NET MVC application?
To keep my project organized, I'd really love to be able to put them side-by-side with the view's .aspx files, but I haven't found a good way to reference them when doing that without exposing the ~/Views/Action/ folder structure. Is it really a bad thing to let details of that folder structure leak?
The alternative is to put them in the ~/Scripts or ~/Content folders, but is a minor irritation because now I have to worry about filename clashes. It's an irritation I can get over, though, if it is "the right thing."
Old question, but I wanted to put my answer incase anyone else comes looking for it.
I too wanted my view specific js/css files under the views folder, and here's how I did it:
In the web.config folder in the root of /Views you need to modify two sections to enable the webserver to serve the files:
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add path="*.js" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add path="*.css" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add path="*" verb="*" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler"/>
</httpHandlers>
<!-- other content here -->
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<remove name="BlockViewHandler"/>
<add name="JavaScript" path="*.js" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="CSS" path="*.css" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" />
</handlers>
<!-- other content here -->
</system.webServer>
Then from your view file you can reference the urls like you expect:
#Url.Content("~/Views/<ControllerName>/somefile.css")
This will allow serving of .js and .css files, and will forbid serving of anything else.
One way of achieving this is to supply your own ActionInvoker. Using the code included below, you can add to your controller's constructor:
ActionInvoker = new JavaScriptActionInvoker();
Now, whenever you place a .js file next to your view:
You can access it directly:
http://yourdomain.com/YourController/Index.js
Below is the source:
namespace JavaScriptViews {
public class JavaScriptActionDescriptor : ActionDescriptor
{
private string actionName;
private ControllerDescriptor controllerDescriptor;
public JavaScriptActionDescriptor(string actionName, ControllerDescriptor controllerDescriptor)
{
this.actionName = actionName;
this.controllerDescriptor = controllerDescriptor;
}
public override object Execute(ControllerContext controllerContext, IDictionary<string, object> parameters)
{
return new ViewResult();
}
public override ParameterDescriptor[] GetParameters()
{
return new ParameterDescriptor[0];
}
public override string ActionName
{
get { return actionName; }
}
public override ControllerDescriptor ControllerDescriptor
{
get { return controllerDescriptor; }
}
}
public class JavaScriptActionInvoker : ControllerActionInvoker
{
protected override ActionDescriptor FindAction(ControllerContext controllerContext, ControllerDescriptor controllerDescriptor, string actionName)
{
var action = base.FindAction(controllerContext, controllerDescriptor, actionName);
if (action != null)
{
return action;
}
if (actionName.EndsWith(".js"))
{
return new JavaScriptActionDescriptor(actionName, controllerDescriptor);
}
else
return null;
}
}
public class JavaScriptView : IView
{
private string fileName;
public JavaScriptView(string fileName)
{
this.fileName = fileName;
}
public void Render(ViewContext viewContext, TextWriter writer)
{
var file = File.ReadAllText(viewContext.HttpContext.Server.MapPath(fileName));
writer.Write(file);
}
}
public class JavaScriptViewEngine : VirtualPathProviderViewEngine
{
public JavaScriptViewEngine()
: this(null)
{
}
public JavaScriptViewEngine(IViewPageActivator viewPageActivator)
: base()
{
AreaViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
AreaMasterLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
AreaPartialViewLocationFormats = new []
{
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Areas/{2}/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
ViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
MasterLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
PartialViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/Views/{1}/{0}.js",
"~/Views/Shared/{0}.js"
};
FileExtensions = new[]
{
"js"
};
}
public override ViewEngineResult FindView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string viewName, string masterName, bool useCache)
{
if (viewName.EndsWith(".js"))
viewName = viewName.ChopEnd(".js");
return base.FindView(controllerContext, viewName, masterName, useCache);
}
protected override IView CreatePartialView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string partialPath)
{
return new JavaScriptView(partialPath);
}
protected override IView CreateView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string viewPath, string masterPath)
{
return new JavaScriptView(viewPath);
}
}
}
You can invert davesw's suggestion and block only .cshtml
<httpHandlers>
<add path="*.cshtml" verb="*" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler"/>
</httpHandlers>
I know this is a rather old topic, but I have a few things I would like to add. I tried davesw's answer but it was throwing a 500 error when trying to load the script files, so I had to add this to the web.config:
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
to system.webServer. Here is what I have, and I was able to get it to work:
<system.webServer>
<handlers>
<remove name="BlockViewHandler"/>
<add name="JavaScript" path="*.js" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="CSS" path="*.css" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" />
</handlers>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
</system.webServer>
<system.web>
<compilation>
<assemblies>
<add assembly="System.Web.Mvc, Version=5.2.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35" />
</assemblies>
</compilation>
<httpHandlers>
<add path="*.js" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add path="*.css" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add path="*" verb="*" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
Here is more information on validation: https://www.iis.net/configreference/system.webserver/validation
add this code in web.config file inside system.web tag
<handlers>
<remove name="BlockViewHandler"/>
<add name="JavaScript" path="*.js" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="CSS" path="*.css" verb="GET,HEAD" type="System.Web.StaticFileHandler" />
<add name="BlockViewHandler" path="*" verb="*" preCondition="integratedMode" type="System.Web.HttpNotFoundHandler" />
</handlers>
I also wanted to place js files related to a view in the same folder as the view.
I wasn't able to get the other solutions in this thread to work, not that they are broken but I am too new to MVC to get them working.
Using information given here and several other stacks I came up with a solution that:
Allows the javascript file to be placed in the same directory as the view it is associated with.
Script URL's don't give away the underlying physical site structure
Script URL's don't have to end with a trailing slash (/)
Doesn't interfere with static resources, eg: /Scripts/someFile.js still
works
Doesn't require runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests to be enabled.
Note: I am also using HTTP Attribute Routing. It's possible that the route's used in my soultion could be modified to work without enabling this.
Given the following example directory/file structure:
Controllers
-- Example
-- ExampleController.vb
Views
-- Example
-- Test.vbhtml
-- Test.js
Using the configuration steps given below, combined with the example structure above, the test view URL would be accessed via: /Example/Test and the javascript file would be referenced via: /Example/Scripts/test.js
Step 1 - Enable Attribute Routing:
Edit your /App_start/RouteConfig.vb file and add routes.MapMvcAttributeRoutes() just above the existing routes.MapRoute:
Imports System
Imports System.Collections.Generic
Imports System.Linq
Imports System.Web
Imports System.Web.Mvc
Imports System.Web.Routing
Public Module RouteConfig
Public Sub RegisterRoutes(ByVal routes As RouteCollection)
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}")
' Enable HTTP atribute routing
routes.MapMvcAttributeRoutes()
routes.MapRoute(
name:="Default",
url:="{controller}/{action}/{id}",
defaults:=New With {.controller = "Home", .action = "Index", .id = UrlParameter.Optional}
)
End Sub
End Module
Step 2 -Configure your site to treat, and process, /{controller}/Scripts/*.js as an MVC path and not a static resource
Edit your /Web.config file, adding the following to the system.webServer --> handlers section of the file:
<add name="ApiURIs-ISAPI-Integrated-4.0" path="*/scripts/*.js" verb="GET" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
Here it is again with context:
<system.webServer>
<modules>
<remove name="TelemetryCorrelationHttpModule"/>
<add name="TelemetryCorrelationHttpModule" type="Microsoft.AspNet.TelemetryCorrelation.TelemetryCorrelationHttpModule, Microsoft.AspNet.TelemetryCorrelation" preCondition="managedHandler"/>
<remove name="ApplicationInsightsWebTracking"/>
<add name="ApplicationInsightsWebTracking" type="Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Web.ApplicationInsightsHttpModule, Microsoft.AI.Web" preCondition="managedHandler"/>
</modules>
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/>
<handlers>
<remove name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0"/>
<remove name="OPTIONSVerbHandler"/>
<remove name="TRACEVerbHandler"/>
<add name="ExtensionlessUrlHandler-Integrated-4.0" path="*." verb="*" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0"/>
<add name="ApiURIs-ISAPI-Integrated-4.0" path="*/scripts/*.js" verb="GET" type="System.Web.Handlers.TransferRequestHandler" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
</handlers>
</system.webServer>
Step 3 - Add the following scripts action result to your Controller file
Be sure to edit the route path to match the {controller} name for the
controller, for this example it's:
<Route("Example/Scripts/{filename}")>
You will need to copy this into each of your Controller files. If you wanted, there is probably a way to do this as a single, one-time, route configuration somehow.
' /Example/Scripts/*.js
<Route("Example/Scripts/{filename}")>
Function Scripts(filename As String) As ActionResult
' ControllerName could be hardcoded but doing it this way allows for copy/pasting this code block into other controllers without having to edit
Dim ControllerName As String = System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Request.RequestContext.RouteData.Values("controller").ToString()
' the real file path
Dim filePath As String = Server.MapPath("~/Views/" & ControllerName & "/" & filename)
' send the file contents back
Return Content(System.IO.File.ReadAllText(filePath), "text/javascript")
End Function
For context, this is my ExampleController.vb file:
Imports System.Web.Mvc
Namespace myAppName
Public Class ExampleController
Inherits Controller
' /Example/Test
Function Test() As ActionResult
Return View()
End Function
' /Example/Scripts/*.js
<Route("Example/Scripts/{filename}")>
Function Scripts(filename As String) As ActionResult
' ControllerName could be hardcoded but doing it this way allows for copy/pasting this code block into other controllers without having to edit
Dim ControllerName As String = System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Request.RequestContext.RouteData.Values("controller").ToString()
' the real file path
Dim filePath As String = Server.MapPath("~/Views/" & ControllerName & "/" & filename)
' send the file contents back
Return Content(System.IO.File.ReadAllText(filePath), "text/javascript")
End Function
End Class
End Namespace
Final Notes
There is nothing special about the test.vbhtml view / test.js javascript files and are not shown here.
I keep my CSS in the view file but you could easily add to this solution so that you can reference your CSS files in a similar way.

Resources